Archived threads in /mu/ - Music - 3198. page

>>73858679
why does this pic look like something i drew in 2005?
did you get this off my live journal???

sweet dreams anon

>>73858679
why is he so cozy?

why

>>73858678
How did that horrible song get so many views aren't least the hook was trolling

>Show Reddit comments on this channel

What the fuck is that suppose to mean

Sketches of Spain

In a Silent Way

Kind of Blue and I don't care if it's the popular one

fuckin all of the above

>>73858555
garbage ass meme

File: 1441946109299.png (70KB, 395x277px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 395x277px

>>73858555
Ah yes, there's no worse music company than mlp.

Not unpopular but Animal Collective. I've only been to three shows but my next tat is going to be the STGSTW artwork (also from a poem called There Will Be Stars, which has also come to mean a lot to me.) I've studied creepily into all of them and their crew as closely as possible. All of my friends associate them with me pretty much and I think this is a symptom of obsession for autism.

Margot & The Nuclear So & So's. Every album is different but every song has a special place in my heart. The lyricism is messy but beautiful and the music behind it matches in such a perfect way. Listening to Margot and drinking wine is my ideal situation on any occasion.

>>73858494
But I know about Screaming Females and Marissa, Anon.

>>73858480
The Solo during the intro is so damn brilliant it's beautiful.
https://youtu.be/WGQnW_hTosU

>>73858508
I had forgotten about that song, great intro, then it goes to shit.

Songwriting is one of my beefs with Kvelertak

>>73858480
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efhlDbZ4SmY

link your rym nibba

What's ur favorite pokamans

>>73858442
Slowbro

I like the work he did on Melody's Echo Chamber, but I find his own music to be pretty bland. Currents was especially awful. He should only do production.

Should collab on grimes

>>73858391
good band.

the only good bands nowadays are bands that try to imitate the 60s style

>>73858370
why does no one post gfriend anymore?

>>73858303
that's around the time OH went down for like a week the first time (since 2015 at least)

happened again a few months later and then again just recently. there's a bump everytime even though anon refuses to admit it

>>73858389
rv ended them

Tower of Power - Tower of Power
god-tier

primus

I have links - gimme a minute

>we

>>73857849
New Bermuda is better.

>>73857849

ye

Tell him that he failed to live up as a wunderkind and that's it not 2011 and no one fucking cares

>>73857817
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADmCFmYLns4

why did he turn gay

>>73857853
yikes...

*insert benis*

File: 1499265629514.png (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>73857693
*I get around*

File: ty segall.jpg (78KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 600x600px

>>73857689
Ty Segall
Oh Sees
King Gizzard
Wand

I listened to Black Keys for the 1st time today and they kinda suck tho

>>73857733
This^ that ty Segall album in particular is very similar I love that CTE album and I was constantly looking for albums like it and I was so happy when ty put that one out

Also this you would like it
https://youtu.be/VkHYMucWFOQ
The whole album it's on is great too

Also there's the Arctic Monkeys first album but you've probably heard that

And there's this band
https://youtu.be/4SgLITBm1as
It's a lot like CTEs rythm section

Also there's
https://youtu.be/rwZbMlpcKH0
Just some good ol headbanging rock since that's what you're mostly going for

Tell me what you like and think :)

>>73857733
Black keys don't suck listen to their old stuff like
https://youtu.be/HVmJ1bg-6dk

File: 490.jpg (28KB, 627x626px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 627x626px

>>73857597

File: 1484334370157.jpg (51KB, 500x672px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x672px

>>73857597
i know all the music theory and i play all the instruments

File: R-4816760-1420395068-7023.jpeg.jpg (133KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 600x600px

>the beatles

fuck off

The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved. In a sense, the Beatles are emblematic of the status of rock criticism as a whole: too much attention paid to commercial phenomena (be it grunge or U2) and too little to the merits of real musicians. If somebody composes the most divine music but no major label picks him up and sells him around the world, a lot of rock critics will ignore him. If a major label picks up a musician who is as stereotyped as can be but launches her or him worldwide, your average critic will waste rivers of ink on her or him. This is the sad status of rock criticism: rock critics are basically publicists working for major labels, distributors and record stores. They simply highlight what product the music business wants to make money from.