Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 495. page

Wow a woman's thong bum! I'll see this movie!

>Taylor Sheridan(Sicario and Hell or High Water)

I will pay to see this movie based solely on that. The fact that I like Remner and Olsen is a QT are just bonuses.

It's a great movie and worth the ticket purchase.

>>87255936
the kind you get when women are in charge.

>>87255936
BUT DUDE! BRAN IS THE ALL SEEING EYE =)

>>87255936
>master strategist
>outwitted by a little girl

>>87492244
you're an alcoholic right?

>>87492244
I can tell that you drink huh pal

So you drink

josh: let me put me and drake in the title and thumbnail, only to show that part for 5 seconds

>>87256167
more like drake and jew

File: yms.jpg (18KB, 364x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 364x400px

>>87255838
Good film, but YMS spends too much time jerking off his dog to it.

I know how to do the play now

fuck her how?

>raging bull
>no bulls, no bbc, no prepping or agreements made
yeah i would like a refund please

File: izzy.jpg (42KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1280x1024px

But I am your wife

Everyone I've spoken to hated this film but I really enjoyed it, best "horror" I've seen recently.

dishonest filmmaking
dirty tricksy marketing
rip off of so many movies like cloverfield lane and 28 days later


absolutely atrocious no wonder the dog fucker loves it, just because there's a dog in the poster

>>87256532
hello mr plebb

File: 1439994644023.jpg (122KB, 1024x1540px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1024x1540px

>Lady Shansha, I believe you lied under oath when you said your aunt Lysa jumped through the Moon door? Does this not matter?
>Ah, I shuppoze we are taking a crippled boy's dreams as facts, then? Should all trials be settled this way?
>Do great deeds not weigh in on my innocence? Saving you from the Lannisters, returning you to your seat in Winterfell, saving your brother and bringing the Vale into your service. A fair trial is the least you can offer me.
>No? Very well. I shall demand trial by combat.
>Not even that? Fine, then the Night's Watch will serve me well enough, with the dead on the way you need every man you can spare.
>You wish to kill me right here? Are you forgetting about the gods? You cannot kill a guest under your roof, you'd be no better than your family's killers.
>You don't care about that? Very well, but you are a Stark, my lady. I shall not accept accept your sentence if you are not the one to look me in the eye and take my life yourself.
>Or, whatever, just have the goblin bitch mutilate my throat with my dagger. Then burn my body.
>Or just leave my corpse on the floor. I shuppoze that would be acceptable as well.

>>87491856
I want to marry Skarsgard.

>>87491856
It made $13.5 million on Thursday night previous alone.

Projected to open at $90 million.

Quit your bullshitting.

>>87491856
You're Utterly retarded. It made $13.5 million Last night for the biggest Thursday screenings of an R-rated film ever

>>87255580
Because show-writers have a child's understanding of politics.

> we must not burn and destroy cities!
But Night King's army is coming, if we don't take command of the combined might of Westeros we won't stand a chance.
> BETTER LEAVE THIS OBVIOUS SNAKE IN THE GRASS BEHIND US THEN.

Yeah nah.

>>87255676
I don't disagree, but my question was more from a military stand point. Cause that's how they present it in the show. Taking back lands, fighting on two fronts. There is almost nothing to worry about when one enemy (Lannisters) are so weakened.

>>87255572

it depends on how they use cgi, most of the artists dont know how to use this shit. But some do better at it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bL6hp8BKB24&t=46s

>>87255826

That's a perfect use of it but I'd argue it's the exception rather than the norm.

This video makes me sad:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9zDQQ3uNAE

>>87255572
cgi is cheap now. back in the day cgi was expensive so it had to be good, or else not worth the $$$