You ARE using BSD..r-right anon?
35 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59260361
I have a vm but I never use it
>>
File: bsd-big.png (49KB, 450x475px) Image search:
[Google]
49KB, 450x475px
yes :)
>>
>>59260361
What would I use BSD for? Text processing?
>2017
>Pins on the CPU
If an accident occurs, you have to replace a $500 CPU rather than a $150 motherboard. Great logic AMD.
91 Posts / 12 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59260296
>2017
>OP is still a clumsy ape
>>
>amd btfo
How will they ever recover from this blunder
>>
>>59260296
>being a fucking gorilla
let me guess you drop your phone too
File: IMG_7464.jpg (697KB, 358x359px) Image search:
[Google]
697KB, 358x359px
Red pill me on 16:10 /g/
76 Posts / 8 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1334286224152.png (503KB, 514x454px) Image search:
[Google]
503KB, 514x454px
>>59260293
Ok, I'll give you the quick rundown.
Get this, so like, count from 1 to 16 going left to right. ok, you got that? and then count 1 to 10 going top to bottom. You with me still? 16 left to right, 10 top to bottom. You got it now? Ok, good. Compare to 16:9 which you would count 1 less when going from top to bottom. See also 4:3 which means you would count 1 2 3 4 from left to right and then 1 2 3 from top to bottom. These are called ratios and it refers to how far you count right to how far you count down. I hope this helped you understand 16:10 and in a broader sense what a ratio is.
>>
>>59260293
It's a marketing term for a ratio. So is 21:9. Apparently people think bigger numbers are better so now we have unclear names for things.
Anyway, 8:5 is pretty good.
>>
File: widescreen.jpg (9KB, 800x450px) Image search:
[Google]
9KB, 800x450px
>>59260293
just get 16:9, you'll have more space.
File: ryzen-cpu-value.png (26KB, 773x371px) Image search:
[Google]
26KB, 773x371px
AMD makes cheap CPUs they said...
337 Posts / 63 Images
View this topic
>>
Inb4 Ryzen 3
>>
Dollar per Core:
1800X : $500/8 = $62.5
i3 7350K: $168/2 = $84.0
Anonymous
Battle of the convertibles 2017-03-06 01:05:13 Post No.59259624
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Battle of the convertibles 2017-03-06 01:05:13 Post No.59259624
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: IMG_7373.jpg (88KB, 421x750px) Image search:
[Google]
88KB, 421x750px
Battle of the convertibles
Anonymous
2017-03-06 01:05:13
Post No. 59259624
[Report]
[View this topic]
Yoga 910 vs Spectre x360 vs XPS 2 in 1
27 Posts / 8 Images
View this topic
>>
holy sshit she has a really nice smile
>>
>>59259650
she does, everything else? not so much
>>
>>59259624
I really, really want those to be real
File: IMG_20170305_162156.jpg (2MB, 4128x3096px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 4128x3096px
preparing to flash libreboot onty my t400 right now.
(probably the only one on this board that actually has)
I need a good splash screen to flash into it
42 Posts / 17 Images
View this topic
>>
File: images.jpg (7KB, 300x168px) Image search:
[Google]
7KB, 300x168px
like this
no tranny porn
>>
File: 20170301_124502.png (831KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
831KB, 1920x1080px
>>>/wg/
>>
>>59259276
what programmer are u using. i can see a pi, but what software
File: average-gaming.png (72KB, 601x830px) Image search:
[Google]
72KB, 601x830px
Ryzen is one of the worst gaming CPUs that I have ever seen launched.
It gets beat by Intel processors that cost half as much.
A $240 Intel i5 7600K is faster than a $500 Ryzen 1800X
A $170 Intel i3 7350K is faster than a $330 Ryzen 1700
Why the fuck did AMD tell people this is a gaming CPU?
303 Posts / 34 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1488664232472.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search:
[Google]
84KB, 653x726px
>>59258977
y-yeah, ryzen is h-horrible
b-buy intel
>>
quick question, OP. Did you check the catalogue to see if anyone else was talking about Gaming Benchmarks for the ryzen processor? You might have been able to find a thread, rather than creating a duplicate :~)
>>
>>59258977
Cuz AMD is retarded
They are run by chinks and poos
File: windows-10_8.1logo.png (184KB, 1917x1101px) Image search:
[Google]
184KB, 1917x1101px
How could Microsoft fuck it up so badly?
34 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59258834
Pajeets in charge of the company
>>
>>59258834
Pajeets
>>
Pajeets mostly
Anonymous
/dpt/ - Daily Programming Thread 2017-03-06 12:02:05 Post No.59258691
[Report] Image search: [Google]
/dpt/ - Daily Programming Thread 2017-03-06 12:02:05 Post No.59258691
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Neon.Genesis.Evangelion.full.443661.jpg (277KB, 1502x1600px) Image search:
[Google]
277KB, 1502x1600px
/dpt/ - Daily Programming Thread
Anonymous
2017-03-06 12:02:05
Post No. 59258691
[Report]
[View this topic]
What are you working on, /g/?
Old thread: >>59256297
327 Posts / 55 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59258691
where is a place I can learn C,C# and C++?
codeacademy has none of them and I don't know where to start
>>
>Manually managing blocks of memory in C is like juggling bars of soap in a prison shower: It's all fun and games until you forget about one of them.
>>
>>59258712
VB.net is easier to start it
File: opengl.png (278KB, 800x600px) Image search:
[Google]
278KB, 800x600px
Why is it so hard to learn graphics programming from scratch?
If you want to make a 3D game, people are quick to recommend you use unity or some big cushy engine.
They don't understand how it works underneath, they just take it like a fact of life.
Most GL tutorials gloss over major details and tell you to use glm without ever explaining what glm does or what it's abstracting away.
And most don't really go much further than teaching you how to draw a rainbow triangle.
It does help that modern graphics APIs function are geared toward projective geometry, which is a dead branch of geometry that isn't even taught anymore.
42 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
Because re-inventing the wheel every time is reserved for autists, and competition among autists have made it such that it's no longer worth the time to investigate these things for the average user.
So now you have two types of people:
1 - people who make games thinking it's the easiest thing in the world because you can literally game engine everything
2 - autists competing to see who can make the barnyard animals also known as "group 1"'s job the easiest
>>
>>59258647
If you want to learn from scratch then you wouldnt be using opengl, you would be writing a kernel and then writing instructions directly to your screen in order to get a linear framebuffer pointer, then you can draw pixels directly to the screen.
So I say it depends on your priorities really, you can make your own custom OS or you can use an existing tool which may or may not be of your liking.
>>
File: 1486843796358.gif (1024KB, 500x354px) Image search:
[Google]
1024KB, 500x354px
>Why is it so hard to learn graphics programming from scratch?
The standard is constantly updating, so most tutorials have out dated API usage.
Most tutorials are based off of C++, which is constantly being updated, so most code is in bad style.
Most tutorials are shit.
File: brave_icon_shadow_300px.png (38KB, 300x300px) Image search:
[Google]
38KB, 300x300px
What do you think of "Brave"? It doesn't look like it's catching on, but the idea seems good in principle. Is anyone using it?
27 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
Botnet
/thread
>>
>>59258540
Fuck off newfag, don't post if you're just going to mindlessly parrot shit
>>
>>59258524
seems ok, just didn't "feel" right when I used it idk
File: FrOMse1T4eX1B4Fk.png (464KB, 1024x1625px) Image search:
[Google]
464KB, 1024x1625px
Reminder that the Intel compiler cheats against AMD CPUs:
https://realmofespionage.blogspot.com/2015/01/starcraft-ii-cpu-benchmarking-with-amd.html
http://www.agner.org/optimize/blog/read.php?i=49
>the Intel CPU dispatcher does not only check which instruction set is supported by the CPU, it also checks the vendor ID string. If the vendor string says "GenuineIntel" then it uses the optimal code path. If the CPU is not from Intel then, in most cases, it will run the slowest possible version of the code, even if the CPU is fully compatible with a better version.
32 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59258447
If you want to try:
>To spoof an AMD CPU on VMWare (Player works) edit the VMX and add the following:
>cpuid.0.ebx = "0110:1000:0111:0100:0111:0101:0100:0001"
>cpuid.0.ecx = "0100:0100:0100:1101:0100:0001:0110:0011"
>cpuid.0.edx = "0110:1001:0111:0100:0110:1110:0110:0101"
>cpuid.1.eax="--:0000:0000:0000:--:1111:0100:0110"
>featureCompat.enable = FALSE
Pic related, results from the StarCraft test
>>
>no bumps
/g/ - Technology
BTW, apparently, there are some programs that can patch binaries made by the Intel compiler to avoid this fuckery
>>
What other popular programs are actually doing this? Maybe my shit amd cpu isn't that shitty
File: fuckthem.png (163KB, 436x632px) Image search:
[Google]
163KB, 436x632px
You are not training Google AI, are you?
26 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
File: fuckthemall.png (199KB, 430x623px) Image search:
[Google]
199KB, 430x623px
>>59257714
I mean, fuck them, r-right guise?
>>
File: Screenshot_4.png (32KB, 307x196px) Image search:
[Google]
32KB, 307x196px
nope
>>
File: 1487886179205.gif (22KB, 331x260px) Image search:
[Google]
22KB, 331x260px
Noooope
What does /g/ think of the nintendo switch
318 Posts / 24 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59257547
I don't.
>>>/v/
>>
>>59257547
Childish garbage marketed to manchildren and pedos. It has worse graphical performance than the xbox one so you know it's not even worth buying to try out.
>>
>>59257590
Pretty much this.
Anonymous
Proper debate: Dlang vs C++. 2017-03-05 10:46:27 Post No.59257519
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Proper debate: Dlang vs C++. 2017-03-05 10:46:27 Post No.59257519
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Proper debate: Dlang vs C++.
Anonymous
2017-03-05 10:46:27
Post No. 59257519
[Report]
[View this topic]
Which one is more productive?
Which one is easy to avoid exceptions?
Is C++ too big to learn (with all the libraries)?
Is D more easy tool to use?
Which one is easier to build scalable programs?
No C meme masters please. I want to pick a language for my personal project (text-editor)
149 Posts / 14 Images
View this topic
>>
Both are shit, try APL
>>
>>59257519
have you considered C?
>>
>>59257519
>Is D more easy tool to use?
No one knows that because no one uses that