can i get some expanding brain memes
>>8808635
I wasn't gunna reply to this bread but that last panel made me laugh
>>8809269
fuck it
>>8808635
>>8808918
Underrated
>>8808918
fucking lol
Nah, I'll just get banned again.
Someone should do one for Newcomb's Paradox or P / NP.
>>8809758
>>8808635
the earth is flat
all round things are flat
everything is flat actually
i can prove this
>>8809758
>Newcomb's paradox
fresh off the press
>>8809590
not bad
>>8808918
Feeling like a brainlet. What's the joke here? Is there some mistake in the formulas/graph?
>>8810007
just more and more verbose definitions of an integral
>>8810007
the last one is from an article that was published recently in a medical journal claiming they had just discovered how to find the area under a curve.
>>8810134
is this shit real?
>>8810244
Yeah there were threads about it some months ago
>>8810252
i am 199% newfag on /sci/
>>8810244
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8137688
It is asolutely real.
>>8810252
>>8810134
holy shit
http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/math1132s14/handouts/taicomments.pdf
>because Tai's model is based on the calculations of individual squares and triangles its precision is obviously absolute
>Tai responds that her formula is based on the sum of the areas of small triangles and rectangles and is not based on the sum of the area of trapezoids
>>8810270
I always thought the paper was a joke. There's no way anyone is that retarded
>>8810270
>http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/math1132s14/handouts/taicomments.pdf
>"Tai considers that the "true value" for the area under the curve is obtained by plotting the curve on graph paper and counting the squares under the curve"
>>8809984
This makes no sense I am an autistic linguist and I can't take a joke.
>>8810134
Fucking again? This shit keeps happening like every 5 years. Now I get that they don't know shit about math, but they don't even notice that every five years there's a new "revolutionary method of calculating area under the trendlines of statistical data" in their own med journals? WHO THE FUCK GIVES THESE PEOPLE THEIR DEGREES
>>8810425
physicians are brainlets. they are rote memorizers, not puzzle solvers.
>>8810425
The article in question is from 1994 and has, I assume, been passed around a lot.
>>8809869
why is 2-box better?
>>8810412
less sophisticated to more sophisticated
>>8810455
it's not
that's why the brain is small
>>8810453
I remember seeing /sci/ shitting their pants over a biology professor that had "rediscovered" integration. real kek worthy
>>8808919
Engineer here.
10 seems risky. I would factor that up by 1.5.
15 is more reasonable
>>8811311
Arrhenius equation needs to be higher
>>8811505
WRONG
>>8811553
epin :DDDDDD
>>8811549
Mr president pls you have things to do
>>8812212
i'm gonna fuck assad's boipucci
>>8812219
That would be highly appreciated. Just don't shitpost.
>>8812236
Sad!
saad witen. thingken.
>>8812265
BUT NOW WITEN HAS AWAKEN!!!! RRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!
>>8811549
bogdanov got me holy kek
>>8808918
is three a greens function? asking for a friend
>>8809808
kek
>>8813063
Three is just the definition of the Riemann integral
>>8811311
10/10
>>8809643
Shite it's real
>>8808635
I like your pics OP.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1PqPMxWhQZw
>>8810888
thats not how the meme works
>>8808918
How about this version?
>>8813262
i like this more
saved
>>8813262
>wildbergian
Uh, that is actually the Fundamental Theorem of Taiean Calculus.
>>8808919
>"Meme-Theoretic Theoretical Physics Memes" on facebook
Dude.