So why is there a discussion on the relation between intellectualism

File: images (5).jpg (13KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 225x225px

So why is there a discussion on the relation between intellectualism and hip hop/classical?

>classical is made by subhuman genetical white aberrations and mutants of the original human race, which was proudly black
>hip hop is made by genetically pure individuals

>classical is made by sellouts who are quick to hop on aristocrats' and uneducated rich fucks' dicks
>hip hop is made both for the common man and the intellectual

>classical is only enjoyed by degenerates, cucks, old fat men, neonazis
>hip hop is enjoyed by several groups, diverse in their own ways

>classical is mostly ignored in the popular consciousness
>hip hop is celebrated in both the popular and unpopular consciousness

>Literally no talent to make classical: just yell at people to play instruments while using made up systems
>takes considerable time to make quality hip hop, which uses powerful and primal rhythms

>people who make classical are often sad losers who are too retarded to do anything else
>people who make hip hop are, if not wellbred, polite, intelligent, and interested in a variety of occupations, not to mention usually attractive and sexually active

>classical composhits are too busy taking BBCs to consider making their music interesting
>progression and experimentation are both rewarded in hip hop, but so is aesthetical beauty

I ask you again. /mu/, why is this still a debate?