Thread replies: 25
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Russia deploys new missile in treaty violation 2017-02-18 11:53:10 Post No. 112947
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Russia deploys new missile in treaty violation 2017-02-18 11:53:10 Post No. 112947
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Russia deploys new missile in treaty violation
Anonymous
2017-02-18 11:53:10
Post No. 112947
[Report]
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Russia has deployed a new cruise missile despite complaints by U.S. officials that it violates an arms control treaty banning ground-based U.S. and Russian intermediate-range missiles, a senior Trump administration official said on Tuesday.
>Russia had secretly deployed the ground-launched SSC-8 cruise missile that Moscow has been developing and testing for several years, despite U.S. complaints that it violated sections of the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, the official said, confirming a story first reported by the New York Times.
>“We know that this is an old issue. The Russians have been building and testing these things in violation of the INF treaty going back to the Obama administration,” the official told Reuters, asking to remain anonymous to speak freely.
>"The issue now is the things are deployed and it’s an even greater violation of the INF treaty,” the official added.
The Russian Defense Ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the Times story.
>The U.S. State Department concluded in a July 2014 arms control report that "the Russian Federation is in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty not to possess, produce, or flight-test a ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM) with a range capability of 500 km to 5,500 km (310 miles to 3,420 miles), or to possess or produce launchers of such missiles."
>Russia accused Washington of conducting "megaphone diplomacy" after the accusation was repeated by the State Department in 2015. Moscow also denied it had violated the INF treaty, which helped end the Cold War between the two countries.
>The previous U.S. administration of President Barack Obama had protested in an attempt to persuade Moscow to correct the violation while the missile was still in the testing phase, the Trump administration official said.
http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/u-s--believes-russia-deployed-new-missile-in-treaty-violation---nyt/42960748
>>
>Based on open-source information such as Russian bloggers, they were deployed in the central military district, the administration official said, adding: “We are reviewing it.”
>Russia now has two battalions of the cruise missile, the Times report quoted administration officials as saying. One is located at Russia's missile test site at Kapustin Yar in the country's southeast.
>The other cruise missile battalion has been located at an operational base elsewhere in Russia, the Times quoted one unidentified official as saying.
>(Reporting by David Alexander and Steve Holland; Editing by Susan Heavey, Grant McCool and Lisa Shumaker)Reuters
>>
Good. Hegemony is a monopoly. With a balance of power you as a citizen have the choice to take your business elsewhere. Going back to mutually assured destruction would be a huge step forward for libertarians and civil rights fans of all persuasions alike. So good. Good job Russia, keep it up. Red pill v2
>>
Where is the proofs? Russia is nice country and christian. US broke treaty first! Where is the proofs?
>>
>>113061
>Going back to mutually assured destruction would be a huge step forward for libertarians and civil rights fans of all persuasions alike.
I don't even know what to say.
>>
>>113095
They're shilling their own thread anon.
You've got a straw-man of libertarians and "civil rights" fans and people who actually ask for evidence when presented with Russian hacker boogeymen hysteria.
There's a dedicated group of posters on this board bent on turning it into their own Pravda. You will march in lock step with mainstream thought as determined by their approved intelligentsia or else.
>>
>>113097
>Russian hacker boogeymen hysteria
> turning it into their own Pravda
>lock step with mainstream thought as determined by their approved intelligentsia
Don't know what to say to this either.
Not even clear which side you think you're on.
Some times I wonder if that was the intention.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcy8uLjRHPM
>>
>>113101
>Don't know what to say to this either.
>Not even clear which side you think you're on.
"U EITHER BELIEVE DAH OFFICIAL STORY LIEK US OR YER A ROOOOOSKIE COLLARBERATUR! MURICA!"
Congratulations on being the new American trash.
>>
>>113103
Liberals are the greatest threat to freedom. THey've been the greatest threat since the 18th century, when they were trying to topple governments and kingdoms for their so called democracy. It is liberals who should be hunted down and destroyed, and socialist Europe and communist China who should be are nemesis, not Russia.
>>
>>113104
LARP'ing as a hyperbolic straw men should be bannable offense from this board.
>>
>>113106
No, educate yourself. Liberals have been shitting things up since the American and French Revolutions. Humanity only reaches its apex under empires; just compare when Rome was an empire vs when it was a republic.
>>
>>113103
>"U EITHER BELIEVE DAH OFFICIAL STORY LIEK US OR YER A ROOOOOSKIE COLLARBERATUR! MURICA!"
That's not what I said, nor what I intended to imply.
But referring to "a dedicated group of posters", who from your use of language it would seem you are opposed, then not making it clear how they or you were aligned was confusing.
>Congratulations on being the new American trash.
You have also incorrectly inferred me to be American.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8moePxHpvok
>>
I miss Obama <3
>>
>>113111
>That's not what I said, nor what I intended to imply.
Yes it was.
>You have also incorrectly inferred me to be American.
That would explain your complete and total ignorance of American politics.
Also, are you posting that video because you're senile and you think it's like a forum signature, or do you believe it holds some relevance to the conversation? Articulate, with words dear.
>>
Why is destruction necassary to balance power?
>>
>>113112
Suck it up. This country ain't ever going back to being liberal ever again.
>>
>>113115
>Yes it was.
Just read my mind?
>total ignorance of American politics
Again reading my mind.
Now I wonder if you're here to make Yanks look bad.
> you think it's like a forum signature
There's a fun idea. I just wanted to included a version with a adequate disclaimer.
This one is a different story. Unrelated to this missile story, though it does involve Russia (USSR).
It might be of interest if you like US history and politics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvyeWaVMDrI
> Articulate, with words dear.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aP_-P_BS6KY
>>
>>113061
So if you were in a mexican standoff with someone, you'd feel safe?
>>
>>113103
>your with us
>or your against us
Some nice SJW logic right there.
>>
>>113087
>the proofs
Reddit? Pls go
>>
@113097, this is 113061, If you meant me, I'm not shilling any thing, I dont have a thread. I just posted my thoughts after reading the article. I'm not scared of Ruskie bogeyman, nor do I buy into the current BS about that. No evidence has been provided that proves to any reasonable degree it was the Russians. Note I said nothing about Liberals, I said Libertarians, big difference!
@113149
No I wouldn't feel more safe in a Mexican standoff, but if the two big guys with guns in the room were, yeah I would. It's better than them both being hand in hand, buddy buddy looking at me. At least if one is a giant dick to me I can move to the other one's side of the room. If they agree to rule the room as one, I've go no option and they have no reason to humor me in the least.
>>
113061 here again, one last thing, I mean expatriation, not treason when I say "go to the other side of the room," just figured I'd get that in there before some little good boy tried to say, "I'm so patriotic, yer a trator!" Hoping to virtue signal and get more tendies. Right wing cucks are even worse than left wing ones. We get it yer a good boy, now go blow daddy government and stop virtue signaling.
>>
>>113149
If the results of anyone killing the other were that they also kill themselves and everyone else they know, end the world and make absolutely everything shit, then yeah, I'd be pretty damn comfortable.
>>
>>113189
>>113195
Click on the post number or put a ">>" next to the post number you are responding to so the board will automatically link the responses and people can see you responded too them. You can also self reference with this method.
If you want to link boards it's a ">>>" followed by the board so >>>/b/ will link to /b/ and >>>/g/sqt will take you to the board with the search results for "sqt"
Welcome to 4chan, and never trip outside of the appropriate thread.
>>
clk xlzzzzzzzzzzzzz
ooooooo
Thread posts: 25
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1