*deletes The Bark and Below It*
Is this kino?
>hello anon, we'd like to ask you a few questions about the murder of anon
>mind if we have a look around your establishment?
>you got a warrant?
>if I have to go back and get a warrant, I'll have your business shut down for days as we tear it apart looking for evidence
>b-by all means have a look around
>Its another Kieran Lee is in everything episode.
More like Def Nope.
best movie in a genre
runner up goodfellas
Casino and Goodfellas are superior Scorsese crime movies. Departed is enjoyable, but the plot twist(s) is so beyond logic that the movie just hemorrhages the appeal it had. The ending almost makes up for it though.
I'm only a mutant though, pls don't respond to me I know nothing.
So, it Aaron Paul actually a good actor? He seems to be overshadowed by Bryan Cranston who gets nothing but praise.
>Would you suck a cock to keep your job at McDonalds?
Is this the kind of question Americans have to ask themselves on a daily basis?
She really thought sucking on a fat guys penis was typical police procedure?
night night /mtv/
>these threads are for gospel, rhythm & blues, funk, modern funk, deep funk, Norther funk, soul, Northern soul, neo-soul, blue-eyed soul, PBR&B, disco, nu disco, black or white, old or new, just anything groovy not already covered on the board !
Rasta bully skank edition
what are you listening to these days ?
any shows you have been to/will attend in a near future ?
what are your favorite albums/maxis/7" released this year so far, and/or the ones you favored from last year ?
What are some movies like pic related?
Can we all agree she is the best, at least?
Is every King of the Hill episode basically
>Strawman comes onto the show
>Hank is a good boy, he dindu nuffin - he just wanted to mow his lawn. He was getting his propane career back on track!
>Strawman is defeated in some way by Hank's old fashioned ways
Or am I missing something?
its a pasta at this point
Its the best way to get replies and start a KotH thread
Thoughts on pic related /mu/?
Harry Potter was easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the seriesüf only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but itüfs certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books are g-g-good though
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King