Are there historical examples of "good" demagogues? The term is almost exclusively used with contempt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndYl1JCWDoo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvRvSHjzt4Y
Did Obama just quote a Serbian commienazi? :^)
pic not related
Trouble is, "good" is a pretty meaningless term. Pericles, I guess?
Could a period like the Middle Ages happen again, either in a certain location or throughout the entire world?
I suppose, by that, I mean could we experience the downfall of an entire world order, and have to slowly pick up the pieces and rebuild a new world organization in its place?
>>2544930
Inherent in any answer to that question should be the question of, "What actually happened to the Roman Empire?"
Cleanse your mind of any /pol/-tier fallacies and the urge of modernity to compare everything to itself in order to justify its own supreme greatness.
Did the world technologically collapse? No. Technology continued to develop after the Roman Empire.
Did the world economically collapse? Sort of, but not really. The Roman Empire would never see the same sort of economic power as it had in its first century (after the Republic), and the Middle Ages saw a reversal of economic trends as it went on, although the economic integration of Europe was more decentralized.
Did the Empire racially collapse? Essentially, yes. The Roman Republic and Empire had slowly pushed north, pressing peoples constantly at war with each other against their enemies. This caused push-back, which led to migrations that were happening even in Julius Caesar's day.
The push-back around the time traditionally associated with the collapse of the Empire was massive, though, and the barbarians got farther than ever before. How this is relevant is because you had peoples who's culture was not as refined as the Romans living in places previously occupied by the refined people. They would adopt their religion and some of their culture, but retaining key elements of their own. This is what changed the Empire into something that we don't call the Roman Empire, but it happened gradually.
Overall, I would say that the idea of the Dark Ages is a meme not founded in any hard fact. There was just the combination of a move toward a less centralized political and economic structure and the movement of people not associated with refined lifestyles into the areas previously associated with those lifestyles. Technology continued to progress. Learning continued to progress among those that learned. Higher degrees of urbanization saw higher degrees of disease, as they always do.
>>2544930
Fortunately the worlds knowledge can now be stored on more than a few sheets of papyrus so it will not be lost in some collapse
>>2544950
This true to a degree but it wrong to think that nothing was lost. The Roman Empire was able to build and maintain many construction projects not found again in Europe till modern times. Also the Roman economy made it to around the end of the 4th century. One more thing the economic collapse was catastrophic for the marginal areas of Rome such as northern France and England.
How hard was it to kill a man with a full suit of 14th century plate armor, circa the mid to late 100 Years' War?
Being pretty much a shell of tempered steel, I would think it all but impossible to kill the knight, unless he was brought down to the ground and then stabbed in one of the few weak points in the armor(small gaps, the eye holes, ect). And although blunt weapons, as far as I've heard, do exceptionally well against plate armor(what with maces, hammers and smack people with the butt end of the sword), There seems to be little in the way to kill a armored knight in melee.
But I must ask: Can, in the course of one battle, the plate armor become so damaged that it would break? Sort of "flake off"?
I'd assume that there had to be some degree of fragility, however minute, if shields were still a vital part of a knight's kit.
Also, feel free to turn this into a general armor discussion. I will bump with pictures periodically. Thank you in advance for any answers!
Shoot him with a crossbow
Hit that cunt on the head with something hard enough and you don't need to break the armor. Or alternatively, punch through it with a spike.
People used shit like maces and warhammers for a reason. You can brain somebody in full plate a lot easier than you can stab them.
>>2544652
Are spears good at puncturing plate?
I'd assume they would be, especially if you put a great deal of your weight behind it.
So, the only real options are to bash him with a blunt weapon, punch through it with a spike or polearm/spear of some kind?
Also, was there any validity to what I heard about knight's getting pinned and finished off?
I always assumed a knight would be beyond fucked if a gaggle of like three or five guys pinned him down, tore off his visor and went to town on his face with daggers and sharpened sticks.
Hello /his/, I have a rather specific question.
I remember reading on here that there was a theory that people before the Bronze Age Collapse (roughly 1200 BC) were actually not sentient.
Does anyone know of the theory I am talking about? Would be greatly appreciated if so.
So you want a link to an ancient aliens tier drivel. Ok
Www.yourmotherisawhore.com
>>2544571
>I remember reading on here
>here
Yeah that sounds exactly like something /his/ would propose.
Breakdown of the Bicameral mind something something
>there are people on this board that actually believe Hitler killed himself in 1945
>>2544514
There are also people on this board who believe OP should kill himself in 2017
>>2544519
I'm certainly one of them.
I wonder what would've happened to him if he accepted Hanna Reitsch's offer to take him out of Berlin in a Fi-156 taking off from an improvised airstrip near Brandenburg gate. The Soviets would probably shoot him down and he'd crash and die
You will not witness the end of humanity.
You will not be here to see the worse effects of global warming, pollution or deforestation.
Yo will not be here to to experience the slow decline of all world religions and the void ethicless human existence which lies beyond it.
An existence where the lack of faith means that man must turn all energy to science.
All art to the contemplation of the real.
The repetitive and never ending real.
The reality of a world with no connection to any life beyond it. With no ability to explore far beyond its cycle.
With all mysticism gone. All sciences explored to their most extreme point.
Humanity, in the end, becomes so intelligent that it realises the futility of existence.
It realises, worldwide, that spawning and educating new generations simply for the cause of replicating our completed knowledge of the world and its surroundings is fruitless.
Humanity will slowly die out - not because it ran out of resources, because of nuclear war, or because it ruined the world, but because it had no more reason to breed.
Nietzsche recognised it first. Mark Twain understood it.
But you wont be here to see the end. You lucky cunt.
>>2544435
t. nihilist
The closest we ever came to being great creatures was Art.
Showing each other complex experiences from our perspectives so they could be evaluated and considered.
This later spawned science as we dismantled the ideas that we had and sought final proof by experiment.
This led to the dismantling of religion, and of society as a whole as all knowledge was kept and repeated, and tested until there was no smaller or larger thing that we could examine.
>>2544435
Fine by me.
The first and second Klan are really interesting and if you're a southerner, the first even more so. Outside of the well-known unabashidly racist elements, they've have had some very interesting and I daresay noble vigilante policies, fighting carpetbaggers in the anti-reconstructionist first Klan, and communists like the IWW in the nativist second. Their popularity reflected this, with numbers in the millions.
Nowadays, you've got a few thousand degenerate-looking classless edgelords espousing such anti-traditionalist American and foreign ideologies such as Fascism and Nazism that cannot be reconciled with our Republic and the Constitution.
What the fuck happened?
Second Klan are cringeworthy larpers, all that Mortal Kombat shit, just plain embarrassing.
>>2544295
The eternal y*nkee infiltrated and corrupted them into the joke honeypot organisation you see today
>>2544393
>a defeated old man catches a fish and sharks consume all of his fish
Is he talking about communism?
No, he's talking about antinatalism
>>2544137
No you dolt, hes talking about fishing
Honestly the book is only about a personal struggle, it is in no way a metaphor or parallel to any political, social, or economic bullshit, unless you want to make it so
>>2544137
First time hearing this, please go on
You don't have a right to anything.
Prove me wrong.
>>2544033
I have a legal right to put my dick in your mom since she consent.
>>2544033
I will force you to act like my rights are real. Then they'll be, as far as I will be practically concerned.
>>2544053
>I will force you to act like my rights are real.
You mean the state will? You couldn't do jack on your own.
examination tomorrow, 1500-1750 havent read anything, what the fuck should I focus on? I know about pic related, was a badass mada fakah
The war of independence.
>>2543889
A lot of religious instability in europe from 1500 to 1700. The Dutch 80 years' war and European 30 years' war comes to mind.
which part of the world
What haplogroup was he?
>>2543888
Did he die checking his watch?
>>2543918
Died during corssfit. It's dangerous but keeps you healthy if you know what you're doing.
>>2543918
He was shot in the back with an arrow and landed in an awkward position.
What differentiates the 80 Years' War and the 30 Years' War? Were they two separate wars the entire time they lasted or did they kinda merge into one another when they started running alongside each other?
Two distinct conflicts that eventually conflated to some extent. Still, the Eighty Years' War went through several phases and even a relatively long truce, it not like it was a single long campaign.
>>2543708
The 80 Years' War lasted roughly 50 years longer
Any good documentaries on Big Foot?
>in b4 "b-but Sasquatch can't into REAL!"
Then you have ten seconds to explain the more than 400 sightings of Bigfoot in America alone since its founding. Even Ted E. Roosevelt ran into a Big Foot
>>2543632
The're just niggers with a thyroid problem.
>>2543632
teddy would've strangled a bigfoot with his bare hands had he really met one!
>>2543632
They're just rednecks with a Hypertrichosis problem.
Why were the Ottomans so bad at fighting once they established their empire? Specifically in their last few hundred years of existence
Didn't they develop a military tradition? Military schools?
Janissaries.
By the time they managed to break the Janissary stranglehold on the military life of the Empire, it was far too late.
>>2543606
>Janissaries
so they just refused to let go of tradition? Kind of like the Russians refusing to modernize their military before WWI?
>>2543565
>They got into the alliance game too late. They had a massive fucking Empire so they could always produce massive armies. Janissaries might have been an old prestigious educated slave based institution at one point, but the malikane system in the seventeenth and eighteenth century allowed turk peasants to join the army, made the sepahis obsolete and generally allowed the sultan to command a small army of warlords that commanded pretty big armies.
That all sounds good if you haven't conquered everyone you could have made an alliance with and all of a sudden England, France, Russia, the Safavids and the Habsburgs are starting to team up against you and rile up a bunch of crazy orthodox balkans and greeks against you. It's one thing having one large army fight another large army, it's a totally different story fighting 3 powerful armies on like 70 fronts with your one big army.
Has there ever been an English King of England?
>>2543508
No because 'English' is not a race. It is a combination of French and German.
The meme image associated with this retarded concept always seems to think that someone who's been born and raised in england but has german great grandparents is somehow not english. It's silly.
>>2543508
nope, it's always been a foreigner or some sort of europeen mongrel breed. english are to busy trying to flee their own island to actually rule it. why do you think they fought so many wars abroad?
>>2543543
The perfect mix, German Efficiency and French Sophistication. God-tier genetic mix.