You guys don't actually believe this shit, do you?
that's a nice chart, thanks
do you not know how a theorem works? it's not about whether it's believed or not. it's about the evidence and validating it. quantum mechanics experiments have thrown so many wrenches into the classical machine we have to interpret interferences with probability. the world isn't simple. if you don't like it go make another theory and test it via experiments. welcome to science and enjoy your stay.
>>8963417
GRW theories aka spontaneous collapse theories are not ruled out by the evidence.
Is it possible to make a real simulation in a computer?(Quantum or anything advanced).What i mean is characters in a simulation must have self consciousness ,but it is not possible since all we see is 1's and 0's(colors) and not real simulation(simulated reality where characters may have consciousness).I want a debate :)
Turing machines can simulate anything. Go fuck yourself.
>>>/x/
>>8963421
Can they simulate a whether or not a program will stop, faggot?
>tfw when you break up with your qtpi gf because she failed trigonometry twice
>tfw you sleep with the girl you're tutoring linear algebra
>>8963356
>tfw you wanna date a girl in your career, shes intelligent, she likes you, but finds another career that match her interest better, she leaves, you dont see her anymore
>>8963356
>tfw too intelligent to get a gf
>>8963308
>small rocks constantly hitting atmosphere with occasional big rock
Jesus take the wheel
>>8963308
You don't need to go to the moon for that, you could strap a rocket to any old rock floating out in the asteroid belt and use it as a megakill weapon.
An International Launch Services Proton rocket with a Breeze M upper stage will deploy the EchoStar 21 communications satellite, formerly known as TerreStar 2. EchoStar 21 will provide mobile broadband services over Europe with an S-band payload for EchoStar Mobile Ltd.
T-10 minutes
Stream is now up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItJpNEZDSUI
>>8963255
Are the Russians are still planning on retiring Proton?
>euro rockets
>no landing attempt
s mh
Spend more billions on telescopes and space stations huh?!
>>8963255
protons seem to have anomalies every ~9-10 flights
i thought all their engines had to be examined because they used the wrong brazing compound
Any good books on modern infrastructure, with a focus on north america and other economic powerhouses around the world? Recently realized I know fucking nothing about this topic despite how important it is.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Brian-Hayes/e/B001IOBQI2
note: you may have to engage your autism and take notes at points
>>8963209
>it doesn't cost 200 dollars
Color me surprised.
engineers are the most annoying people on the fucking planet
>>8963182
People who hate on operating systems just because they have funny names are the most annoying people on the fucking planet
Y'all niggas fucking stupid.
why doesnt the dumb cunt tie her hair up. earth is flat
Why is the stereotype of the scientist/ mathematician so beta in the eye of the public?
Who cares?
>>8963067
Because they tend to have worse communication skills than the average professional (because the average professional doesn't have much more to offer than their communication skills)
High IQ is correlated with depression and other various mental disorders.
The exact reason is probably a complex result of the way the brain functions, but anybody who has ever dealt with or seen a large number of highly intelligent people (ie scientists, engineers, and people in academia) will know from first hand experience that they are more likely to be weirdos than just some random normie. This is just anecdotal evidence, but it's something that pretty much every person has experienced in their life.
Hi /sci/,
2 Days ago I was convinced that humanity has a major cause on the climate change, and that we need to save the world by reducing CO2 emissions. In my opinion, everyone who would not believe in this was a science denying retard. I mean 97% (or 80-90%) of climate scientists do believe in it.
(I would NEVER question their work and believes, as I myself am not an expert on climate change. I am a interested citizen who just wants to understand the whole thing. )
Yesterday, I became interested in the subject: I caught myself making the argument: "i believe it without even having to look at the data". This surely was not scientific at all. So i decided to really convince myself about our cause on the climate change.
I started to read the policy makers summary of the IPCC report. I looked at graphs and arguments of both sides. But somehow it only resulted in more skepticism. I find many arguments, that look sane to me, that debunk the theories of IPCC.
Is it really so clear that we are the cause? Please /sci/, help me to understand the evidence that we are.
Pic related, for example, shows that there were periods with WAY more CO2 than now. And those times also supported life. How can i believe now that CO2 increase will fuck up the world?
I will post more such arguments, and i hope we all together can debunk these ideas. Thanks a lot.
Yes, but what kind of life?
Certainly, a lot of us (humans) and some other species will die if the world keeps heating up. Also, other species might benefit from this.
>>8963018
?Pic related, for example, shows that there were periods with WAY more CO2 than now. And those times also supported life. How can i believe now that CO2 increase will fuck up the world?
The issue is the rate of change, not the total concentration.
>>8962998
OP=faggot^2
1 - -1000 = 1001
math makes no sense
why the fuck is this possible
webm. unrelated
>>8962979
[eqn] 1 - (-1000) \\ = 1 - (-1 \times 1000) \\ = 1 + (-1) \times (-1 \times 1000) \\ 1 + (-1)^2 \times 1000 \\ = 1 + 1 \times 1000 \\ = 1 + 1000 \\ = 1001 [/eqn]Seems intuitive to me senpai.
1 - x = 1001
-x = 1000
x = -1000
>>8962979
explain this in terms of money
HURR DURR, IF I HAVE NEGATIVE 1 MILLION DOLLARS, AND I SUBTRACT ONE IT MAKES ME HAVE ONE MILLION AND 1 DOLLARS DURR HUR RHUR
all right listen up you faggots, if you can do maths then answer me this:
X_0 = 0
X_k = X_k-1 + random(-a, a)
How many times will the sequence on average cross 0 if k goes up to infinity? Or is the amount of sign changes infinite too?
And what about:
Y_0 = 0
Y_k = Y_k-1 + X_k
or
Z_0 = 0
Z_k = Z_k-1 + Y_k
Etc...
(I think it's always infinite but I find these sequences interesting as they are basically integrals of the random function)
The amount of sign changes will be infinite but the average duration between each sign change will also be infinite (this is essentially because 0.5*1 + 0.25*2 + 0.125*4 + ... doesn't converge).
Infinity is weird like that.
How is babby formed?
>>8962907
hilarious and original
When a man really loves a stork he gets birds and bees to make a babby out of baby formula (it's called baby formula because its the formula for making babby)
Is the earth flat because of non-Euclidian geometry?
checkmate /sci/
>>8962872
Locally flat, yes.
the Earth is in the shape of a Reuleaux triangle.
prove me wrong.