[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /lit/ - Literature - 1510. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: 1472086318700.jpg (52KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]
1472086318700.jpg
52KB, 850x400px
Do you agree with him /lit/?

I think we need to reinstate Scriptio continua and eliminate all punctuation and lowercase letters, with the exception of some usage of word-breakers. That way people will stop focusing on stupid punctuation usage, and the styles of writing that go along with it, as a paradigm for written substance. People should instead rely only on their words and their usage of them to indicate the points those punctuation-marks and their interpretations cover, by replacing it with a model of natural oral speech.

It may seem like I'm being ironically-archaic, but I'm dead-serious. Punctuation is like lined-paper -- helpful if you're new to writing and is more pleasurable with writing at first, but the more and more you write you notice it gets in your way and restricts you too often.
9 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
We should abolish letters too. Letters are like talking to yourself.
>>
>>9275147
Punctuation as a delimiter for clauses is alright in reading is alright.

The proper use of a comma is to do a slight rest.
>>
>>9275147
down with capitalization too. or make everything capitalized. what the fuck purpose does that shit serve?

File: Tom-Waits-Sebree-e1460679967287.jpg (230KB, 1201x799px) Image search: [Google]
Tom-Waits-Sebree-e1460679967287.jpg
230KB, 1201x799px
Who is the Tom Waits of literature?
9 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>9274981
katherine dunn
>>
there's like 12 of them
>>
McCarthy, but quite specifically Suttree

File: download (51).jpg (6KB, 176x238px) Image search: [Google]
download (51).jpg
6KB, 176x238px
>started reading Seneca's letters after reading pic related

Why does he straw man those who don't agree with him so easily? Seneca seems like a bretty chill reasonable dude, and nietzsche is out here acting like anyone who doesn't agree completely with him is a mong.

What was his fucking problem? I'm also willing to be his critiques of other contemporary philosophers have their problems, albeit it I haven't read to much of his contemporaries
8 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>9274927
>HURRR WAHWAHWHA WHY ISN'T NIETZCHE PERFECTLY REASONABLE ;_;
>What was his fucking problem?
He was one of us
>>
>he fell for the 'will to truth' meme
>>
Of course people far above your level of sophistication all seem pretty cool, nobody is saying that plato or kant are garden variety retards, but ultimately their philosophies and psychologies are not what neetsz is looking for

File: Mrs._Dalloway_cover.jpg (44KB, 213x320px) Image search: [Google]
Mrs._Dalloway_cover.jpg
44KB, 213x320px
I just read this. What did I think of it?
7 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>9274821
Best book you've read this year
>>
My favorite book by a woman
>>
>>9274821
Septimus....

File: IMG_1887.jpg (156KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1887.jpg
156KB, 800x600px
Write something interesting
10 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>9274785
Ryan Adams and Bryan Adams were both born on the 5th of November
>>
I sexually identify as walrus teeth AND YOU SHOULD TOO
>>
>>9274785
"Britney Spears" is an anagram for "Presbyterians"

File: murakami haruki in sweater.jpg (63KB, 496x750px) Image search: [Google]
murakami haruki in sweater.jpg
63KB, 496x750px
>Murakami began to write fiction when he was 29.[18] "Before that", he said, "I didn't write anything. I was just one of those ordinary people. I was running a jazz club, and I didn't create anything at all."[19] He was inspired to write his first novel, Hear the Wind Sing (1979), while watching a baseball game.[20] In 1978, Murakami was in Jingu Stadium watching a game between the Yakult Swallows and the Hiroshima Carp when Dave Hilton, an American, came to bat. According to an oft-repeated story, in the instant that Hilton hit a double, Murakami suddenly realized that he could write a novel.[21]

I thought you had to write every day for thousands of days starting at age 13.
15 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
thats if you want to be good
>>
>Murakami began to write fiction when he was 29

Oh it shows!
>>
writing isn't actually that hard, the hard part is having something interesting to say

File: 1458691997601.gif (1002KB, 250x251px)
1458691997601.gif
1002KB, 250x251px
Can irony be defeated? It seems like anything can be mocked and scoffed at, even the act of being ironic itself.
18 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Irony is just fear + detachment
>>
>>9274669
You're saying people are ironic when they feel apathy?
>>
The gentle cure will be in analysis, where irony is recognized for what it often is: failure to engage. It still attracts hits on worthless review videos for now.

The harsh fix will be when the robots arrive and make a generation of ironists completely useless.

What are some literary equivalents to any of Goya's Black Paintings?
14 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
My diary in poetry. Not even ironically.
>>
>>9274620
>>
>>9274620
Wouldst thou like to live deliciously?

File: 1489967372593.jpg (20KB, 420x418px) Image search: [Google]
1489967372593.jpg
20KB, 420x418px
Why didn't /lit/ tell me that the book of Proverbs was so dank?
6 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
We told you the whole bible except Chronicles and the tanakh other than Genesis was dank.
>>
Isn't one of the big Bible memes "skip everything but Ecclesiates and Proverbs"? I feel that I've seen that posted a fair bit.
>>
File: 1489898436049.jpg (22KB, 419x304px)
1489898436049.jpg
22KB, 419x304px
>>9274617
>adhering to meme advice

File: images (3).jpg (8KB, 179x282px)
images (3).jpg
8KB, 179x282px
hi i make a few obscure lit threads every know and again. post anything that you consider to be less than well known/appreciated and isn't on this list http://pastebin.com/J9dHaQDd. bonus points for anything with lots of adventure or wisdom
24 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
Pistis Sophia
>>
>>9274586
added to list
>>
>>9274579
Sigrid Undset
di Benedetto
JM Synge
Bartol
Tournier

I see all of these underrepresented on /lit/

What did you think?

My thoughts (just finished reading) will follow in the next post.
8 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>9274343
You gotta keep 'em overrated!
It was baaaaad
>>
I suppose the easiest way for me to read Stoner is as a study of human dysfunctionality--of how people are shaped by their circumstances, distorted and distended and disfigured (both physically and mentally), until the most monstrous acts seem to follow almost naturally from what they have become, and how at no point in that process could anything different really have happened; the villains are themselves victims, hurt by the world and by others. Edith grew up in a loveless household; Lomax was cruelly mocked by his peers; Stoner's marriage was doomed by his naivete about love, which stems from his upbringing in a poor farming household during which he attained very little worldly knowledge.

I think there is more than just that; part of the beauty seems to be that any person ought to be able to empathize with each (or at least most) of the characters. For me, I empathize with the wistful inevitability with which Stoner draws away from his parents; I empathize with Lomax's desperate urge to see virtue in a student who shares his own flaws, even if there is none to be found; I empathize with Grace's and Edith's emotional disassociation, caused by a childhood spent around people with little love or care for one another; I even empathize with Walker in some sense, or at least the part of him who knows he's in too deep but struggles to overcome his ego and do the right thing (quit). That isn't to say that Edith's behavior wasn't psychologically destructive for both Stoner and Grace, or to say that Lomax didn't act maliciously--none of this is saying that their environment redeems their sins--but it helps me appreciate that others act as they do often not because they don't understand the consequences or morality of their actions but rather because having experienced what they have there is no other way to act! I suppose even after years of being aware of it I find it difficult to fully rid my thinking of the fundamental attribution error. Just as we (or at least I) ourselves conceive of our past failures as inevitable results of the life which preceded them, so should we realize that the faults of others are not so easy to fix (as some commenters on Stoner seem to believe...) as just beating the right course of action into their heads. By drawing us into these "villains" of the novel, Williams helps to dispel our self-absorption, to see others as we see ourselves.
>>
>>9274358

People also seem to say that the characters in Stoner seem like caricatures. I think this is true to some extent, and that it forms a major weakness of the novel, but I also believe people overstate the case for this. Part of the beauty of Stoner is how it illustrates, so frankly and sincerely, the prejudices and failures and brokenness of normal people. If we looked around us and objectively evaluated what we saw, we would likely see Stoners and Ediths among our parents and relatives, Graces among our childhood friends, Walkers among our classmates and colleagues, Lomaxes among our superiors; and we do already to some extent, to be sure, but there is a certain natural tendency, I think, to optimistically believe one's own life and relations to be better than they are. Were our own lives to be made into novels, I am sure that readers would believe at least some of the characters within to be so absurd, so extravagantly (self-)destructive or cruel or nasty or broken, that they could not really be real people! Williams sees the world as it is; he presents Stoner's life to us so cleanly and honestly that we can walk in his footsteps and see through his eyes, but he presents the external reality of Stoner's world unclouded by the mist of (irrational?) optimism through which we interpret our own existence. To some extent, we aren't horrified by what Stoner experiences; instead we're really horrified by the similarities we intuit between Stoner's world and our own, and what they mean about our lives and the people in them.

File: LOL.jpg (49KB, 640x585px) Image search: [Google]
LOL.jpg
49KB, 640x585px
What do you think of archetypes, /lit/? Inevitable byproducts of the essence of storytelling? Invaluable insights into our collective subconscious? Meaningless patterns found because they are searched for? Give me your thoughts
8 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Useful.
>>
>>9274303

Patterns so broad they can fit anything.
>>
That meme picture follows the Heros journey formula

File: francis_fukuyama.jpg (358KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]
francis_fukuyama.jpg
358KB, 1200x1200px
https://aeon.co/essays/was-francis-fukuyama-the-first-man-to-see-trump-coming

>Since Francis Fukuyama proclaimed ‘The End of History’ 25 years ago, he has been much maligned. His work now seems prophetic.

>Fukuyama might have done a better job of predicting the political turmoil that engulfed Western democracies in 2016 – from Brexit, to Trump, to the Italian Referendum – than anybody else.

>Fukuyama jettisoned Hegel’s implausible metaphysics, as well as Marx’s idea of ‘dialectical materialism’, as the proposed motor of historical synthesis. In their place, he suggested that the modern scientific method coupled with technological advancement, alongside market capitalism as a form of mass information-processing for the allocation of resources, could explain how humanity had successfully managed to develop – haltingly, but definitely – on an upward course of civilisational progress. The catch, however, was that we had now gone as far as it was possible to go. Liberal democratic capitalism was the final stage of Historical synthesis: no less inherently contradictory form of society was possible. So, while liberal democracy was by no means perfect, it was the best we were going to get. Big-H history was over, and we were now living in post-History. That was what Fukuyama meant by his infamous claim that History had ‘ended’.

>Fukuyama combined Nietzsche’s idea of the last man with his own diagnosis of underlying human psychology. His prognosis was that the outlook for post-History Western society was not good. It was possible that the last men at the end of History might sink down into a brutish contentment with material comforts, rather like dogs lying around in the afternoon sun (this was what Kojève predicted). But they might well go the other way. There was every chance that the last men (and women) would be deeply discontented with their historically unprecedented ease and luxury, because it failed to feed megalothymia. If the last men went this way, they would become bored by what Fukuyama called ‘masterless slavery – the life of rational consumption’. The spread of egalitarian values that went along with secular democratic politics would open up spaces of severe resentment – especially, we might now postulate, among those who had lost their traditional places at the top of social hierarchies, and felt cheated of the recognition that they believed they were owed. (Sound familiar?)

>yfw he was right
10 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
Except he rejected and apologized for his ideas in his most recent work, trading them in for a much more fluid system of strengthening and weakening bureaucracies that are either helped or hindered by tribalism or variations on spoils systems.
>>
>>9274725
Is this true?
Because back when i was in college he was kind of taught a lot in both (senior level) political philosophy classes,international relations classes, and business with a foreign clientel focus classes
>>
>>9274294
Fukuyama is a Hack who wrote a literal meme

18 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
File: god.jpg (207KB, 771x1080px) Image search: [Google]
god.jpg
207KB, 771x1080px
>>9274185
>>
File: Herman_Melville.jpg (101KB, 448x672px) Image search: [Google]
Herman_Melville.jpg
101KB, 448x672px
>>9274185
You know it
But let's make it hard mode
One per country
>>
>>9274224
us: melville
brit: shekspear
span: cervant
frans: flaubert (or le temperdu??)
ruse: tolstoy
itali: dent

?

File: 9781607102120_p1_v1_s192x300.jpg (15KB, 192x295px) Image search: [Google]
9781607102120_p1_v1_s192x300.jpg
15KB, 192x295px
Is this an okay version of Homer's texts? The translation is from Samuel Butler.
7 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>9274180
Nope. He doesn't even register on the list. Lattimore > Pope > Fagles
Those are the only ones that matter.
>>
>>9274197
...The /lit/ meme trio for Homer translations is Lattimore, Fagles and Fitzgerald anon.
>>
>>9274212
It may be the meme triumvirate but it's wrong.

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [1500] [1501] [1502] [1503] [1504] [1505] [1506] [1507] [1508] [1509] [1510] [1511] [1512] [1513] [1514] [1515] [1516] [1517] [1518] [1519] [1520] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.