Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 5661. page

I didn't forget this movie. I always wanted a sequel. It's a great movie

I've only recently realized that he's the actor that played Anakin Skywalker

But that is the cliche underrated movie that was panned for being just entertaining fun that is always posted.

Female Taken

>>82928239
She's 50 years old and still perfectly bangable, which is more than most here could ever hope for

File: 18444213_1895051077373430_654808974486405120_n.jpg (80KB, 1080x1350px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1080x1350px

This happend.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BULIcuwgDSA/

>>82928238

this movie was better than it deserved to be

>>82928251
I was pleasantly surprised

wHHHisky

>>82928033
Go with god OP

>>82928033
You can't beat /tv/. It beats you.

are you talking about drumpf's impeachment or what?

eva before surgery

File: Green_Eva_Dreamers_167.jpg (85KB, 1511x835px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1511x835px

for reference

anne has better nipples, otherwise they're pretty similar

>>82927915
It's a masterpiece.

It's also half full of shit propaganda.

>>82927915
>watching Swindler's List

Good goy.

>>82928247
>falling for the /pol/ jew
lad ...

>>>/co/

>>82927818
co co coc o!!!!

>>82927818
So only AD circlejerk threads belong on /tv/?

File: 1484982012226.jpg (48KB, 385x408px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 385x408px

DROPPED

>>82927553
she looks nice but her voice kills boners

>>82928302
Are you kidding me lad? I kept getting semis when we were watching Planet Earth in school

File: _20170519_134537.jpg (115KB, 720x841px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 720x841px

Lel

>>82927513
"Oh nothing Tommy, it's tip top, just I'm not sure about the colour"
Possibly in my top ten films. Essential British kinographier

File: original.jpg (21KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 720x480px

>this, is a shotgun, sol
Most quotable movie in existence

>>82927472
That 1930s Bonnie and Clyde Australian thingy

>>82927472
D4: Whitey Cucks

90 minutes of Uma Thurman's feet shot in 70mm

File: 1492974739289.jpg (17KB, 267x274px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 267x274px

>>82927432

>>82927432
No way. This is a joke right.

>A Really Good Film Company
Someone has to be taking the piss.

>>82927924
When I google it I can't find anything about them.

Only redditors like it and furfaggots.

So this show is about a depressed, rich horse dude?

>>82927452
yeah, pretty relatable, right?

did they really have to push up her boobs like that?

>>82927239
MUH COMPANY WARS

>>82927082
Comfy is the right word anon. It has a chance of being good. Trailer had some funny moments. Just as long as no one expects it to be some masterpiece we'll all be okay.

>>82927082
> date with """""nerdy""""" girl
> she pops open her HD
> "Do you like Family Guy LOL ^_^"
> Pretend to like it coz I want to get in that vag
> sit through an hour of her hawing like a buffoon at infantile gags about farts

How can anybody enjoy anything by that buffoon Seth McFarlane?

Am I just being trolled or do you imbeciles really think its hilarious when someone farts, falls over or scratches their balls.

I'm incredulous

>>82927197
Great blog

>not HBP
back to meme school

File: 1495191092116.jpg (2MB, 1620x2884px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1620x2884px

Professor Dumbledore, I'm a character in one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: 1482351843537[1].jpg (159KB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1920x800px

>>82927085
Okay let's go again

Mr. Potter, I'm Half-Blood Prince.