So I said, "Provide Earth's location by sending an all-sky distribution in galactic coordinates of the ∼8600 x-ray-bright low-mass young stars identified by the ROSAT satellite. Have them follow the brightly lit breadcrumb trail."
Then some wise guy had to go and say, "You only need information on six stars, Anon. We [all] learned this inStargate".
You're delusional, Anon#2! They [Stargates] use constellations; arbitrary grouping of stars, 88 of which are recognized by modern astronomers. A constellation pattern has no fucking significance: the stars are at very different distances from us and appear close together only because of a line-of-sight effect. This is well demonstrated by α and β Centauri, which lie side-by-side in the sky although in fact α is 4 l.y. away while β is over 100 times as distant.
Stargate addresses can only be interpolated from the corresponding pictorial representations of star constellations, because only a nominal fraction of the possible combinations of Stargate symbols represent valid addresses. They are ill-suited for the purpose that you propose. As aforementioned, the constellation patterns as seen from Earth are only apparent because of how space is observed from Earth, and their corresponding mapping is thereby based on Earth's coordinate system, with those very same stars used as reference points, because, although the stars do move with respect to each other, this movement is observable for only a few close stars, using instruments and techniques of great precision and sensitivity.
Constellations are very uneven in scale and relevance; some have little justification for distinguishing designation. Constellations as you are suggesting are a bogus idea. Playing connect the dots with X marking the spot will make it easier to plot a course or program boom tube to Earth. Why would you otherwise try overcomplicating it, you crazy Canuck?
>>81271805
The symbols represent a planet within the constellation not the entire constellation. It's still a stupid addressing scheme though.
wat
>>81271997
Wot m8, did you even watch the film and/or then the Stargate series?
>>81272029
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-MUzvASr8s
Why the fuck did they think this shipping was a good idea?
This is my otp. They're both so f*cking bada$$!!
>>81271692
>f*cking bada$$!!
You do this unironically, yes?
>>81271621
Avatar and adventure time.
>big eyed characters
>poor animation
>low budget
south park is anime, and we all know how much shippers love animeim conflicted because i hate anime but south park is pretty good
There's a reason they're shipped but that's not it. (Consider more why there's so much Ed Edd and Eddy shipping for instance)
>>81270756
because people will obsess over anything if they're given access to the internet?
i didn't even know there was ed edd and eddy shipping
what the fuck
>>81270690
>Disliking anime
>On an anime imageboard
/co/ can you recommend me some "fun" comics?
You know, stories that don't take themselves too seriously with every theme they try to shove down your pie hole. They can be from any genre as long as they're simple and good ol time to read.
Examples of shit I'm looking for: Pic related, Uncle Creepy, Invincible, World War Kaiju etc.
>>81269827
>Invincible
>fun
Jack Staff
Miami Vice Remix
The Cowboy Wally Show and Plastic Man by Kyle Baker, the latter in particular even has a final story arc that makes fun of serious comic moments.
Remake
Afrodisiac and Street Angel
Infinite Kung Fu
>>81269883
It's SUPER fun. Think of the plot of any invincible arc and you'll realise how fun it is.
>the success of deadpool has proven that R rated comic book movies can be viable
>DC is no doubt desperate to get on that train
TRANSMETROPOLITAN MOVIE WHEN
>>81269774
Do you honestly trust WB as it is now to do Transmetropolitan right?
we already have a fear and loathing movie
you really wanna bore audiences to death?
How the hell didnt I know this until today?
>>81269467
>Gay
>that fashion sense
He's a discredit to his people
>>81269467
Real life doesn't have Lobdell thought bubbles explaining everything in excruciating detail.
>>81269467
shut up. nobody cares.
I'm just trying to get into Hellboy. Any advice where to begin? Seed Of Destruction felt a little too slow, though that wasn't written by Mignola, right?
Release order, Hellboy's very simple to get into.
I like Seed, but no, that was written by his buddy. Perhaps the follow would be more your speed. Mike wrote it, it's more action. Byrne is a good writer in my opinion, but maybe not the right speed for Hellboy.
The PowerPuff girls Reboot looks nice
>>81268879
Dear god....
why are they allowed to play sports
Blosm use mussels kek, its suer effective
Does a cartoon need to have things like continuity and an overreaching plot in order to be truly great?
>>81268780
Nah, but it does help the audience stay interested I guess. So there's that.
Do Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies cartoons have both of those?
Is there any chance of this being good?
I know it's Tynion, but I really want to hold out hope that we could have a good batfam book
>>81268577
It'll probably be serviceable if Tynion keeps away from Harper. His Tim is alright. He had one Cass issue in BRE that was good. But he's already confirmed plans for Harper so it's all moot. Prepare for another BRE.
Is Clayface in the Batfamily now?
>>81268577
That Harper is nowhere to be seen, and that Batwoman and Clayface are on-board already puts this leagues ahead of Eternal S2.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/article/spider-mandate-slott-promises-massive-seismic-shift-in-spideys-world
>In the Battleworld version, you had the section on that wacky map which was called The Regency. When you think about it, all they really knew in their world was the Tri-State area. That's not as far as the world extended -- they just dealt with that.
>This is a Regent that lives in our world, and sees the totality of it. We're also going to see more about why he's doing what he's doing. In Battleworld, he was doing it because he knew about this god named Doom, that was controlling their fates. Everything he was doing was to build up to a confrontation, to make himself as powerful as a god, to confront Doom. This Regent has a completely different set of motivations in our new, Marvel-Prime Universe.
Does Spider-Man know this Regent?
>Nope. The Marvel-Prime Peter has no idea, but you can bet -- since we're doing a Regent story -- that yeah, there's going to be Peter and Mary Jane dealing with this. It's a way of bringing her back into the book.
>And Peter has really been doing Tony's bag of tricks. Peter's been, "Look at me, the wealthy industrialist!" and, "Look at me with a major company named after myself all over the world, and my new suit of armor!"
>He's really been stealing all of Tony's tricks. Now we're going to get to see the flip side.
>>81267795
>slott-promises-massive-seismic-shift-in-spideys-world
THERAPENEVER ENDS
We also saw a teaser with Mary Jane in the Iron Spider, or Iron Jane costume -- whatever you want to call it.
>I'm calling it Iron Spider! It's Iron Jane in the same way no one calls her "Spider-Gwen" in the book.
That's getting pretty far in the future, but what can you tease about that image?
>It will come to pass. [Laughs] It's not one of those, "Hey, we showed it on the cover, but you never saw it in the book!" No, it's not one of those.
It happens around the same time as "Civil War II," and of course Peter first got the Iron Spider costume in "Civil War." Is there a tie-in there?
>Eeeeeeh?
Will be better than BvS or will suffer the same fate?
>>81267710
Probably be better, but will suffer sales because of BvS
Suicide Squad doesn't seem to take itself as seriously and has comedic relief
Snyder isn't directing, so it will be a better film at least. Also it has Batman, Joker and Harley in it, it's gonna make shitloads.
Will Looney Tunes ever have a comeback?
>>81266644
WB is all about dark and gloomy now anon. Looney have no place in such world.
>>81266644
Careful what you wish for anon
Just look at all the new Tom and Jerry direct to video movies. They all suck
>>81267474
yeah Storks looks fucking grimdark
Why were Klasky Csupo's human characters so disgustingly ugly? I understand having a distinctive art style, but it actually made their shows hard to watch.
Funny thing, Aahhh Real Monsters would make sense for this style, but the humans in that show were not nearly as ugly as most of their shows.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BI_AYZCseU
>>81266187
To stop people from making 34.They failed
Worth a read?
it alright
>>81264508
It's one of Jurgen's best works. Take that as you will. That said it's pretty enjoyable imo.
I'm gonna have to get to it now that Jon is apparently a mainstream character.