Archived threads in /wsr/ - Worksafe Requests - 138. page

File: 1475646910635.gif (2MB, 700x394px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 700x394px

This?

File: K-On boob touch.jpg (259KB, 1205x1600px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1205x1600px

>>371993

File: jay.jpg (144KB, 774x749px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 774x749px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ioit5DWsWsw

>>372086
Thx anon

Just to reiterate, I need a somewhat realistic shop of the OP image to make it look like >>371880.

Y tho

File: stop.jpg (14KB, 304x326px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 304x326px

>>371836

>>372218
He likes the unusually sexy anthropomorphic character, maybe for just a quick wank or a profile picture.

lynx

There's probably not one right answer, but a lot of heated opinions and personal preferences.

While some people will swear by Opera or some obscure forks of Firefox or Chrome, for simplicity's sake let's stick to the reasonable mainstream alternatives for Windows: Firefox and Chrome.

Usability: Both are very customizable with add-ons. I like tinkering with my browser and prefer Firefox, but I believe Chrome offers the better experience out-of-the-box.
Resources: As far as I know Chrome is less of a resource hog than Firefox.
Features: Both were pretty swift in implementing HTML5 and other newer features. Chrome is probably a little bit faster and more comprehensive. Firefox can take a long while until some dev gets around to low-priority features.
Security: Chrome has amazing sandboxing, but pretty much all high-security browsers (like pre-configured TOR browsers) are based on Firefox, because Chrome is a Google botnet and cannot properly proxy DNS requests.

Apart from my personal preference (Firefox for life!) and lack of in-depth experience with Chrome, I think a serious answer would be: Try both and use the one you like better.

>>371726

Get Firefox, a Chrome fork with the Google shit removed (Chromium variant) and Opera and see which you like best.

>>371714
>make one
Sure, what do you want it to include? Keep all the outlines?
>Be specific.
We need to add this to the sticky

>>371714
It's a version of Bury Pink Girl. Can't find template for this.

>>372064
sorry,
yes, I was talking about keeping the outlines

File: image.jpg (26KB, 360x360px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 360x360px

>>371588
Mushishi

Fune wo Amu

Amaama to Inazuma

bumpo

burp

bumpigini

https://starcraft.com/en-gb/articles/20674424

StarCraft is free

>>380106
Thanks, Now I'm looking for warcraft.

>the latest Warcraft

Not counting expansions. Warcraft III was published 15 years ago. "Latest" is technically correct but a rather odd choice of words.

File: 50.jpg (430KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 500x375px

>>380094
what

3 frame gif using the "replace" frame disposal. there are no non-moving parts, just 3 full-frame static images.

>>380097
>>380096
why am i then seeing some kind of an unmoving "outline" then

paysafe codes maybe?

>>379830
Ah, good idea. You mean those cards you can buy at gas stations? I'm not sure about the region lock though, I live in europe and the guy is in America

Crypto

Haibane Renmei

Saikano
Clannad
Kimi ni Todoke
The first 10 minutes of the first episode of Kotoura-san.

File: 43b4b124115656bf27ee9902811673cf.jpg (68KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1920x1080px

>>379692
favs

5 cm per second
welcome to the nhk
anohana
ping pong the animation
watamote

>>379461
Louis Daguerre
there i just covered all three for ya

well, I'm not an art student, so my best guess for a good topic is focus stacking. It's new, computer based, usually used to take pictures of details that are otherwise microscopic, dominated by one piece of software, uses a mix of gear that is new to photography like software and stepper motors to old shit like microscope lenses and extension tubes and things mounted backwards and extension tubes

>>379474
>hurr durr write an essay about Joe Photograph