God is real, because the universe is a simulation.
In quantum mechanics there is a strange phenomena where particles seem to have no properties until it is measured, then all the properties manifest immediately upon observation.
In software design, there is a concept called a flyweight pattern. Basically, if you want to create an ocean, you don't program 3 billion fish into it. You program a small area, and 1 fish. It's only when the user of the software needs to see the intricate details of a fish does it load those properties, before it is visible, just in time.
This is exactly what quantum mechanics is doing. The properties aren't loaded until a human observes them because designing it that way is infinitely more efficient. Think how many particles there are in the universe.
The speed of light. As you approach the speed of light, time slows down for you, but your perception of it does not. This is happening because the computations of the simulation are not occurring fast enough to update the reality around you. It is literally a bound on the I/O. It is just like in a video game with lag. Your perception of the game's time remains constant, but the game is unable to process the calculations fast enough to make it real.
The existence of other aliens. Drake's equation basically tries to estimate the number of civilisations in the galaxy. Even by using the most conservative numbers, there should be countless numbers of them. Where are they? It's because this is our simulation. You don't put more than one sample in a petri dish if you only want to study 1 sample.
By every definition of our word 'God', God exists, God exists because the universe is a simulation, and there are creators. The most profound part is that...even if you get out of 'this' simulation. The next one is a simulation too. Ad infinitum.
>>2188647
what
how do i become this autistic?
>>2188647
>still believing that the universe exists
>>2188647
tl;dr
Give me the sauce, boss.
>>2188647
Didn't read lol
>>2188647
sauce please
>>2188647
Post on /sci/ please. Not because it's off-topic here, but because it'll really grind their gears.
>>2188976
Swamp Stamp
>>2188647
No, you are only evoking God because you cannot deal with an ontologically incomplete universe
So lemme guess. Despite the fact that the cosmos was here - linearly(if you must), before humans, temporal differential hems it all up nicely for you.
Doesn't the difference between human observation/record and mechanical registry tip you off to the absurdity of observation-dependent reality? I mean, no human has "registered" a photon's behavior. They've only attenuated equipment to do so.
This doesn't include the differences between massive and massless systems. One could argue that photons are more acted upon by, than act upon, their surroundings. Hence their strange apparent behavior in a isolative laboratory setting.
Assuming that particles "need to be efficient" is a priori absurd. Simplest explanations preclude assigning agential characteristics to physical systems.