Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1818. page

>>7953639
u are low iq brainlet xD

Oh and inb4 the "anyone that laughs at IQ scored low on an IQ test meme".

>>7953640

There it is, the forced 10 second meme.

>>7953626
Chinese people like other Asians simply don't care about discovery. They prefer to use what humanity knows now and apply it to satisfying their technological needs and that's pretty much it.

>>7953626
maybe they don't share a lot of their findings

>>7953626
Rote learning does not promote problem solving.

>>7953603
Psychiatry or other field of medicine. It pays very, very well.

>>7953606
If only i could get into med school now..

>>7953610
It's all about memorization. I used to be very bad at it, but then I learned what the method of Loci and spaced repetition are.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_loci
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaced_repetition
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mnemonic
Google mnemonics for med school too.

You can easily get in med school if you have average intelligence and can memorize more or less well.

Caffeine is a symptom of what you're talking about.

>stress
>television and other eye-straining shit
>being sedentary in general
>toxic preservatives

>>7953591
Sugar

>>7953591
Caffeine makes you smarter and durable, as long as you do not have pre existing blood pressure problems then drinking it is as harmful as drinking clean water.

The only risk in modern life is third wave feminism.

What do you think? Granted you think at all.

File: african.jpg (70KB, 1103x352px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1103x352px

>>7953545
i don't think they exist...:( sadly

>>7953550
Literally just integrate a function 5 times :3

Why are you so afraid to label your GMO cancer properly ? Ofcourse you're gonna do it you dumb bitch.

This isn't your shilling board, and there is no board called /monsanto/. But enjoy the rest of your visit in >>>/trash/

>>7953442
Are you retarded? Do you know how much food will be labeled with "GMO" if these laws are to be federally passed? Every fucking Apple that's larger than an inch wide for one. I don't know if you're joking but you seem pretty autistic.

>>7953461
> GMO is labelled depending on the sizes of the fruits
> I don't know if you're joking but you seem pretty autistic.

Shit trolling attempt kid 0/10

Monsanto shilling is not science and belongs to >>>/trash/

>>7953284
You might have better luck on >>>/diy/ friend.

>>7953363
Thanks, never been there but I found what I wanted

>>7953284

yeah, ive done some diy CNC stuff

>>7953279
No, but you support the destruction of that planet. That's just what the Plutonians want to hear.

File: 548057588[1].jpg (13KB, 635x378px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 635x378px

You will be tied to a wooden totem and publicly executed by burning to death. 9th planet is planet X

>>7953283
Planet X orbit is enormously big, thus it's not planet it's just very big asteroid, Pluto is 9th planet suck it.
PS: everyone who thinks difirent please visit [spoiler]http://m.wikihow.com/Tie-a-Noose[/spoiler]

>>7953197
The Jacobian Conjecture is a nice problem. Quite slippery.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobian_conjecture

A condensed study of traditional results for the 2-variable case (which is believed to be true) can be seen in Makar-Limanov's "On the Newton Polygon of a Jacobian Mate".

>>7953197
I'm in uni, just finishing up Linear Algebra and Diff EQs. I'm majoring in electrical engineering, is there any point in taking any other math class, or am I just wasting my time?

>>7953197
I prefer lewd math over pure. [eqn]\mathbb{A} = \left( \begin{array}{cccc}
L & O & L & I \\
I & L & O & L \\
L & I & L & O \\
O & L & I & L
\end{array} \right)[/eqn]

>>7953186

Strictly speaking, ethics have no place in scientific discourse and inquiry. Science is not should, but could.

Unfortunately for could, should imposes itself upon us by our nature.

File: 1447237147651s.jpg (3KB, 124x125px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 124x125px

>Unfortunately for could, should imposes itself upon us by our nature.

only for the poor and weak

File: IMG_20160225_192138.jpg (1MB, 2304x2533px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2304x2533px

Probably pretty unethical for the probably two or so specimens it would take to make one that could sustain itself or survive at all

Other than that, fuck it, reverse engineer that fucking chicken, I want a dinosaur

by the way - art by me

I don't know how it works but I think it works like that.

The propane tank will increase the complexity of the situation enough that an alternate path that uses doubles instead of floats will be taken to guarantee numeric stability.

>>7953037
Propane burns at 3,623 °F in the open air.

There is a story circulating the internet than Hitler was saved from drowning as a child. It doesn't matter that the story is fabricated, obviously if he has drowned as a child the last 80 years would have happened much differently in almost all of the world.

>>7953009
Yes but its far more likely that your butterfly effect will either benefit or inconvenience people in minor ways than it will cause a disaster or the next holocaust.

File: 2xdpend.gif (151KB, 272x248px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 272x248px

>>7953009
The Butterfly Effect is a meme summary of chaos theory, which is severely misrepresented in the media but basically explains the behaviour of systems where a slight change in the initial conditions results in completely different outcomes. The simplest example of this is a double pendulum, as seen in pic related. The two pendulums here start out in almost exactly the same position and follow roughly the same path to start with, but the slight difference in their starting positions eventually manifests itself in wildly different motions.

People are however often too eager to apply this to the real world, forgetting certain 'buffer' effects and the fact that many events precipitate out of the zeitgeist of the moment. For example, WWI ostensibly started with the assassination of Franz Ferdinand by Serbian nationalists, leading to a cascade of mutual aggression pacts bringing the European nations into war with each other. Really though, political tensions had been high for a long time and the nations were all looking for any excuse to go to war with each other. In this case, the war was more or less inevitable and it was simply the assassination that set it off. The socio-econo-political aftermath of WWI is what laid the groundwork for WWII, which in turn laid the groundwork for the rest of the century. Thus, even if Hitler had never become Chancellor another populist leader may have ridden in on the back of the latent German nationalism and the story would have played out more or less the same, just with different actors. Or perhaps it really was only that one man who was able to precipitate the events that occurred - more extensive analysis might be able to determine one way or the other, but without a time machine and rights to alter history to check the hypothesis it's all just conjecture.

That's why the world is both easy and difficult to predict, it's a chaotic system but with 'buffers' of overarching trends.

>>7952964
/sci/ posters give off large amounts of beta radiation

File: 1444268684454.png (19KB, 592x492px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 592x492px

>>7952965
based i see /sci/ can meme with the best of em

you can lock the thread now mods

File: 1456001662070.jpg (43KB, 390x470px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 390x470px

>>7952965
nice

>>7952810
There might be some debate about this topic - i haven't looked into it but going on fucking google images where there are no citations or anything.

File: 30th.jpg (51KB, 499x299px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 499x299px

lol

ok ill try to understand this!

mh honestly, you took the easy way out by trusting those sources...

i recommend you use better source for something like this. this is only caused by oversimplification of explanations. typical phenomenon...

try this, but preconceive that wiki also isnt 100% trustworthy or correct in general.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tide

What I'm really asking is what's the best/quickest way to go about solving this?

If you are looking for the total amount of unique sets with out regard for order, then yes, you divide by 6. This is known as a combination, instead of a permutation, which depends on order as well.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combination

10 choose 3 = [math]10 \choose 3[/math] = 120

Look up " probability and combinatorics"