Because it requires 0 talent?
>>72540661
well, since there's a lot of garbage from the genre, and it's so closely associated with a lot of negative biases. The few good, to great, to even legendary musicians in the genre often are over looked. Also, it's depressing to a lot of people, which is redundant, since a lot of people love a lot of depressing music, like Joy Division's Closer, or any of Swans music, etc.
This is what normies consider a good concert. You have every right to be smug.
>>72540540
>Israel is first to be touched with America's index finger
hmmmm
>>72540581
really makes you think,
Still a better set of artists than half the shit I see posted in chart threads
>deletes Brian Eno
bitch what
>deletes MGMT
>>72540448
that's the third best track
Starting with an obvious one.
>>72540423
even non-Metallica fans can respect this album
>live album
What's the fucking point?
I don't to hear retards go WOOOOO over the song I want to hear.
This
favourite tracks? favourite album? why? are you guys seeing them on their new tour? i wanna hear it all, lets discuss the beautiful duo known as Beach House
I hope they go more ambient in their next album
>favourite album?
Devotion
>favourite tracks?
Gila
All The Years
Heart of Chambers
Astronaut
D.A.R.L.I.N.G
Silver Soul
Lazuli
Space Song
Somewhere Tonight
>why?
Because they're good
>>72540396
Or shoegaze. Or both. There's no way they'll make another straight-forward pop record. The worst case scenario is there next album being mostly all synthpop with minimal guitar. I have faith though, Depression Cherry and TYLS were both great albums.
Is shilling my bands record literally the only way to get people to listen to it and give it ratings? Before anyone brings it up, yes I do want our music to be heard. I want to tour and have this be a profession/lifestyle.
>>72540329
Shilling here will alienate mu towards your music but potentially get it noticed. I shilled my bands shit here a while ago and a few review sites took notice and reviewed our album.
So it works, if you're willing to make mu hate you.
>>72540345
Eh idk I want /mu/ to like us. Well I know how /mu/ is so that wouldn't be happen fully but I don't really care about capturing the attention of the non-internet music communities. It seems like all the buzz occurs and starts on the internet.
>>72540366
That it does. We ended up with more fame from the internet than IRL since it allows you to be known around the world.
Mu would probably hate it anyway, it hates anything that has come from itself. I recall the same thing happened with car seat headrest too.
any doom-heads online
DUDE
>>72540062
WEED
>>72540072
LMAO
Which album is their best?
>>72539978
Obviously the queen is dead if you say otherwise you are a contrarian
>>72539978
i wanna say none but i kinda have sympathy for u and i wanna give u a tip. stop listening to them faggots b
I only had Strangeways when I first discovered the Smiths so, in a cruel twist of fate, I ended up connecting primarily to the quintessential contrarian Smiths album.
Reminder that this album got 7.5 from Scaruffi and higher score than every Radiohead album
that's the best vektor album
>comparing two cuck bands for nu-males
why
That's easily one of the best thrash metal albums ever. Radiohead have made attempts at the greatest modern alt-rock album, but they have a lot of competition.
I'm drunk and feeling nostalgic tonight. What are some songs from roughly '97 - '03, (with some deviation allowed, of course) that still hold up today. Hidden gems welcome too!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lgs9QUtWc3M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVehcuJXe6I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cbo2n2MzxxE
Michelle Branch >>>> Avril Lavigne
jesus christ almighty this album is shit
shut the door dad UGH
>>72539958
Someone who agrees! Yay!
It's so lost about where it is. It has one foot in boring 60s pop music and another in what is yet to come, and it doesn't balance this very well. It's easy to pick out the safe songs and skip them.
>>72539958
Is that surprising? The Beatles are almost as bad as the gorillas. Might've well have been cartoons.
why would someone create a /mu/ chart without the name of the albums ?!?
Garbage taste echo chamber attention whores
>>72540088
hmmmmm
>>72540113
Really makes you think
What's with all the music from the '80s (or at least, a distinctively large amount of them) sounding really similar? I guess it has to do with the strict, machine-like drum grooves they use, the sequenced bass synths, stuff like that, but why is so much of the music like that? So much of the music from the '80s, including some from the underground, have that distinct "'80s" sound. What makes that music sound that way, and why was that sound so prevalent?
If you don't get what I'm saying, listen to this as a good example (I know it's a kind of experimental pick for an 80s song, but bear with me here):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-_O7nl0Ii0
:--)
>>72539507
I get what you're saying, but imo honestly I think it just has to do with the limited technology available at the time more than anything. The best way to make a catchy tune was to make a dance tune, even back then, and that's how dance songs were written.
I'M THE SCATMAN!
SKIPDOIEOEDPEOEOEODPDPAPAPALADA
>>72539470
IM THE SCATMAN
Why does Gene sound different on this? It sounds like he's doing a Mexican Kermit voice the whole album
Object
Your Party
DC Won't Do You No Good
The Wolfman
Let's Get Divorced
Light Me Up
Woman and Man
All great Ween songs from this era.
It really is the best Ween album, feels like a fun party the whole way through.
No filler tracks like Common Bitch, Laura, Mourning Glory, Candi, Japanese Country, Dancing in the Show Tonite, Ice Castles or Alcan Road.
I love how smug this album is