Red pill be on flat earth. Anyone got any inserting articles

>>18577136

BORING!

>>18577156
Tell me what's behind the wall

Ok, you win. The Earth is flat. Can we talk about something else now?

>>18577136
NOT REAL.

The red pill is that glacier formations look really cool.

File: 1459392403366.png (291KB, 400x471px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 400x471px

>>18577136
The earth is hollow not round. Flat earth is disinfo to make to give up hope when there are entire divisions of national socialist Germans just waiting for the right moment to emerge and save us.

File: Circle_of_the_Earth_Investigation_web-06.png (1MB, 1700x2200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1700x2200px

>>18577136

>>18577136
Anyone who believes in this has had too many rare fungis...

File: fe2.png (4MB, 1532x1194px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1532x1194px

>>18577136
I would expect to see the base of the dome after a while, may be a long while though. It's impossible to say without actually going here but privately funded explorations are forbidden by international treaties.

>>18577136
There is no flat earth, it's the same 5 videos of "200 proofs" that have all been disproven, and even if contrary evidence was put forward you'll just get called a shill pushing a global conspiracy that makes no God damn sense. Even the arguments in the threads are garbage because there is no explanation from flattards.
Seriously fucking pointless

>>18577136
>red pill me on flat earth
it`s false and shitty
you are welcome

If you believe in flat earth theory, then you're just a massive fucking faggot. That's the red pill.

The blue pill is you believe that the earth is a sphere like the rest of humanity, only you'll still be a massive fucking faggot for ever considering the earth to be flat.

File: 1483904708911.jpg (85KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 720x540px

Earth is flat, this is the reason you can't embark on a direct flight between Rio and Johannesburg.

http://www.farecompare.com/flights/Johannesburg-JNB/Rio_de_Janeiro-RIO/market.html#quote

all the flights have either 1 stop or even 2 stops!
No direct flight because the distance is far too greater, because Earth is flat.

File: retards.png (767KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

767KB, 720x540px

>>18578716
Your own image shows a direct flight between Rio and Johannesburg.

>>18578734
not a commercial flight.

>>18578736
why would it matter if the plane had 200 people or 2, it is just as possible

>>18578740
if the plane has 200 people or if the jet is a military jet with extra fuel tank/greater reach? That matters.
Feel free to look up a direct commercial flight, there is none.

Sau Paulo, which is near Rio, has the larger hub airport. There are plenty of direct, non-stop flights between Sao Paulo and Johannesburg.

On a flat earth map, this would be even further away from Johannesburg.

>>18578238
any proof that Earth is a spinning ball, champ?
after 500 years of polishing that theory, I assume you have some solid proofs in stock right?
please no NASA CGI.

>>18578750
So what you're saying is that commercial jets routes are optimized for economical reasons, not geographic reasons.

>>18578761
>any proof

Yes.

>>18578761
explain how sundials work on a flat earth

>>18578757

http://www.farecompare.com/12q/3.47/results.html?quoteKey=CSAOCJNB201704300000R201705160000P1CTF&siteCode=1#results?quoteKey=CSAOCJNB201704300000R201705160000P1CTF

and the very few able to do the trip are the big players
Airbus A330 and Boeing 767.
The other smaller commercial jet don't seem to be able to do the trip without refueling.
This is consistent with what was said
>>18578716


>>18578769
>>18578769
nice proof, I'm totally convinced that Earth is a spinning ball, good job balltard.

>>18578793
I could show you proof, but you'd just deny it. No doubt you've seen it before and ignored it.

This is why you people are described as ignorant. For the way you ignore things you don't want to acknowledge.

>>18578757
> There are plenty of direct, non-stop flights between Sao Paulo and Johannesburg.

11 out of 511 flights in that sample

http://www.farecompare.com/12q/3.47/results.html?quoteKey=CSAOCJNB201704300000R201705160000P1CTF&siteCode=1#results?group=&order=price,depDateTime,depDuration,airline,retDepDateTime,retDuration,depStops,retStops&mode=RoundTrip&locale=en&siteCode=1&preloadProfile=results&quoteKey=CSAOCJNB201704300000R201705160000P1CTF

If the earth is flat then like, why doesnt someone fly over the antartic or whatever, and reach space this way.

>>18578807
How many do there need to be to prove your argument is bullshit?

Just one will do.

>>18578804
>I could show you proof, but you'd just deny it.

I could but I won't..because reason.
Sure man, continue shilling for the ball, you have a family to feed.

>>18578809
>Just one will do.
read here
>>18578793

>>18578810
Oh? So if I show you earth as a spinning ball you won't just pretend it's NASA cgi or something else?

if the earth is flat, Christopher Colombus would have ended up on this ice wall instead of America

>>18578812
>Airbus 330s or Boeing 767s don't count
>for reasons

No, they still do. You're just desperately shifting the goal posts because you got proven wrong.

>>18578815
If you show me a NASA CGI, I will call your bullshit. That's for sure.
I'm asking a real proof but all you have are NASA CGIs.

>>18578822
>I will call your bullshit

Right, exactly my point. You'll just claim any proof is NASA cgi even when it isn't, without any proof for your claim.

>>18578821
>Airbus 330s or Boeing 767s don't count
>for reasons

Like I said, only larger jet can make the trip because they have greater range. On the flat Earth the actual distance is greater than shown on the map.
A320: range 3,100 to 12,000 km
A330: range 5,000 to 13,430 km

The red pill is that the flat-earth meme is a psyop.

>>18578824
in 500 years of spinning ball Earth, all you have to offer is NASA dubious "material". You must have something else considering the flat Earthers have already been able to gather hundred of proofs in just a few years.

File: 1483910172671.jpg (125KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 720x960px

>>18578841
the true redl pill is that people are not evolved monkeys spinning at MACH 1.0 on a space testicle.

>>18578842
No, there' s plenty of other proof, you'll just claim that's fake too, just like you do with NASA.

You're a very dishonest person, anon. All flat earthers are.

File: it'sround.png (131KB, 512x341px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 512x341px

Eratosthenes got close to the true circumference of the earth, thousands of years ago, using the ball earth model.
Stop falling for the most blatantly bad psy-op ever perpetrated.
If more people lived in the southern hemisphere I'm sure we wouldn't have this problem.

>>18578862
There's more than enough people on the Southern Hemisphere anon.

These people are purposefully choosing to be stupid.

>>18578867
I know, but many don't have the same access to the internet as their northern counterparts.

>>18578867
>>18578870
But you're right. these people are just being stupid for the sake of it.
I know that NASA can be a bit suspicious. I know all about the Jack Parsons Lab and such. There's just so much evidence that it is round. Irrefutable evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKiI5k-_iaU

Flat-earth psyop has been propagated to map the flow of memes on the internet and find echo chambers where the uneducated and gullible congregate. As shown in the Snowden leaks, modern intelligence tools enable real-time monitoring of such information flows.

It is also handy as slidebait, so please sage flat-earthers and moon conspiracists.

>>18578678
How did I become an astronomer?

I tried debunking the Flat Earth.

I didn't realise there were so many people who believe that the world is flat!

My main question for you guys is, who would honestly benefit from lying about it being round??
"If we tell people the world is flat we can hide our sinister lair underneath it and no one will find it!!" - NASA

But also, what about all of the other planets and moons? Are they all flat but only the top faces us so they look round? Or are they all round and we are on the only flat one? Does this mean the sun revolves around us? And if so how is there a time difference between countries?


I'm no scientist so this question might not make sense, but if the world was flat, wouldn't there be different amounts of gravity in different places around the world?

And why hasn't anyone recorded a visit to the edge of the world?

This shit is bananas!

>>18578930
Nobody will acknowledge or attempt to answer these, or you'll get a vague answer like "control the population" even though that makes no fucking sense

>>18577136
why are we doing this thread again

what did we ever do to you

>>18578734
Thread over

>>18578716
Those are not spherical flight paths, they've been modified to fit the mercader style map. Very misleading, because if the flight paths were actually drawn onto a globe map they would make sense.

>>18578930
shitty b8

File: truth-animals101.jpg (149KB, 444x632px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 444x632px

>>18577236
tfw i wish this was true

File: 1484884665518.jpg (278KB, 1600x700px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 1600x700px

>>18578849
christ you niggers are dumb

>>18577136
>what's beyond the wall?
Mexico

>>18579193
How fucking cool is it that a neutron star can have a visible surface larger than 50%?? Its so fuckung cool tb.h

Not related to the topic, u just msde me remember

File: what.png (103KB, 239x360px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 239x360px

How come none of you flat earthers ever go to the edge of the earth and take a photo of the void as proof to us. What's stopping you?

Also, why would anyone try to cover up a flat earth anyway?

Also, why is literally every other planet, star and moon in the observable universe ball shaped, but earth isn't?

Also, if gravity is actually a result of earth flying straight up at a high speed, how come the entire universe is also keeping pace with us?

How do satellites work if the earth is flat?
Are satellites even real?

If giant ice walls prevent all the water on earth from draining off, where would the water go if there was a hole in the wall?
Where would anything go if it fell off?

How come I can see the curve of the earth when I'm on a plane, a hill, or at the ocean?

How thick is the earth if it's flat and what would happen if I dug straight through to the other side?

Please answer my questions.

>>18577176
Mexico

>>18579265
Unfortunately, they won't be able to answer your questions, because it would go against their beliefs.
All hail flat earth!

>>18579265

Flat Earth was a central intelligence agency psyop.

>>18579343
The idea that Flat Earth was a central intelligence agency psyop was a central intelligence agency psyop.

>>18579265
>How come I can see the curve of the earth when I'm on a plane, a hill, or at the ocean?
You can't, stop talking shit.
That you actually believe this just shows how deep the brainwashing goes.

>>18579391
What about the other questions then?

File: yo_dawg_psy_op.jpg (149KB, 533x400px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 533x400px

>>18579382

>>18579265
You forgot to ask about why the Earth's shadow is 100% circular on the Moon.

Also, the fact that the math works out for the Earth's shadow size on the Moon's surface based on a sphere Earth theory, but flat Earth theory is 100% horse shit if you try to use it for the same math.

BTW any random asshole can bounce a signal off the moon to measure the distance of the moon, thus validating the math on this, without having to go into space at all.

>>18579848
Dude, science can't beat these people. Their autism is too strong.

>>18579391
Oh, when does the brainwashing activate? Because where I live is in a kind of bowl shaped area and I can't see any curvature from my house. But I did go to the ocean once and I saw the curve? How does the brainwashing in my brain know to tell me the ocean is curved and not the mountains around my town?

When I was on a plane, I also saw the curve, how did my brain know then to start lying to me? Did my brain react to the smell of airplane peanuts?

>>18579861
>science

>>18579166
>mercader

>>18579193
lame.
leftmost frames use a fish eye lens effect.

http://www.creativebloq.com/photoshop/recreate-fish-eye-effect-11121244

>>18578859
plenty other proofs but all come from the same source which provably lied about so many things that keeping a list is impossible and most importantly an agency founded by a satanist.
fuck off.

>>18579848
>15,000 miles across based on the topology
provided
>Sun at 3,000 miles high

based on what material?

also the apparent position and size of the Sun can vary depending of the lensing effect of the atmosphere caused by the presence of water in air acting like a lens.

you can't see to infinity because of your eyes, the properties of light which doesn't travel to infinity, the density of air, and perspective.
Not seeing something doesn't only depend on its position in the sky but also its distance.

claiming that because the Sun is at 21*, it should be visible is just plain stupid.

>>18579343
the global/globalist/globalism is the psy-op, it is the thing constantly repeated in everybody's mind days after days after days. This is how a psy-op works, it must be repeated again and again, like these globe CGIs you constantly see on TV, in Universal Studio shits, in your school books, that's how psy op work.

>If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.

> Joseph Goebbels quotes

The globe is the Psy-op.

>>18578808

we are locked in. There is no satellites or space station, we can not travel beyond the heavens. There is possible no planets or stars either. It's a massive deception.

>>18579265
>How come none of you flat earthers ever go to the edge of the earth and take a photo

lookup Antarctica treaty, people with no official (UN-regulated) business in the area are barred access.
If you want to go and see you have to take a registered flight that wont land anywhere on Antarctica or take the only authorized boat for a limited tour but you won't be allowed to disembark and start your own journey into the deep. This is forbidden
The same is true of Asgard, the island in the middle of the dish.

File: Sirius-star.webm (1MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x576px

>>18580461
planets are wandering stars, stars with a singular path. Stars exists but arent even remotely close to the description made by modern sciences (the global religion).
Here is Sirius for instance, you will notice the presence of an unexpected hexagonal form that invalidate the giant ball of gas narrative pushed in jesuit sciences.

>>18578930
>I didn't realise there were so many people who believe that the world is flat!
more everyday and once flat there is no turning back.
the global religion is losing more ground everyday.

File: 727-computer-reaction-face-gun-shoot-head-suicide-an-hero.png (15KB, 560x398px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 560x398px

>>18578761
Faggot, get a old cheap GoPro, gps tracker and, a balloon and do your own test.
YT is filled with shit like that.
People like you are more annoying than christfags

What the fuck is this shit
We have satellites in space that circle the earth. They send back pictures AND videos that show the earth is round.
FUCK

>>18580478
Maybe Super Jupiters but nothing else counts like that.

File: 121,000 feet Little Piggy .webm (2MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 720x576px

>>18580499
GO-pro are fish eye lens, genius.
are you a 7th grader?
Earth with a standard camera (not GO-PRO) is flat, horizon is flat and no drop at 121,000 feet.

>>18580502
>what the fuck is that shit
you can troll better than that.

>>18580502
you actually believe what they show you?
you do realize that all satellite operators are part of the globe conspiracy
that's how they are making money

>>18580517
well if you keep editing the field of view like that, all round edges appear straight.

It's retarded as fuck. There, redpilled.

>>18580431
>light doesn't travel to infinity

Yes it does

>density of air

There's only a few miles of air. And it's densest at sea level

>perspective

lol, no

>>18580405
Thanks for proving my point.

File: 1282612977863.png (20KB, 241x230px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 241x230px

>>18580517
Joke`s on you faggot, GoPro can record NORMAL and WIDE.

File: 10769499-winter-park-in-the-evening-covered-with-snow-with-a-row-of-lamps.jpg (360KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 1200x1200px

>>18580526
>editing
the complete flight including launch and landing of the balloon available here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQITXbcz2hg
GO-PRO are fish eye lens, just google it, there is no secret.

>>18580531
>Yes it does
No only in jesuit sciences
>There's only a few miles of air. And it's densest at sea level
Not on a flat Earth, if the Sun is like you said, 3,000 miles high and 11,000 miles away.
Are you dense?
>perspective
lol no what? you don't know what is perspective?
objects appear smaller, the farther they are from the observer.

>>18580534
Your point was basically, I know thousand of proofs but all come from NASA.
Your point didn't need any further proof, it was basically acknowledging that you have shit to support your spinning ball.

>>18580478
That's just a really bad lens/aperture. Look up bokeh, it's a similar thing

File: Incandescent.jpg (785KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

785KB, 2560x1440px

>>18577136
Flat Earth is 100% bullshit. It was disproven by the ancient Greeks, by the Mayans and other mesoamericans, and by basically every other advanced civilization throughout history that charted the stars and dreamed of the horizon. Believing in Flat Earth Theory is like an easily identifiable symptom of mental retardation beyond what most people think to be possible.

I challenge any "Flat Earther" (I'm not convinced they aren't trolling on a grand scale) to find the edge. Literally find the edge and take a picture. Find the edge and chart it. Maybe get a shot of the great turtle that the disc of the world is mounted on the shell of.

Also...how many people are in on it. Everyone besides you? Airline pilots would have to know. So would each and every scientist, university educated physicist, government official, independent space agencies around the world...we live in a world in which three people knowing a secret guarantees that everyone will know eventually. Millions upon millions of secret keepers with no whistleblowers? Its bullshit.

And please explain how I managed to watch the international space station pass in front of the moon and across the night sky if it doesn't exist? I own a telescope and I enjoy viewing phenomena in the sky.

File: procyon.webm (1MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x576px

>>18580505
here is Procyon, another star.

File: ddd.jpg (86KB, 736x440px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 736x440px

>>18580568
> It was disproven by the ancient Greeks, by the Mayans and other mesoamericans, and by basically every other advanced civilization throughout history

this is a lie, all civilizations on Earth knew that Earth was flat, the globe deception started about 500 years ago.

>>18580478
>kiddie with a shitty dollar store telescope tries to view a start with a broken lens
>gets a distortion effect with the light
>decides to form his entire worldview around it

This is pure comedy.

>>18580575
but you came naked again
talk is cheap, show me your material supporting the ball earth, no CGIs.

File: ULkqCIg.gif (1MB, 482x482px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 482x482px

>>18578930
>My main question for you guys is, who would honestly benefit from lying about it being round??
The Satanists/Illuminati who control our government.

The fact that our world is flat and has a wall around it and all the other "planets"/heavenly bodies are round shows that our world was intelligently and purposefully constructed.

Yes, the sun revolves around us, the Earth is at the center of the universe.

There is a time difference between countries because of pic related

Why would there be different amounts of gravity in different places around the world?

People are not allowed to go to the edge of the world and they have border patrol there to protect anyone from finding out. It's a very concerted conspiracy, perhaps the biggest one in history.

>>18577136
I hope someone I know personally starts talking about flat earth in real life. I want to laugh in their faces.

>>18580461
Jesus Christ

>>18580583
> I want to laugh in their faces.

only show how mean of a person you are. You probably feel emotionally attached to the spinning testicle for a reason.

>>18580525

What the fuck are you talking about

>>18580586
I'm always open to the truth. But in this case there is no truth involved whatsoever. Its like trying to convince me I'm a dog. You could spin some metaphysical truth about the lack of objective truth in the universe and how a ten dimensional plane of existence throbbing simultaneously outside of space and time allows for an infinite number of realities in which I exist as a dog...but that won't change the fact that I'm a human being now.

File: NlJpEYx.jpg (242KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1024x768px

>>18577136
Forget physics, mathematics, etc. Try this, in order for the Earth to be flat, an international coalition of governments would have to have agreed to keep the fact that the U.S. (because the world loves us?) faked over dozen moon missions. The Cold War era Soviets who put the first man in space would have to have agreed to let the U.S. get all the glory for being the first to the moon. That's right, the Soviets just swallowed their national pride all the for the sake of covering up that the Earth is flat.
Not to mention the European Space Agency, the Chinese, and the Japanese must all be faking their photos, videos, and data.

Also in all the conspiracy - every shipping line and cruise line in the world. All upscale cruise lines offer complete around the world packages for those wealthy enough to afford it. Sure the 1% all in on it, but every cruise ship contains at a minimum several hundred workers - and to that over 100 years of cruising and how many millions of ordinary citizens from all of the world must be keeping this conspiracy going?

What's the end game here, to globes selling instead of wall maps?

File: earht.png (71KB, 237x291px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 237x291px

LOL

>>18580597
this is why nobody takes /x/ seriously

File: AS17-134-20387HR-smokescreen.png (2MB, 2741x2311px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2741x2311px

>>18580593
>Its like trying to convince me I'm a dog.

No it's like trying to convince you that you have been fooled all your life about everything that truly matters (who you are, where you live, your true purpose).

File: 1483908468805.jpg (71KB, 918x960px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 918x960px

>>18580610
Anon's pic comes from NASA but you're right, that's why people do not take it seriously anymore.

This entire thread in a nutshell.

>the earth is flat!
>then how do you explain A, B, C, D, E and F?
>snarky response to only D, the most trivial of points, with A, B, C, D, E and F left entirely unaccounted for
>something something brainwashing something something conspiracy
>Asgard out of nowhere

What is even the point in engaging with flat earthers? Nobody is going to take them seriously but other flat earthers. Sure they'll scoff and raise their nose about how much more intelligent they are but at the end of the day do you even care what that person thinks? No, nobody does. So why bother?

>>18580638
Pretty much this. Every point is answered with "you're brainwashed you're a zombie NASA sux" lmao

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>18577965

>>18580399
>fish eye lens effect.
Bullshit. A fisheye lens would capture the entire plane, not just the hemisphere you're looking at.

File: zAS11-44-6590HR-composite-small.jpg (839KB, 1591x1582px) Image search: [Google]

839KB, 1591x1582px

>>18580642
Oh yeah lolz, you are so right m8
NASA provided lot of super proofs, those flat earthers are just nutjobz, lol lmao. they sux lel.

xDxDxD

File: Image39-lowgravity.png (138KB, 808x637px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 808x637px

>>18580653
firstly, left most frame was shot with a different angle and secondly, there is a blatant fish eye lens effect applied on the two left most frames because simply zooming won't make only part of an image appear magnified, everything is zoomed at once otherwise it is called a fish eye lens effect.
Have a Moon landing collector fake.

>>18580582
>People are not allowed to go to the edge of the world and they have border patrol there to protect anyone from finding out.

Wrong. Thousands of tourists visit Antarctica every year.

>>18579391
Bitch yes you fucking can.
Sunlight won't kill you, go outside for once in your pathetic life.

>>18580573
taking and image for historic reference

>>18580689
>Wrong. Thousands of tourists visit Antarctica every year.
in the authorized tours only, one in boat and a handful ones in plane. You are barred access to the landmass for exploration.

>>18580573
I know this is pointless but if Yggradsil is what you think the Norse believed as science then a gigantic snake eating its tail is the wall that keeps the world in. A world mounted on a tree.

What I mean is those are mostly religious pics you genius.

File: timelapse - Sunset.webm (606KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 720x576px

>>18580696
When the density rate of air is low enough, the weather and the time in the year are right you will be able to see the actual solar disc shrinking and disappear before your sorry eyes.
But for this to ever happen you first need to follow your own advice and go outside for once in your pathetic life.

File: FE-from a plane.webm (1MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x576px

>>18580696
from the pilot cabin, I see no curvature
Doh!

>>18580717
>low enough

You mean high enough. Also it's not the density that matters, but change in density. So it only happens very low on the horizon.

>>18580696
from 121,000 feet, still no curvature?!!
>>18580517

>>18580704
Nope, you can go anywhere you want.

There are guided tours available if you want them to do the preparatory work for you, but you're welcome to go wherever you want.

>>18580724
Nice video of the haze obscuring the horizon.

But that video doesn't prove anything. It's inconclusive either way.

File: Moon coming - (moonrise).webm (1MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x576px

>>18580726
No I really mean low enough because with too much water in the air, the atmosphere turns into a lens that will make orbs like the Sun appear larger near the horizon (on a flat earth that is where the distance/quantity of water between you and the orb is greater)
Atmospheric lensing will compensate the shrinking caused by perspective and will give you those big ass Suns setting over the horizon in some part of the world where the climate is filled with humidity.
But as I said, if the atmosphere is low on water you can really what happens behind the scene as shown in that clip made in Africa or that other one showing the lunar disc growing as the Moon "rises".

>>18580731
>Nope, you can go anywhere you want.
No that's a lie.

>>18580749
According to the flat earth model, the sun never gets that close to the horizon anyway.

And the Lunar disc does not change in angular size as it crosses the sky, also in contradiction with the flat earth model.

>>18580755
You're probably thinking of Montana.

People aren't allowed to go to Montana. The government stops them at the border.

File: flatfromaplane.png (729KB, 1245x647px) Image search: [Google]

729KB, 1245x647px

>>18580734

File: horizonnoteyelevel.png (289KB, 846x475px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 846x475px

>>18580770
>just clouds

Yes, anon, those are clouds. But you're not showing a flat horizon.

Why look here! It's the horizon dropping several degrees below eye level, due to the curvature of the earth. Something flat earthers say is impossible.

I guess this must be NASA cgi.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eD6bH03DJBI

File: planev1.jpg (55KB, 1024x449px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1024x449px

>>18580734
see pic
>>18580760
>And the Lunar disc does not change in angular size as it crosses the sky, also in contradiction with the flat earth model.
the lunar disc must appear to change in size following the law of perspective. This is consistent with the flat earth model and disproves the jesuit sciences.

File: planev2.jpg (61KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1024x768px

>>18580780
your eye level bar is incorrect.

>>18580780
watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQITXbcz2hg
compare the level of the horizon in the camera frame at ground level, at 121,000 feet
same! DOH!

File: ffap2.png (535KB, 1259x627px) Image search: [Google]

535KB, 1259x627px

>>18580734

>>18580787
>the lunar disc must appear to change in size following the law of perspective


Only if it's dramatically changing its distance. According to the flat earth model, it is dramatically changing it's distance, yet it doesn't change in angular size.

In the round earth model, it does not. This is one of many simple observations the round earth model accounts for but flat earth fails at.

>>18580793
Prove it.

>>18580797
There is no indicator of eye level at all in that video. I'm not sure you understand what eye level means.

>>18580801
>clouds
>narrow field of view

We could do this all day, anon. At the end of the day you'll still be wrong.

Alright, so let's say, for the sake of argument, that the world really is flat. That the pre-Christian Germanic tribes were right and the world really is a disk hanging from a giant tree. And let's say that "They" are covering it up. That there really is some big global (or should it be circular?) conspiracy to hide the Truth.

That begs the question: why? What would "They" gain from convincing everyone that the world is a globe? Why would it matter to "Them?" How would the shape of the Earth affect "Them" or "Their" (presumably sinister and evil) "Plans" in any way? What possible motivation would "They" have to "cover it up?"

And please try to come up with something a bit more original than "They just hate religion" (you are, of course, aware that the discovery of the world being round long predates modern Atheism and the Enlightenment period, right? You are aware that even in the Middle Ages every reasonably educated person west of the Hindu Kush knew the world was round, right? You are aware that the Romans knew the world was round, right?) or "They just want to control everything you believe" or "shill detected." And if you decide to say something like "population control," how about explaining how exactly the shape of the Earth would help "Them" control the population.

Do "They" just really hate vikings? Is that what it is? Some giant globe-spanning - oh, sorry, circle-spanning - conspiracy to convince people that the vikings were wrong for no reason beyond "fuck the vikings"?

File: 1472185169127.jpg (102KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 960x960px

>>18580734

>>18580818
That one's both hazy and shooped.

>>18580802
the lunar disc size is growing in the clip provided and this is the behavior expected on a flat earth model because of the law of perspective. What we see in therefore consistent with the flat earth model but can't be explained by bullshit sciences, may be a mirage? ... DOH!

Eyes'level is at the level of your eyes, i.e you don't have to move your head upward or downward, the horizon is still at the same level, right in front of you.
And that is always the case, at ground level and at 121,000 feet high.
The reason I said you could compare the relative positions of the horizon in the camera frame was to validate that indeed the horizon didn't move down once the camera at 121,000 feet high proving that the horizon is still at the same position, eyes' level
DOH!

>>18578716
or maybe there is no demand for a commercial rio-johannes flight...

>>18580809
>We could do this all day, anon.
Indeed and I notice that you have once again no proof whatsoever to back your initial claim that the Earth is obviously round when seen from a plane.
You just admitted that you are full of shit but it's okay xDxD

File: whatthefuckamicasting.jpg (48KB, 435x571px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 435x571px

>>18580717
>>18580724
Cherry picked photographs, did you actually GO OUTSIDE and take them personally?
>>18580729
Prove it.

Explain gravity faggots.
Explain visibly confirming planets, stars, meteorites, falling stars.
Explain having to compensate long range projectile trajectory according the curvature of the earth.

We can do this all day you fucking role playing fairy tale faggots.

>>18580830
>Eyes'level is at the level of your eyes, i.e you don't have to move your head upward or downward, the horizon is still at the same level, right in front of you.

Which is what's happening in that video. The airplane is flying perfectly level. The altimeter is not moving, the vertical air speed indicator is not moving. The plane is flying perfectly at "eye level."

Yet when you look straight ahead, you can clearly see the horizon is several degrees below where the plane is pointed at, it is below eye level. This is because the earth is curved.

If you don't believe the video, you're perfectly welcome to reproduce the experiment yourself. In fact, you don't even need a plane. You can go up in a tall hill, with a theodolite, and debunk the common lie that the horizon always rises to eye level.

>the horizon didn't move down relative to the eye level in the video I posted

Without an indicator of where eye level is, there is no way to substantiate that claim.

>>18580848
>>18580717 isn't a photograph but a video clip showing the Sun shrinking in size as it goes away and far from the observer following the law of perspective. This clip can't be explained by modern sciences because it doesn't work on a globe.
>>18580848
>prove it
done already, as I said compare horizon levels in the camera frame at ground level and at 121,000 feet. it never changes proving the horizon at 121,000 feet is at the same level than it is at ground level, eyes' level.
proving the Earth is flat.
> playing fairy tale faggots.
name calling make you sound weak and desperate.

>>18580818
>airpano.com

I love how whoever made this forgot to remove the watermark. This is a site that specializes in panoramic shots. They intentionally manipulate wide angle images simply for aesthetic purposes.

Alright, instead of just calling you a faggot like everyone else, I'll actually humor the argument.

Please tell me, who exactly would benefit from lying about the shape of the Earth? Why in the (as you claim, flat) world would any government be interested in 'covering up' such information? Where's the money to be had? Who's getting paid off?

And don't give me 'I don't know but I'm sure the Illuminati has it's reasons' or whatever. Any sane political power would not bother undertaking such a long-term, widespread disinformation campaign without a damn good reason.

While i know this is an obvious troll thread, i can't help but wonder why are some posters SO FUCKING ASSBLASTED that others think the earth is flat..
Its like they're either controlled by denial, or getting paid to "worry about the persons with wrong beliefs".

Because, lets face it, nobody gives a fuck if that african kid eats or starves to death today; but they care about "stupid flat earthers".

Give me a fucking break.

>>18578862

This could also prove the Sun is smaller and closer to the Earth. Place two pencils upright a distance apart, and shine a torch so one casts no shadow. The other one will cast a shadow. This, on a flat surface.

>>18580865
>video clip showing the sun shrinking in size

No, it's showing the glare from the sun shrinking in size. Not actual disk of the sun.

In order to do that, you need a filter.

And when you do it with a filter, the angular size never changes.

>>18580857
>Which is what's happening in that video.
No, there is no way to tell from your video.
All I see is the finger pointing at a green bar. there is nothing else to see, we don't even have a view from the cockpit at ground level in order to be able to compare by ourselves.
This was a very weak attempt.

>>18580873
If and only if the sun's rays aren't parallel.

But the sun's rays are parallel, and that was proven before Erastothenes did the experiment.

>>18580878
You're welcome not to believe the video, anon.

If you don't, then go do the experiment yourself.

File: Image40-lowgravity.png (43KB, 353x261px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 353x261px

>>18580876
>No, it's showing the glare from the sun shrinking in size
No the glare of the Sun has nothing to do but shills feel very attached to the glare effect.

>>18577176
sheets of ice

>>18580884
The glare of the sun is literally the only thing visible.

Explain the following:
https://youtu.be/qJmTbhC1O3s?t=1m21s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nUFLLUahSI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8rrWUUlZ_U

Why would they lie about the flat earth?

I can't figure out a motive other than they're all satanists trying to drive people away from the bible, but that's not good enough.

>>18580901
but enon, its iluminuts
thei want me brainz, but im to cluver 4 thm. I know the erth is flat, not yu sheep

File: AS11-44-6581HR-composite.jpg (2MB, 2340x2327px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2340x2327px

>>18580866
>. This is a site that specializes in panoramic shots. They intentionally manipulate wide angle images simply for aesthetic purposes.

nice story, you forgot to cite a source though.

>>18580882
I used to believe but now I prefer to know. Your video is factually nothing more than a hand showing a green line. I don't know what the pilot was really saying, nor do you.
Besides I have hundred of well documented proofs showing the horizon at eyes' level from a plane and at 121,000 feet high.

File: 1485525134059.jpg (97KB, 680x1075px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 680x1075px

>>18580865
You saying the earth is flat makes you sound weak and desperate.
Purposely ignoring my requests for an explanation as I regretfully pander to your non-sense makes you sound weak and desperate.

You are, in fact, a role-playing, fairy tale believing faggot.

You have no proof of the edge of the earth.
Everything you've said is absolutely without a doubt speculation.
(False) hypothesis.

The great lakes are at a higher altitude than where I currently live. If the earth is flat, why aren't I looking at the up at the rim of the great lakes?
Do you know why?
Because the Earth is a sphere.

>>18580916
>forgot to cite a source

I linked the source. The same one in the watermark the nutjob who made that forgot to link.

>I have hundreds of well documented proofs

No you don't. You've got people repeating the claims hundreds of times, but they're all lying, and again, it's easy to prove that they're lying by going up to altitude and measuring the noticeable difference between eye level and horizon.

You don't even need to be a pilot. Hell, you don't even need a real theodolite anymore. They have virtual theodolite apps for smart phones now.

>if I fuck around in photoshop with this jpg image, I find jpg artifacts.

Good job, anon. You've confirmed that jpg is a jpg.

File: AS17-151-23201HR-ceiling-small.jpg (718KB, 1536x1560px) Image search: [Google]

718KB, 1536x1560px

>>18580934
>but they're all lying
typical nutjob defending the system he depends upon. I have no love for your kind.

>Those straight lines are just jpeg artifacts
ahah nice one but good luck convincing anyone with such non-sense.

File: AS11-44-6586HR-composite.jpg (2MB, 2340x2327px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2340x2327px

>>18580933
> fairy tale believing faggot.
Resorting to ad hominem is a sure sign of weakness. You are no longer in control of the narrative.

>>18580976
Then answer the questions and prove me wrong.

Oh wait, you fucking can't.

>>18580755
But you CAN go to the south pole, and how do you explain the south pole(like how compasses work) on a flat earth?

File: sumerian_heliocentrism.jpg (20KB, 481x348px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 481x348px

>>18580976
Ancient Sumerian's, without any modern technology, literally had a better understanding of our solar system than you do.
Kill Yourself.

File: Duck_Dodgers_In_The_24½th_Century_-_Video_Dailymotion_-_2017-01-21_15.37.40.jpg (377KB, 896x614px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 896x614px

>>18580461

Maybe this ain't really 2017. This still is from a cartoon from 1953. When Duck Dodgers yells he is from the 24 1/2 century, the word 'known' gets covered, so it shows the word 'now'. It's like he is saying 1953 is really 2353.

>>18580478

This looks like technology. Why have the constellations remained the same for thousands of years. Maybe they are just projectors or lights.

File: sumerian_heliocentrism2.jpg (13KB, 480x349px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 480x349px

>>18580993
>>18580976

File: FE - sea 5km no curve.webm (3MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x576px

>>18580895
the ship in the distance melting with the horizon is well documented.
If the ship isn't too far away you can get it back entirely with a good telescope as shown in this short clip showing there is no curvature at a distance of 5km which contradict the balltards model. There should be a 2m drop.

except there is no drop, because earth is round and gravity keeps the whole thing together.

It is really surprising how flat earthers think they are on to something that makes absolutely no sense.

>>18580976
Answer smart guy.
You fairy tale believing faggot, you.

File: FE - sea distortion.webm (2MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 720x576px

>>18580895
furthermore if the object is too far away, then starts a mirroring effect produced by water reflection that hides a growing part of the object starting from the base and growing up.
As a result the object appears like floating over the water surface when it facts the hull is just partially rendered invisible with a copy/pasta (mirror) effect very well illustrated by this short clip.

>>18581010
No, gravity is a lie,
monkeys like you can't live upside down because of a magical force. Are you stupid?

>>18581031
thing is you are never "upside down", because in the great void of space there is no up or down dummy

>>18580818

I like how you can literally see the curve in all the pictures you retards post while you deny that there is a curve there.

Mental illness in action.

>>18581031
Gravity is supposedly the force preventing Space to suck the shit out of Earth, a very powerful force it must be (those fans of Aliens, know what I mean)
Yet every time I jump on my legs, I defeat it.
Balltards will believe anything xDxD

>>18581034
Also, if you are claiming that earth is flat you have to produce clear and convincing facts not some "photoshopped" pictures and a strong urge to not accept perfectly presented evidence about a round earth.

Convincing facts do no include: Mind control, Illuminati

People who believe in flat earth have clearly never been out at night in an area without artificial illumination, where you can clearly see the atmoshperic dome

>>18581038
nah dude you don't defeat it, are you seriously that fucking dense?

>>18581048
The force of gravity can't resist the power of my legs and is forced to surrender to my will. When I say I go up it will let me go up no matter what.
Yet the same force will prevent all the air and water of Earth from being sucked into the infinite void of space that acts like a giant vaccuum. You know like that shit head in Alium 4 that get sucked to death toward the end. Well I beat the fuck out of that shit force with my bare legs.
This is a joke folk, there is no gravity. Weight and density explain all that you observe in nature.

>>18581038
The force of gravity that applies to you, I'm going to estimate, is about 150 kilos.

Your legs are capable of putting out slightly more force than that, but only for a split second, which is why you come back down.

It's sort of important that legs can overcome the force of gravity momentarily, otherwise they'd be rather useless.

>>18581055
In alien 4, the force that is pushing the alien through the hull is actually the air on the inside of the ship trying to get out. Also Alien 1 and Alien 2.

Vacuum itself isn't really a force.

File: FE-musicprogramming.png (414KB, 1275x857px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 1275x857px

>>18581037
you are unintelligent but let me spell it for you.
We are looking for a drop of the horizon but the horizon never quite the level of your eyes proving you can't be on a sphere. The horizon is almost always a straight line with typically a small curvature left and right caused by perspective and your eyes globe. Also keep in mind that the earth is round and flat, a disc is round.

File: AS11-44-6582HR-composite-small.jpg (1MB, 1591x1582px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1591x1582px

>>18581068
>>18581067
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjZ7Cb5WDLM

>>18581071

If the earth was flat you'd be able to see more of it at the height of the camera in your picture. You don't because the horizon falls below the sight line of the camera.

>>18581081

>t. flat earther discovers jpeg artifacts

File: composite-AS11-44-6588HR.jpg (2MB, 2340x2327px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2340x2327px

>>18581088
more photoshop artifacts, lol

>>18581081
Yes, anon. THat's the scene we're talking about.

High pressure on the inside. No pressure on the outside. All the little air molecules are bouncing around inside the ship, and now that there is somewhere else to go, they all start rushing out to where there is no pressure. That's why you see all that wind going out the hole.

>>18581081
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEzhxP-pdos

>>18581099
Where? All I see are jpeg artifacts.

Riddle me this round-earthers, if humans evolved from monkeies, then why are there still monkey around?

Checkmate :')

File: NASA-bmarbleW.jpg (797KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

797KB, 2048x2048px

>>18581082
>you'd be able to see more of it at the height of the camera in your picture

No because of two simple things called perspective and air density.
perspective: the farther you look at, the smaller and lower things appear to be (see illustration here >>18580550), past a certain distance your eyes are not able to recognize anything, hence the apparent horizon line
air density: the farther things are, the more they tend to become blurry before they eventually vanish. This is due to the increasing amount of air between the observer and the object creating distortion of light.

>>18579255
Your mom can have a visible surface higher than 50%

but also yes, i agree.

>>18581117

lol Jesus you people are thick.

I honestly think you should all be sterilized.

File: composite-AS11-44-6592HR.jpg (2MB, 2340x2327px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2340x2327px

>>18581107
You like it, I'm sure.

File: NASA-bmarbleE.jpg (676KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

676KB, 2048x2048px

>>18581127
>I honestly think you should all be sterilized.
poor argumentation but defending a lost cause is hard mode, I will concede that.

>>18581138

No seriously. Your ability to explain away things that you can see with your own eyes, while mildly entertaining, isn't the sort of ability humanity needs spread around in the long term.

All the evidence against flat earth in this thread but these pompous dick-sucking faggot's still sit on their high horse ignoring any legitimate questions

>>18581108
If you and your cousins both came from your great great grandmother, why are there still your cousins?

>>18581146
>humanity
By that you are probably referring to Darwin's "planet of the apes" to which you belong.
>>18581147
durr durr, sure thing shill.
And yet I can't see one single evidence ITT supporting balltards' flying testicle.

>2017 and people still think earth is flat

>ITT people who dont understand how geography works

>>18581166
You are cancer.

>>18581166

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddFvjfvPnqk

File: composite-AS11-44-6577HR.jpg (2MB, 2340x2327px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2340x2327px

>>18581171
I create that feel among balltards

>>18581173
new X-men?
judging by the quality of CGIs, they got a cut in their budget.

>>18581175
Because you are cancer.

>>18581178

I'd feel bad for you if you weren't such an insufferable cunt.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHtvDA0W34I

>>18581173
>NASA
Fuck off shilling balltard

File: 9981.png (882KB, 1156x848px) Image search: [Google]

882KB, 1156x848px

>>18581184
and also because you are a balltard.

>>18581190

www.youtube.com/watch?v=q48Swb2ATww

Getting lazy with your dismissals now.

>>18581192
1. When you look through a telescope at any of the other planets for long enough, why are you able to see them and their moons clearly as round, with a shadow cast as a ball has a shadow, right in front of your eyes?

2. How are you able to see their moons orbit them if they are not round?

3. How are you able to see Saturn's rings encircle its globe if it's not round?

4. How are you able to see their poles change angle toward you in three dimensions if not round?

5. How are you able to see the large planets like Jupiter and Saturn clearly spin about their axes if not round?

6. How are you able to see them pass behind the Sun if not orbiting it?

7. These are all things that you, personally, can go and look at plainly through common telescopes. So:

IF we can all at least agree that the OTHER planets and moons we look at are round, (since each of you can look at them yourselves and clearly see that they are with your own eyes), is it more likely or less likely that Earth would be an exception among all of them, and be the only planet that behaves differently?

8. Or does FE claim that Earth is not a planet, but something else entirely???


9. If the earth is flat, why is it that Euclidean Geometry does not work to obtain the shortest path over long distances (such as those traveled by airplanes)?

9a. To further that question, how can it be that a parabola actually produces the shorter route, if the surface is not curved? Why does only non-Euclidean geometry work for determining shortest travel distances over long paths? Are you claiming such is not the case?

10. Why must GPS satellites calculate positions based on a sphere in order to perform accurately?

>>18581189
your video shows alleged curvature at 95,000 feet but amateur balloons already called their bullshit showing there is none to see at 121,000 feet. I provided a short clip here
>>18580517
and a link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQITXbcz2hg

What do you insist so much with all that rubbish? Don't you have anything else to provide to support your flying testicle?

>>18581192
>>18581198
11. What is Sunset on a flat earth? How could it occur geometrically and still explain how half of the earth is night and half day?

12. Please describe the ice wall that you're saying exists instead of the south pole. How high is it? Can one fly over it? When one does fly over it, does one fly off into space?

13. Are you then claiming that we can launch ourselves into space by flying perpendicular to the "earth's upward acceleration?" merely by flying off over this ice wall?

14. How far does the ice wall extend? Has anyone ever walked upon it? Is there evidence of that walk?

15. Has the FE ice wall ever been documented as observed in any way? Anything? Even one photo or report from the field somehow?

16. Please describe your competence in what lens distortion is and how it works, especially to varying degrees of severity.

17. Also then describe how it's possible that so many photos could be so SEVERELY distorted by a regular lens so as to make a flat object look round, with parts of it fully behind other parts of it and not exposed to the camera, while objects adjacent to it are hardly distorted at all.

18. Are you saying that literally ALL photographs ever taken of the earth have been faked or subject to extreme lens distortion?

19. If we are not accepting photographic evidence of RE, do you believe ANY photos of ANYthing whatsoever? Ever?

20. If you're willing to accept even one photo of anything ever at all (that you didn't take yourself), why are photos of the round earth excluded?

File: o-FELIX-BAUMGARTNER-JUMP-570.jpg (29KB, 570x320px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 570x320px

>>18581203
*why do you insist

whhhhyyyyyyy

>>18581192
>>18581204
21. If we're not accepting photographs, please at least explain the most likely reason why there have been NONE of a flat earth, EVER, and ONLY photos of a round one.

22. How do seasons occur if we are not on a ball, axially tilted toward a central light and heat source?

23. Explain the phases of the moon, and what causes them, if not orbit and rotation.

24. Explain the tides, and what causes them, if not gravity and orbit.

25. If the earth is not round, and planets not round, then why is it that we must use calculations based on orbits of round objects in order to place satellites into space adequately?

26. Why is it that we can see those satellites orbit us with a common telescope, and how do they lose direct line of sight if not dropping behind the curve of a round earth?

27. Why is it that we must calculate based on those orbits and related signal loss to make our phones work?

28. If the earth is not round, and planets not round, then why have we had to use spherical/orbital calculations in order to successfully land rovers on other planets? Are you claiming that we have not done such?

29. If the earth is not round and gravity does not exist, then what keeps us from losing our atmosphere and ocean?

30. Are the seas supposedly contained by this ice wall?

31. Since the atmosphere would surely be above such ice wall, what prevents it from spilling off over the sides of the earth, into space, as the earth accelerates up toward the atmosphere?

32. If the earth is flat, then how is it that if I fly in any direction along a straight line from any point and don't stop, I will eventually return to exactly where I started from? Do you claim that this will not occur?

33. Astronauts have been to space and claimed to have looked at an unmistakably round earth. If you reject their photographic evidence, do you also claim they are lying or delusional about what they have seen??

>>18581203

But you can clearly see curvature in that video.

>>18581192
See these hieroglyphs?
>>18580993
>>18580999
You are a failure to humanity. You are a failure to your parents, and every ancestor that struggled so hard to make it even possible for you to exist.
Your bitterness is not an answer.
What's worse, it's you're a narcissistic and you believe with absolute certainty that you are 100% without any doubt correct.

You deserve to be killed.

>>18581198
I'm not in charge of the flat Earth desk support.
You are supposed to already know the basics before debating flat earth, you just proved that you have no business being here in the first place.
But let me help you with this 6 hours long flat earth documentary that will teach you the model we were talking about. And please GTFO.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhRiLP32qfs

>>18581192
>>18581198
>>18581204
>>18581207
Flat Earther's can't answer any of these questions.

>>18581212
No there is no curvature, the horizon is at the same level (eyes level) than it was during the launch. There is no drop hence no sphere.

>>18581219
>muh youtube documentary
You have NO explanations, why am I not surprised.

Someone post the "you are IN the earth" gif or post a redirection link if posted in this thread.

File: nocurvature.png (268KB, 620x354px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 620x354px

>>18581222
Yes I did here
>>18581219

>>18581224

There is clearly curvature.

How can you claim the horizon is at eye level during the launch, whatever that's supposed to mean, since there is no video of the launch?

>>18581235

>i don't understand field of view: the post

File: FE-rhcp.png (679KB, 1273x963px) Image search: [Google]

679KB, 1273x963px

>>18581227
I don't have 5 hours to commit to a balltard which actually is a paid shill, earning a living from lying online.

File: FE-watching the wheels.png (589KB, 1277x954px) Image search: [Google]

589KB, 1277x954px

>>18581245
Yes I understand it very much, a large field of view create of fish eye lens effect which we have talked about since the beginning.
shill harder.

>>18581258

But the photo you say has no curvature has a much larger field of view than the NASA shot.

>>18581236
> since there is no video of the launch?
there is a link in the description of the video
You keep claiming there is an obvious curvature but let me see it, I want to know what you call a curvature and I will tell you why you are retarded.

>>18580999
The Sumerians believed the earth is flat and in the geocentric model.

It's in all their writings.

That image is probably just a group of stars. Probably the Pleiades. If it were supposed to represent the solar system, they wouldn't have shown people beneath it looking at it from the outside.

>>18581249
>"Somebody thinks a inaccurate view points are dumb? They must be a shill!!"
No, I am very much a dude on the Internet.

I like the paranormal, I'm willing to accept a lot of things.
But you, you're a fucking fool.
If I had your address, I would come to your house, and beat you to death with a ball bat.
You are setting the human race back with this non-sense that has been purposely planted into your head to confuse you and you don't even realize what's happening,
You're the reason society thinks conspiracy theorists are stupid.

The earth is not flat, and all you can do is regurgitate bullshit that you've heard but cannot prove.

You believe the disinformation lies you've been feed and it's fucking sad.

>>18581264
Oh? How can you tell?

Because the image is wider?

>>18581264
the larger the FOV the more fish eye effect you obtain.
It is the still from NASA that actually has the largest FOV and showing the fish eye lens distortion that conveniently emulates Earth rotundity that never existed as proven by the clip I provided.

File: horizons_how_do_they_work.jpg (11KB, 460x591px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 460x591px

>>18581265

It's that black line where space starts.

Here, I used the crayon brush just for you.

>>18581273
shill or not, my point still stands. You have no business here since you don't know the flat Earth model. period.

>>18581278

How come the only thing being distorted is the earth in the background?

>>18581284
I think you're a shill.
You've been paid to come here and intentionally fill people's heads with bullshit to confuse us.

File: 1456536667508-0.jpg (55KB, 597x519px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 597x519px

>>18581283
>Here, I used the crayon brush just for you.
oh sheeiit that was very kind of you
That black line doesn't move in the camera frame between the moment the balloon is at ground level and the time it reached 120,000 feet. Why didn't it move you may ask? well the reason is because on a flat surface no matter how high you go, the horizon line will be at eyes' level. On a sphere you would expect to find a drop and as a result you would have to look down to find the horizon.
That's basic geometry.

>>18581290
> only thing being distorted is the earth
because that's untrue, the white sheet on top is curved as fucked. Remove that shit in your eyes and try again.

>>18581271
Cite your sources because you're lying and you know it.

File: sumerartmuseum2.jpg (33KB, 500x410px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x410px

>>18581318
You thought this was actually an ancient lock, didn't you? lol.
No this is a depiction of the flat Earth and its dome.

>>18581337
Are you kidding?
No, it's not.

>>18581346
No I'm not kidding and Yes that's what it is.
You shouldn't be surprised, all civilizations great and not so great knew the material reality in which they lived.

File: 6471018809_7ed7029bcc_o.jpg (650KB, 2457x1842px) Image search: [Google]

650KB, 2457x1842px

>>18581337
>>18581364
Look! It's a depiction of the flat earth, those jewish commie illuminati space lizards place them in everyday life just to mess with those who know teh truth!

>>18581364
How exactly does it depict a flat earth?
I see nothing in that picture that even remotely suggests it's intended point was to be an image of the Earth.

Please, explain.

>>18578740
Because it changes the number of holograms needed to project on the windows, you dumb fucking retard.

>>18581213
>You deserve to be killed.

Said like a true psychopath. How can I argue with that? that was just perfect xDxD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_9Vbsk7crM

File: hebrew-cosmology.jpg (81KB, 480x552px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 480x552px

>>18581378
>I see nothing in that picture that even remotely suggests it's intended point was to be an image of the Earth.

That's probably your parents' fault, I don't blame you.

>>18578740
/thread

>>18581400
Nice mental gymnastics.
You still didn't answer the question.
Show me, on that artifact, what on it is intended to make you think "Hey, that's the earth."

>>18581407
not /thread, he got his ass handed to him a bit later.
here
>>18578793
>>18578837

>>18580467
>asgard

Holy fuckin shit

>>18581417
>Nice mental gymnastics.
LOL, are you a legit retard?

File: 1440110276875.jpg (7KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x250px

>>18579299
>Dubs confirm

>>18581426
ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION
N
S
W
E
R

T
H
E

F
U
C
K
I
N
G

Q
U
E
S
T
I
O
N

>>18581426
see
>>18581447

File: 13161954_1610891759230212_7066009472161064533_o.jpg (78KB, 944x1204px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 944x1204px

>>18581431
see
>>18581451

>>18577136
>Red pill be on flat earth.

Dumbest fucking meme since the "we didn't land on the moon" meme.

>>18581455
WOW HOW AMAZING IS IT THAT YOU'VE ONCE AGAIN COMPLETELY IGNORED THE ORIGINAL QUESTION I'VE ASKED?

SHOW ME, ON THAT ARTIFACT, HOW DOES IT REPRESENT AN ATLAS?
I'M TRYING, I'M REALLY TRYING TO GIVE YOU A CHANCE TO JUSTIFY YOUR VIEWPOINT BUT YOU JUST KEEP DIGGING YOURSELF DEEPER.

NOW, YOU SAID THIS >>18581337 IS A DEPICTION OF THE EARTH. SHOW ME SPECIFICALLY WITH THAT IMAGE, WHAT IS WHAT.
CONVINCE ME. PROVE YOUR POINT. VALIDATE THE INFORMATION YOU'VE "PROVIDED".
OR MAYBE, JUST STOP LYING.

>>18581305

lool

No

It has been more than four hours.
Why do you argue this, over the Internet? What does either side stand to win on this specific case at this point in time? Are you masochistic, or is this practise?

>>18581487

I despise stupidity.

>>18581482
but yes. Everything was right and on point but feel free to explain what you failed to understand.

>>18581491

I fail to understand how you can be this willfully ignorant.

File: issbs.png (1017KB, 1273x721px) Image search: [Google]

1017KB, 1273x721px

>>18581487
balltards and their spinning testicles need help, they are into a death cult and that's very sad.

File: ISS - fake door2.webm (733KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

733KB, 720x576px

>>18581500
explain your point.

>>18581504

So how do you explain the curvature in this one?

Fisheye lens again?

>>18581502

You're projecting again, Mohammed.

>>18581502
that's not how greenscreening works, you don't need a grid on it.

You would however if you were dicking around with a floating tennis ball like the guy in the pick and wanted to measure how far it goes over time, preferably with a high speed camera.

File: ISS-scubatank.webm (501KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 720x576px

>>18581514
very simply, the exterior scenes of the ISS show are typically filmed in a giant pool designed specifically for that kind of footage, the clip you see playing behind the astroactor and that was inserted with a movie editor is likely a real footage made from high altitude with a fish eye lens.

>>18581527

That's an arm you fucking halfwit.

File: 1483908499563.jpg (91KB, 539x960px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 539x960px

>>18581528
>arm!
you already tried that approach last time, shill, but you failed.

Holy shit this guy is literally fucking retarded.

>>18581524
>he doesn't know Orad technologies

poor shill is out of his league, I'm afraid
xDxDxD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=er5xxGyWs1Y&t=0s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Dddpk3Llng&feature=youtu.be

>>18581531

Hey I can't help if you enjoy wallowing in ignorance.

>>18581542
Good, you may be the first clever balltard ITT, show me a hard evidence supporting the flying testicles theory, I dare you smart monkey.

>>18581549

Why? You've been shown the evidence repeatedly. It's all CGI and fisheye lenses.

You lack all ability to reason. You are literally not even a human being. You're an empty meat sack, leeching off of society and spreading your degenerate genes. You're worse than cancer.

>>18581549
So are you nigger or a muslim?
Or both???

>>18581554
>Why? You've been shown the evidence repeatedly. It's all CGI and fisheye lenses.
Bingo!
Hence the reason why I asked for HARD evidences. When I see a CGI I see a cartoon, you know, like when (or rather IF) I watch Spiderman I know this isn't real because I'm a grown up man, well educated and smart.
CGIs are cartoons not hard evidences of anything happening in the real world.
You failed to substantiate your claim that the Earth has the shape of a space testicle and spinning at MACH 1.0 at equator. You have literally nothing to show but silly NASA bullshit that were proven fake time and time again.

>>18581555
you ain't the cleverest of the group

>this thread

Well next time I'm suffering from (You) withdrawal, Ill just start shilling flat earth.

>>18581571
You're obviously not that smart.

>>18581580
Be warned that (you) coming from paid shills, psychos, retards and other people involved in the death cult are not as tasty as regular (you)

also be prepared for this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_9Vbsk7crM
you are dealing with the scum of the scum.

>>18581585
I just don't give a fuck.

>>18580999
I count 11 spheres, some larger than others. Could be balls, luminaries or even orbs. More likely orbs since that's what stars/planets really are. Could also be a depiction of one specific planet and its known satellites (orb + minions)
What did you think that was?

>>18581531
Those don't look anything alike.

>>18581337
Ancient people believed in a lot of stupid shit, anon. What's your point?

>>18581620
They look pretty much alike from where I am.
Also take note of all the bubbles visible during the clip that further proves this shit was shot under water.

>>18581619
>orbs, because that's what the planets are

Well yes, but the Sumerians had no telescopes to observe that. To them, they simply appeared as bright points, same as any stars.

>>18581626
>Ancient people believed in a lot of stupid shit, anon.
you can't make that claim without providing anything to support it. It goes to the trash if you don't explain WHY you believe that ancient people had retarded belief and WHY you think your current belief system is superior.
hmm let me make a guess, NASA CGIs?

>>18581571
Here's a video of the round earth rotating.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceJOBFj3hKs

>but that's CGI!

Nope. You claim it's CGI, but you're lying. You have no reason to claim it's CGI, except because it's challenging your preconceived notions.

Which is something a child would do.

>>18581632
>Sumerians had no telescopes to observe that.
You dont know.

>>18581635
Stupid shit ancients believed in:

flat earth
diseases caused by demons
gods
A giant holding up the sky in the Atlas mountains
Every time you fart that's a piece of your soul leaving your body
the sun rotates around the earth
All numbers can be expressed as ratios of integers

They were a very stupid people, anon. Not that you can blame them, because they hadn't invented science yet. It's not like they're as stupid as you, and just ignore it.

>>18581638
a fucking CGI.
It took me 2 seconds to detect the fake light reflection made by your typical ray tracer.

>>18581639
We do, yes. Telescopes weren't invented until the renaissance.

File: sun-05.jpg (61KB, 1045x1065px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1045x1065px

>>18581619
The Sun, Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, and (???) possibly Nibiru.

>>18581590
That, AND you're just not very smart.

>>18581643

>flat earth
true
>diseases caused by demons
dunno
>gods
true
>A giant holding up the sky in the Atlas mountains
More likely a metaphor, genius, for Mt Meru or Mt Sumeru, Yggdrasil, the tree of life, etc...
true
>the sun rotates around the earth
true
>All numbers can be expressed as ratios of integers
This is true for real numbers.

Everything is true.

>>18581648
You don't know shit.

>>18577176
some water

File: powell_irq.jpg (120KB, 1160x629px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1160x629px

>>18581650
> Telescopes weren't invented until the renaissance.

wisdom coming from wikishit.

>>18577136
The earth is round you caveman.

>>18581652
okay that's what you want it to be
it could be Jupiter and some of its satellites.
Or saturn, or just regular stars (not wandering)
You are projecting.
nibiru is bullshit.

>>18581648
Nope. You're lying.

>>18581664
>this is true for real numbers

And false for irrational and they didn't believe in irrational numbers. Because they were stupid.

>>18581674
Show me an ancient sumerian telescope, anon.

>>18581678
round like a disc

>>18581666
Someone should tell NASA to move their fucking clouds, spinning the testicle alone isn't enough.

You fucking flat earthers are worse than the lizard people.
Why the fuck would the government go through so much effort for all these hundreds of years just to be able to lie about the earths shape?
Goddamn, I fucking hate all of you

>>18581695
>he thinks the clouds don't move

Somebody didn't look very closely.

>>18581679
I've seen no evidence to convince me of Nibiru either that's why I used (???).
But that looks like our solar system rotating around the Sun, whether you like it or not.

>>18581697
I looked closely, they do not move at all.
>>18581699
>But that looks like our solar system rotating around the Sun, whether you like it or not.
It looks as much like Jupiter and its satellites.

File: 9584352-Sun-over-white-Stock-Vector-sun-cartoon.jpg (87KB, 1300x1281px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1300x1281px

>>18581704
Dude. It's the Sun. Look at it.

File: ISS - vomit comet.webm (1MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x576px

>>18581696
please no bully

>>18581706
Yes I do but I see nothing suggestion a motion let alone a rotation around the central orb.
Not only that but it could be any stars.

>>18581699
It kinda sort looks like a very oversimplified cartoon solar system, yes. Along with plenty of other explanations.

But if the earth is supposed to be one of those planets, how come the people are sitting on the earth looking up at it?

Also it contradicts what the Sumericans actually wrote about cosmology.

>>18580817
>>18580867
>>18580901
They literally have no answer

>>18581704
>I looked closely

Well then you better get your eyes examined, because they move.

>>18581714
they hide God. Where you live defines what you are.
Is it that hard to understand? Do you need to be spoon fed everything in your miserable life?

>>18581711
I'll accept that.
>>18581712
It's obviously not to scale.
It's a depiction of a model.

>>18581733
Well, you are free to accept that explanation of course but that doesn't make it anymore right.
This is a mere guess, you know that.