Remember when CoroCoro said a while back that Rowlet, Litten,

>>28468279
We have 87 threads on this topic already

>>28468279
Yes

See
>>28466227
>>28467985
>>28467930

>>28468279
It's unclear whether it said they all HAVE a secret or they all SHARE a secret.

>>28468323
It hints at them sharing...

>>28468279
Yes, they'll most likely have Day/Night variants of their final stages. The Corocoro issue stated that "they ALL hide a secret", implying that even they don't have these Day/Night time forms; the starters will still have some type of evolution pattern or similar secret.

File: realdeal.jpg (68KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 960x540px

>>28468349
It does nothing of the sort. Stop spreading misinformation.

File: 1473706488458.png (146KB, 363x312px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 363x312px

>>28468420
>Stop spreading misinformation
>While posting the Night evolutions of the starters
My fucking sides

>>28468497
That image is more likely to be evidence that Komala doesn't evolve than the evolutions of Rockruff and the starters having anything to do with each other.

>>28468537
now thats a lot of reaching

>>28468279
It suggests it, but it doesn't CONFIRM it. Don't get too excited or you might end up getting disappointed.

File: cera.gif (1021KB, 451x239px) Image search: [Google]

1021KB, 451x239px

>>28468537
>evidence that Komala doesn't evolve
>Komala doesn't evolve
I'm sorry anon, but you'd have to be an absolute retard to think that thing doesn't evolve

>>28468559
It's right next to Komala, and yet it only points to those 4, those four all evolve, Komala doesn't - after all, it is a gimmicky normal Pokemon. They could easy have included Komala in there if they wanted to. It's not a coincidence.

>>28468279
Can you not make 30 different thread to talk about the same shit?

>>28468610
>Normal type with a gimmick ability
>Evolving

Pick one.

>>28468624
>gimmicky normal Pokemon
And what is it's gimmick again?

>>28468610
Mate, I fear for your mental condition if you think it evolves.
This thing has Spinda or Smeargle written all over it.

>>28468679
A ridiculously broken ability. No way it evolves.

File: the-situation-glasses.gif (2MB, 280x294px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 280x294px

>>28468624
>>28468651
>gimmick ability
Have you NOT been paying attention to the past few months of info dumps? Literally almost EVERY new Pokemon has a new unique ability that's completely meta changing

Please go the fuck away

>>28468279
It's either that or synchro bullshit.

Since synchro bullshit hasn't benn announced yet and we're in september already, yes, you can think that's the case.

>>28468740
>No counter point to your argument, so go away.

>>28468694
Spinda didn't have a unique ability.
Why would GF go through the trouble of making such a useful ability and give it to a stage one shitmon...
Wait...this is Gamefreak we're talking about...shit

>>28468651
I forgot that slaking doesn't exist

>>28468870
the counterpoint was "Literally almost EVERY new Pokemon has a new unique ability that's completely meta changing", are you fucking retarded?

>>28469136
So? More examples of gimmicky non-evolving normals.

>>28469180
Minccino

>>28469245
Chattot

>>28469245
Minccino evolves you idiot.

>>28469180
I don't understand how this is relevant to whether or not this guy will evolve or not.

"WE ALMOST NEVER GET GIMMICKY NORMAL TYPES THAT EVOLVE, SO WE'LL NEVER GET ONE!"

Like, the fact it's designed like a child makes me think it'll evolve, since those kinds of designs always evolve. Does my overarching theory trump yours or does your trump mine?

>>28469245
Zorua/Zoroark

File: 250px-Pijako-DP.png (53KB, 250x276px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 250x276px

>>28469378
>le it looks like it evolves meme

>>28468740
Is it Generation II all over again?