Why haven't you bought Intel optane memory yet?

>>60912754
Optane is a retarded fucking name first off

>100/100
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/8157/intel-optane-memory-32gb-2-nvme-ssd-review/index9.html

>>60912754
because it's a waste of a good m.2 slot when i've got a samsung 950pro ssd in there already

>buying from a dead company

File: 1495377075341.jpg (18KB, 720x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 720x400px

>>60912754
Because L2ARC is a faster, cheaper, and more efficient way of doing the same damned thing.

>>60912932
>his mobo doesn't have two m.2 slots

>>60912754
because why would you over an ssd?

>>60912754
>32gb
>cost like 250gb ssd
Ok :)

>>60912754
>dies overnight
Thank you schlomo, i'll get Samsung SSD.

File: beagoodgoy.png (217KB, 979x789px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 979x789px

>be a goodgoy and buy our overpriced flash stick

unavailable on Z170

Not significantly faster in real world workloads while being ridiculously expensive.

because I'm poor af and use all my money on cute panties and stockings

Because Intel made it.

>>60916062
*pats head*
good girl

>>60916109
:3 thank you sir!

>>60912754
Because it's an absolute joke

>>60912754
Cause it requires kaby lake which then forces me to downgrade to winblows 10.

>>60916062
>>60916109
>>60916287
>>>/b/
>>>/soc/
>>>/lgbt/

File: 37b.png (471KB, 1100x1142px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 1100x1142px

>>60912791

>Cons
>Low Capacity
>100%

How can a product have a score indicative of no flaws while listing a flaw in its review?

>>60912754
What's the point

>>60914666
grazus tripsai xddd

>requires lava lake
>expensive
>made by jewtel
And the most important issue: It's literally pointless. You can save money using common SSD than this piece of stupidity.

File: rms (2).png (502KB, 1151x646px) Image search: [Google]

502KB, 1151x646px

>>60912754
because stallman.org told me not to buy intel

>>60914666
>>60917991
kiek čia jūsų sėdi?

>>60914666
kek you don't even know its purpose

I think it's fucking incredible they just did what sandisk was ALREADY doing with their ReadyCache SSDs since forever ago, just with faster SSDs, and then managed to make everyone believe it is some huge fucking innovation.

>>60914666
Lizingu gali gi nusipirkt poorfag'e

Intel sells fast SSD but people who want to take advantage of it have to buy a Rysen CPU with more pci lanes.
What is their master plan?

>>60918659
and what exactly is it purpose?

>>60921698
It's to intelligently speed up HDD performance. If you had a 1TB HDD and an optane drive it would be like having a 1TB SSD.

>>60912754
because this pointless increment to "hybrid" HDD's is fucking dumb. hybrid HDD was stupid, this is worse. just put a fucking nvme m.2 in there and put the important shit on it.

>>60916109
>Girl

>>60921763
lol so sshd? i can already buy that, and i already have that 2tb sshd for 100euros.

>ITT: Retards that don't understand the niche this fills
Because I haven't maxed out my memory capacity and don't need a giant pool of extra OS independent ram

>>60921763
>It's to intelligently speed up HDD performance
It's to act as an extended memory pool with smart caching, it's not just to improve HDD load speed.

It operates below the OS to extend what the OS sees as a memory pool so high RAM usage applications can natively use it as an extension rather than having to do with disk caching tricks themselves.
The main thing you'd want it for is stuff like media production and enormous SQL databases

>>60914666
>>60917991
>>60918578
>>60919215
Holokausto nebuvo bet jis turi būti

>>60921763
That's just the first iteration of XPoint.
Once we have it on DIMMs next year, the storage stack latency disappears, as does the PCIe overhead, and it can become functionally a memory replacement/addendum.
As of now, it's glorified RST hobbled by overhead it was never meant to see. Intel only stuck this together when they realized their NAND controller could be crudely slapped on top of XPoint for caching. Even with the embarrassing implementation, that the 1st Gen of a new kind of memory already exceeds NAND in some ways holds great promise for the future, when it's not working with one arm tied behind its back.

>>60916062
can I see your feminine penis

Essentially makes your HDD into an SSHD, you just need the super expensive cpu to go with it.

>>60912754
it's shit

>>60912754
Because I have an ssd.

>>60912754
I have an SSD (also a PCIe M.2 drive, but that;s beside the point)

>>60921698
cache memory
optane + hdd or optane + ssd

>>60912754
Can't boot from it, shit capacities.

>>60923086
You sync it with your primary drive -> faster booting

>>60912754
> 32GB
> the only viable application for it is HDD I/O cache
It's a joke.

>>60912754

You know a product will fail when the marketing slides from Intel was 1000 times faster speed than NVMe SSD and the final products is slower than NVMe SSD

>>60923688
It can be used as SSD cache as well

>>60912773
> not intel opterone
> now with ryzene 210X performance memory controller

>>60923688
> the only viable application for it is HDD I/O cache
Wrong.
see >>60921867

>>60923840
> It operates below the OS to extend what the OS sees as a memory pool
It's a hardware cache, can you not see it? It's like CacheCade, but from Intel and it only works with expensive Optane and, therefore, dead on arrival.

>>60923914
>It's a hardware cache
In the same way RAM is a hardware cache
The expense between having to program read/write cycles to hard drives (SSD or HDD) is WAY FUCKING HIGHER than letting the OS natively treat it as memory. That's Optanes entire advantage. It's a gigantic pool of slower memory with none of the caching and slowdown issues of writing to disks.

>>60923923
> In the same way RAM is a hardware cache
Bullshit. Learn the difference between a volatile and a non-volatile memory.

>>60923923
> letting the OS natively treat it as memory
It's slower that NVMe and NVMe is several times slower than RAM, what are you talking about? It can work as a swap partition at best.

>>60912754
How does that thing work anyway?
Can you just use it as a normal 32GB drive and install gentoo on it?

File: he knows.jpg (16KB, 183x232px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 183x232px

>>60924032
oy vey, just buy optane, goyim

>>60924004
Has nothing to do with being volatile. That's an independent property. RAM is designed to be a faster cache for data being in use at that time. There is even faster cache on the CPU die, even in multiple stages. It's all the same shit.