So I am getting tired of SK and want to read horror novels from other writers. Is this guy good? How does his style compare to King's?
>Clive Barker is the new prince of horror
>t. Stephen King
>>9822418
If you're trying to distance yourself from King, Barker may not be your best choice
try Laird Barron instead
>>9822418
His short stories are his best horror work (I have not read his fantasy books). Just start with Books of Blood, vol. 1. He's very good.
>How does his style compare to King's?
That's a nice question that a better lit crit could answer than can I.
His style is not radically different from King's - it's not like reading Faulkner vs. Hemingway - yet Barker does have a distinctive voice, and a distinctive set of dramatic moves and motifs -- a certain existential horror which is likely familiar even to those who haven't read his work from the first two parts of Hellraiser movie series. A fear and fascination with the possibility of eternal damnation, likely arising from the tension of his being raised a rather pious Catholic, with all the smells and bells (or so I gather) and then becoming a gay man.
So, a gifted writer whose talent has been formed and shaped and racked, so to speak, on that particular table. This beautiful excruciation, gathered drop by drop in the blood bucket, not without screams and tears, informs his narratives and is the spirit behind them - the ink with which they're written - that distinguishes him from King.
what are some points to keep in mind when trying to write realistic, revealing dialogue?
what are some exercises you do?
>>9822361
>what are some points to keep in mind when trying to write realistic
research how people talk IRL enough to find out that the way they talk is a terrible fucking idea, tell the realistic to find a fire and to die in it, then think of the way people ought to talk and write accordingly
>revealing
the character reveals itself by interacting with the environment and especially with other characters
>what are some exercises
dialogue is the exercise because you reveal who the character is even to yourself the writer, indeed to write a dialogue is to (re)write the character
Study Henry James. He is a master of dialogue. Each section of dialogue must be set up very carefully so that everything they say is at once dramatically significant and realistic. Dialogue is the crest of a wave. It represents scenes of the greatest importance so is probably best done sparingly and with a a lot of context so that even the most seemingly mundane conversations are full of significance. Dialogue that does double duty (for example in narrating a story, or describing a person or building) is very good. But be sure it is also realistically done otherwise you'll run the risk of compromising the illusion of reality. At which point your story is dead.
>>9822391
How ought people to talk. This would be helpful to know for my personal life.
Have you noticed that literature is really just an autistic sub-category of communication in general? Especially when compared to oral communication.
Literature is to oral communication what keepy uppies are to actual football (soccer). Definitely requiring extreme talent and precision but also high levels of autism. You can try the first in the latter but even an extremely high level practitioner could only barely get away with it. In 99.99 % of cases it only leads to completely justified exasperation and ridicule.
I enjoy reading essays and articles on aldaily.com, usually the ones they do on authors. Are there more site like these, with a special focus on human interest stories?
I really don't like sonnets and I don't know why
>>9822200
Great post 10/10
>>9822200
>those digits
Just read the love song. Any more poetry like that?
>>9822006
Of j. Alfred Prufrock? If so, yeah...like, the rest of Eliot and a lot of Pound. Maybe Gertrude Stein.
why do you want write a story?
>>9821953
Fuck off, frog homo
>>9821953
I have an interesting idea and I want to use it as an outlet for themes which have been in my life
>inb4 another armchair psychoanalyst writes a biography projecting negative views of lit stereotypes
>>9821953
I want to give people something they can enjoy
Wagner Edition
Thread Theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGAKgoclJ6A
Just finished reading pic related as my first Nietzsche if anyone wants to chat about it. Where should I go next with his work?
I think the most convincing aspect of The Birth of Tragedy isn't the Apollonian and the Dionysian, but his explication of Socratism, and Alexandrian library culture. There are definite insights into the modern culture contained therein and it's interesting how this Alexandrian culture has survived, contrary to N.'s predictions, what could be considered a revival of the Dionysian in the west during the 20th century.
Anyway, general thoughts on Birth of Tragedy or Nietzsche's other work?
>>9821834
Untimely meditation is also pretty good. I think it is important because you get a good insight in N's earliest thoughts and you can see where he originally comes from
You move on to his music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2afrV4f-9EI
>>9821834
>Wagner Edition
I always found his polemic poems against Wagner hilarious
> – Ist das noch deutsch?
Aus deutschem Herzen kam dies schwüle Kreischen?
Und deutschen Leibs ist dies Sich-selbst-Zerfleischen?
Deutsch ist dies Priester-Hände-Spreizen,
Dies weihrauchdüftelnde Sinne-Reizen?
Und deutsch dies Stürzen, Stocken, Taumeln,
Dies zuckersüße Bimbambaumeln?
Dies Nonnen-Äugeln, Ave-Glockenbimmeln,
Dies ganze falsch verzückte Himmel Überhimmeln?...
Is/was there a better horror writer than Aickman?
Honestly after all the Poe, Lovecraft, Campbell, Ligotti, or King I've devoured over the years, nothing leaves me with same uneasiness & dread
>>9821560
>nothing leaves me with same uneasiness & dread
He does the uncanny and eerie very well. I've found his most well respected stories a bit unsatisfying because they can be so cryptic and inconclusive. I probably need to spend more time rereading to get the most out of them though.
Anyway, definitely under-recognised in the pantheon of horror/weird short story writers.
>>9821605
I'm actually rereading his' Ringing the Bells' & it packs so much more the 2nd time around. Truly feels unfamiliar & hopeless. Shame he started putting out his collections so late in life.
I've only read two of his collections, but they became instant favorites that I obsessed over for quite awhile. I'm planning to read some more of his stuff in the fall/winter when I like to go nuts on ghost and horror stories.
Judean scholar or Roman rhetor? Saint Thomas or Plato?
Have you ever tried to learn Homer by heart?
If it's true they all did it with mind palaces like Joshua Foer wrote in Moonwalking with Einstein, then I'm not even going to consider it before I'm comfortable memorizing my grocery lists.
>>9821779
Read this.
Are we gonna submit Dreamscape for Not the Booker prize or what?
Why aren't you reading the best contemporary philosophy yet?
http://mundusmillennialis.com/
That shit is straight up gnosis. If you were ever wondering what spiritual attainment looked like, there it is.
memes wgatever
Shadow Over Innsmouth was cool. I really liked the narrator's acceptance of his fate. I'm reading a Lovecraft book right now, so I'd appreciate any leads to more.
>>9820933
You should watch this kino masterpiece.
The King in Yellow by Robert Chambers for sure
Why is Hungarian literature so fucking good?
What's your favourite?
uigiudisuiduisk biukjalksh by iopjokalk-reok,lfokemw kokwodwdfdnj"owkdskl"mdksm