When is suicide rational?
If you would cause more harm than good by remaining alive.
When you frogpost like a retard
Never. In fact it is the worst crime you can commit, even worse than genocide. Suicide is the destruction of the entire universe.
>tfw I have somewhat moved beyond my edgy atheist phase and am starting to see the beauty in loving Christ
I just need that one last push. I think I want to believe, but can't .
>>2557693
I've been a christian for years now but I occasionally wonder if I actually believe. Having been raised atheist I've always found it hard to believe in dead people coming back to life.
Any Jews here?
Can a humble goy such as me convert and be saved?
>>2557604
We don't do proselytization, sorry goy. You can always join a (((reformation synagogue))) though, hehehe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSqK9HoFpiA&t=7s
get that /pol/ shit out your brain.
>>2557604
You can never be a jew unless your mother is a jew.
did the sumerians invent anime?
>>2557483
yes their gods were waifus and husbandos and their goal in life was to be noticed
They had so many firsts. They walked out if the stone age almost fully formed.
>>2557499
Pretty much. Almost every element you can think of that comprises a civilisation was developed in Sumer.
...FUCK OFF!!
It's not just symbolism you fucking idiots, saying this is symbolism doesn't solve anything, it's just not dealing with the truth, this ARE austronaut and nobidy will convince me otherwise
that looks like someone wearing one of those elaborate headdresses found in south american indian history
>>2557466
It looks nothing like that though
>>2557466
Not OP, but those represent animals.
Is this just decoration or were there actual blue eyed people in pre-Columbian America?
Yes, they're called Chachapoya and they were descendants of Celts who were driven out by the Romans.
>>2558618
[citation needed]
>>2557400
It could be. It's not impossible for similar analogous mutations to exist in two unrelated populations.
Childhood is being upset with Caesar's assassination
Adulthood is realising it made sense.
>make Gauls into Roman citizens, get assassinated a week later
FUCK VERCINGETOREX AND FUCK GALLIC PEOPLE
the senates charges against him were a joke tho
>>2557431
so what
Allright /his/,
next month I will be interviewing a 90+ year old german veteran.
What are some GOOD questions I could ask?
He fought on the eastfront.
He was shot twice.
He was in the HJ as a child.
Don't have more info as of yet.
pic somewhat related. Not him.
How many villages did he burned and how many women he raped
are you gonna suck his dick too
>>2557364
Ask him about the organizational side of things. How did he get his orders, how much of the greater battlefield did he know or was briefed about before going into combat, that kind of thing.
Also, if he was shot twice, ask him about what the standards of returning wounded to combat were.
Thoughts on the BBC documentary '1066 a year to conquer'.
I was able to get 10 minutes in before I quit.
>Harland and his forces constantly called Vikings
>'Danes another force of Vikings conquered England in the 8th century'
>typical mail coithes without any padding or actually being tied on
>calling the 3 claimants warlords and not claimnants or prospective kings
>claiming William had fought for his title since he was 7, despite being content with his regent council often changing
>shitty live action footage which is repeated at least twice in those first 10 minutes
Overall just a documentary for normies
BBC trying to contend with the History channel
>>2557302
>>2557316
its all sensationalist crap
they always have some guy with a masters degree tell you what it was like during a battle
"there was lots of blood and mud"
"there even was screaming and yelling"
>>2557352
But surely if it was a 'for the moment' thing they would have done it last year not this year
So yeah have you watched it or are you AJP Taylor
In the year 2700, who will be the historical figures of our time that people still talk about?
Oh fuck YOU op
Fuck you
>For the purpose of determining what is history, please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago
OR 683 YEARS IN THE FUCKING FUTURE YOU SHIT WEASEL
>>2557305
you have to go back
>>2557305
but this fits under humanities
Is an horse a consul?
Was it Nero who made a horse a consul?
Was it a horse who made Nero consul?
>>2557192
It was Caligula. And he did it to demonstrate how little he respected the position, not because he was a crazy horse fucker or something.
I wish to honor my warrior ancestors by becoming a berserker. How can i do that?
click your heels 3 times and cross your fingers and your toes
Find some churches to pillage.
take PCP
Who's your favourite General, why, what did he do, what did he fuck up?
I'll start:
>Hanibal. He was daring, unpredictable, a brilliant tactician. He pussied out and didn't march on Rome though....what if, what if?
>>2557039
>didn't march on Rome though....what if, what if?
His forces, lacking siege equipment, would be staring at a bunch of stone walls. Possible milling around uselessly. Hannibal would order the construction of impromptu engines, rams and ladders and the like, and foresting parties would be sent out to gather lumber, guarded by strong detachments of cavalry.
In the days to weeks to assemble siege equipment, his army of some 40,000ish, lacking any sort of logistical support and living off of what they could barter and steal from the locals, would exhaust the food supply and starve en mass, at which point it's an even shot whether they'd mutiny against him or just disband.
Everyone would go "What an idiot" looking at him in hindsight.
>>2557078
>implying a walls alone could completely stop an army that size for any significant amount of time
The Romans of the day thought their days were numbered, it was basically 23:59 on the doomsday clock to them once news of Hannibal's victory got back to Rome.
>>2557118
>implying the city was empty of troops
>Implying that they weren't raising new manpower.
>Implying that the walls could not in fact keep out huge forces for significant lengths of time.
I mean for fuck's sake, they did in other conflicts like the Peloponesean wars or the first Punic Wars; it's actually hard as fuck to assault a walled city in ancient times, especially when you don't have a proper siege train, which Hannibal didn't.
Okay, how did the katana actually compare to European swords of the time, /his/? No biased bullshit from either side please.
>>2556951
sucked ass in comparison famtbh
Watch this guys videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlq1MYdK5gg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJvg_feyTrg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4O6uJJL0oo
It was shit. there's a reason for samurai to use imported arms and armor whenever they could afford it.
Describe /his/ in one image
We're froglovers?
>>2556918
>>2556922
Yes, except for the few Brits on this board who'd rather praise themselves (since no one else will)