pic related
pic related
Animal Collective fucking sucks
The only thing good about them it's that sign Ariel Pink to pawtracks.
>>74203215
YES
Someone finally fucking said it. They're actual garbage.
Now that it's acceptable to like nu-metal and pop goth/emo in light of Chester's suicde, can we get a thread for this type of music from the early 2000s?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RisBAkC0x8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCCyoocDxBA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVQpfoqsY8Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3ChrdJoBCk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuZhnNR6vzc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vBGOrI6yBk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cQh1ccqu8M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU4hhNKsPog
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4gPZPKJc0s
>>74203177
No.
>>74203499
@OP L
>>74203177
>MCR
>early 2000s
What's Swans' best?
drainland
source on that bear?
Tbk desu
what did he mean by this?
>>74203158
holy shit I just discovered Nino Ferrer today
it good
>>74203158
"I only fuck black women"
>>74203310
"Looking For You" is a goat track
Name a more egotistical, narcissistic artist.
hardmode: no rappers
lennon
>>74203117
Roger Waters
HAPPY CANDY DAY!
>>74203092
I don't like candy
>>74203092
>>74203097
>>74203100
where's our cake boy
What went right?
inb4 knee-jerk sexism
>>74203024
they really revitalized the market for ugly wigs
how many people complaining about the so called misogyny in hard rock bands such as AC/DC, van halen, guns n roses etc. also listen to gangster rap music which is a hundred times more violent than those bands will ever be
name the AC/DC song that condones beating up women. i'll wait
>>74203050
This. Blacks are always given a pass for being misogynistic
desu
so what do u do in this thread?
>>74202934
you post your last.fm so you can meet up and have anal sex.
How would you rank the members of Odd Future?
Earl > Frank > Tyler > who fucking cares
Tyler
Earl
Frank
the rest
Has taco or anyone else done anything
Name a bigger pussy in music
>>74202689
you...
>>74202689
Don't go around sladering Charls Carroll.
>>74202707
Charls would break him
Pic related.
>>74202422
>any hip hop being on there at all
stopped reading there
>>74202422
I'm too not really into music
>>74203807
Really?
The Who or The Rolling Stones?
People always compare Beatles to Stones but I feel The Who are a better comparison. It's a tough choice honestly, i'd go with The Who.
>>74202391
The Rolling Stones had better singles, The Who had better albums.
>>74202391
the who on the basis they actually have more then one song i can listen to without my brain dissolving into mush and/or ears bleeding
Rolling Stones were absolute trash
ITT: we post like we're on /mu/
I guess I'll get this started
>Does anyone know any music that goes with the sound of your youth being wasted?
>What's some good music to listen to while browsing /pol/?
>ITT: we post like we're on /mu/
>what swans album am i going to shill today?
>>74202320
first visuals
https://youtu.be/uCLwgyE4Kp0
I summon professionals in this thread.
I gave up on actual monitors. So, I just need good headphones to be able to create and mix music.
I'm no professional mixing engineer or anything, I just need to mix to a level where it's just "ok" and generally listenable, so my demands are not high. I used to have sennheiser HD 380 Pro, which were advertised as a professional mixing device. And oh boy they caused lot's of trouble. It was literally unbearable. So I did some rough mix/eq with them, it sounded ok. And then I tried to listen this exact track with different headphones (lots of them). And it was a fucking mess, it was like a totally different music, bass was all over the place, it was just unlistenable. I mean it was so bad that I decided to use apple earpods and 100$ in-ear sennheisers instead and it was way better. Later I, once again, decided to get some better headphones, "professional" ones. But this time I started researching. And guess what. The INDUSTRY STANDARD is HD 280 PRO (which are supposedly even worse than HD 380 PRO). So what should I do? Was my unit defective or something? Should I just buy those?
>>74202288
HD 280 Pro's are very neutral, and any other monitoring headphone you buy is going to be the same. If you aren't used to neutral sound it's going to sound strange compared to the bass-boosted piece of shit earbuds you're accustomed to.
>>74202327
Yeah, I kind of get it.
But I mean in those HD 380 PRO I was equalizing bass the way I can at least hear it, but in all consumer oriented headphones (beats, earpods, cheap sennheisers and all that) the same bass was so enormously loud that 80% of what you can hear there is that bass. I mean what is the point of professional monitoring headphones then if the sound you hear using them has pretty much nothing in common with the sound of consumer headphones? How am i even supposed to use them? I mean I thought that the point of monitors and monitoring headphones was like "If you make your track sound good in those, then it will sound good in everything else".
brainwavs hm5