Great idea

>>5532128
I mean, she's right. I'm mixed race and I feel ugly and disgusting. I'd probably get plastic surgery if I had money and I was convinced it would look natural. I wish race mixing was biologically impossible.

I think mixed race people are the most beautiful

File: IMG_3065.png (36KB, 642x539px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 642x539px

>>5532137

>>5532128
She's right my dude. I'm mixed race (black/white) and I'm virgin at 28. My social life is alright but I look like an ugly goblin. Your image of race mixing is totally off because you keep seeing the most beautiful and successful specimens on TV and in magazines. Don't get me started on health issues, let alone mental health issues.

You shouldn't have a mixed race kid because of your fetishes, or because you "think" you'll have a lucky dice roll and they'll turn alright, or because you're a vapid virtue signalling cunt and want to bathe in social approval.

>>5532174
I don't think they are, and I don't think I am. I want there to never be another mixed race child.

>>5532187
>Don't get me started on health issues, let alone mental health issues.
literally everyone has those

>>5532192
Your opinions are ignorant and make you seem like a moron.

>>5532194
Mixed race people even more.

>>5532192
You're saying "I'm ugly so everyone else like me is ugly" I think that's pretty conceited of you, have you ever considered that it's just you that is ugly?

Are you with it or not

>>5532198
My opinions come from my experience as being a mixed race person and I can tell you that whatever has made you think that creating more of us is a good idea, it is wrong. Being mixed race hurts you for existing as one and hurts everyone else because they have to be around you.

>>5532213
Almost all of them are, and for the few that are pretty, they'd be much better off just being one race. Even if they are pretty, just seeing more of us around feels like a reminder of the possible future filled with only generic mixed brown people that people with Blacked fetishes fantasize about. I don't want America to be Brazil 2.0. As a mixed race person, please stop making mixed race people.

>>5532207
>[s4s] - Sh*t 4chan Says
show ur data

>>5532319
Exhibit A https://www.reddit.com/r/hapas/

im the whitest whitey to ever white from a racially homogeneous country and i look p good but hey hey hey i am also the ultimate sickly child with all kinds of issues so why dont you man up and start enjoying your mongrel superpowers (my dog was a mong and not only was he pretty but also lived a long happy life and dont even get me started on markiplier) what im saying is at least youre not inbred cheers

>>5532445
Hybrid vigor only occurs when the pure breeds have, you know, problems.

>>5532324
this isnt evidence that mixed people have more issues than purebread (which actually doesn't exist) people

>>5532489
That would be politically incorrect
biology doesn't exist!

>>5532495
there's literally no pure breed, retard
you ascribe traits to imaginary boundaries on the Earth and act like those traits only exist in that geographic location
but they don't
it's all just genes turned on or off, genes that we have in all of our bodies, in all of our genetic makeup
biology DOES exist, you just don't understand it for shit

File: 1484274104812.png (600KB, 889x613px) Image search: [Google]

600KB, 889x613px

>>5532537

File: 1472662206531.jpg (246KB, 619x682px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 619x682px

>>5532582

>>5532582
>>5532586
niggers are underdeveloped, ugly and their genes muddy everything up in a idealistic world we'd kill them all. not even joking. they've demonstably proven to be dumb and aggressive proto-humans lole

>>5532128
Haha, they deliberately call her "Human Barbie" and "BIZARRE looking woman", so that reader is prejudiced against her rather than race-mixing. You know, like, "Who are you to talk?!" way.

>>5532128
>>5532137
>>5532174
>>5532187
>>5532192
>>5532194
>>5532198
>>5532207
>>5532213
>>5532251
>>5532445
>>5532458
>>5532489
>>5532495
>>5532537
>>5532582
>>5532586
>>5532589
>>5532627

>>>/b/
>>>/pol/
>>>/r9k/
>>>/bant/

You're all n00bz tbh fam

File: 9947f0ea656e9c50.jpg (1MB, 1276x3397px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1276x3397px

>>5532586
But haven't you seen what humans did to dog breeds in like a century?

>>5532664
2

>>5532648
lole, of all boarads you listed old /pol/ is the only one to remotely have anything to do with this. But that's /pol/ from MONTHS ago, dunno what it's now.

/b/ is for sick porn and gore. /r9k/ for personal blogs. /bant/ is a board of no meaning and no purpose aside from showing flags like /pol/ does, im not into flag collection lole

>>5532670
6

>>5532671
[s4s] is still literally the worst board to have a serious discussion on because of how shiposting is activly encouraged

>>5532683
Expected "serious discussion" from "ironic" shits on other boards. [s4s] is post-irony/New Sincerity, thus easily the most advanced, futuristic, post-modern board on 4chan and perhaps even on the Internet.

>>5532698
no

File: hmmmm.png (142KB, 1200x927px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1200x927px

>>5532207
hmmmmmmm

>>5532699
checked dubs

Your fortune: Good news will come to you by mail

>>5532586
"Other important points to consider is that virtually every population differs to some degree from every other population of a species due to stochastic processes and, perhaps, microevolutionary events within the population. Thus variation among populations making up a single subspecies is expectable. In earlier days,it was considered (by some) to be legitimate to name as a subspecies any population that could be shown to be statistically different from other populations of the species. Eventually it became evident to most that, given a large enough sample size, any two reasonably sized populations could be shown to differ. Since any utility at all would be lost by naming each local population, the idea of "taxonomic" difference comes into play—but, as noted, how much difference is required for it to be a taxonomic difference is subjective, and there has been limited success in getting systematists to agree on the magnitude of that difference."
"In practice, the subspecies may be a useful tool, but must be used with caution and pretty much requires familiarity with the particular species and what philosophy has been used to name the subspecies within that species."
http://museum2.utep.edu/mammalogy/species.htm

From a few cursory google searches, it seems that we are the subspecies homo sapiens sapiens, and share the species homo sapiens with homo sapiens idaltu. There seem to be arguments that the neanderthals should be considered a subspecies in homo sapiens, but at current the majority seems to consider them a distinct species.

Hope this helps you understand why different races aren't different subspecies. There's also other stuff about genetic diversity (I am seeing people saying that the average African is more genetically removed from another African than he is from a European) that might be interesting for you to look into, but I don't have time to try and properly source/confirm this stuff right now.