What about communism attracts the biggest cunts? It sounds like an ideology hippies would follow but instead it attracted thugs, often literally.
A violent revolutionary movement ends up attracting sociopaths who are in it for the violence. Same thing happens with Nazism and Islamism.
It attracts frustrated cunts that can't make it in the current system. So they want to get on top by destroying it. They want to become the soviet nomenklatura. They want to piss all over the poor and have the poor worship them as their saviors, from the greedy capitalists who were exploiting them.
Mostly it attracts thugs who want to make it big time by becoming high ranking commie party members
What's his name again?
"Russians called me a Pole, Poles called me a Russian"
Roskolnikovsky
What are some wars where two peoples were diplomatically at each other's throats, a third party slyly steps in, intentionally nips one in the butt for their own gain or amusement, and shit hits the fan with the first two peoples?
Basically like pic related.
Jews
Komenda wars
Basically europeans acting as jews in africa
What was Ernst Roehm's vision for Germany?
What form of socialism did Ernst Roehm want to see in Germany?
Not being a cuck to industrialists and capitalists like Shitler was.
Remember that the SA members primarily came from poor working class houses. They were angry anti-semitic nationalists who hated communists BUT they were also angry working class socialists who hated capitalists. To them, capitalism was inherently Jewish.
Hitler primarily rode to power on the wings of middle class and industrialists like Krupp and Thyssen. They invested heavily in him. When he finally took power there was no place for Rohm and the SA.
>contemporary art is sh-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gN2zcLBr_VM
>>3350945
That song is a masterpiece
>>3350926
>Arguing semantics.
Is this guy Qin Shi Huang of the West? His name literally becomes the emperor title for 2000 years.
>>3350906
>emperor title
>not people claiming their descent as one of caesars and so legitimate
Was it autism?
>Ñeeeeeeeeee!
From hindus to christians to shamanists to confucianists to almost everybody, buddhism seems to trigger them all.
Why is that?
are Turks European?
>>3350645
>are people living in Asia Minor actually European?
no we're not fuck wh*Tes
I'm currently reading Wittgenstein's tractatus and I don't understand what certain signs in combination with other signs mean.
Can someone explain 5.5321 to me.
"Thus, for example, instead of ‘(x): f x⊃ x = a’ we write ‘(∃x). f x .⊃. fa : ∼(∃x, y).f x . f y’."
Specifically what does the colon signify? I've seen it before in the tractatus but only in passages where understanding its meaning didn't seem that important to me so I thought it would suffice to look it up after I'm done with the book.
>>3350328
guys?
find a single, solitary flaw. This is perfection, this js peak performance
>No comfy serf farm to tend to while not having to worry about things
>>3350067
>dysentery
Qt. 13 year old serf purges the pestilence from your anus.
Socialism is an unfair, exclusionary and paradoxical concept. Giving to the homeless is racist. Prove me wrong.
If we divided all the wealth in the world equally it works out at roughly $50k net worth per person
If we divide global gdp equally it's roughly $15k per person per year
I think we can all agree this is not enough to live a comfortable "middle class" lifestyle. Nobody in their right mind would advocate living that way. Therefor there has to be some inequality.
So why help anyone in the West at all? A homeless person in the US is objectively better off than a slum child in Kolkata, so why would you give your change to the homeless and not the child? Just because he is closer to you? I think most of us can agree national borders are arbitrary and ultimately meaningless and not enough justification to help one person over another. So giving to the homeless guy on your block is discrimination against indian and african kids, plain and simple.
Trying to bring about more income equality within Western countries while keeping developing countries poor is sheer entitlement and hypocrisy.
Fight me
>he thinks economics is zero-sum
>>3350005
You don't understand socialism.
>>3350014
fine, replace socialism with "reducing income inequality"
How did a country like Pakistan develop its nuclear weapons?
How did these goatshaggers do it? I've read that the US basically gave them nukes under the Atoms for Peace program, but what I really want to know is if they could have developed into the power they are without US interference
>>3349889
They had some low ranking spy-*cough* 'scientist' infiltrate an organization and steal it.
>but what I really want to know is if they could have developed into the power they are without US interference
USA was against them having it iirc. To give credit where it's due they built a lot of them by themselves by piecing together a lot of documents. They got funding from Saudi Arabia and China to build it.
>>3349960
Okay forget about nuclear weapons, the US gave them a nuclear reactor - so therefore the US did indeed make them a nuclear power.
to continue my point it wasn't due to some great intelligence of Paki scientists that they became such a huge nuclear power.