New firefox is pretty good. What do you think, guys?

I think I'll be switching to Brave

>>61720332
>32-bit
cmon ruskie, time to upgrade.

>>61720374
You mean to another chromium reskin browser?

>>61720377
It's my work pc

>>61720332
It was never bad.

>>61720332
the drag space bothers me, but aside from that peachy

>current year of the lord
>using firecucks

>Windows

>>61720332
Trash

I've been using Firefox nightly on my device machine. It's super obvious when sites are developed for Chrome and not for every modern browser.

>>61722425
Dev machine*

Fuck

>>61720332
>Cнимoк.png

>>61720332
why are you using the 32 bit version

>>61720332
>coding on a web-editor hosted on a .com website
noice

>>61720377
Abort sanctions.

>>61725731
still better than using any electron-based editor

>>61720934
>any year
>using cuckchromebotnet

Anyone got 4chan x to work? I got greasemonkey, but it dont load any script when im on 4chan.

>>61727478
It never stopped working.

>>61727524
it didnt work for me, but I just removed Greasemonky and replaced it with ViolentMonky and it worked just fine.

File: 2017-08-04-153035_1280x800_scrot.png (153KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1280x800px

anyone still using seamonkey?

>>61727688
Man I haven't used that in forever.

>>61727688
>>61727757
Looks pretty clean. Is it any good?

>>61727843
Nope

I hope they will change the compact theme.
At the moment it doesn't matter if you use the compact one or the normal one, it take exactly the same pixels for everything.

>>61727843
It's great. It uses a modern version of Gecko (unlike Pale Meme), yet retains a classic browser interface, albeit the Netscape/Mozilla Suite one rather than Firefox's. It's also extremely customisable and supports most Firefox extensions.

>>61729005
Not true at all.

Also Firefox is shit

File: Reddit-Logo-NOTEXT-2[1].png (38KB, 1193x1654px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1193x1654px

>>61720374
>it's about ethics in video game journalism

File: themes_comparison.png (12KB, 484x74px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 484x74px

>>61729212
Left is compact dark and right is default. I'm on linux.

>>61729410
>Linux

>>61720332
I don't believe you. It's been bad for a long time now.

>>61729492
Take a screenshot comparison on windows and let me see the difference

>>61720332
Waterfox is the path
https://www.ghacks.net/2017/03/13/waterfox-dev-has-big-plans-for-the-browser/

>>61720374
same desu
I wish development was faster though, it's still a little too barebones
but I'm already using it on mobile devices

Getting rid of the retard-buttons in the options tray is a godsend.

NIGHTLY IS SO FUCKING FAST NOW HOLY SHIT

and all of my addons already have replacements

THANK YOU BASED MOZILLA

>>61729005
In Nightly they added a "density" setting that allows you to make firefox bigger or smaller and the color schemes from the former compact themes were added to the theme menu. You can use the default colors and make firefox bigger/smaller or you can use the light/dark theme and keep the default sizes.

>>61730947
Where?

File: 2017-08-04 19_32_15.jpg (3KB, 414x57px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 414x57px

>>61730970
in the customize menu

File: Window Capture.png (560KB, 2695x1801px) Image search: [Google]

560KB, 2695x1801px

>>61720332
My only complaint is the black titlebar.

>>61731046
that's the thing i like the most about it. saves me from customizing it for hours again

File: themes_comparison.png (14KB, 724x74px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 724x74px

>>61730978

File: cool.gif (2MB, 295x273px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 295x273px

>faster than chrome while using less ram and being much more customizable
i love it

File: Ghostface-Killah_02-09-2016.jpg (28KB, 304x304px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 304x304px

it's the shit

>>61720332
I think you fireshills need to stop keeping 5 active threads about this. THAT WOULD BE GREAT.

t. not retarded FF user

>>61731330
t. retarded chrome user

>>61720332
>open YouTube
>40% cpu usage watching a video
>same video on chrome
>10~15%
Seems like still shit, faggots

>>61731401
Link the vid you watched so I can try it out.

>>61731488
he won't, he's a lying google shill.

>>61720332

Does firefox users also get excited when their "girlfriends/wifes" get a new cucker too?

>>61731076
Delicious :-P

Can't wait for the touch density for my Surface, and the compact for my ThinkPad.

>>61730978
why is my firefox missing title bar option? how do I change it to be dark?

File: 2017-08-04 20_13_17.jpg (44KB, 2455x324px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 2455x324px

>>61731550
are you using nightly? you can change the theme in about:addons

File: file.png (19KB, 1680x89px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 1680x89px

Can I still set my bookmarks like this?

>>61731571
title bar stays the same on the latest nightly

It's suprisingly a lot faster than previous versions.

I'm pretty happy with it.

>>61720374
>chrome clone

#beBrave

File: 2017-08-04 20_18_36.jpg (181KB, 2493x173px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 2493x173px

>>61731584
yes.

>>61729410
OOO!
Is that dark theme default option??
No more third party browser themes that I have to edit.

>>61731680
Awesome thanks!

>>61730947
That's pretty slick.
Thanks for the info!

>>61731688
yes, that's the default. i like it better than how it currently looks in stable, it's even darker. in stable you get this weird dark blue/purplish shit

>>61731401
Upgrade your FF from version 40 grandpa.

Those issues are non existant anymore.

>>61731688
Not just dark themes, but also density modes! Notice how the right most one is very compact compared to say the middle or left.

>>61720332
anybody else hate the sqaure tabs?

>>61731680
>How to take a screenshot

>>61731747
It looks a lot better than using a 3rd party theme like darkfox.

I'll have to tweak around with it a bit but I'm pretty excited.

>>61731795
No, I'm not a chromefag

>Cнимoк.png
cyka blyat

>>61731777
That's pretty awesome!
I really like it personally.

>>61731795
Why?
They reduce space taken up, and allow more precise accuracy with a mouse.

>>61731795
no. used to have tabmix plus for the square tabs, i'm glad they're default now. less wasted screen realestate is always welcomed

>>61731827
>inb4 install edge
>>>/v/

>>61731857
Install firefox 57, use the compact theme or classic theme restorer :^)

>>61731846
This.

Function over form is true beauty.

File: 2017-08-04 20_32_13.jpg (16KB, 1207x610px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 1207x610px

is there any way to change the newtab page? i want it dark. already tried the settings in about:config

>>61731880
Let's see your browser/OS

>inb4 windows+edge
>using proprietary software while browsing /g/

>>61731899
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/hide-or-display-sites-new-tab-page

You can also change the color to #000000 (hex for black)

>>61731957
>he doesnt want a open standard for web extensions that arent just limited to a single browser
>he wants non-sandboxed XUL

back to your botnet
>>>/g/oogle

File: 2017-08-04 20_39_09.jpg (16KB, 465x504px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 465x504px

>>61731953
thanks, but sadly the blank page option is gone in nightly (i should have mentioned i'm not on stable).

how could i change the color? i'm sure there's a css file i can edit SOMEWHERE, i just don't know where.

>>61720332
Pleasantly surprised, OP.

I prefer minimal addons, and it was a easy transition.
Glad I was willing to try nightly out.

>>61732023
Does this work?
I saw it suggested on reddit for nightly.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/new-tab-tools/

File: Capture.png (1MB, 1771x785px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1771x785px

>>61731766

>>61731925
What phone do you use, anon?

What the fuck is wrong with those UI decorations? Is that the power of Windo'unos?

>>61732125
Lineage/gapps-less

File: 2017-08-04 20_46_01.jpg (18KB, 1334x682px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 1334x682px

>>61732101
i just found a solution without having to use an addon, thanks anyway.

if anyone is interested
https://superuser.com/questions/1235975/change-firefox-new-tab-background

i chose the third solution with the userContent.css, now it's black and doesn't hurt my eyes anymore. great!

Does it finally integrate the title bar and the tabs bar in linux?

File: Untitled.png (295KB, 859x454px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 859x454px

>>61720332
It's fast as fuck

>>61732108
>windows

That doesn't prove anything.
Let's see a web based test with actual information and comparison of browsers.

>>61732174
Thanks for the tip!

I'll be rolling out the update after work tonight so that will come in handy.

I can't live without my dark theme.

>>61720332
Can confirm very snappy on Arch!

>>61732263
AUR or binary?

Is there a way to have both regular stable Firefox and Nightly installed on Arch?

If I try to install both, opening Nightly just opens regular FF.

>using sjw fox
>2016+1

>>61732298
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-nightly/

File: 2017-08-04 20_49_52.jpg (327KB, 1848x918px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 1848x918px

>>61732108
what kind of processor do you have? this is with an i56600koc, 1080p. the video was obviously playing at the moment.

do you have hardware acceleration on or off?

>>61732193
windows should not be the issue here, looks more like ancient hardware to me.

File: firefox.png (1MB, 1579x875px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1579x875px

>>61732108
>>61732193
Watching TI on twitch in chromium.

>>61732302
look into a chrooted system
you will need to have seperate libraries for each browser so they dont conflict

lazy?
appimage/snappacks/flatpaks or a new age package manager

>>61732332

Is anyone using always-nightly?

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-always-nightly/

>>61732319
>2016+1
>still suggesting people #beBrave
>still suggesting people #beEdgy

>>61732398
Very interesting anon.
Wasn't even aware of it!

Thanks for the link,
I'm going to try it out.

>>61732398
Rolling release browser!

:D

File: jimmy nu-tron 4.jpg (57KB, 598x581px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 598x581px

post >yfw all of your addons are marked as LEGACY

File: Screenshot from 2017-08-04 15-03-45.png (16KB, 270x231px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 270x231px

>>61732439
Seemed like a better solution for constant updates. I just installed the package myself and FF says I'm on 57.0a1 so everything seems to be good.
I also have my first problem with Nightly, pic related always hides my extensions when I make my windows smaller. Is there any way to disable it?

File: 1501873694.png (126KB, 647x294px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 647x294px

What do i gain if i update? It's not broken or anything.

File: screenshot.png (183KB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1440x900px

>>61731925
hmmmmm?

File: spray can high drug.jpg (95KB, 600x646px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 600x646px

>>61732555
speed
security
soon-to-be broken addons

File: dude drugs lmao.jpg (45KB, 600x660px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 600x660px

>>61732555
anyway, even if you don't like updating (you should always update), why the fuck are you using an outdated version of nightly instead of the stable v50 release?

>>61732632
If it's not broken don't fix it. I'm actually amazed how stable it is and don't remember the last time it crashed.

>>61732666
it's worth updating this time, unless you have some legacy addons you heavily rely on. but even then, i'd say just adapt. it's so fast now!

>>61727571
Yup, this.

>>61727478
Also, use Violentmonkey instead of Tampermonkey cuz the former is open-source.

>>61732590
>SumatraPDF
My man!

Why are firefox fans obsessed with moving goalposts? In numerous images now your shitty browser got btfo by every single other browser in existence.

Just give it up, sjws killed your favorite browser.

should i upgrade from vivaldi? im getting some real nice fonts on this and everything is sleek so im a bit hesitant in trying out nightly

>>61732590
You're gonna like the new baked-in compact density UI option.

>>61732163
>use an OS that comes with goog phonecalling built in on top of undocumented shit
>but i wont install google apps XD Im a privacy oriented techie!!!

File: Average_Imbecile_2017.jpg (48KB, 428x285px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 428x285px

>>61720374
>Anno Domini 2017
>willingly and knowingly installing and using any software or hardware even remotely associated with Alphabet/Google

Do you even prepare your anus?

>>61734036
>>willingly and knowingly installing and using any software or hardware even remotely associated with Alphabet/Google
So why do people use Firefox?

File: 1343198209835.jpg (19KB, 330x411px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 330x411px

To be honest, I gave up web browsers a long time ago. I just use Chrome now. Most websites are designed with Chrome or Safari in mind, the syncing "just works" without duplicating hundreds of bookmarks or deleting them spontaneously, RAM stopped being an issue for me a while ago, and at this point the majority of people writing extensions are doing so for Chrome's model and not Firefox's.

I'm glad Firefox is around to provide an alternative, but frankly, it's just not for me anymore.

>>61734095
>the majority of people writing extensions are doing so for Chrome's model and not Firefox's
nightly is dropping xul and switching to webextensions, this means chrome extensions will work in firefox.

File: beheading_when_.jpg (279KB, 1261x797px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1261x797px

>>61733693
>sjws killed your favorite browser.
Yes

>>61734095
>I'm glad Firefox is around to provide an alternative, but frankly, it's just not for me anymore
Yes

I've used Firefox since the beta way back in around 1999-2000, my first two years of med school. I was using Netscape Navigator at the time but its development and improvement had already become somewhat stagnant. Firefox was a beta thing being passed around from one geek to another, and it eventually made its way to my geeky pc. I've used Firefox proudly ever since, and I've become very comfortable with tinkering under its hood. I'm sad to say that Firefox is bloated now. It feels bloated. It no longer feels fast and quick. And me, who tinkers under the hood, I find so much more nonsense that I have to turn off to maintain some privacy and speed. It's like this browser is trying to kill itself off.

Anyway, I'm back to those late 90's early 2000's, looking for the next new browser to emerge. I've been experimenting with every browser I can find, hoping to finally drop Firefox once and for all.

>>61720332
I still don't really like it, or care.

>>61734095
>RAM stopped being an issue for me a while ago
Luckily for you with e10 firefox uses just as much ram as chrome now :^)

File: vodka.jpg (128KB, 515x585px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 515x585px

>>61720377
Maybe he spent all his money on vodka and krokodil injections

>>61727688
Is that Lubuntu?

Does nightly have telemetry ?

>>61729948
This
Love Waterfox, never going to switch

File: 1485167737633.png (271KB, 843x947px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 843x947px

>>61720332
>New firefox is pretty good.
Yeah, it's fucking awesome. It liberated me from all the pesky addons that I've been using for a decade.

Seriosuly, fuck SJWzilla, fuck those libtard shitheads, fuck those feminists, fuck those "feed little african girls".

Never again.

I'm off to Brave and will never come back.

>>61736129
Good goy.
Remember to always #BeBrave

>>61736129
and nothing of value was lost. i'm glad mozilla is developing the future instead of listening to autists like you. keep crying bitchboi.

>>61720332
yep, like the new design and it's noticeably faster. good shit mozilla.

Cool, Looking forward to Waterfox updating

File: 1489227109689.png (42KB, 806x289px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 806x289px

>>61736414
>Good goy
Enjoy that SJW propaganda, dumb goy.

>waterfox still tests slightly faster

hmm.

>>61736484
>Enjoy that SJW propaganda
There is no such thing.
>pic
They just keep an optional checkbox to enable Telemetry. Are you trying to deceive someone into thinking otherwise, shill?

>>61736548
>They just keep an optional checkbox to enable Telemetry
Yeah and toggling telemetry off in windows actually turns it all off!
You fucking delusional faggot.

>>61736560
>in windows
Why would someone in his right mind use (((windows))) anyway?

I'm very happy with Nightly 57 now. It's fast as hell and I was able to replace all addons so far.

https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/gesturefy/ is pretty nice but I hope I can open my bookmarks with it in the future.

File: 1492414097276.jpg (328KB, 1342x1411px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 1342x1411px

>>61736548
>There is no such thing.
hah!

every time you open a new tab, there's a fucking progressive/anti-white/feminist/anti-freedom message.

Is there an alternative to the "Dark background White text" addon, that works properly? I cannot live with all fucking webpages full of white shit, holy crap.

>>61736579
truly illiterate bravo

>>61736656
>pictures featuring black people are progressive/anti-white/feminist/anti-freedom messages
Get back to >>>/s/tormfront for I see that /pol/ might too normal for your autismo.

>>61736671
yes, it's called css

google global dark css or something. or make your own

>>61732345
>>61732359

You're probably watching it with vp9.

Set media.benchmark.vp9.fps to 0 in about:config, then restart firefox. It'll put you back to h264 on youtube. Should use a lot less gpu if you're using a discrete card that doesn't have vp9 decoding.

>>61736760
>firefox is shit at handling standards
who would have known????

>>61736780

To be fair, vp9 is relatively new and not everyone has hardware to decode.

>>61736709
go fuck yourself you loq IQ piece of shit.

File: this is you.jpg (43KB, 570x587px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 570x587px

>>61736831
>loq IQ
what did you mean by this

firefox nightly, epic or brave? or is there another choice for privacy. cvurrently using vivaldi but wanna escape the botnet

>>61736831
>muh IQ
Literally white beta males version of blacks' "muh dick"
So I guess that Jews are your 'master race' then, since they have the largest IQ of all groups? :^)

>>61736866
go back to sucking BBC. that's all you're good for really.

>>61736720
You clearly haven't used the addon, it has way more options than just adding a black custom css theme to pages.

Impossible switching to me if there's not an addon like this.

tried to download on xp but I got ESR instead :/

>>61736918
You can go back to fapping to 'based traps' like Blaire White and shitposting on 4chan 16 hours a day, while dreaming how nice would it be to have a white wife who loves you plus several white children with her, at the same time a tear runs down your cheek :^)

>>61736940
That happens on Vista as well.

>>61736484
Good thing I'm on Firefox 52 ESR.

What about Vivaldi?

File: mpv_2017-08-05_04-16-01.png (41KB, 1806x934px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 1806x934px

sheeeeit it works

but now I'm getting these errors.. did I compile it wrong? I put the d3dcompiler.dll in my mpv folder. Or do I have to put it into the folder that is used for building mpv?

Error parsing option opengl-backend (option parameter could not be parsed)
C:\Users\user\AppData\Roaming/mpv/config:19: setting option opengl-backend='angle' failed.
Error parsing option script-opts (option not found)
C:\Users\user\AppData\Roaming/mpv/config:88: setting option script-opts='osc-layout=bottombar,osc-minmousemove=2,osc-box
alpha=130,osc-scalewindowed=1.0,osc-scalefullscreen=1.0,osc-hidetimeout=2000,osc-seekbarstyle=bar,osc-minmousemove=0,osc
-vidscale=yes' failed.

>>61720332
the SJWS won its fast as hell and sleek. I havent used firefox for about 3-4 years but thats over now just need to remove the system titlebar that is enabled by default

>>61731899

decompile omni.ja and edit the files in the newtab directory

File: purty.png (305KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 1920x1080px

clean burning propane.

I switched to Chromium years ago but I just checked Firefox 57 and it seems like Mozilla finally got their shit together. Might consider switching when 57 reaches stable.

>>61736866
wrong, even if you mean (((white))) ashkenazi jews

Can I really not set a global zoom level in firefox? What the hell

File: bpwxcVo.png (97KB, 2456x204px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 2456x204px

>>61729410
why isn't the back nice like picrelated? why is it flat?

>>61731550
>>61731571
he doesn't need nigtly to use the compact default themes, they were included in 54 or something

>>61731795
kinda but they look cleaner because no antialiasing is needed

>>61739833
>the back
button

is it nice and oval (shaded) in windows but flat in linux :( ?

>>61738660
https://support.mozilla.org/bg/questions/1125554
kinda

>no more vimperator or pentadactyl
I'm actually sad about this

File: 1483354333049.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

soooooooooooooo FAST BOYS. SO GOOD

>>61734510

Same here, waiting for something, anything.

>fast as fuck
>new interface is nice
>new logo is nice
I like it.

>>61720332
give me back my addons

File: 000000000000.png (94KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1920x1080px

It's beautiful.

>>61736129
christ you have a ton of useless shit

>>61720332
Recently switched from chrome to firefox nightly. It's really pretty nice. Feels nice using a browser not from google when I'm already using gmail, youtube, google search and Android...

File: fc137b1534d9f16acd85edf4075a5353.jpg (26KB, 428x368px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 428x368px

>install it
>crashes before loading the welcome page

>>61731046
you could say, it got blacked

>>61741464
>nightly software is unstable
woah

>>61741156
Back to /r/eddit

File: Untitled.png (396KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 1600x900px

i would use firefox nightly, but wtf is this shit

>>61738531
Nice delusion, stormweenie

>>61741464
why is a nightly development version unstable????
damn sjw cucks

>>61727688
My nigga

File: 001.png (111KB, 749x568px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 749x568px

Comfy as fuck

I disabled smooth scrolling but there's still a "smooth" scrolling animation, how can I disable it completely?

FF can suck my ass.

I've used it religiously for the past 7-8 years, but recently completely dropped it.

I can literally have chrome up, log into facebook, check email, play a game of chess, etc. before FF opens up. And when it does, it's not going to be fun man.

It is the modern equiv to IE.

File: 1236482406425.jpg (52KB, 184x181px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 184x181px

Every discussion about Fx 57 people keep spamming how fast it is. But how will a slight speedup matter if you're also going to slow down the user?
I believe that computers are here to do work for us. The WebExtension API causes a serious regression in terms of how the computer can optimize the time I spend using it.
On top of that people have made questionable decisions in the past and used "an extension could revert this" as part of the justification. I'm fine with them either doing things correctly or letting me fix it. But now that has been taken away.

I don't use software that fights against me, even if it would make web pages load instantaneously.

>>61742369
Just go to options and disable/enable multi processing. The same happened to me.

>>61744224
Tell us how Firefox 57 is slowing you down.

File: 165694b97cbe9fd0108258bdf74d182e.jpg (194KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1920x1080px

Does the latest Nightly (57.0a1) disable addons? Please tell me it ain't so.

Nightly has been great for me personally.

>>61744396
Now I have to manually edit my cookies to visit sadpanda.

>>61744475
It's enabling a web standard for browser addons ie webextensions.

They will be portable between opera and chrome and sandboxed.

This will allow more eyes on projects and reduce development time.

>>61744554
All extensions still work in Nightly.
Also https://github.com/haruhichan/exhentai-plugins/pull/6

File: firefox.56.startup.tabs.png (39KB, 958x597px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 958x597px

>>61743595
Nice bait.
>slow startup
>nightly
pic related
>"facebook"
>"chrome"

Just leave.

>>61744584
Thanks for the forgiving reply even though I'd obviously not read anything in the thread prior.

I hope this means userstyles for Brave, because currently it's all I use Firefox for (besides screenshotting webpages), and the userstyles are currently broken since this update. I can enable it in addons, but it turns youtube purple (should be black), and soundcloud seems to not change at all...

>>61744619
Not sure personally.

If Brave adopted the webextension protocol too it should have support.

>>61727478
Greasemonkey broke but violentmonkey works fine, try it it fixed it.

>>61744649
Sorry to use your post for a non sequitur like this, but a while ago I read that Stylish (the addon that enables userstyles) sold out and sells your private data, or something now or will soon:

https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/thread/58317363

So apparently (according to the thread) you're supposed to use this or similar to use userstyles:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/stylrrr/

But I both forgot and was too lazy, so if they're harvesting info right now I've been giving it to them for free for I dunno how long. Just wanted to spread awareness for anyone else in the same boat as me.

>>61743420
Are you using nightly?

If you go to the firefox nightly wiki they just added more scrolling features and options.

You should be able to configure it how you want.

>>61722851

Picture.png really? Best you could come up with?

>>61744649
Brave is literally Chrome, why would they ever try to adopt webextension? You faggots think just because it has a new logo and a bloated custom UI slapped on top that it's not still literally actually Chrome underneath. Vivaldi is the same.

>>61744722
? he's quoting someone else's filename

>>61744730
You're just not Brave enough faggot.

File: Untitled.png (9KB, 288x394px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 288x394px

>>61740590
There's still the "overflow" menu which I believe still has all of the options of grid menu from australis, only difference is that it's a 1D vertical list now rather than 2D grid.

A fixed menu layout allows you to memorize the layout of the menu so you can find the options faster. That's probably why they went back to a fixed layout as standard

File: asd.png (19KB, 633x309px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 633x309px

t-they will fix ublock, right?

>>61744819
Already fixed, senpai.
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/releases

>>61744819
fucking redditfags reeeeeeeee......

>>61735017
and it's still unresponsible even after the e10 update

>>61744276
Thanks anon. I will try it.

File: StatCounter-browser-ww-monthly-200901-201707[1].png (277KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 1280x720px

>>61736432
>i'm glad mozilla is developing the future
yes they're exactly doing what people want, that's why they're going down real fast

>>61734510
>I've been experimenting with every browser I can find, hoping to finally drop Firefox once and for all.
I'm in the same boat, but have come to the sad realisation that Firefox is the best we've got right now.

>>61744957
I'm more upset about how much Safari has gained. Safari is the new IE, never does ANYTHING standard like all the other fucking browsers.

>>61744957
>Muh marketshare
IE6 sure was pretty great, right?

56 will apparently be the last version I ever use.

So what did they replace slave master with?

>>61744985
even i changed from firefox around a year ago because it was slow, crashed all the time and every new update broke addons, now they want to get rid of ALL good addons
it's pretty sad how they do everything they can to ruin this browser, and i've been using it since version 3

File: 1501014937958.gif (2MB, 400x372px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x372px

>>61720332
I already switched to Waterfox. I fucking hate SJW cunts.

>>61720332
Does nightly now force you to use webextensions? What about firefox beta?

Is there a webextension for vertical tabs that isn't shit?
The regular tabs can't be hidden without manually tweaking a CSS file.
Even then the sidebar that's apparently the only way to display vertical tabs always starts closed.
Even after manually opening the sidebar it doesn't remember that I had tabs, not bookmarks in it last time.

Then after manually switching it to display tabs they don't even use up the entire height of the window. There's this giant header on the sidebar itself that just says "Tabs" and has a close button that I'll never use.
It also displays below the navigation bar. Great, let's give the address bar an extra 170px when it has hundreds of pixels it uses for nothing.
Want to open a bookmark or history sidebar and drag stuff between it and the tabs? Fuck you you can't even have two sidebars open at once.

I haven't even mentioned how the tabs themselves are only like a shell of the real ones, with fake menus and functionality that I use daily just gone.

>>61736656
Niggerfox.

>>61745092
>Does nightly now force you to use webextensions?
No. It flags addons that aren't going to be compatible in the future but you can still use them for now.

>>61744584
Forgive my ignorance but this sounds like a good change to me. Am I wrong (I probably am)?

>>61745241
Overall it's an improvement but it has a few problems right now at least. Currently the APIs that are exposed to addon developers aren't completed yet so there may be functionality missing that some addons may need. It's also likely that some addons will just never be supported in their current form because what they require isn't justifiable for Mozilla to support. These addons will either be dropped or they'll have to be re-imagined in another form that isn't as extensive.

>>61735664
yes

>>61720332
> throw out everything that was good in Firefox
> eat just as much memory as Chrome
> still be slower quite a bit
> WOW ITS THE FUTURE

Fuck off.
This is no longer Firefox but some fucking abomination. Use Chromium, Chrome, SRWare Iron, Comodo Dragon, Edge, Opera, Vivaldi or even fucking Internet Explorer.

>>61744618
Source on this?

>>61745241
It's very good for the future of open standards.

>>61744276
it did not help

>>61745505
>suggesting chromium/chrome/vivaldi/edge/ie

proprietary trash and literal botnets

FUCK OFF SHILL

File: 1495221489356.jpg (62KB, 960x954px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 960x954px

>>61720374
>>61729965
>>61731642
>>61736129
>switching to pajeet browser

>>61745514
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOAi7CZsi0g

>>61720332
>Online IDE
You are too dumb for Rust, give up

File: 1499839747841.jpg (35KB, 570x374px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 570x374px

>>61745591
>that intro
true autism

File: brave.jpg (58KB, 700x400px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 700x400px

WE ARE /BRAVE/

File: 50.jpg (66KB, 306x306px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 306x306px

firefox is saved. v57 is the best thing that happened to it since v3

>>61745505
mte
if you're going to be as bloated as chrome, might as well use a browser like opera or vivaldi which actually offer features in exchange for that resource use

File: pajeet.jpg (8KB, 276x270px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 276x270px

>>61745648
YOU ARE /PAJEET/

>>61745638
>Implying we aren't all autistic spergs.

Also that guy isn't the original poster.
He got it off slashdot.

>>61745666
Nice repeating digits.
Firefox was neat, lean and ram-friendly until this new "e17" shit hit. It was eating like 600mb ram? Now it's eating 1.5-3+gb easily. And it's slow as fuck. And there are no addons anymore.

So what is the point?
The tl;dr of my post: Just use anything instead of Firefox really. Anything is better, even fucking Internet Explorer.

>>61745697
I wasn't calling the poster autistic, I was calling the video author autistic.

>>61745666
Vivaldi is proprietary....
Opera is a neutered chrome clone.

Even Chromium calls home and redirects traffic.

Firefox is all we have for a open source alternitive.

>>61745648
this is the shittiest idea/browser ever fucking made.
> hurr durr evil jew advertisers don't give them money
> GIVE US YOUR FUCKING MONEY INSTEAD

Wow, such a great idea.
I also never felt better seeing fucking ads AND paying for browsing.
What the fuck?!

>>61745706
I'll give you that.
Pretty sure that guy was troll posting the video.

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/17/07/22/0236233/the-new-firefox-and-ridiculous-numbers-of-tabs

http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/07/firefox-55-quantum-flow-tabs

>>61745648
Dude, just stop.
You look like a idiot.

>>61745698
I don't know what they were thinking. How could they possibly not understand what the fuck their strengths are? "Privacy" "For the People", and yet there's telemetry out the ass, limited extension support because of half-assed implementation, a resource hog because devs @ moz can't into design, unnecessary features while cutting out ones users have enjoyed for years, and there's zero design differentiation from any of the chrome clones.
Utter cancer, and I can't believe it's being shilled so hard here on /g/. Truly is /g/ - Consumers & Shilling nowadays.

>>61745737
>Even Chromium calls home and redirects traffic.
>Firefox is all we have for a open source alternitive.
So does FF you shill. Even worse, they take money from Google.

chromium is better in every possible way. this trash is not needed at all

>>61745698
>"1.5-3+gb"
what kind of larping bs is this?

im using a rpi on nightly with over 30 tabs and its under 200MB total including my OS

at least make your lies believable so people actually think you are using the software

fucking shills

>>61745811
The difference is firefox informs you and you actually can disable it without recompilation.

>>61745823
Chromium still has binary blobs.
Why do you think there is a ungoogled project?

>>61745888
for redditors who think they need to browse facebook "secretly"

>>61736129
Glad they're ignoring people like you. We'd be stuck on single process forever. Move over and let the multiprocess devs take over - you can have your shitty Brave browser.

>>61745905
the ungoogled project is actually very intensive work.

its no joke at all.

https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium

the down side is this all relys on 12 contributors and they just changed the license from gplv3 to bsd3 essentially killing their project and not allowing it to be shipped with linux natively

>>61736560
>Windows
>Ever

Welp.

>>61745888
>The difference is firefox informs you and you actually can disable it without recompilation.
LOL
firecucks actually believe this

>>61745938
This.

We also wouldnt have sandboxed tabs, containerized profiles, and improved graphic rendering.

>>61745945
ungoogled uses very old version. i will use nik's chromium build forever

>>61745956
They do inform you.
They even show you how to disable it in the blog and wiki.

Everything can be disable in about:config without recompiling.

The same cant be said for chromium.
Feel free to use a packet trace brainlett.

>>61745945
I recently stopped using firefox (and waterfox) after about 15 years now. it has become wayy too laggy to be practical. stuck with chromium, I mainly just miss Roomy Bookmarks Toolbar and the bookmarks sidebar but thats it

>>61745975
It's also a student project consisting of a small team.
Don't expect continued development after graduation.

So what's the general concensus? Firefox>all other browsers now? Does this mean I should switch back to it from Chrome?

>>61746025
If you dont use any extensions why not use nightly?

It's certainly not "laggy" like you're implying.

Also I use Linux I prefer software that can be natively shipped.

>>61746052
don't trust shills. any firefox is a horrible mess

>>61746052
It's only a issue if the botnet and monopoly bothers you.

A lot of people here use windows or mac despite the /g/ mascot so don't expect much foss advocacy.

>>61746058
are you kidding? I had to use at least 10 extensions on FF/WF. even after disabling them, still frequent lockups, laggy, especially with video play.

>>61746065
>>61746052
don't trust shills. any chrome is a horrible mess

>>61746065
t. chrome shill

You probably use Windows 10 too.

>>61746065
>>61746089
don't trust shills. any opera is a horrible mess.

>>61746085
Care to take a video on nightly as proof?

>>61746065
>>61746089
But there's shills on both sides idk who to believe...
>>61746078
>botnet
Doesn't really bother me since I'm not doing anything illegal yet but I want to be like you cool kids who use extensions and addons and stuff. Basically I want to internet properly and optimize my laptop

>>61746098
>>61746065
>>61746078
>>61746085
>>61746089
>>61746096
>>61746098
>>61746113
don't trust shills. any webkit is a horrible mess.

>>61746122
try fireshit yourself and see

>>61746052
meh if you already are a slave to the microsoft botnet you dont really care anymore

i have made my compromises for comfy gayums and chrome is fine for me

>>61746131
and see what?
>>61746144
what do you mean?

>>61746113
nope. i don't care.
already wasted time with lagfox and posting about fagfox. not going to make a video for you either.

>>61746052
When did /g/ get this defeatist attitude?
I thought you guys were the literal Foss autistists..

I need to get out of here.

>>61746182
see that is uses even more ram than chrome, see those disgusting fonts and other shit

>>61746190
Get wrecked liar. ;)

>ree install chrome reee

>>61746198
>citation needed
>fonts
you can change them...

you guys really are running out of things to nitpick huh?

>>61746198
>more RAM than Chrome

Holy shit, shills

>>61746213
jesus christ you are a faggot. i don't even WANT to install chrome, but I have no choice and im not installing ching chongpera either

>>61746197
I just got a laptop in years dude, I never browsed this board until now. I just want to fit in ;_;
>>61746198
proof?

>>61746238
i tried it yesterday: chromium with 6 extensions playing 60fps video - 2.2gb ram, nigtly with 0(!) extensions playing the same video - 2.4gb ram

>>61746249
/g/ is now /v/
trying to fit in means being a chrome shill using windows 10/android playstore and using gmail

if you want to be different and the minority of /g/ you install lineage+fdroid /linux/firefox and host your own email

all they do is shit talk about what gpu works better for gaming and thats about it

>>61746277
I dont play video games so...

its not that i want to be different i just want to be anonymous

guess the wiki thats stickied here will be better help than you guys tbqh. thanks and bye!

When is it going to be released for the non nightly users?

File: FF.png (48KB, 673x374px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 673x374px

New logo? Looks nice.

>>61746264
yeah but we want to see a 3rd party website post results from a well regulated test

you have bias as do we all and you could have bad hardware codecs or you are spoofing results

never trust just a screenshot you need it to be verified by multiple people or from a trust 3rd party

otherwise you are just blowing smoke and by denying to create video evidence you are increasing that doubt that you are telling the truth

>>61746314
>>61746001

>>61746315
ok, everybody make their own decisions. i just can't go back to firefox despite using it for many years until 2015

>>61746308
>be anon
the majority of people here will call you a ped for such actions

"nothing to hide" is another giant argument used here by gamers

if you take it seriously you should look at linux communities and projects

>>61746314
A E S T H E T I X

>>61746315
imagine being this dedicated to proving the new firefox is "better"

>>61731066
The green color doesn't fit the black address bar tho.

>>61746398
>he wants to pretend that /g/ doesnt fake results to shit on others
>he pretends /g/ doesnt lie out their ass hopinng no one will call their bullshit

sure thing bud

File: america-freedom-to-fascism-original.jpg (256KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1000x1500px

>>61746122
>botnet doesn't really bother me since I'm not doing anything illegal

Let me ask you a few direct questions, friend. You do know that everything you do on the internet is forever, right? How sure are you that what you do and have already done won't be deemed illegal in the future? How do you know that what you do and have done won't become public information and considered a liability by your future employer or loan officer? Are you willing to gamble your one and only life on the quality and permanence of the federal government and the laws of the land?

I'll leave you with this thought — "If you aren't doing anything wrong, you have nothing to hide." is the loudest and clearest indication of a trap set by an authoritarian state planning to expand its legal authority over the citizenry. Caveat emptor, my friend.

>>61746426
are you new?
that green color signifies TLS...

>>61746429
my statement still stands. how fucking spooked are you about this and why??

Why would you willingly run an unsafe browser?

>>61746471
Yeah, but it's dark green + black isn't a good contrast.
Light green / blue / orange would be better.

>>61746494
>spooked?
You haven't provided anything to be "spooked" about shill.

Nice try though. ;)
You personally sound spooked by firefox considering you don't use it but you need to post here!

If you didn't care you wouldn't waste your time in this thread.

Stay spooked.

>>61746498
I agree.
Don't use stable update to Nightly to stay secure and sandboxed.

>>61727688
Seamonkey perform better than equivalent firefox versions. Specially in video related stuff. I get more fps. H H o/

>>61746528
whats it like working for firefox dev team?

MOM THEY ARE INSTALLING FIREFOX AND THEY WONT INSTALL CHROME

REEEEEEEEEEEE
STOP LIKING WHAT I DONT LIKE
REEEEEEEEEEEE

>creates same thread tomorrow

>>61746586
If anyone is spooked here, it's you.

FF 57 is fast as fuck and will only get faster, on top of beating Chrome with quality addons.

You're shitting on the addon problem now, but you know that soon, it won't be a problem.

And you're scared. You're terrified.

>>>61746586
What's it like being a dumb nigger?
>>>/x/

>>61746585
cool story bro.
care to provide evidence?

>>61731571
>>61731604
After disabling colorific and some other color related plugins the option for the native dark theme appeared for me

Its fucking cash. Just updated from the stable branch and I think I'll stay on nightly until something fucks up. The updated UI is slick and the CSS grid inspector is a nice. Pretty soon I'll never need to use bootstrap cancer ever again

>>61746604
okay you win
downloading FF 57 right now yay what extension do install to suck your cock

>>61745872
> larping bullshit
Nigga of course if you have no ram it will try to run on your shitty hardware, big news Sherlock. Try running it on a modern desktop.

I am not even fucking lying.
1) Get a normal desktop. No, not a fucking potato that the chinks sell for 10$.
2) Run Firefox ESR (version ~36 or whatever, something without e17)
3) Run Firefox current (with e17)


Install a few addons, open a few pages, check RAM usage.
> old version: ~500MB with 10-50 tabs, it's fucking A.
> current: ~1200-2000MB, ram usage always doubled but it is usually even a lot more than double

File: fireshit.png (52KB, 612x465px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 612x465px

>this is now the Nightly logo
DISGUSTING

>>61746637
Even if I do provide evidence, it is possible you experience another results. Try Seamonkey and get results by yourself. After all, is that kind of results the more important for anyone. XOXO

>>61746760
Now try 57.

Exactly.

>>61746764
>>61746781
>>61746807

>>61746764
You've posted this multiple times daily.
It's easy to identify you because you name everything the same.

Stop being butthurt and trying to associate something that isn't there.

It's a butane flame.

>>61746784
DELETE THISSSS
REEE

>>61746784
But there are no addons nigga, so what's the fucking point?

>>61747007
>saying nigga
>using addons

If all you care about is addons be happy that webextensions will be plentyful because opera and chrome adopted them too.

>>61747033
Well then, I can just use Chromium/Opera/Vivaldi or even Edge?
Back to point 1. What's the point?
Like I have the same thing over and over again, except it's slower.
SO WHY?!

>>61747056
It's already been mentioned in this thread multiple times and every thread that you make.

Clearly you are a dumb negroid for even suggesting edge and vivaldi so why waste the time to explain?

>>61747092
well, no one explained it (or you forgot to link it?).
so please, link me one from the archive then.
since it's... """always explained""", mr. powerful white power guy.

>>61747105
Stop playing stupid.
Literally every thread including this one.

Chromium = binary blobs
Opera is a weak chrome clone
Vivaldi and Edge are both proprietary

Chromium can't be shipped on linux natively because of this unlike firefox.

You wouldn't know that though because you use windows.

>inb4 ungoogled-chromium which is basically abandonded at this point with 12 commiters who are doing it for a school project

File: Selecció_012.png (72KB, 545x532px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 545x532px

Is there any way to get rid of the extra title bar on linux (KDE) and have CSD?

>>61747301
csd?
I personally just use fullscreen and hotkeys.