Archived threads in /mu/ - Music - 3204. page

>>73851255
If you think band shirts are cringe then you're probably cringe

>>73851255
really like this desing, not sure if i would use that color tho

File: Untitled-k.jpg (236KB, 852x852px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 852x852px

the new album is going to be sick

nope

okay this is it. this is the definitive push from the nest that i've been anticipating. i used to have hope for /mu/. i used to think that despite its current condition it could get better. I used to think that grimesposting was something that would either burn itself out, or get snuffed by enough sensible anons questioning its calamitous omnipresence. i've been desperately holding onto this glimmer of hope for nearly two years, but now, as i look out onto the devastated wreckage of the catalogue, as i see the smoldering remains of a place that used to bring me joy, i can say with certainty that there is no future for me here. that my precious fragment of hope was nothing more than a mirage formed in the tumultuous blaze of impurity and degeneracy.

the grimesfags are not even human anymore. they have become a hideous manifestation of all that is vile and immoral. and after two years of fighting their unrelenting presence i've come to the realization that they cannot be stopped.

/mu/ is doomed to perish in the flames of perverse tyranny. to be swallowed by the disgusting assemblage of those who embody degeneracy. and with this bitter acceptance of defeat i will take my leave. i will abandon this barge as it sinks into the depths of hell before i find myself dragged down with it.

goodbye /mu/. may God have mercy on the souls of those who stay, and may judgement be passed upon the singularity of depravity that is the grimesfags.

You should probably delete this

>>73851231
yup

it's the pineapple of human achievement that's for sure

>>73851231
no

poor education

there's no really definite culture here so some people are raised with literally no culture

the american dream indoctrination only feeds people into consuming commercial pop trash

the list goes on and on

we're not as well-off as you think.

*britfags

File: Robert-by-Marie-Staggat-06c.jpg (613KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

613KB, 1200x800px

burial isn't good

I accidentally made an Animal Collective album once by spilling beer on my CD of the Lion King soundtrack.

>>73851193
Kek

>>73851150
nice

Fleet Foxes

>>73850918
Me screaming whenever I get stung by a wasp

>>73850918
Any female artist (except Bjork)

>Contemporary musicians never spoke highly of the Beatles, and for a good reason.

The Rolling Stones disliked the Beatles so much that they begged Lennon and McCartney to write a song for them; went to the Beatles’ parties; attended the Beatles’ recording sessions; appeared on the Beatles’ records and got the Beatles to appear on their own. Eric Clapton, a principled hero of rock, showed his loathing for everything the Beatles stood for by becoming one of Harrison’s best friends and jumping at the chance of playing on a Beatles session. Jimi Hendrix despised the Beatles so much that he was playing the title track of Sgt Pepper within a couple of days of the album being released. In short, the contempt with which the Beatles were regarded by their peers is familiar to nobody who knows anything at all about the history of popular music.

>Not to mention the American musicians who created what the Beatles later sold to the masses.

You can’t accuse the Beatles of selling other people’s music and simultaneously accuse them of changing the same music before they sold it. If they changed the music, then they transformed it into their own music; if they didn’t change it, then in selling it to the masses, they can’t have wrecked it.

>The Beatles sold a lot of records not because they were the greatest musicians but simply because their music was easy to sell to the masses: it had no difficult content, it had no technical innovations, it had no creative depth.

While it’s true that difficult (i.e, non-catchy) music is seldom very popular, there is no reason to suppose that the ‘masses’ automatically reject technical innovation; if a record is hot enough, people will buy it, no matter how innovative it is or isn’t, and the truth is that most listeners neither know nor care about the level of technical innovation in a record. In any case, it is demonstrably untrue that the Beatles’ music was not technically innovative. Among the techniques that they pioneered in popular music were: controlled feedback, automatic double-tracking, use of tape loops, use of Indian musical techniques, use of chance techniques, creative use of studio technology (feeding Lennon’s voice through a Leslie speaker on Tomorrow Never Knows), etc. And those are just their innovations in recording technique; their innovations in musical style and songwriting are too numerous to go into.

Kek, I believe this

>>73850574
you've been browsing moo for years and have never listened to Loveless? I doubt that a little bit

>>73850597
I've been browsing for years and I have no clue what Radiohead sounds like.

6. Drowning Pool - Bodies

7. Road Runner Blues - bappreciated

>>73850436
>of all time
>they are all rock songs from the 60s (inb4 bob marley)

File: quebec-560x560.jpg (97KB, 560x560px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 560x560px

>>73850258

>>73850258
Way to /thread yourself

Thank you for this post Kendrick

derivative samey crap like ever other trap rapper

>>73850195
I literally don't get it. A few anons said to think of his music as "minimilastic trap" but it was still shit

A wild bogan appears

>>73850185
Be attractive

>>73850281
I disagree

oh my uggos

File: jihoarin.jpg (157KB, 580x773px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 580x773px

miracles fighting!

The rest of KC's discography, maybe?

File: christgau1med.jpg (18KB, 400x266px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 400x266px

Stop listening to prog rock

>>73850749
why

>>73850128
>How come youtube acts harsher than the gestapo by blocking basically every Crimson King song?
Because the artists want it that way.
Buy the CD, cuck.

>>73850148
>i don't have money :(

and it also would be preferable to have audio files to stock into my mp3 player