Why do jannies keep pruning all the trap threads?
Since when is that against the rules? This is hardly an on-topic board
Get styled on, degenerate nerd. Trump won, you lost. Keep up the good work, mods.
Saged, so don't bother replying.
>>34349261
lmao they prune the /pol/ threads too now sweetheart
>>34349182
Take that degenerate crap back to /lbgtaeifhfg/ where it belongs.
They aren't pruning enough of them and trapposters should be permabanned.
>>34349182
It is ok fellow trap thread poster as long as we stay strong we shall adapt and we will once again conquer this board
>>34349182
Take it to >>>/b/ you got damn reeetard
>>34350327
Every sage shall get a bump
>>34349182
Good job, mods. Go to /b/ if you need 14,000 porn threads in the catalog
We must slay all the trap gods
>>34349413
>lmao they prune the /pol/ threads too now sweetheart
show me proof
>>34350507
0 trump/kill the fags threads up right now
They're doing their job. The community has spoken and they don't want all fucking trap threads every 3 seconds.
Go to /b/ or /lgbt/ if you want fagshit
>>34349182
>all the trap threads
>threads
thats the problem just stick to one thread
>>34350617
They don't though. If they did it would be a nonissue. People feel the need to make 30 threads and spam unrelated threads with their faggotry.
as a shit poster trap threads are my favorite bait look at all you angry retards
yet, there are multiple roastie threads here everyday, nobody with the ability to ban blinks an eye
really gets the frontal lope looping
>>34350674
>If they did it would be a nonissue
no, you don't seem to realize the issue
before, there was just one thread, which would often reach 300+ replies because we stuck to one thread
now, in /r9k/ butthurt janny edition, that is no longer an option because THE THREADS ARE FUCKING REMOVED so MORE threads must be made by necessity or we risk disappearing
That's not even the real issue here, traps aren't a fucking hive mind or monolith, this isn't like /britfeels/ where the trap threads are actually fucking generals which should be limited to one per day or whatever
the ONLY thing which connects these threads you are complaining about is that their topic is a non-traditional sexual orientation
if the exact same threads were vaginalized, changed from >tfw no bf who goes camping to >tfw no gf who goes camping
there would be literally no issues
>>34350948
yep, nobody here complaining about the FEMBOTS SHOW ME UR TITTIES :DDD thread up now
>>34351085
>butthurt janny edition, removing asap
this, 1 or two threads would cap and be remade fast, BUT then it turned into them randomly being deleted only a few replies in, et cetera and now we're here.
>>34351085
That's what happens when you sperg out and piss everyone off, you faggots thought it would be lulzy to bait Anons with "WHY HAVENT YOU FUCKED THIS BOIPUSSY" threads and in general spammed /r9k/ like the bronies did with /b/ years ago, luckily there's a containment board for you degenerates >>>/lgbt/ and if you don't like it tough shit, fuck trap threads and fuck trap posters you people rightfully lost your privileges to post trap threads.
>>34351085
fuck off cunt, this is a straight board, I'm sick of you fucks spamming your bullshit all over this board
>>34351303
Traps arent gay you retards so guess what I'm staying
>>34349182
>this is hardly a ontopic board
Yes, that's why your 24/7 generals aren't allowed here, mongoloid. Also you have your own board.