[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

/wowsg/ - World of Warships Admiral

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 774
Thread images: 228

File: d1bb69f1ce89e15c52aadaff7754ad51.jpg (959KB, 744x1147px) Image search: [Google]
d1bb69f1ce89e15c52aadaff7754ad51.jpg
959KB, 744x1147px
German Steel edition

Patch 5.9 (LIVE):
http://worldofwarships.com/en/news/common/update-notes-059/

Patch 5.10(Soon™):
http://worldofwarships.asia/en/news/announcements/ver-0510-patchnotes/


Stat tracker/Stalk your favorite wowsg
http://warships.today
http://na.wows-numbers.com/

>Useful Information:
http://pastebin.com/nuWhcW1K (embed)

>In-game chat channel
EU Channel: "Official /vg/ channel", password is "vidya"
NA Channel: Search for '/vg/' channel by Antibully ranger
SEA Channel: /vg/

NA: [KUMA]: http://na.wargaming.net/clans/1000021519
NA: [NTR]: http://na.wargaming.net/clans/1000007315/
EU: [NOFUN]: http://eu.wargaming.net/clans/50001123

old thread
>>151964983
>>
File: Rodney_firing_on_Bismarck.png (2MB, 1346x548px) Image search: [Google]
Rodney_firing_on_Bismarck.png
2MB, 1346x548px
Why are wehraboos sop but angry all the time?
>>
first for /wtg/-refugees
>>
File: lugerchanbtfo.jpg (146KB, 850x601px) Image search: [Google]
lugerchanbtfo.jpg
146KB, 850x601px
Reminder that NA is the best server
>>
>>152058249
Something along the lines of
>Rodney was inaccurate. Only superior German guns were accurate
>Bismarck was never penetrated
>all facts are propaganda
>Bismarck was only ever scuttled

Then more obligatory naziboos saying retarded shit then pretending they never said it.
>>
>>152058251
Tfw you were part of the first wave, long before KOTS was announced.

>>152058249
>>
>>152058741
Ok Mako.
You're not British but keep pretending you are.
>>
>>152059018
don't you every fucking mumble at me again luger, my kid
>>
>>152058559
>one post saying that a specific hit doesn't make a gun great
>this is interpreted as claim that Rodney only ever hit Bismarck with a single shell
Honestly, I have no clue how you can arrive at that conclusion.

If any of the asshurt British shitposters had cared to read teh navweaps link, they might have understood what that post was implying, b ut they went into full damage control mode and started chanting 'wehraboo'.
>>
>>152059175
>teh
>my opinions are facts
>Germans were far superior in every aspect
this place has more naziboos that /wtg/
>>
>its a repeat of the RN vs KM shitflinging constest
>>
>Muh naziboo
>Muh bong
>Neverending euro autism

To be fair, both your populations deserve to get replaced by muslims

t burger
>>
Kreigsmarine was a mistake.
>>
File: 1340972909051.jpg (82KB, 712x720px) Image search: [Google]
1340972909051.jpg
82KB, 712x720px
>>152059175
>teh
>>
>>152058785
>Rodney was inaccurate.
This was actually shown to be an accurate statement with a link to navweaps.

>Only superior German guns were accurate
Where did anyone say anything about German guns?

>all facts are propaganda
The only actual fact I saw was the navweaps link, but it figures that the Brits would call that propaganda.
Probably because it's from an American website, those rebellios colonial rascals.

>Bismarck was only ever scuttled
Which is something that had been confirmed by the people who were on board of that ship, but maybe that doesn't count for some other funny reason.
>>
>>152059598
the feeling is mutual. i hope yellowstone wipes you off this planet
>>
So, opinion on the new BB line?
>>
>>152059706
:^) >>152058741
>>
>>152058103
do you think the Neptune will be good?
>>
>>152059303
>my opinions
>navweaps link
Are you retarded?
>>
>>152059749
We do at least have a chance it won't happen in the next 50 years :^)
>>
>>152059706
Britcucks are eternally butthurt that the Germans skill secured their kill.
>>
>>152059764

Everything but the t10 is good.
>>
File: 1374192539342.jpg (4KB, 212x218px) Image search: [Google]
1374192539342.jpg
4KB, 212x218px
>falling for Nelsonposter's bait

Why do you guys keep doing this?
>>
>>152059303
Nah uh never happened did you see my link http://www.navweaps.com/
>>
>>152059706
>Why do you call me a naziboo
>it is true the Bismarck was scuttled. it was never damaged from the fight

When you write, spell and act like a retard; people stop caring. It's also sad that you spend your time trying to E-defend the HONOUR of the kreigsmarine because you can't accept the fact the Bismarck was sunk by an older ship. Just stop replying or go find some Wehraboo forum to jerk it on privately because to be honest; most people on here don't give a fuck about what you say
>>
File: 1469357055053.jpg (18KB, 240x251px) Image search: [Google]
1469357055053.jpg
18KB, 240x251px
>>152059903
t. jose
>>
File: 1437017181516.gif (2MB, 174x174px) Image search: [Google]
1437017181516.gif
2MB, 174x174px
>>152059749
>literally the only hope the rest of the world has for a chance to come close to America is if half of it literally explodes
>mfw
>>
File: Bismarck_(r)_damaged.png (192KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
Bismarck_(r)_damaged.png
192KB, 1024x1024px
>>152059706
The Bismarck would've sunk anyway, the scuttling just hurried it along.
>>
>>152060034
honestly this
>>
File: 1451322678091.png (18KB, 500x330px) Image search: [Google]
1451322678091.png
18KB, 500x330px
>>152059303
>>152059686
You made a grammar error I see, I no longer have to come up with an argument yay!
>>
File: too_much_real_life.jpg (116KB, 550x413px) Image search: [Google]
too_much_real_life.jpg
116KB, 550x413px
>>152059824
>muh superior RN skill, proven at trafalgar
>we sunk the biscuit n shit
>US supplies were meaningless
are you for real
>>
>>152060034
where did he say it was never damage from the fight? do you have some problems with your eyes?
>>
>>152059968
>>152059764
T7 is okay, T8 is pretty good, T9 is passable, T10 can be shot from spawn on island

everything in between is mediocre or hard to use
>>
File: nelson20.jpg (36KB, 736x392px) Image search: [Google]
nelson20.jpg
36KB, 736x392px
>>152059970
the irony is this started without me. small dicked wehraboos are this autistic and will argue over me making an unrelated funpost
>>
>>152059706
>rodney was inaccurate

Read you own fucking source

>During the action, Rodney expended 375 rounds of ammunition spread by gun as follows AL (36) AC (46) AR (22), BL (45), BC (44) BR (52), XL (44), XC (42), XR (44). In these, the first letter is the turret and the second identifies the left, center or right gun.

>Rodney and KGV both scored around 40 heavy hits each for a total of 80. The balance of the reported "300 - 400 hits" are 8 inch, 6 inch and 5.25 inch. KGV fired 660 5.25 inch shots, Rodney 716 6 inch, Norfolk, 527 8 inch and Dorsetshire 254 8 inch.

YES VERY INACCURATE. VERY VERY INACCURATE
>>
USN > all
>>
>>152060209
you dont have any rights to begin with nelsonposter. naziboos are actually above you
>>
>>152060180
>9gag image
wanna know how I know you're a pathetic wehraboo :^)
>>
File: 1457321169930.png (375KB, 477x613px) Image search: [Google]
1457321169930.png
375KB, 477x613px
>>152060179
>Typo
>A grammar error
>>
>>152060335
sounds like some of you sluts need to post ur stats kid
>>
>mfw i recognize this hypershitposting from /wtg/
FUCK OFF TRIAHX
>>
Naziboos

>"READ MY SOURCE IT PROVES YOU WRONG"
>read the actual sources
>rodney landed most of the shots it fired
>"NO READ MY SOURCE THE RODNEY NEVER LANDED A SINGLE HIT"
?????????????

No wonder Germans can't win wars if they are this retarded
>>
File: 1471409481208.png (580KB, 630x840px) Image search: [Google]
1471409481208.png
580KB, 630x840px
>>152058785
>Rodney was Inaccurate
i dont know about that, but i do know they couldn't elevate her guns past 30 degrees because the shockwave would blow out all the windows in the superstructure

>Bismarck was never penetrated
i dont remember reading up on any confirmed hits by the Price of Wales or the Rodney. i do remember a swordfish torpedo smacking the Bismarck's rudder and forcing the crew to scuttle

>all facts are propaganda
thats the nice thing about history, imo
nothing is concrete. maybe one day we'll find the diary of a Rodney gunner who claims to have hit the bismarck, maybe not. But all historical truths are open to debate

>Bismarck was only ever scuttled
what would you call it?
>>
>>152060463
Namedrop op succeeded.
ts aspies out.
>>
>>152060203
>hard to use
This is why raptor skipped it then
>>
File: 1454818268147.png (529KB, 3516x5000px) Image search: [Google]
1454818268147.png
529KB, 3516x5000px
>>152060463

Ho ho~
Explain further~
>>
>>152060496
>the bismarck was scuttled because of rudder damage
>not because it had no functioning turrets
>no bridge
>hundreds of holes in it's sides
>was on fire
>holes in it's dead

yeah, I'm sure it was scuttled only because of rudder damage. Next you'll be saying that it could have sailed to port if it wanted to
>>
File: 1471424856213.jpg (106KB, 949x911px) Image search: [Google]
1471424856213.jpg
106KB, 949x911px
Refer Nelsonfag as Snoozing_Mako for that is who he is.
>>
>>152060602
>scottish teeb
>autism
>has down syndrom
>believes in chemtrails
>sucks in every game he plays
>>
>>152060741
go back to /wtg/ you autist holy fuck
>>
File: 1467145234086.jpg (104KB, 480x313px) Image search: [Google]
1467145234086.jpg
104KB, 480x313px
>>152060741

Thanks.
>>
File: 1454474968425.jpg (48KB, 450x337px) Image search: [Google]
1454474968425.jpg
48KB, 450x337px
>>152060496
>out all the windows in the superstructure
nah that was fixed pretty early on rodney with metal plates welded ender the windows that brocked upward blast. that was also only if firing as far backward as the guns could traverse
>i do remember a swordfish torpedo smacking the Bismarck's rudder and forcing the crew to scuttle
unfortunately for your recolection rodey also hit bisco with a torpedo and several shells below the water line. also the swordfish hit alone wasn't enough
>what would you call it?
considrering most historians agree that the vast majority of her crew was dead and she was sinking and would have sunk within 2 or so hours in deep water. I would call her um...sunk
>>
File: 1420662960098.png (96KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
1420662960098.png
96KB, 600x600px
>mfw /wtg/ shitposters have displaced anu as the boogeyman of choice
>>
>>152060848
NO THE BISMARCK WASN'T EVEN DAMAGE FROM THE FIGHT IT COULD HAVE SAILED BACK TO GERMANY IF IT WANTED

THE GERMANS ONLY SUNK IT BECAUSE THEY FELT BAD FOR THE BRITISH
>>
>>152060496

Prince of Wales hit Bisko before Furious' bombers made their run

Ark Royal's bombers were the ones who hit her rudder later on and left her easy prey for Rodney and KGV
>>
>>152060829
kys triahx
>>
>>152060664
"Bismarck was sunk by the combined effects of shellfire, torpedo hits and deliberate scuttling" - Wikipedia, Last Battle of the battleship Bismarck

huh, guess i was wrong about the whole scuttled only because of rudder damage bit
>>
File: Prince_of_Wales.png (164KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
Prince_of_Wales.png
164KB, 1024x1024px
>>152060496
>Despite the technical faults in the main battery, Prince of Wales scored three hits on Bismarck in the engagement. The first struck her in the forecastle above the waterline but low enough to allow the crashing waves to enter the hull. The second shell struck below the armoured belt and exploded on contact with the torpedo bulkhead completely flooding a turbo-generator room and partially flooding an adjacent boiler room.[65] The third shell passed through one of the boats carried aboard the ship and then went through the floatplane catapult without exploding.[66]

You do realize pretending to be a retard still makes you a retard.
>>
>>152060829
/wtg/ is already here
you can't stop the us
you will sit back and allow /wtg/ inflitration, /wtg/ indoctrination, /wtg/ subversion and the international /wtg/ conspiracy
soon, you'll be just like us
>>
>>152060943
We have come full circle then
>>
>>152060943
Autistmati is still blaming his downs syndrome on whatever scapegoat/boogeyman he can find though.
>>
>>152061054
yeah

it kind of had no turrets, a bridge and massing hundreds of pieces of it's side
>>
>>152060034
>people stop caring
Apparently not.

The British become too upset whenever facts are shown that chalenge their opinion, and can't actually discuss without chanting 'wehraboo' whenever they would have to admit that the RN was mostly a shitshow in the 20th century, specifically following WW1 and in the interwar years.

I don't have to defend anything, nor is any of this meant to defend anything, and it was the (presumably) British who dragged the 'it sunk the Bismarck' argument into the other thread and started shouting 'but we won agaisnt the evil kreigsmarine'.

I don't give a fuck, Bismarck was a rather badly designed ship without a clear mission or purpose, and beating the Kriegsmarine was nothing that anyone should even have to write home about.

But the British really appear to be like the Russians in this regard: They will believe whatever their own propaganda has been shoting off teh rooftops for the past 70 years, and it has to be true, and anyone who threatesns this opinion must obviously be a nazi and wehraboo etc.

It's baffling, really.

But I get the hint. You go on believing what you learned in Sink the Bismarck, and I'll go on reading after action reports.
>>
Why is Mako in love with Nelson so much he will shitpost about it?
>>
File: bismarkded.jpg (148KB, 1369x838px) Image search: [Google]
bismarkded.jpg
148KB, 1369x838px
Still my favorite damage report pic tbqh
>>
File: 1364701885014.jpg (69KB, 680x453px) Image search: [Google]
1364701885014.jpg
69KB, 680x453px
>>152061153
IF ONLY WE HAD SOME KIND OF WALL LIKE STRUCTURE TO KEEP THEM OUT, THIS NEVER WOULD HAVE HAPPENED
>>
>>152061178
Who will he blame next? Crab people?
>>
>>152061182
>it was a shitshow

Yes, it was so bad it beat the kreigsmarine. If the RN was a shitshow, what does that make the kreigsmarine?
>>
>>152061181
i thought the crew placed charges on her keel to make sure she sunk because the engineers weren't sure if she would sink before the RN got to her
>>
File: 1412654589288.png (248KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]
1412654589288.png
248KB, 500x375px
>>152061245
All shitposting aside, it's impressive that given all that damage she sustained she managed to stayed afloat for as long as she did.
>>
>>152058103
Why is Cleveland so much worse than the Ruski and IJN cruiser of the same tier ? Shouldnt it be tier 5 ?
>>
File: 40435126_p10.png (52KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
40435126_p10.png
52KB, 300x300px
>>152061551
>Cleveland
>bad
what
>>
File: sternfelloff.jpg (18KB, 400x278px) Image search: [Google]
sternfelloff.jpg
18KB, 400x278px
>>152061546
agreed it has always been interesting how long german ships float with their sterns blown off
>>
>>152061474
idk about that

but she was defanetly sinking
>>
>>152061551
Because she used to be the single most overpowered ship in the tier before and after hers. She's still a little bitch to fight with all the fucking fires she causes.
>>
>>152061664
>defanetly
Shiet anon, get it together.
>>
>be Kolberg
>hit something with HE shell
>80% 0 damage shatter
>5% 0 damage bounce
>15% 200 damage simple pen
>1% infinite damage detonation
Precision German engineering
>>
>>152060316
The point was that they mixed guns with different rifling for some reason, but whatever.

Also, Bismarck was moving at 14 kots and could not maneuver during that action.
The number of hits scored is hardly surprising, especially when you consider the range to which Rodney closed.
>>
Will there be a German CV line, or just a few premiums?

What would be their schtick?
>>
>>152061857
I just go full yolo and charge them at the start of the game with the intent to torp/ram.
>>
File: 1459813516072.jpg (111KB, 500x707px) Image search: [Google]
1459813516072.jpg
111KB, 500x707px
>>152061993
w h e n
>>
>>152061608
Good luck causing any fires when you are already sunk by shelling from beyond your gun range.
Especially when you are the primary target exactly because of your arsonism.
>>
File: REEEEEEEEE.gif (1MB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]
REEEEEEEEE.gif
1MB, 680x680px
>Koning
>Begining to undestand the how the lady works
>Trying to cap B
>2 Torp Bombers
>only 2 torps hits
>DETONATION
>>
File: Graf_Zeppelin.png (99KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
Graf_Zeppelin.png
99KB, 1024x1024px
>>152061993
Next CV line would probably be the French or the British.

Maybe their planes are fast and can reposition quicker than the others?

>>152062097
>Posting inferior Japcrap
wewlad
>>
>>152061948
>the first argument was about how the rodney couldn't hit it
>now we are back tracking to how the bismarck was going slow and couldn't move

Back peddling: the post
>>
>>152061993
what planes could they possibly invent for a German carrier line?
>>
>>152061993
Not before Ruski carriers with extra planes above the napkin design, tovarisch.
>>
god damn gniesaenaus second hull is a shit. who thought this was ok
>>
>>152061993
Graf is going in Soon™

>>152062038
I'd do that but it's only 8 games or so to get the 3k XP I need. I'm not that suicidal yet.
>>
>>152062304
>German non-premium boats having a chance in Wows
It's a double miracle that the Nassau is decent.
>>
>>152062337
The Karls is worse. Use the same tactics.
>>
>>152060487
What acctually happened:
>Rodney's guns were not without trouble according to this link
>NO IT SUNK THE BISCUIT
>Well yeah but that was not the point, the guns had decades of trouble, and were not performing all that well compared to the other 16" guns
>BUT IT SUNK THE BISCUIT YOU NAZI WE WON WW2 AND SHIT
>>
>>152061948
>they mixed guns with different rifling for some reason
Man, reading the navweaps page on her guns reads like a shipwreck report. The sheer amount of teething problems with her is reminiscent more of Germany's rushed tank designs.

Good thing videogames exist and those teething problems don't exist. I still expect her to probably have lower accuracy as an homage to her historical performance, though.
>>
>>152062304
>105mm 9% firechance
>128mm 5% firechance
JUST
>>
>>152061993
>What would be their schtick?
Secondaries and survivability
>>
>>152062470
this was not the argument. Are you fucking retarded?
>>
>>152062304
does Scharn get to keep the 150mm secondaries or are they all 128mm as well?
>>
File: 1471432182496.jpg (100KB, 1166x876px) Image search: [Google]
1471432182496.jpg
100KB, 1166x876px
>Konig
>Bayern

>Konig
>Bayern

>Konig
>Bayern
>>
>>152062498
>homage
I'm sure that's exactly what patriotic Ruski devs will call it.
>>
>>152062515
But how do the 12.8cm's perform in the AA role? I have high hopes for them.
>>152062532
>German CVs getting high HP, healthpots, and 10km base range secondaries but with shitty planes

What could possibly go wrong?????
>>
>>152062243
Why are you so salty, chink?
>>
>>152062621
scharn gets the 150mm and the 105's which are better in everyway than the 128's. also gneis litteraly needs the hull upgrade to not be gimped
>>
>>152062568
Then what was the arguement?

All I read was some guy exploding into autism after sombody dared 'criticize' Nelson's guns with a navweaps link.
>>
File: Surcouf.png (61KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
Surcouf.png
61KB, 1024x1024px
>>152062719
Says the chink getting mad about someone posting an image on a image board.
>>
>>152062498
Shhhh, don't tell that to the Brits.

They'll explode into even more autism.
>>
>>152062715
the gneis gets 136 far DPS on 128mm mounts, buffed to 149-150 with BFT. This can be further buffed to 300 with manual AA, but the choice between AFT and manual AA is gonna be very difficult to make in my opinion. Hiryu has low hp torpedo bombers so 150dps on your far mounts might be serviceable, but if you encounter any Shocucks or Lexis you'd be boned.

>>152062728
this is bullshit
>>
>>152063098
But I'm not salty at all.
>>
File: Shimakaze.png (104KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
Shimakaze.png
104KB, 1024x1024px
>>152063205
Neither am I.
>>
>>152063463
>>152063098
>>152062243
is that some weirdass KanColle ripoff?
>>
>>152063161
>the choice between AFT and manual AA is gonna be very difficult to make in my opinion
?????????

Why not both?
>>
>>152062103
And by the way, IJN cruisers have a better chance at setting fires.
>>
>turn trees on
>fps in the 20s
ayyyyyyyy
>>
File: this is fine.png (275KB, 658x417px) Image search: [Google]
this is fine.png
275KB, 658x417px
I'm okay with the events that are unfolding currently.
>>
>>152063584
China strikes again.
>>
Anyone play Gneis yet? How's the accuracy?
>>
>>152063664
Manual AA is useless if there's no carriers in a battle or you have a good CV ally that quickly sinks the enemy CV.
It's also useless when the planes don't come your way.
>>
>>152063584
Then I guess you're just going to contintue to post your shit designs :^)
>>152063584
Essentially yes, it's one of the more popular ones called Zhan Jian Shao Nyu (Warship girls).
>>
>>152063941
It's still more useful than manual secondaries or concealment. Literally why would you not take it? There's enough CVs to make it at least somewhat useful.
>>
>>152064141
>not taking manual secondaries on a ship line that can get up to 10.5km range at tier 8
why
>>
>>152063923
they're fine its still german so its BLANSE but better than tirpitz. honestly the gun count is the worst part in regards to accuracy, but atleast you can pun bb's unlike scharnhorst
>>
>>152064615
Scharnhorst just HE's them while torpedo beating a dozen DD's until it can torp the BB.
>>
File: 1462984980125.png (222KB, 503x838px) Image search: [Google]
1462984980125.png
222KB, 503x838px
>>152064578
I wouldn't
>>
>>152064757
>Scharnhorst just HE's them
>With that dispersion
Wew 1 HE shell every 20s. Scharn sure showed them.
>>
>>152064757
yea but with gneis you can actually cit them or just normal pen them for like 13k every 26. also I somehow managed to cit another gneis though the front at like 10k so thats um...intresting
>>
File: 1471459197250.jpg (87KB, 227x337px) Image search: [Google]
1471459197250.jpg
87KB, 227x337px
>mfw shitposting stops whenever anusmati is in battle or asleep
>>
>>152064856
frankly shcarn and gneisau secondaries can do the work on a secondary specific build, but that requires the tier 5 skill and im not autistic enought to play that much or buy a bote just for this.

nassau is so slow, goddam. i forgot how much i liked kawaiichi because its secondaries would eat dumb CAs alive.
>>
File: 00f61cd2222fb34eefe85a26e28f6c0c.png (814KB, 800x1129px) Image search: [Google]
00f61cd2222fb34eefe85a26e28f6c0c.png
814KB, 800x1129px
>>152064842
That wasn't the question.
>>
File: Kirov.png (436KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
Kirov.png
436KB, 1024x1024px
>>152063584
I prefer it because there's a lot more variety to the ships and the designs are more than generic skimpy shit with some ship stuff on the side, and I don't have to use a VPN just to play a dumb flash game, and English translation soon. Plus I enjoy pissing people off by posting it.
>>152064034
>Complains about shit designs
>Posts kancolle
wew lad
Nice quoting(((((((
>>
>>152065114
nah gneis's secondarries are garbage compared to scharn. litteraly no point untill bisco
>>
>>152065114
>CAs at t3
>anything getting within 8km of a kawachi
Are you sure you remember correctly?
>>
>>152065198
>guns in the same mounting trained to separate elevations

triggered
>>
>>152065198
Your pictures only prove how right I am about those shit designs :^)
>>
>>152065267
we were all noobs back then.

i sure caught some surprises with very few shell hits on DDs before i died a horrible death.
>>
File: 1448050757135.gif (1MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]
1448050757135.gif
1MB, 640x360px
>gross's 128mm's have 5% fire chance too
WHY
>>
>>152065198
I guess?
The deigns are okayish id say but the planes and the gun turret designs are upsetting
does it have the USS midway though
>>
>>152064578
make fun of """her""" small airwing
>>
File: Roberts.png (74KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
Roberts.png
74KB, 1024x1024px
>>152065451
Funny, I was thinking the same thing <:^)
>>
>>152060203
Flamu says the T10 is good tho.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1NHH755FKc

>>152064141
>More useful than concealment
Give it a go on the next PT. I used to think the same as you.
>>
>>152065997
>"""her"""
What did she mean by this?
>>152066062
>n-no u
pathetic, just like chinkcolle designs.
>>
Does anyone know of an easy way to populate a spreadsheet with a certain parameter of every fully-upgraded tech-tree ship (specifically HP)?
>>
File: bismarckisthegreatest.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
bismarckisthegreatest.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>Bismarck clubbing T10s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6sXIoYOnps
>>
File: Essex.png (128KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
Essex.png
128KB, 1024x1024px
>>152065582
No, but the Essex is and she has an eagle of freedom.
>>
>>152058249
>>152060209
Have some more Nelson-class photos Nelsonbro
>>
File: Best Sister.webm (3MB, 852x480px) Image search: [Google]
Best Sister.webm
3MB, 852x480px
>people thought tirpitz would be better than best girl Bisko
>mfw
>>
>>152066702
Ever notice how they try to not to show the rather unfortunate superstructure?
>>
File: Enterprise_(USS).png (512KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
Enterprise_(USS).png
512KB, 1000x1000px
>>152066590
>Not posting best CV
>>
File: shot-16.08.17_15.02.37-0413.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.17_15.02.37-0413.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
H-here I go!
>>
File: 1463273037171.jpg (63KB, 592x492px) Image search: [Google]
1463273037171.jpg
63KB, 592x492px
>>152066861
>cuck has to justify his lack of torps
>>
>>152067054
>>
File: 1460146688502.jpg (345KB, 1174x1200px) Image search: [Google]
1460146688502.jpg
345KB, 1174x1200px
So the RN cruiser meme is going to be fast firing 6in guns and meme torps? will they get smoke
>>
File: Rodney Firing.jpg (35KB, 743x463px) Image search: [Google]
Rodney Firing.jpg
35KB, 743x463px
>>152067054
As in when they're getting photos of the guns? Or in general? If the former its for obvious reasons if its the latter then kek
>>
File: Iowa.jpg (80KB, 960x544px) Image search: [Google]
Iowa.jpg
80KB, 960x544px
>>152067062
why does it look like Iowa in a DD outfit with a flight deck strapped on her back
>>
File: 1459289413841.jpg (156KB, 707x1000px) Image search: [Google]
1459289413841.jpg
156KB, 707x1000px
>>152067142
Torpedoes are a crutch
>>
>>152067417
And yet they kill you so much.
>>
>>152066560
>Horst Wessel Lied
>not https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-sgfSTINck
smhtbqhfam
>>
File: 1468781681067.jpg (1MB, 2070x2972px) Image search: [Google]
1468781681067.jpg
1MB, 2070x2972px
>>152067479
Because they're fucking cheap and require no skill
>>
>>152067526
not this while >>152067479

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfPSZECLl3s
>>
File: Lexington.png (68KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
Lexington.png
68KB, 1024x1024px
>>152067402
Aren't blonds the stereotypical American girl?
>>
File: C927.jpg (1MB, 2099x3029px) Image search: [Google]
C927.jpg
1MB, 2099x3029px
>>152067581
Is raptor into Bisko NTR doujins?
>>
>There are people who defend DD bullshit
>>
File: UWkEa.jpg (479KB, 1247x866px) Image search: [Google]
UWkEa.jpg
479KB, 1247x866px
>>152067526
desu senpai most german music is really shitty
>>
File: .British Tree Idea.jpg (3MB, 5760x3152px) Image search: [Google]
.British Tree Idea.jpg
3MB, 5760x3152px
Vague British tree speculation
(Ignored DDs cos I know literally nothing about them, don't know much about carriers either senpai but oh whale)
>>
File: KILL.png (40KB, 316x900px) Image search: [Google]
KILL.png
40KB, 316x900px
>>
>>152067417

says the man who takes them like a total slut
>>
File: 54660693_p0.jpg (1MB, 1364x1929px) Image search: [Google]
54660693_p0.jpg
1MB, 1364x1929px
>>152067402
She was drawn up before the Iowa was.
>>
Why is the Atago so fucking bad
>>
Since most of you are NA and get pandered to like a chinese panda bear which is pregnant how is the Scharnhorst?

>>152067829
What bullshit?
>>
File: Capture.png (79KB, 925x449px) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
79KB, 925x449px
>>152067829
Lowest damage in all T10?
>>
>>152067953
Lion was hardly a concept they had already started construction. Also just for reference its hard to build ships when you are getting blitz'd RIP
>>
>>152068101

>Why doesn't my Destroyer do as much damage as a Carrier or BB?
>Nerf!
>>
>>152068115
>>152067953
Also failed to list Malta as concept
>>
>>152068101
>low damage in tier 10
>this means they are bad at every tier

>>152068089
Firing their guns at >5km and never being spotted
>smoke
>>>>>smoke
>>
>>152067829

>There are people that defend the Derpitz/Atagoy.
>>
File: W6YMNH9.gif (1002KB, 272x198px) Image search: [Google]
W6YMNH9.gif
1002KB, 272x198px
>>152067953
>N3 is brit BB TX
>>
File: RLM.gif (554KB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]
RLM.gif
554KB, 250x188px
>>152068230
>>152068115
Fair enough true but I don't think the actual tree layout isn't too far fetched
>>
>>152068379
>Atago
>uptiered myogi with a health pack that only give 5000 health
>good
>>
File: 43794360_p20.png (64KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
43794360_p20.png
64KB, 300x300px
>>152068480
>>Atago
>>uptiered myogi
>>
>>152068435
It cant be the L3 that would be too simple, WG have to screw us somehow
>>
>German battleships simultaneously stole both AA and brawling from tier 3-7 USN BB's

kek
>>
>>152068565
I think he meant Myoko.
>>
File: Third Reich Mike.jpg (11KB, 173x250px) Image search: [Google]
Third Reich Mike.jpg
11KB, 173x250px
>>152068439
>The Ministry of Aviation (German: Reichsluftfahrtministerium), abbreviated RLM, was a government department during the period of Nazi Germany (1933–45).

>Red Letter Media (stylized as RedLetterMedia) is a film/video production company operated by independent filmmaker Mike Stoklasa

>RLM
>RLM
Coincidence?
>>
>>152067953
Vanguard is a fast battleship not a battlecruiser nvm a CA.
>>
>>152068565
Myoko*
>>
>>152068210
>>152068274
>BaBBies
>>
>>152068274
It is how it is though, depending on the ship sail away or go balls to wall and sail at the bastards.
>>
File: 43794360_p30.png (72KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
43794360_p30.png
72KB, 300x300px
>>152068704
I know.
>>
>>152067953
>No Admiral class battleship
Hood premium only? No plz

>>152068841
>BB
I enjoy suffering. So I play cruisers
>>
>>152068274
Do you play like that guy in the Zao webms? The key to avoiding torps is to predict when they are coming.
>>
>>152068647
>Anything coming close to Texas in AA at tier V

Nice try Naziboo, but these colors don't run.
>>
>>152068758
Mein Gott
>>152068761
I know but I had nothing to go there apart from possibly Renown-class which would get rekt at such a tier and fast-battleship is the closest thing to Battlecruiser outside of Hood that can be at such a tier, and I know its not a CA the tree is supposed to branch from CA to BC
>>
>>152068480

Aww, I know it hurts you but yes, your crutch of a T8 CA is PTW.
>>
>>152068935
>CAsuals
Why are you having problems with DDs in smoke? Aren't cruisers supposed to have sonar or radar?
I play DDs and BBs
>>
File: this_is_bait.png (164KB, 640x357px) Image search: [Google]
this_is_bait.png
164KB, 640x357px
>>152068480
>>
>>152068101
Yeah i remember top tier gameplay almost dying when we had every T10 game with 5+ Shima's all sailing in groups and spamming undodgeable skilless torp walls while never
being detected once unless you were lucky and had a CV who actually scouted. So you'll forgive me for not giving a fuck if team invisifire isn't raking in the damage.
>>
File: Asterix.gif (4MB, 360x202px) Image search: [Google]
Asterix.gif
4MB, 360x202px
>>152068935
WG would never pass up the opportunity to monetize hood, sorry tovarish
>>
File: KillRaptorHeSaid.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
KillRaptorHeSaid.png
1MB, 1920x1080px
>>152067968
Should've listened to chat
>>
>>152068584
seeing the Warspite and what WG has shown us of the RN line, i believe the RN TX BB will be the Lion or some WG concept

WG jerks off thinking of National peculiarities and the RN BB peculiarity will be the 15in guns and speed
as you go down the line, the 15in guns will be powerful, slow cannons with great accuracy, but poor range, up until T7 (where the nelson and her 16in guns will be) then back to 15in on the KGV and the Vanguard, where the 15in will transition to decently fast firing guns that still pack a punch, but they will retain their low range and low dispersion. this will be supplemented by the speed of the KGV and the Vanguard, Turrets and ship. then, for the Tree finale, the Lion will retain the reload, dispersion, and speed of the 15in gun, but with more alpha and greater range given by the 16in gun.

The Brit BBs will be 2nd line ships that use their speed to get into position, Alpha and their dispersion to punish BBs and CAs that get too comfortable showing their side. Unfortionally, they will play a bit like KM BBs, but the two nation's navel doctrine was fairly similar (minus the use of subs)
>>
>>152069683
lel lion cucks. That thing will be the T9 at best.
>>
>>152067953

fuck I hope they split off the BC line and don't bastardize the BB line with them
>>
>>152069057
You've got a line going from a heavy cruiser to a heavily armored battleship then a thin skinned BC followed by a design so retarded that the only thing worse the RN tried was peroxide propelled submarines.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Explorer_(submarine)

That's not a line it's a clusterfuck of massively different playstyles.
>>
File: 1463609162215.png (151KB, 449x442px) Image search: [Google]
1463609162215.png
151KB, 449x442px
>>152069762
>lets build a national tree around small, fast ships with great guns, then once they hit TX, we'll change the meta completely and hit them with a huge, bulky ship with the 18in guns
>>
>>152070095
>Let's build a national tree around giant light cruisers, then once they hit TX, we'll change it into a gigantic heavy cruiser with huge 22cm guns

?????
>>
File: SwordfishThisAsshole.webm (3MB, 852x480px) Image search: [Google]
SwordfishThisAsshole.webm
3MB, 852x480px
God I love the Bismarck
>>
>>152069567
So will hood be op? She's better armored than iowa
>>
>>152070261
but the Moskva plays almost exactly like the rest of the line. the N3 would have a playstyle completely out of left field compared to the rest of the (speculatory) line
>>
>>152070360
Being better armoured than the Iowa is not really an accomplishment.
>>
>>152070270
>Swordfish this
>IJN Carrier with no swordfishes.

0/10
>>
boog pls

Post pictures of you being broke.
>>
>>152070504
>likely t7
>better armored than ioway
>8 15in guns
>6 torpedo tubes 3 to each side
>31 knots
sounds fun tbqh
>>
>>152070485
Keep thinking that, Lion cucks. Your tears will be delicious when N3 comes out.
>>
>>152070485
It's worse that T10 it has 20inch guns (WG has said no to any 20 inch guns already) and a 35kt speed oh and it has a puny 11 inch belt and 4 inch deck so expect any CA to pen all
day everyday and it's 1000ft+ size means you'd have to be blind to miss it.
>>
>>152069851
Heavy cruisers to battle cruisers has always been discussed, the only out of place bit is vanguard (at least it's fast) as I can't put renown or hood there
>>
>>152070979
I'm confused are you talking about the n3?
>>
>>152071129
>>152071186
THIS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Incomparable on that messed up CA/BB/BC line.
>>
>>152070845
No underwater torpedo tubes allowed tovarish.
>>
>>152071186
Not him but I assume he's talking about HMS Incomparible
>>
>>152064939
Makes you really think.
>>
>>152071365
she has 2 x 2's above water goyim, also apparently bongers are getting the ability to single fire toprs on their cl's or dd's for some reason
>>
File: Capture7.png (363KB, 408x608px) Image search: [Google]
Capture7.png
363KB, 408x608px
>>152070881
>picking a pub napkin design over a design that had keels laid
gg no re
>>
>>152071664
>Putting a ship better suited to T9 in the quagmire that is T10
>WG NOT using a napkin design that would be right at home in T10

Sure thing, deluded Lion cucks.
>>
>>152071664
don't worry goy lion will be great at t9. if you want a shity bong montana at t10 with the 1945 lion you should kys. N# is just much more fun sounding. she's short stacked and t h i c c
>>
FUCKING UNIVERSITY, I AM FUCKING LATE IN THE GERMAN HYPE
>>
File: shot-16.08.17_15.57.01-0061.jpg (534KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.17_15.57.01-0061.jpg
534KB, 1920x1080px
Fun ship.
>>
>>152064578
I wouldnt. I would escort her.
>>
File: 1462595286871.gif (982KB, 390x338px) Image search: [Google]
1462595286871.gif
982KB, 390x338px
>>152071826
it would fit right at home being torped 24/7 with its terrible maneuverability, spotting range, and huge size

>a T10 BB needs to have at least 12 16in guns or 18in guns
has it occurred to you that BBs have secondary battle characteristics such as maneuverability and visibility? Or maybe the size of the ship?
>>
File: 1446564872784.jpg (35KB, 211x211px) Image search: [Google]
1446564872784.jpg
35KB, 211x211px
>>152071894
>>152071826
>samefagging
>>
>>152072379
Poor deluded Lioncuck thinks he's seen N3's in game stats.

She will be buffed in minor ways, just like Montana's buffs. WG isnt going to pass up the opportunity to put a big gunned ship like her in the Brit BB line and you fucking know it.
>>
File: 1370404606320.gif (2MB, 245x275px) Image search: [Google]
1370404606320.gif
2MB, 245x275px
>>152070564

>my checking acct right now as I hopefully wait for a fucking paycheck

can't continue on my kebab grind because of this shit and I really don't have interest in german BB's at this time outside maybe buyin a scharnhorst
>>
File: WaveIsaPrincess.png (48KB, 361x176px) Image search: [Google]
WaveIsaPrincess.png
48KB, 361x176px
>>152072584
>>
File: KirovBelle.png (513KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]
KirovBelle.png
513KB, 1280x1280px
>>152065198
>>
>>152069241
>sonar
it does nothing. I want my defensive fire back.
>>
File: 1463712577109.jpg (107KB, 501x443px) Image search: [Google]
1463712577109.jpg
107KB, 501x443px
>WoWs is updating
>already farmed the credits, 3k xp, free xp and captain to start my grind to get my shipfu Bismarck.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZDJUTYDiq8
I am ready
>>
File: Terror of the Atlantic.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Terror of the Atlantic.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
Oh my god. She's so beautiful.
>>
File: 1367317899579.png (435KB, 709x510px) Image search: [Google]
1367317899579.png
435KB, 709x510px
>Nassau
>Turn away from enemy fleet
>Shells goes into my stern
>Detonate

wew
>>
File: agincourt.jpg (139KB, 1650x312px) Image search: [Google]
agincourt.jpg
139KB, 1650x312px
>>152067953
>No Premium Agincourt
With the right buffs, it would make a fine T10 instead)))))))))
>>
>>152072815
Why would WG even want to?
They have shown their willingness to break from the Only big guns at T10 meta with the großer kurfürst
Besides, why would YOU even want another T10 BB that handles like a beached whale?
I want a T10 BB where I can run circles around torpedos instead of relying on my armor to tank the damage.
>>
>>152073235
REPTAR
HOW GOOD IS BISMARCK
>>
File: N3b.png (210KB, 2300x1026px) Image search: [Google]
N3b.png
210KB, 2300x1026px
>>152072815
>15in belt internally angled at 20degrees
>decent tps better than hoods atleast
>9 457mm guns
>8in deck
>16 6in guns
>only 250 meters long
How could anyone not want her.
>>
>>152073340
>They have shown their willingness to break from the Only big guns at T10 meta with the großer kurfürst

>has the option to mount the same or bigger guns than Montana
Are you really this retarded, lioncuck?
>>
>>152073340
>handles like a beached whale
she's going to be slow but will have warspite handling trust me my dad is a wargaming
>>
>>152069317

Even back then Shimas were doing 50% of Yamato's average damage.
>>
File: 1471032203945.jpg (27KB, 508x566px) Image search: [Google]
1471032203945.jpg
27KB, 508x566px
>>152073476
>Großer Kurfürst gun upgrade
>420mm
>16.5in
>Bigger

>Cuck
>Cuck
>Cuck
Go back to your containment board, kid
>>
>>152073823
>non sequiter
>no argument
not an argument
>>
>>152073682
>She
That thing doesn't even deserve to be called a she
If the Yamato is a finely crafted sword, then the N3 is a wooden club
>>
File: biskochanofftoagoodstart.png (11KB, 1086x60px) Image search: [Google]
biskochanofftoagoodstart.png
11KB, 1086x60px
>>152073386
:^)
>>
>>152073960
SECOND TO NONE
>>
>>152073823
Yes lioncuck, 16.5 is, in fact, bigger than 16.

I know it must be hard you for your cucked mind to handle this shocking concept, but please try anyways.
>>
File: 1467571420509.jpg (94KB, 602x709px) Image search: [Google]
1467571420509.jpg
94KB, 602x709px
>>152073917
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy

Good job
>>
>>152073413
18 inch guns
>>
File: bismar01.gif (5KB, 177x225px) Image search: [Google]
bismar01.gif
5KB, 177x225px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8fVvphU9E4&feature=youtu.be&t=1m3s

B I S M A R C K
>>
File: 1463471990608.png (126KB, 1500x1383px) Image search: [Google]
1463471990608.png
126KB, 1500x1383px
>tfw everyone wants to division
>tfw you can't help everyone but forced limits on people in divisions
I will do my best guys.. just give it time if you are solo suffering.
>>
>>152074154
>still no argument
>more non sequesters
>add hominmid
>argument add wikifidelis
>argument to nausea
nice try kid but I went to the best law school in Australia you can't out argue me
>>
ROYAL NAVY CRUISERS TREE CONFIRMED ON ASIA SERVER

T10 IS MINOTAUR
>>
>>152074513
Only a couple of hours late m9
>>
>>152074513
So now that we are getting the USS Worchester but english and with guns that are better in every way with torps, can murilards stop begging for a usn line split
>>
>>152074630
searched thread and saw no discussion
>>
File: 1465567932636.jpg (221KB, 767x750px) Image search: [Google]
1465567932636.jpg
221KB, 767x750px
>>152074125
>.5in on every barrel
>4 less barrels
Oh yea, big firepower upgrade over the Montana
Face it, the Großer kurfürst's battle prowess comes from its turtle shell armor, secondaries, and it's speed
NOT its main armament
This clearly shows that a battleship can still be at T10 without having 18in guns
>>
>>152074513
>T10 has 9 6in guns in three triple turrets

How the hell will that even be competitive at that tier?
>>
>>152074787
>Großer kurfürst's battle prowess comes from its turtle shell armor, secondaries, and it's speed
hahahahahahahaha

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
No
>>
>>152074787
But L3 doesn't have enough armour to make for just 9 16inch guns at tier X, when tier VII has that
>>
>>152074854
If it's got enough range and RPM, it could work as a fire starter.
>>
>>152074854
>The third group of Minotaurs, the Tigers, were being built from quite early in their evolution with a different main battery consisting of three triple MK 24 6 inch turrets, which were DP, elevating to 60 degrees, and which automatically tracked and followed targets under 274/275 radar control.

maybe it will be an AA meme machine
>>
>>152074787
>4 less barrels

>4x3 42cm is 4 barrels less than 4x3 16

How the FUCK do you figure that? Are you actually this retarded? Christ, you lioncucks really are deluded.
>>
>>152074675
There will be a USN CA line split, WG has even said this, can you not into Q&A?
>>
>>152072846
What do you work at?
>>
>>152074787
nah. if they adding another 12 barreled 16in BB at t10 would be to much it's getting boring and WG knows it
>>
>>152074918
Its definitely not from its maneuverability or firepower

>>152074919
It would have guns with cruiser like dispersion and cruiser like speed and handling, but with a battleship silhouette, although shorter
>>
>>152074918
Flamu pls
>>
>>152075149
The gun upgrade reduces the amount of guns per turret to 2
The 420mm upgrade makes the Kurfürst a 4x2 layout
>>
>>152075336
Oops

Meant for >>152074787
>>
>>152075217
Adding another 9 barreled 18in platform would?
>>
File: boringmontanascheme.png (20KB, 300x47px) Image search: [Google]
boringmontanascheme.png
20KB, 300x47px
>>152075368
nah ur a cunt
>>
File: Untitled.png (153KB, 315x417px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
153KB, 315x417px
>>152075368
You can't trick us, lioncuck. We all have access to the client.
>>
>>152075521
we have two 4x3 16in styles why would we waste our time when we could actually have fun with a beauty like n3 instead of a literal lion clone with an extra turret and uptired when a second to none is available and would work
>>
>>152075584
>>152075616
You really think someone would go on the internet and tell lies?
>>
File: faragut.jpg (216KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
faragut.jpg
216KB, 1280x720px
>faragut is bad they said
>US DDs suck they said
>>
File: 1330987109804.png (91KB, 213x292px) Image search: [Google]
1330987109804.png
91KB, 213x292px
FRIENDLY REMINDER THAT LION'S 16" GUNS WERE COMPARABLE IN PERFORMANCE TO COLORADO'S 16" GUNS

I'm sure the T10 BBs will be quaking in their boots at the prospect of a 9 gun colorado.
>>
Invite to Johans aim assist plz?
>>
>>152075812
>Things no one has said since the great buffening of USN torps and the great nerfening of IJN torps
>Also the buff to turret HP
>>
>>152075829
>lion
>1030kg shells
>n3
>1360kg shells
seems like an easy choice as to which is better suited for t10. especcially when the very light weight outbored 420mm's were 1220kg
>>
File: crying erika.jpg (553KB, 2507x3541px) Image search: [Google]
crying erika.jpg
553KB, 2507x3541px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8fVvphU9E4
>tfw detonations will never look like this
>>
File: 1464105935403.jpg (28KB, 460x276px) Image search: [Google]
1464105935403.jpg
28KB, 460x276px
>>152075584
>>152075616
Face it, the Lion is the superior T10 candidate
You just want another 18in platform even though it would be nothing like the rest of the line and complete shit when stacked up to the Yamato
>>
>>152075812
what happened to "i will never play non axis ships" :^)
>>
>>152076081
>3x3 16" guns firing cute little lightweight shells
>T10 material

kek
>>
File: 1462977749211.jpg (5KB, 151x225px) Image search: [Google]
1462977749211.jpg
5KB, 151x225px
>>152075752
>Beauty
>>
>>152076081
the 457mm guns on n3 would be in between the montana and yamato's tho. they are 100kg's lighter. The reason I want N3 is due to her armor and shortness as well as secondaries. She seems like a fun brawling shit instead of another fast BB
>>
>>152076018
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNBR_18-45_mk2.htm

She could easily be given the 1920 1500kg shells.
>>
>>152076324
its not about her being fast, its about her being maneuverable
a T10 BB that wont have to take Midway torp drops on the nose because i could turn inside a drop
>>
>>152076081
>entire line is relatively slow up until kgv
>even then kgv and lion are slower than their t8 and t9 fast bb counter parts
>english bb's all have thick belt armor and decent secondaries
>all turn well
N3 seems to fit better and will be shorter than the 1945 lion plan
>>152076494
Problem is those were meant for the bl mk1 18in guns N3 had the mk2's guess they could skookum it up if they wanted to
>>152076525
thing is the lion with 12 16in gus you are advocating is longer with estimates of atleast 830ft+ in lentgh. that woul certainly give it worse turning than the n3
>>
>>152076169
Welp, i played ranked and got tired of getting memed on by Mahans
>>
File: YOUCANTSTOPDEATH.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
YOUCANTSTOPDEATH.png
1MB, 1920x1080px
>Bismarck average damage: 115k
SHE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH THIS!
>>
>>152077418
why the fuck do you get to play german bbs already?
>>
File: 1468461117875.jpg (145KB, 658x600px) Image search: [Google]
1468461117875.jpg
145KB, 658x600px
>>152077617
>>
>>152062038
>Kolberg
>Torps
Does the Kolberg B hull upgrade give you torps but not tell you when you mouse over?
>>
Tier 6 destroyers on NA who want free wins, get on
>>
>>152077418
so this is where you go when you arent shitting up DCS
>>
Does Scharn get +/-1 MM?
>>
>It's a Lionfag, ex-Nelsonfag spergs out episode
>>
>>152076034
>be RN
>explode
LMAO
>>
File: cheering cuckfu.png (241KB, 539x734px) Image search: [Google]
cheering cuckfu.png
241KB, 539x734px
PSA: If you're planning to buy 6 months or 1 year of premium account soon, that chance is tomorrow. 15% off the usual GOLD price due to WoT Summer event.

The catch is, it only mentions gold price. So you won't be able to use your current doubloons. However there is a chance WG will also apply the discount on the doubloon price, as they've done on past sales.
>>
File: 691dd147650baaecc5e37612d3cbf708.jpg (391KB, 4500x3500px) Image search: [Google]
691dd147650baaecc5e37612d3cbf708.jpg
391KB, 4500x3500px
>>152079539
>cheering cuckfu
>>
File: 1466899703076.jpg (171KB, 444x553px) Image search: [Google]
1466899703076.jpg
171KB, 444x553px
>>152076034

>krauts successfully deterring a swordfish attack
>>
1 bong
>>
>>152079810
>Bismarck having good AA
>Bismarck shooting down a plane
>>
2 bong
>>
3 bong
>>
4 bong
>>
5 bong
>>
File: 1458082774569.jpg (97KB, 500x565px) Image search: [Google]
1458082774569.jpg
97KB, 500x565px
>>152080327
>>152080618
>>152080815
>>152081062

>Single barrel
>>
6 bong
>>
File: 1444764093479.png (91KB, 339x379px) Image search: [Google]
1444764093479.png
91KB, 339x379px
>>152079028
>teebs jumping to each other's throats

And nothing of value was lost desu
>>
7 bong
>>
8 bong
>>
>>152081705
>>152081483
Im guessing that the top tiers will have very good torpedoes, but not many of them
>>
9 bong
>>
>>152081205
>[Laughing USN CA in the distance]

Rule the Waves amirite?
>>
>>152081279
4x2 CL at T6???
>>
>>152081846
If they go by the Minotaur design plans, she will have 2 quad tubes on each side.
>>
File: Bayern Class.jpg (655KB, 3500x2250px) Image search: [Google]
Bayern Class.jpg
655KB, 3500x2250px
>>152081062
>Tier 2-5 is nothing but Karlsruhe purgatory

I am ready to suffer. Also planning on playing Bayern till the end of time - should I go for secondary spec considering the assload of 150s hull A gets?
>>
File: disgusted pastas.jpg (158KB, 1024x700px) Image search: [Google]
disgusted pastas.jpg
158KB, 1024x700px
>>152081279
>>152081483
>>152081705
>>152081919
Why doe they all look the same?
>>
10 bong
>>
>>152081998
Like we would let one of those things near us, what do you think? That all American players are Raptor?
>>
>>152082059
>"does it work well"
>"yes"
>"Don't change it then"
>>
>>152082141
>Those 90rpm double barreled secondaries.

I am extremely intrigued.
>>
>>152081483
>>152081705
>>152081919
>>152082141
my guess is
>fantastic 6in autism guns
>good arcs
>bad ap
>autisticaly fast reload rates
>ok armor
>just workable speed
>lodes a torps
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujoT_3XUp5M
minotaur should have some pretty intresting guns seeing they are the same as vid related and it has double quad torps per side
>>
>>152082478
Don't confuse the Tigers for the Minotaur, if we're lucky we'll be able to upgrade up to that but the standard minotaur is pretty meh
>>
>>152083010
uhh the guns are the exact same.
>>
>>152083010
The T10 Minotaur is the 1950s Minotaur design Z4A using the Tiger's guns.

It has absolutely fucking nothing to do with the actual 1943 Minotaur and was a completely unrelated design.
>>
File: Photo06clSwiftsure2NP.jpg (42KB, 1037x543px) Image search: [Google]
Photo06clSwiftsure2NP.jpg
42KB, 1037x543px
>>152083114
The tigers, like that video states, were made after the war.

the minotaurs had a completely different armament/turret design
>>
File: 9b41957c094c6aed8eda9b14581af047.jpg (897KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]
9b41957c094c6aed8eda9b14581af047.jpg
897KB, 1280x1024px
>tfw your team is so bad that you wish the enemy team would end things faster.
>>
>>152083010
they have the same guns. Also the Tiger was a updated Minotaur

>>152083381
The layout was different but they used the same autoloading and guns
>>
>>152083381
see>>152083287
Completely different ship
>>
>>152081483
>>152081705
>>152081919
>>152082141
I was expecting the high tier bong ships to look a little less... hideous. These scows look like they're straight out of the 1920s.
>>
TERROR OF THE ATLANTIC
BEST BATTLESHIP IN THE GAME
BISMARCK IS BADASS

Holy shit tho I have over 100k average damage and she's still STOCK!
>>
>>152083381
Completely different ships if you want a Minotaur/Swiftsure class the t7 fiji is a crown colony and the Minotaurs were basically the same. The Minotaur we are talking about is a completely different design with 5 mounts with double 6 in turrets
>>
>>152083381
That's a Fiji

We're talking about the minotaur
>>
>>152083783

Isn't that just a slightly worse Tirpitz?
>>
>>152083783
Nerf when?
>>
File: masculine bows.png (1MB, 980x646px) Image search: [Google]
masculine bows.png
1MB, 980x646px
>>152083770
its a feminine trait you just wouldn't understand
>>
File: minotaur za.jpg (23KB, 682x193px) Image search: [Google]
minotaur za.jpg
23KB, 682x193px
>>152083521
>Also the Tiger was a updated Minotaur

No, it wasn't.

The post-war Minotaur WG are adding was designed as a successor to the Tiger using more of the same guns. Sketches and information are readily available in books and on the internet.

It IS NOT the 1943 Minotaur-class that was built and entered service. It wasn't some sort of design proposal for it either. It was literally a completely different ship with no relation to the original other than the fact that they shared a name and they were supposed to carry the same gun caliber.
>>
>>152083770

RN cruisers were some of the ugliest ships of WW2.
>>
>>152084475
the video that was posted was just showing the ROF of the guns

Which the Minotaur also has
>>
File: 1471451207210 .gif (903KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]
1471451207210 .gif
903KB, 900x600px
>>152084601
Better then amerrigarbage
>>
>>152085031
that's incredibly debatable. Early american ships were ugly as fuck. But their Late shit was really pretty

Same for the bongs. Early shit was ugly. late shit was aesthetic

And this is coming from a bong
>>
Why would T10 bong cruiser get 3in secondaries while Des Moines doesn't get her 3in secondary battery?

>the mountings were of the dual purpose, open-base-ring type
>>
>>152085219
Wave you fucking princess. Stop giving in. When you give murricams an inch they take a kilometer. STOP
>>
>>152085334
Fuck off you cuck. Put a trip on and call it muhammed
>>
>>152085031
I'm curious as to how the ship crew felt when the plane slammed into the ship. Must have been some crazy shit to witness.
>>
>>152085326
they probably wont get to have them be dual purpose, I with they would but wg wont let anything smaller than slav 85mm be secondaries.
>>
>>152085475
I think it would have went something like
>oh goodness billy, you feel that bang?
>yes bob, I nearly spilt my tea
>>
File: Jews did the metric system.jpg (158KB, 926x875px) Image search: [Google]
Jews did the metric system.jpg
158KB, 926x875px
>>152085334
>When you give murricams an inch they take a kilometer

We take a mile, Ahmed, we don't use metric bullshit like they do back in Pakistan.
>>
>>152085713
t. yrone
>>
>>152085219
It's another wave pretends to be full blooded anglo episode
>>
>>152085326
National pelicularities))))
USN is of AA
while RN is of secondary))))
>>
>>152086139
>full blooded anglo
Hundreds of years of inbreding? Why would I chose to be that? I wasn't my choice in being an anglo
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1WO3M1Ed24
>that det
top kek
>>
Did the servers just die?
>>
>>152086480
>self hating fake anglo
Honestly its kinda disgusting that you even exist fa.m
>>
File: image.jpg (21KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
21KB, 225x225px
>>152085587
>I with they would
>>
What's with the false flagging and obsessions? Did Anumati wake up??
>>
File: Wave's autism revealed.jpg (1MB, 3874x2206px) Image search: [Google]
Wave's autism revealed.jpg
1MB, 3874x2206px
I wonder who could be shitposting.
If you respond to this because it triggers your shitpost instinct, you are part of the problem.
>>
>get in game
>guns have a small delay before firing
>it gets worse until -35ms meme and the game just drops
>can't connect anymore
Nice servers Wargamingbabies
>>
>>152086639
Looks he did wake up if we go after the recent shitposts.
>>
>>152084131
The biggest difference is love
>>
>>152086627
How's your sister aka your auntie aka your gran aka your cousin aka your step sister?
>>
Why is Anumati obsessed with "wave"? Tsundere?
>>
File: 41656035 (1).jpg (244KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]
41656035 (1).jpg
244KB, 1280x960px
Le happy merchants ey.

RN Battleships when, i wanna be comfy
>>
>>152087115
http://www.strawpoll.me/11011827
>>
File: 1400978293633.gif (3MB, 400x223px) Image search: [Google]
1400978293633.gif
3MB, 400x223px
Does anyone have a guide of upgrades/ captain skills for each type of ship?
>>
>>152087190

I want RN BBs but the game doesn't really need another tranche of battleships for now

RN DDs or CVs would be nice
>>
File: 1349760162695.gif (925KB, 212x176px) Image search: [Google]
1349760162695.gif
925KB, 212x176px
Wow these bong cruisers look fucking awful. Repulsive even.
>>
File: shot-16.08.17_15.46.08-0079.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.17_15.46.08-0079.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
Hmmmm
>>
>>152088670
Skidmarck
>>
>>152088801
That's clearly Tirpitz.
>>
>>152088670
superior german seaplane doesnt need to work in order to fly
>>
File: 1454768147156.jpg (623KB, 1280x1420px) Image search: [Google]
1454768147156.jpg
623KB, 1280x1420px
>>152087820
RRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
>>152089248
this is fucking hilarious
>>
File: git_gud.png (20KB, 456x337px) Image search: [Google]
git_gud.png
20KB, 456x337px
when you're so good you have over 100% win rate.
>>
>>152089248
>Those differently shaped guardrails

lel
>>
File: laughing dragons.jpg (211KB, 805x945px) Image search: [Google]
laughing dragons.jpg
211KB, 805x945px
>>152089248
>>
File: shot-16.08.17_15.55.49-0639.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.17_15.55.49-0639.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
Working as intended
>>
>>152087578
>BB
1. Basics of Survivability or Basic Firing Training for less burning or better AA and secondaries
2. Expert Marksman to make turret traverse less shit
3. Superintendent for more pot
4. Advanced Firing Training for even better secondaries and AA
5. Concealment Expert, Manual Secondaries, or Manual AA depending on what variety of shit meme you want

>CA/CL
1. Basics of Survivability or Basic Firing Training (for AA, pretty useless on low tier shit)
2. Expert Marksman to make turret traverse better
3. Superintendent if captain is meant for T9 or T10, Vigilance or High Alert are both alright if it's not
4. Demolition Expert for BBQ
5. Concealment Expert or Advanced Firing Training for more utility or better AA (CE is generally better in most cases)

>DD
1. Basic Firing Training for more rooty tooty point and shooty
2. Last Stand so you don't eat shit when the first shell that hits you knocks out your engine
3. Superintendent for more dank smoke (some people recommend vigi for reasons I will never understand), some DD can do okay with torp accel
4. Survival Expert if you're a Clapper, Advanced Firing training if you're a Ruskie, Polan or Jap, though SE really works on just about any destroyer.
5. Concealment Expert (though some people prefer to take another T4 skill or two for certain ships like Ruskie DDs)

>CV
Fuck off.
>>
>>152089616
>>CV
>Fuck off.
Did the clicky flatships delete you too many times :^)
>>
>>152089341
>>152089524
What's funny

I don't get it
>>
File: 1471474756462.jpg (25KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
1471474756462.jpg
25KB, 500x500px
>>152087192
>anusmati's face when wave ignores him
>>
File: 1471474886447.jpg (3MB, 3448x4148px) Image search: [Google]
1471474886447.jpg
3MB, 3448x4148px
>>152087070

Updated the pic :^)

>>152089843

:_;7
>>
WHO IS THE CUTEST WOWSG COUPLE????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
>>
File: whoa thats alot of baBBies.png (184KB, 622x233px) Image search: [Google]
whoa thats alot of baBBies.png
184KB, 622x233px
it was 9 v 9 nassau and some cruisers, real good stuff.
>>
>>152090165
Boredom and gumby are a crossboard couple!
>>
>>152090165
abru and raptor
>>
>>152088670
>Bismarck didn't get her red tops
Why?
What does her Perma Camo look like?
>>
>>152090462
ok ehren
>>
>>152090312
Is it like that through the entire tree? I thought of using some free xp to just skip ahead a tier or 2, maybe to 5
>>
>>152091243
Bismarck has torpedoes???
>>
>>152091243
1. The Bismarck never had torps IRL and doesn't ingame
2. The pic is a tirpitz
>>
File: 2016-08-17_16.16.21.png (731KB, 1600x796px) Image search: [Google]
2016-08-17_16.16.21.png
731KB, 1600x796px
Guess the boat
>>
>>152091872
Omaha, or memeansk
>>
>>152091872
Murmansk
>>
>>152091243
Bismarck permaflage is her Exercise Rhine scheme without red turret tops, superstructure stripes and windmill.

The picture is Tirpitz though.
>>
>>152091912
>>152091964

yep, its the memeansk. Using Movecraft I was even able to give it working torpedoes.
>>
>>152091872
>lack of the extra two rear turrets
>pukey camo

Murmansk
>>
>>152091783
>>152091712
I didn't see that. My bad.
>>
File: 1471454877369.png (336KB, 536x473px) Image search: [Google]
1471454877369.png
336KB, 536x473px
>t6 is 4x2 38cm guns
>t7 is 3x2 38cm with torps
>t8 is 4x2 38cm guns

Guess the fucking class and nation
>>
What the fucki is wrong with that back gun on the gneise thing pulls the splits every shot. Did they me the sigma on this thing like 1.1
>>
>>152092148
>T6 is an old mini Bismarck
>T7 is a fast mini Bismarck
>T8 is a Bismarck
>T9 is a bigger Bismarck
>T10 is a bigger bigger Bismarck
>>
>>152091435
Ok turbo
>>
>>152092401
Bigsmarck
>>
>>152092401
So many skidmarcks
>>
>>152092503
Biggie Smarks.
>>
File: 1462918910568.jpg (44KB, 480x679px) Image search: [Google]
1462918910568.jpg
44KB, 480x679px
>>152092401
>my shipfu is Bismarck
what a time to be alive
>>
Is a bad thing that your shipfu is Gneisenau
>>
So will they add rodney as a prem t8 with a higher luck stat?
>>
>>152092401
Damn dude, i cant wait for the tier 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 to get scuttled every game.
>>
>>152093094
forgot the "?"
>>
Kek the loading screen is a Moskva trading broadsides with a Yamato

Fucking slavs
>>
File: shot-16.08.17_19.37.46-0343.jpg (550KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.17_19.37.46-0343.jpg
550KB, 1920x1080px
comfy
>>
File: shot-16.08.17_18.37.45-0493.jpg (329KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.17_18.37.45-0493.jpg
329KB, 1600x900px
>doublestrike

neat.jpg
>>
>getting good shots in nassau
>suddenly disgusting dispersion with shells going way off target even at 6km
>>
>>152093524
>tfw i probably would have survived that game if i had just kept reversing instead of trying to go foward and taking a single fubuki torp
>>
>Go back to school and good internet next week
>RN cruisers soon

What a time to be alive.

I'm even happy about the whole "All CL" thing because as we've seen before via certain ships (Cleveland, pre-nerf Mogami, Buddy, MK) CLs can be OP as fug even at higher tiers.

What would likely be the Bong's thing that differentiates them though? Dispersion? RoF? Fires?
>>
>>152093524
boog div with me in my blys and teach me how to gunbote :^)
>>
>>152093598
>Guns on Nassau are pretty comfy
>'upgrade' to Kaiser
>Guns are shit

What a time to be alive.
>>
File: RiYZews.jpg (65KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]
RiYZews.jpg
65KB, 960x720px
>>152093598
Pay no attention to the slav behind the curtain
>>
>>152093803
Minotaur's guns had a rof of 15-20 rpm and it has lodes of torps other ships will also probably have autism rof, the real question is how the arcs look
>>
File: 1468976632616.jpg (151KB, 600x936px) Image search: [Google]
1468976632616.jpg
151KB, 600x936px
I hope the launch day fever dies down for KM BBs soon
I really want to grind them but I dont want to be up against 10 other nassaus
>>
>>152094081
tahts gonna be a long 2 month wait

might be best to buy scharnhost and just free exp them
>>
>>152093779

;_;7 Jon

>>152093835

You'd be better off taking notes from somebody who's actually good at the gunbote DD
>>
File: w.png (39KB, 1820x418px) Image search: [Google]
w.png
39KB, 1820x418px
>>152094062
not great...
>>
>>152094404
FINE I DIDNT WANNA PLAY WITH YOU ANYWAYS.
>>
File: 63453235.png (61KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
63453235.png
61KB, 600x600px
>>152094062
>20 RPM on a cruiser

Shit man. As long as it's not Atlanta-tier arcs just the HE spam alone would kill everything
>>
>Gneisenau with secondary HP mod
>Lose half my secondary mounts every match
>literally every match

Higher average damage than Nagato tho so who cares
>>
File: w2.png (31KB, 1351x449px) Image search: [Google]
w2.png
31KB, 1351x449px
>>152094523
Pretty much Cleveland tier
>>
>>152094597
gneis has horrible secondaries tbqh
>>
File: cleveland.png (16KB, 328x209px) Image search: [Google]
cleveland.png
16KB, 328x209px
>>152094523
>>152094785
Almost exactly Cleveland tier.

Slightly better, but not by much.
>>
>>152094523
>>152094785
Well, it's not perfect, but Cleveland's still a good ship. If Minotaur is Cleveland with 1/2 the reload, I'd enjoy it.
>>
>>152094797
The 105s and 128s need their fire chance reversed

won't happen, but I think the 128s will be buffed in some way regardless
>>
>>152094969
>trying to hit tier 9-10 DD's with Cleveland arcs from beyond 6km

lel
>>
File: WNBR_6-50_mkN5_arrangements_pic.jpg (909KB, 924x1280px) Image search: [Google]
WNBR_6-50_mkN5_arrangements_pic.jpg
909KB, 924x1280px
Gotta say these thing look pretty slick. Shame the Americans never got their automatic 6in guns working well.
>>
>>152095126
Just realized those little tubes on the barrels are for water jackets. will WG animate them
>>
>>152095126
Eh, its okay. 8 inch auto-loading guns are cooler.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICifnf63lCs
>>
The Nassau is actually quite good

Regards,
Nassau owner
>>
>>152095667
the nassau reminded me how much i dont know how to battleships
>>
>>152095126
>>152095437
So I'm wondering. The advantage of 6" gun over 8" guns used to be that a 6" shell could be loaded without the help of machinery, so the reload was faster. However, with auto-loading, does this become irrelevant?
>>
File: 1468253005672.gif (331KB, 340x500px) Image search: [Google]
1468253005672.gif
331KB, 340x500px
>>152095079

>Meanwhile in Khabarosk
>Smaller caliber
>Just as high RoF
>More damage
>Bettter arcs
>Faster
>Stealthier
>>
>>152095743
Pretty much. The power disparity between a 6" gun and 8" gun is also massive. 8" shells weigh over twice as much as most 6" shells, and penetrate anywhere between twice and three times as much armor at all ranges.

If you can afford to make heavy cruisers, there's really no reason to make light cruisers.
>>
Right now it's the moment to begin the grind and finish at least Nassau. The BBs outnumber the cruisers, so HE spam is not as prevalent, and BB's can brawl each other without burning the entire time.
>>
>>152095960
When did auto-loading guns come into fruition then? If it's before 1940, then my disappointment in the RN can only grow.
>>
>>152096253
Late 1940's.
>>
>>152095743
kinda yes kinda no. 6in also has the advantage of being able to be used for anti aircraft duty much more easily. you could make 8in DP gun but holy shit would that be a task. Also you have to remember the size of the ship and its purpose was more relevant. Also 155mm has been the go to shell for artillery support forever now for many reasons
>>
File: Turtle Hermit Method.jpg (123KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
Turtle Hermit Method.jpg
123KB, 300x300px
>>152087115
>Game with RN Battleships, Destroyers, Carriers, and Battlecruisers.

Just gotta look elsewhere.
>>
>>152095826
yea Khab will shit all over RN CLs if they have cleveland arcs.
>>
>>152096373
Ok good. My disappointment has been alleviated for now. I do know that for what they wanted to do with them, CLs were best for the RN.
>>
>spotting damage now tracked
neat if it actually gives an xp benefit

>potential damage
Amusing as fuck when you're in a DD
>>
>>152089385
You'd prefer if they were all the same shape? You some kinda commie?

>>152093157
Why not tiers 4 and 5?
>>
>>152096740
what if RN gets 13km torps and smoke
>>
>>152097067

It would still do worse than the Khab. The only thing they would have over the Khab is AA.
>>
>finish game in amagi
>total potential damage: 1,040,035

u wot, I tanked a million damage?
>>
>>152097067
They should get smoke. Hell, Norfolk and Suffolk had smoke and they were CAs
>>
>>152097067
CL dont get no smokes or IJN botes would have them

the torp range might fly, but it would be hilariously slow or a precursor to 15km ijn torps
>>
>>152097067
Also the aussie magazine from whatever ago also confirmed RN cruisers will be able to signle fire torps from their lauches. For what purpose?

what will the Aussie ship they promised by the end of the year be?
>>
>>152097553
well the torps almost all the bong cruisers used were a version above the ones on the bylatcyka and had better range. tbqh the rn probably had the 2nd best torps around during the war, but they were 2nd place by a long shot behind the nips
>>
>>152097612
>2x4 torp launchers can be used as 4x2 torps
better spread, greater control of all them torps, it sounds nice on a long lance capable ship
>>
>>152097815
so bong torps might be fast 8km range torps
>>
Boys, when is 0.5.10 coming to EU/UK. Still not updating for me.
>>
>>152098016
probably
>>
>>152090165
Abru and raptor duh
>>
>>152097413

Every ship has smoke. You just pore raw oil on the outside of the boiler. Boom, smoke.
>>
>>152097612
Sydney in all likelihood
Kormoran when?

>>152098294
>The regular server restart takes place every Thursday at 05:30 CEST (UTC+2).
>Implying there's a UK server
DON'T FORGET: YOU'RE HERE FOREVER
>>
So will the British tier 10 cruiser be good?
>>
>>152100018
haha no
>>
>>152100018
my gut says maybe. it all comes down to how the armor is vs he and how much hp it has. also if the arcs are horrible or not. so atleast a 50% chance it's really bad and or it's really good and gets nerfed to shit
>>
>>152100327

>gets nerfed to shit

Zao....
>>
File: shot-16.08.17_17.51.43-0949.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.17_17.51.43-0949.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
>we want to solve torpedo soup
>>
>>152100539
hi raptor
>>
>>152100539
>Something kills a baBBy
holy shit that's OP, WG nurf pls
>>
>>152100429
yea but this is RN we're talking about litteraly the only reason WG announced them is because Gaijew tried to one up them by announcing pt botes would have RN at release
>>
>>152100964
Where do you guys get this stuff? Were you at the board meeting when they decided to add RN?
>>
>>152101076
basic intuition comrade.

I don't even frequent this board often and came to the same conclusion as Anon.
>>
>>152101076
RN was confirmed for Q4 2016 half a year ago, the announcement now is either because gaijin announced ther boats, or because they want to get a 'release one tree, announce the next' thing, or becasue it's gamescom.
Or just a coincidence.
>>
File: Leningrad.jpg (172KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]
Leningrad.jpg
172KB, 1200x675px
This qt is coming soon, hopefully T6.
Oh and HMS Belfast is coming along with it.
>>
Is the Gneisenau good? It's the ship I'm most looking forwards too
>>
File: Not so sensible chuckle.gif (2MB, 245x246px) Image search: [Google]
Not so sensible chuckle.gif
2MB, 245x246px
>>152102447

>Another RU premium
>>
File: shot-16.08.17_20.19.19-0879.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.17_20.19.19-0879.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
HERE WE GO BOYS
>>
File: gneisenau.jpg (278KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
gneisenau.jpg
278KB, 1920x1080px
>>152102797
No. It's awful, especially in tier 8 matches with a 10 pt captain.

Do not play.
>>
>>152102797
she's pretty decent her guns are horribly inconsistent, but she's basically the scharnhorst with worse secondarys and the ability to really hurt BB's really bad unlike sharn and slightly faster
>>
>>152102980
>Someone spent money on the german tier X BB
bet he thinks his money was well spent :^)

>>152102797
I want to know the answer to this too
>>
>>152102914
>how dare these ruskies make ruskie ships in their own game
>>
>>152101731
>>152102424
You guys are fucking idiots.
>>
File: shot-16.08.15_11.21.22-0543.jpg (760KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.15_11.21.22-0543.jpg
760KB, 1920x1080px
>>152103112
Scharnhorst is awful too
Do Not Buy
>>
File: shot-16.08.17_17.59.59-0738.jpg (445KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.17_17.59.59-0738.jpg
445KB, 1600x900px
Entertaining little bote.

Will be neat to compare the ship lines.
>>
>>152103523
better rof on lower pen barrels compared to kawaii-chi, better secondaries to compensate

it can be penned even when angled.
>>
I'm going to buy either the Scharnhorst or Tirpitz

Is the tirpitz and scharnhorst good?
Can the tirpitz compete as a battleship?

I just wanna know what ship is better before I buy one
>>
>>152103457
For the life of me I can't get any accuracy out of the scharn.
>>
>>152104007
Its pretty hit or miss sometimes. I cant tell you how many times i have thought i would hit a guy but all the shells just land around the enemy ship.

However, it is the ship i have my most double strikes in, so theres that.
>>
>>152094062
It's secondaries also have a rate of fire of 90-120 rounds per minute. It will shit all over destroyers.
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (156KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
156KB, 1920x1080px
>>152103928
>>
>>152104331
has this been posted before? Sorry senpai
I just wanna know :(
>>
>>152103928
Neither of them are Krasny Krym, so you're guaranteed to get a great-looking money printer. Go for whichever you think looks better.
>>
>>152104559
I want to know if tirpitz is a good battleship and if the scharnhorst is a good battlecruiser

I'm still kinda new here to /wowsg/ so I'm out of the lop on how ships perform
>>
>>152104853
Go buy a mid tier premium instead. We don't need even more clueless people shitting up the end game.
>>
>>152104853
Tirpitz is a good, competitive battleship.

Scharnhorst is a good battlecruiser, of the resilient kind. It excels only against shitters, since a little angling does wonders against it. But as it turns out, there are a ton of shitters, so the thing can easily abuse them.
>>
>>152104998
>>152104998
>>152104998
I never said I was new to the game. I said im new to this thread. clam down, I just want to know about 2 premium and which is better
>>
>>152104853
Tirpitz is the better ship overall for its tier. It doesn't really have any crippling weaknesses.

Scharn isn't as good, but is still fun thanks to its handling, armor, and the fact that it doesn't see T10s. It is let down by its guns though, which are underwhelming for a battleship.
>>
>>152105123
lurk more faggot

mc fucking kill yourself kiddo
>>
>>152104853
Tirpitz is basically retard-proof. But it rewards brawling up close more than border-hugging autism, although it's perfectly capable of both.
>>
>>152105217
>>152105358
so I should get the Tirpitz? How well do the guns perform against other battleships?
>>
>>152105602
Dispersion is somewhat lousy, but you get better ROF as a tradeoff. Penetration is perfectly fine.
It's also hilarious to torp the occasional BB that makes the mistake of coming up too close or not running away in time. Torp tubes get blown up somewhat often though.
>>
>>152105835
So I assume the scharnhorsts guns have low pen and lower alpha? I see they have really bad dispersion; is this a stat card error or is it reflected ingame?
>>
>>152106005
>280mm guns @tier 7 vs 380mm guns @tier 8
Take a guess.
>>
>>152106225
Ok. Thanks for answering my question

I shall buy the memepitz
>>
>>152093803
The secondaries on the T10 will have a ridiculous rate of fire of 90-120 rounds per minute per barrel because they are also autoloader.

My guess is they will be the best at hunting destroyers, and probably replace the zao at being the best at invisi-firing and starting fires.
>>
>>152102914
>>Another RU premium clone of another ship
>>
>>152106542
The Minotaur doesn't have an Autoloader. You're thinking of the Tiger class

They the same guns but the Minotaur doesn't have autoloaders
>>
>>152106723
>clone
But it's not.
>>
>>152106891
not that Minotaur the other Minotaur you dumb goyashim
>>
File: GannetXG789.jpg (32KB, 550x393px) Image search: [Google]
GannetXG789.jpg
32KB, 550x393px
>>152082059

Brit's have fucked aesthetics
>>
>>152105282
Rude
>>
>>152106991
wat

The British Tier X cruiser won't have that high ass RoF. The British tier X minotaur will only have 8 RPM for it's main guns
>>
>>152107257
not not the crown colony modification Minotaur the other Minotaur that isn't the Minotaur that you're thinking of the other Minotaur that one you understand right that Minotaur that's different but not the Minotaur that's the t7
>>
>>152107461
wat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minotaur-class_cruiser_(1943)
This is what we're getting ingame. It has a rof of 8 rpm, not 20
>>
>>152107593
nah >>152082141
>>
>>152107727
oh shit. you're right. So what Minotaur are we getting ingame. What class is it? Is it the Tiger class
>>
>>152107257
That basically makes it useless if it has that low RoF with only 9 6in guns
>>
>>152107908
Design Z4A, apparently. Funny how all the top links direct back to the official forums. WG sure had to dig out the paperest of paper designs for T10.
>>
>>152107908
paper ship but it's related to the tiger as it has the same guns a napkin scrible of it's in the thread somewhere
>>
>>152107908
I think it was a researched design that was probably considered for Minotaur/Tiger, but never used. That said, it's the same as the "improved Essex" design but in CL form
>>
>>152108104
why didn't they just use the Tiger class? Are only russians allowed cold war ships?
>>
>>152108238
>Are only russians allowed cold war ships?
Judging by the presence Des Moines, no.
>>
>>152108238
tiger is probably to lightly armed and honestly in alot of wars would be outclassed by some german dd's
>>
>>152108238
Tiger class had only 4 6 inch guns.

I think the design they chose was a good compramise
>>
File: burgerboat.jpg (4MB, 5776x4326px) Image search: [Google]
burgerboat.jpg
4MB, 5776x4326px
If i were to go down the USN BB/CL line would i be disappointed in comparison to going down the German line? How do they each generally perform?
>>
>>152074513
I like how the Brit ships are named. It's nice seeing ships not named after places or people for once
>>
>>152108754
>Weymouth
>Caledon
>Fiji
>Edinburgh
>>>>>>not names of places
>>
>>152108658
>Chester
who cares
>St. Louis
no longer the murderboat of its heyday, but still nothing to laugh at
>Phoenix
pretty decent in all respects, the only cruiser in the tier that manages to have firepower, agility and somewhat respectable armor all at the same time
>Omaha
bigger Phoenix, doesn't get to play with bigger guns like Kirov-kun and Furutaka-senpai, but doesn't seem to suffer much from it either
>Cleveland
shadow of its former glory, hit way too hard by the nerfs. Suffers too much from retarded shell arcs, but can still easily burn down everyone who closes to 10 km or less
>Pensacola
the opposite of Cleveland, once a "fuck this game" ship, now has agility, great turret traverse and excellent guns. Prone to getting citpenned when looked at though, with ridiculous detection range to boot
>New Orleans
not quite bad per se, it's just the competitors shine more
>Baltimore
awful guns, awful ROF, awful lack of torps, awful shell arcs, awful in general. Looks good, though.
>Des Moines
a monster at close range, provided it gets that far.
>>
>>152110052
The Baltimore has amazing armor or citadel locations back in the days. It's almost as hard to cit pen with a cruiser, just like the Cleveland.
>>
>>152108658
Haven't gone down the US cruiser line so I can't say there, but as far as I know they're not vastly better or worse than the Germans, both of which are just not as good as the IJN/VMF lines.
US BBs are better, they're really generally pretty good these days, the low/mid tier ones are pretty slow but they're pretty tough in return and fun to brawl with, outside of that they're not plagued by any serious glaring weaknesses and the high tiers ones like the NC are plenty of fun.
>>
>>152100539
>he thinks that is torpedo soup
>>
>>152110052
Baltimore has good AP and HE and decent concealment.
>>
>>152108658
>BBs
USN has better AA and torpedo protection. Quite straightforward battleships that are effective at most ranges. KM are optimised for relatively close engagements with their secondaries and armour scheme

>CL/CA
It's hard to generalise the USN line, but it's relatively strong aside from perhaps T9. Their AP and HE are about equally useful. It has strong AA from T6 up. KM cruisers rely heavily on AP. Their guns have good range and they also have short range torps with good arcs of fire. Their drawbacks are weaker armour and slightly worse manoeuvrability.

>>152110052
>Suffers too much from retarded shell arcs
It only has shit arcs for AP. HE is on par with
>>
>>152110741
>on par
Forgive that brainfart at the end. HE is worse than IJN, but not terribly so.
>>
File: ss+(2016-08-17+at+10.46.49).jpg (92KB, 883x360px) Image search: [Google]
ss+(2016-08-17+at+10.46.49).jpg
92KB, 883x360px
>>152103457
how do I Scharnhorst? Cruisers aren't afraid to broadside me. 2 citadels didn't even do close to the damage of 10 seconds under my secondaries.
>>
Hi, friends. As a break from German BB grinding, I uploaded and annotated a bunch of photos from my Iowa trip, and I wanted to share. My goal is also to create albums for Midway, Hornet, Texas, Lexington, and Constitution in the next few days.

If you have any blurbs to add to the photos, please let me know. Thanks.

http://botebutt.imgur.com/
>>
GOD DAMN the gneisenau can't hit jack shit. wonder what the sigma is on this thing because holy shit for a brawler this thing can't hit crap up close
>>
File: 1470539869092.png (474KB, 656x972px) Image search: [Google]
1470539869092.png
474KB, 656x972px
>>152111160

Did you find her secret place?
>>
>>152111160
>botebutt
>>
>>152111293
Of course he didn't, nobody has ever found a ship's secret place.
>>
>>152111293
Imagine if you were walking through a museum ship and you found a shiny metal ass. How would you even react?
>>
>>152111160
Thanks Jake!
>>
Speaking of which, could any of the museum ships be recommissioned during wartime?

ofc they'd be outdated but I heard some museum ships were recommissioned as trainers
>>
>wake up
>still no fucking scharnhorst
>>
File: World of Warships General..png (18KB, 1315x242px) Image search: [Google]
World of Warships General..png
18KB, 1315x242px
>>152111437
>>152111542
>>
File: bender-smoking.jpg (78KB, 450x334px) Image search: [Google]
bender-smoking.jpg
78KB, 450x334px
>>152111542
Bite it
>>
>>152111293
This is weirdly erotic.
>>
>>152111648
Pretty sure the Iowa's still technically have to be able to be reactivated, but it's such a pain in the ass that it's not worth it.
From reading some report about when they did it the last time they had a whole lot of trouble both mechanically getting them back to operational condition and actually getting any kind of training because they had to go out and find people who'd actually served on them ages ago.
>>
>>152111648
I'm not sure if Midway was ever donated by the Navy. If the Navy still owns it, then they can recommission it out of mothball anytime they want.
>>
File: QT Hotel271.png (594KB, 598x815px) Image search: [Google]
QT Hotel271.png
594KB, 598x815px
Hotel: Literally, the QTest.
>>
>>152112058
>a whole lot of trouble
Eh no, the report reads like this: "there was some cosmoline on it. We cleaned it off and put a filter in the hydraulics and everything ran just peachy"
http://dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a183947.pdf

Reactivating battleships solely for shore support is retarded though.
>>
File: 1471393722557.jpg (150KB, 575x523px) Image search: [Google]
1471393722557.jpg
150KB, 575x523px
Everything about german bbs is shit.

No AA
No accuracy
Awful turret traverse
One torp hit =1/4 hp gone
Easy to be set on fire


Not even Bayern or Gnenenesaau with AFT + BFT will shoot down tier 5/6 IJN paper planes.

Why did WG fucking ruin it
>>
File: Contemplative Haifury.png (256KB, 298x479px) Image search: [Google]
Contemplative Haifury.png
256KB, 298x479px
>>152113958

Its also easy as fuck to flood them with air dropped TBs.
A single squadron can take half the health of a German BB whereas an IJN or USN BB would take 1/4.
>>
I AM GOING TO KILL EVERY GERMAN BB I SEE
FUCK THEM
>>
>German Battleships
>Main guns feature a high rate of fire and quick turret traverse

Quick turret traverse? Was that written before some kind of pre-release nerf?
>>
>>152113562
It could still be useful as a Anti-Aircraft or anti-missile ship.

It also has the armor to easily survive the small-medium sized anti-ship missiles fielded by kebabs, which would otherwise destroy the much less armored ships fielded today.

And of course shore bombarent of those kebab held areas.
>>
>>152113958
They are good brawlers thanks to turtlememe armor and meme secondaries
>>
File: 1463913149297.png (140KB, 254x467px) Image search: [Google]
1463913149297.png
140KB, 254x467px
>>152114536

>GPS guided Iowa rounds with modern technology.
>America's big dick slapping shit.
>>
>>152114536
nah. might aswell create a new rail gun bombardment cruiser if you want a BB. the entire engine system on the iowas is garbaged also litteraly no space for electronics tbqh because it wanst designed for it
>>
>>152113958
You can't ruin what was never good in the first place
>>
>>152114536
You don't design a ship just for kebab removal. Besides the USN is going back to conventional engagement philosophy anyways now with the distributed lethality program.

In which case, your issues are the Russians and Chinese. The Russians already have missiles that can cleave through the armor of an Iowa.
>>
>>152114738
There's always the total reconstruction option, like what Japs did with their old ships before the war. It's no like the Iowa is housing a nuclear reactor so it wouldn't be too big of a problem. It would be costly, but still probably less than the cost of designing and building a whole new ship from scratch. For all we know the technologies to forge such armor like that on the Iowa may have been lost to time, or the facilities to produce it not up and running anymore.
>>
>>152115198
Still would probably have more chance of survival against one than for example one of the Arley Burke class destroyers, probably more structurally sound than them.

Still, it's just speculation, and any ship nowadays can be easily sunk by a torpedo under the keel anyways.
>>
File: shot-16.08.17_22.45.29-0749.jpg (392KB, 1351x1009px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.17_22.45.29-0749.jpg
392KB, 1351x1009px
>>
File: 1471490695126.jpg (36KB, 500x269px) Image search: [Google]
1471490695126.jpg
36KB, 500x269px
>>152114659
If they're good brawlers, why do they lose a quarter of their hp after one torp hit? Why do they get damaged for at least 10k when another bb hits you with AP? Why do they lit up immediately from one HE salvo?
>>
>>152115516
Survivability doesn't matter too much if you want to think like that. As you said most ships can be heavily damaged easily and the Iowa is no exception.

So the Navy decided to have a bunch of smaller ships with decent capabilities rather than one super large one. Because if the Iowa get's mission killed. Sure it may not sink but it's going to be a bitch and a half to repair or replace. A DD is much replaceable and numerous. If a DD goes down, well we have a 100 more of them so it's okay in the long run. Compared to only 2-4 BBs.

>>152115325
Actually none of the industry is there to maintain an Iowa anymore. The 16 inch gun ammunition, gun powder, maintenance, and parts required for an Iowa simply do not have any industrial backing at this point.

Of which the USN predicted at minimum 20 months to even attempt to get industry back up at the cost of a couple hundred million of dollars. And no, the military isn't a infinite money supply and has some serious budgeting issues today.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmVpisMoyn0

Would you ride her down?
>>
>>152115325
the tech to build the iowa doesnt really exist in the US these days building armor plates that thick is just something no one but china really could do now. also if they were to make a new battleship it would likely use some kind of nera composite anyway. besides the range on the iowas guns is ouny compaired to the projected for the railguns that are in the works
>>
File: 1464430089271.png (241KB, 430x528px) Image search: [Google]
1464430089271.png
241KB, 430x528px
>above average BB damage today
>above average BB kills today
>above average BB KDR
>bellow average BB survival rate
>bellow average BB WR
>-1 BB WTR
These teams are killing my BB stats
>>
>>152116094
>the military isn't a infinite money supply

If the economy is good, the military will ask Congress for money and get it. If the economy is bad, the military will ask Congress for money and get it.

Either way the military get it's money, now whether it is spent wisely or not is up for debate.
>>
>>152116075
you should also ask why ships like gneis have such horrible sigma that they can barely hit shit reliably at close range
>>
>>152115325
>For all we know the technologies to forge such armor like that on the Iowa may have been lost to time, or the facilities to produce it not up and running anymore.

To be fair, if people actually wanted to build armored ships again, they'd probably be better off with using modern MBT armor as a starting point. The last time somebody put some serious thought into ship armor was most likely in the 50s, while vehicle armor has been actively developed over the past 60 years.

And modern tank rounds would go straight through the Iowa's turrets.
>>
File: Future Hotel.jpg (56KB, 736x519px) Image search: [Google]
Future Hotel.jpg
56KB, 736x519px
>>152116515
How about a new era battleship then?
>>
>>152116815
Funnily enough, your example is mainly used for shore bombardment.
>>
>>152116815
Find a way to justify the insane cost of one.

Furthest thing you'll get in any realistic manner in the next few decades is the advent of a new class of armored cruiser.
>>
>>152116904
Which is what the Marines currently desire, yes?
>>
>>152116980
That's like saying the A-10 is good because soldiers like BRRRTTT. There's a reason why the USAF is replacing the A-10 with props for COIN and low intensity CAS missions.
>>
>>152116970
I'm sure Nippon would find a way if allowed to.
>>
File: Cl1lG12WIAIETSn.jpg (234KB, 1200x982px) Image search: [Google]
Cl1lG12WIAIETSn.jpg
234KB, 1200x982px
>>152093803
Wargaming has stated that the RN CLs will all have single-firing torpedo launchers; potentially a game changer.
>>
>>152116970
Also keep in mind we are talking about the US military here, we find ways to justify anything.
>>
File: Balls_of_fuckin'_super-carbon.jpg (286KB, 1500x844px) Image search: [Google]
Balls_of_fuckin'_super-carbon.jpg
286KB, 1500x844px
>>152116980
Shore bombardment against BETA, I should say.
>>
>>152117121
I still have no idea how this will work other than me sperging out a torp in chain fire every 10 seconds maybe so i always have a torpedo loaded
>>
>>152114364
Still curious about that.
>>
>>152116980
the marines literally only exist because they said they would full force oppose the integration of the military unless Truman literally wrote the permanent existence of the marines into law. The marines can want whatever they want the army has literally done their job better forever now.
>>
>>152116815
>>152116904
>>152116980
>>152117489
For example
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wpb7K7r1rJI
>>
>>152117858
Don't the marines already get mostly hand-me-down equipment from the other branches because nobody who isn't in the marines likes them?
>>
>>152116115
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpBgCXOg6RI

Better vid
>>
>>152118154
they get a budget but they always complain about how few dozens of billions they get so they buy cheap shit and then they waste the rest on random random shit is usually overpriced specialized equipment or shit to fic their cheap shit
>>
>>152117908
We maburabu now?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4SrJXSbDgg
>>
File: 29215BB6.png (985KB, 1440x1200px) Image search: [Google]
29215BB6.png
985KB, 1440x1200px
>>152118450
>The Mogami-class cruisers, displacing a little under 30 000 tons, are high-speed warships with five 30.5cm three-barreled gun turrets as their main armament

How absurd
>>
>>152118438
Aren't the marines basically obsolete anyway? Either the enemy can't put up enough resistance to justify their existance, or the other side has no qualms about throwing tactical nukes at that kind of operation.
>>
>>152118668
Japan tends to remember things a little differently.
>>
File: 1305220086903.png (25KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
1305220086903.png
25KB, 400x400px
>>152116815
>>152116904
>>152117489
>>152117908
>>152118450
>>152118668
>>152119018
>>
>>152118887
they literally exist because in case of north korea break glass and beach land. currently they just get used in the same way as regular army infantry except they somehow have deluded themselves into believing they are some kind of markspersons shock infantry riflepersons faggot fucks
>>
>>152119256
You don't like the looks of Future Hotel?
>>
>>152119350
>He doesn't know CHOMP
>>
>>152119270
>in case of north korea break glass and beach land
Does anybody actually think China won't throw them out immediately?
>>
>get Independence
>still shit
>go back to Tenryū to grind for Hōshō
Jesus, why did I ever leave?
>>
>>152116515
Probably composite armor combined with a citadel made of depleted uranium would be decent against a large amount of anti-ship missiles.
>>
File: 1462203172148.png (243KB, 600x850px) Image search: [Google]
1462203172148.png
243KB, 600x850px
>>152119559
It is a mystery.
>>
>>152116373
>>152116094
>the military isn't a infinite money supply
>F-35
>>
>>152119617
Yea, nobody seems to take into account of all the newer modern armor that could be retrofitted onto her. It's not like you would want to completely keep all the WW2 era armor.
>>
>>152119528
China would probably just say they no longer support them and let the other countries go through the trouble of invading them
>>
>>152119739
F-35 is not infinite money. It's simply the focal point of a desperate USAF needing a new fighter to replace all the damn aging F-15s. Also for better and for worst. The country does run on a military industrial complex. RnD in the military has significant paybacks back into civilian industry which is why the USA's military budget can be as large as it is.
>>
>>152119528
people tend to overestimate the ability of the chinese ground army they are basically only a boarder guarding force meant to counter russia and india. besides we would be in the right the only reason marines would be used is incase of north korea invading the south. if the chinese tried to stream into NC from the north they would get rigid rekt so hard these days it would be dumb. so they wouldn't do it. they would rather lose NC as a buffer then be so embarrassed and spark off a large scale war with the US just to support some retard in Pyongyang.
>>
>>152119739
Like I said, whether it is spent wisely or not is totally up for debate.
>>
>>152119873
I'm sure they'd be positively thrilled to have US troops parked directly at their southern border.
>>
>>152119964
f-15 isn't going anywhere if they had acheived the full 700 craft order for the f-22 instead of stopping at 200 maybe. the f35 exists because of the need to fill the strike gap of the aging f-18 and f-16. Also because we are going towards stealth to defeat russian integrated air defenses we need aircraft that can do that aswell as fill the gaps in the missing stealth fighters. the f-35 overall is a pretty cost effective aircraft for the number being purchased for capability. at full rate production it will be around 75mil per craft, meanwhile the super hornet is around 65mil currently. the 1.5trillion thing people always thow around is just the projected till 2070 purchase maintenance and researcher costs
>>
File: 6cV6I7g.png (109KB, 421x491px) Image search: [Google]
6cV6I7g.png
109KB, 421x491px
>>152119739
The development for the F-35 has been more expensive than say, the F-22 yes, but the plane itself isn't that much more expensive than other aircraft.

>In $2012 dollars the F-35A is 76/86(lowest/average) million over it’s production run, the F-35B/C is 94/109 million. The F-16 Block 52 is likely 73 million, A Super Hornet is 63/79 million, a Growler is 64/72, the Gripen E/F is around 80-85 mil, the Rafale C is 87mil and M is 100mil, the Eurofighter T3 costs 110 million in $2012, the F-22 115/181 million These costs are UNRF. Unit costs are often confused between Unit Recurring Flyaway(basic airframe + engines + avionics), Unit Non-Recurring Flyaway(+ mission/weapon systems, ancillary and equipment), Procurement Unit Cost (+Spares), and Program Acquisition Unit Cost (+Development costs), it is important to compare the same cost measure. It is also very important to ensure calculations are made in same year dollars as inflation can rapidly change apparent pricing.

>Also to remember is the aircraft lifetime, the Super Hornet is rated for 6,000 hours years where as all F-35s are 8,000 hours, to add more hours to the Super Hornet is called a SLEP and costs 28 million for 3,000 hours. The Eurofighter is rated for 6,000 hours and Rafale 7,000 hours, the F-22 is 8,000 hours, as is the F-16.


https://comprehensiveinformation.wordpress.com/
>>
Looks like we started a:

>It's another F-35 thread takeover episode
>>
File: 1463194953674.jpg (147KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
1463194953674.jpg
147KB, 1280x720px
>>152117489
God that show is so good, fleets were epic, even had a Montana class
>>
>>152120280
You do realize that we don't produce any new block F-15? The F-15 fleet has been literally falling apart due to fatigue issues. The wars in the Middle East have devastated our fleet of aircraft due to constant sorties well over their recommended limits.

It's actually the opposite of what you've said. The F-18 and F-16 are being manufactured still with much more newer versions nowadays such the Viper. And the Navy has a maintenance program that guarantees the longevity of their aircraft unlike the USAF due to how they cycle their carriers.
>>
>>152120280
>Also because we are going towards stealth to defeat russian integrated air defenses

Lookin' good
>>
>>152120759
Congrats for proving that you don't understand what happened there or how stealth on aircraft works.
>>
>>152120759
>Let's just use the same flight path over and over again
>They can see us anyways right?
>Stealth amirite?
>>
>>152120695
yea but f-15's are cheap as fuck at 25 mil a pop and they are upgrading alot of them with aesa's. I would love to replace them but f-22 production is likely never gonna start up again. might wait till the 2030 fighter proposals for 6th gen. till then f-15 will have to do for fighter role.
>>152120759
I'd go into the particulars of that even but they have been discussed so much ad nasuam on /k/ for the past 5 years that I don't think I need to. please stop using bate so stale I'm far to drunk to care.
>>
>>152120951
We should probably drop the /k/ stuff now. Or at least get back to ships.
>>
File: 111111.png (722KB, 1000x706px) Image search: [Google]
111111.png
722KB, 1000x706px
wtf nerf this
>>
>>152120951
>>152120695
But F-35s are going to replace the A-10, too!
>>
>>152121021
yea probably
>>
>>152120830
> you don't understand how the magic invisible planes work
> murica strong
What could possibly go wrong
>>
>>152121097
Which is a good thing.
>>
I don't like BBs but I like cruisers with big 8 inch guns shooting AP at ~4RPM over 6in HE spam. Should I buy the Scharn?
>>
>>152119559
independence is not shit what non-sense are you spouting.
>>
>>152121053
It is perfectly Balans))))))
>>
File: GuessTheBote1.jpg (449KB, 1718x1320px) Image search: [Google]
GuessTheBote1.jpg
449KB, 1718x1320px
Guess the bote
>>
>>152121306
hms minotaur
>>
>>152121306
North Carolina
>>
>>152121235
They're good for clearing the sky, but nothing else.
>>
>>152121306
Zao?
>>
>>152121117
You continue to prove your ignorance of the subject?
>>
>>152121406
I was playing it today doing a good 60-120k dmg per game with a new captain so idk.
>>
>>152121373
>>152121439
Nope
>>152121392
No, but close
>>
> British cruiser line
> tier 4 and 5 have tiny turrets
They won't have 130mm guns, right?
>>
Post unfun botes.
>>
>>152121562
literally everything will have 6in guns.
>>
>>152121053
Do you have the one of Soviet or Chinese tanks and helicopters advancing towards those alien miners?
>>
>>152121306
>>152121306
Iowa?
>>
>>152121735
Clooooose
>>
File: manifestbreastiny.png (794KB, 1250x1128px) Image search: [Google]
manifestbreastiny.png
794KB, 1250x1128px
>>152121530
>>
>>152121752
M-montana?
>>
>>152121752
Colorado
>>
>>152121868
>Colorado
>>fast
>>railguns
>>detection
>>
>>152121306
Montana
>>
File: 1457595518955.gif (1MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]
1457595518955.gif
1MB, 500x281px
>>152121852
>>152121868
She's not American
>>
>>152122030
Moskva?
>>
File: 222222222.png (1MB, 1800x768px) Image search: [Google]
222222222.png
1MB, 1800x768px
wtf there was nothing i could do????????
>>
>>152122003
>>152122030
Look I'm just throwing wild guess here

If that pic didn't mean NC or Iowa, I don't know what he meant
>>
>>152119408
what does chain chomp have to do with this
>>
File: 1439680547628.jpg (71KB, 737x688px) Image search: [Google]
1439680547628.jpg
71KB, 737x688px
>>152122115
>>152122154
>>
>>152121306
Hotel or that german BB
>>
>>152122228
Unless you are talking about the Des Moines
>>
>>152121306
Imperial class Star Destroyer
>>
>>152122154
the pic means that raptor is a memeing retard
>>
File: 1460129309094.jpg (106KB, 900x582px) Image search: [Google]
1460129309094.jpg
106KB, 900x582px
>>152122349
Closest so far
>>
File: Chomp.gif (170KB, 260x195px) Image search: [Google]
Chomp.gif
170KB, 260x195px
>>152122190
this
>>
>>152122436
fug, I know it but I dont remember the name
>>
>>152122549
wtf I hate chain_chomp now
>>
>>152122436
Republic class Star Destroyer


Now what do I win?
>>
File: nelson23.jpg (28KB, 585x439px) Image search: [Google]
nelson23.jpg
28KB, 585x439px
>>152121306
HMS nelson
>>
File: 1469321245102.jpg (59KB, 453x439px) Image search: [Google]
1469321245102.jpg
59KB, 453x439px
>>152122904
>>
>>152122949
your disgust is irrelevant my kid, all that matters is my prize. you gunna give me a scharn yet jake you dumb slut
>>
>>152123050
mako pls
>>
>>152123050
But Mako, I thought the Scharn was a meme not to fall for?
>>
File: captcha..png (253KB, 701x596px) Image search: [Google]
captcha..png
253KB, 701x596px
>>152123050
Not me. Too busy being mad at German BBs to meme here on this board.
>>
>the Scharnhorst has terrible dispersion

Where did this meme come from?

It's nothing to write home about, but it's decent. Anything within 13km is hard to miss, especially DD's because of the shell travel.

It might not be cruiser like at max range, but it's guaranteed to do more damage per salvo if you can shoot straight. I'm not sure what everyone was expecting.
>>
File: shot-16.08.18_00.29.22-0346.jpg (157KB, 1323x629px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.18_00.29.22-0346.jpg
157KB, 1323x629px
This ship desu senpai
>>
>>152123382
just wait till you get to the geneisenhouse. the only only reason the scharn don't feel inaccurate is the shell output. 6 15in guns with the worst sigma in the game is horrifying. still not a horrible ship.
>>
I play cruisers. I like:
>slower shooting hihg velocity 8inch guns w/ good AP over 6inch rainbow arc HE spam
>fast
>engagements around 10km
Should I buy the Scharny?
>>
>>152123812
>IJN anything
>good AA
>>
>>152123812
fubuki
>>
Has EU even announced its Scharn sale yet?

>>152123382
>especially DD's
You kill a remarkable number of DDs in Scharn, actually.
>fast shell speed
>flat arc
>equally fast or FASTER turret traverse than any CRUISER tier 7 AND ABOVE except Dmitri)))))))) and Atlanta but no one actually thinks of her as a cruiser
Even if you're shotgunning, shotgunning fast and straight will land you hits more often than not.

>>152123825
Since you just described Scharn, yes.
>>
>>152123825
If you have a Nazi captain with CE and demo then sure
>>
>>152122743
>>
>>152124024
>You kill a remarkable number of DDs in Scharn, actually.
That's because of the meme-tier secondaries.
>>
>>152123825
If it is anything like it has been over the last several months in the SO tech tree, you probably would like it.

And from what I've seen, and observed thus far, it is. And you would probably like it.
>>
>German BBs are out now
>STILL NO SCHARNHORST
WHY
>>
>>152123812
Is it Bismarck?
>>
>>152124115
Honestly, Scharn may be a better ship to train German cruiser captains with than Prinz Eugen.
>>
>>152124552
To get a rise out of you Anon. Next they'll be posting some more GAMESCOM GAMESCOM GAMESCOM news to make you even saltier.
>>
>>152124592
BINGO BABY!

This webm is your reward.
>>
SI or vigilance for KM BBs?
>>
>>152124621
EU just got it released though
but I don't even care about gamescom IT'S NOT EVEN IN MY HEMISPHERE GIVE ME MY SHITTY NAZI BOTE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
>>152124643
I hate you, Raptor. Fuckers who free xp ships should be shot.
>>
>>152124713
SI
>>
Least EU finally got the blyskawica for sail in the tech tree. Which is nice since they didn't seam to want it in the prem store for some reason.
>>
>>152123812
It's an American ship, or else you wouldn't have said it had good AA

But it is Bismarck isn't it? With you implying that Trump is literally Hitler right?
>>
File: nazi-bote_.jpg (589KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
nazi-bote_.jpg
589KB, 2560x1440px
>>152124024
>>152124115
>>152124478
I hope Putin will use my money to bomb syria
>>
>>152123382
Anyone who is used to Tirpitz dispersion can easily handle Scharnhorstes dispersion.
>>
File: Template.jpg (94KB, 1718x1320px) Image search: [Google]
Template.jpg
94KB, 1718x1320px
>>152124767
t.Yamato Captain
>>152124790
It's Bismarck, her AA is actually pretty ok, but putin with an SMG didnt exactly scream GOOD AA to me lol

Template if anyone else wants a go
>>
>>152124790
Not sure about the Bisko but the Tirptiz actually has surprisingly good AA if you take the manual AA like I was dumb enough to do. Despite having the Iowa/NC/Monty the Tirpitz is still my highest plane kill ship in the game.
>>
>>152124906
raptor *sigh* why are you such a spergering autist
>>
>>152124767
Yea, it's our fault that we have jobs and disposable income to spend on a game we like, so sorry for your inconvenience.
>>
>>152125028
>Raptor
>job
>>
>>152124897
Me too senpai, know that our money will go to a good cause
>>
>>152125056
Don't know about him, but I have one at least
>>
File: 1471107615282.jpg (35KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]
1471107615282.jpg
35KB, 500x375px
>>152124974
>>152125056
>tfw you're dunking shitters with your waifu while haters talk shit
>>
>>152125254
STOLEN MEMES AGAIN
>>
>>152124713
I made a handy-dandy calculator which you can use to help make your decision.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JapnvYHgTRn1ndUlLD9eFiRMfeEc6Ufqf7RHVy4HEzk/edit?usp=sharing

>>152124906
>jpg template
kys
>>
>>152125364
>jpg
raptor is such is incapable of knowing what that means
>>
File: atlanta_question_marks.png (792KB, 959x447px) Image search: [Google]
atlanta_question_marks.png
792KB, 959x447px
>>152122904
how they installl guns on oil tanker?
>>
File: afb9cbffc6f4781ba4f6863a6c95f6cc.jpg (429KB, 1125x681px) Image search: [Google]
afb9cbffc6f4781ba4f6863a6c95f6cc.jpg
429KB, 1125x681px
>>152124906
>>152125028
I was in my Montana and went against a Gross Kurry, he free XP'd and didn't know how to play it. Was removed by our Taihou and it was hilarious. We just steamroll the team after that.

People who free XP are terrible.
>>
File: Listing but still underway.jpg (103KB, 740x625px) Image search: [Google]
Listing but still underway.jpg
103KB, 740x625px
>>152125254
>tfw you've been getting progressively worse at you're shipfu as time goes on
>>
>>152124610
Scharn is a better cruiser than Hipper tbqh
>>
>>152125486
You assume I haven't grinded a few complete lines by now, and if I hadn't got the basics down still, then someone like that should uninstall right away. It was not hard for me to adapt to the German BBs due to my experience in Tirpitz. You must have come across a complete noob who had just got his first t10
>>
>>152125486
to be fair there's a pretty big difference between someone going to the grossgermanium after never having played a BB past T3, and someone who has both full BB lines + Tirpitz and a bunch of experience in them.
>>
File: Yami_Headpat.jpg (226KB, 850x1202px) Image search: [Google]
Yami_Headpat.jpg
226KB, 850x1202px
>>152125364
>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JapnvYHgTRn1ndUlLD9eFiRMfeEc6Ufqf7RHVy4HEzk/edit?usp=sharing
Cool calculator
Ill probably get some mileage out of it
Nice work
>>
File: 1455985696140.jpg (135KB, 850x732px) Image search: [Google]
1455985696140.jpg
135KB, 850x732px
>>152125334
>>152125364
>>152125461
>>152125486
I'll just be over here
with my 100k avg dmg in Bisko
>>
>>152124897
>>152125135
>first game in scharn
>find first target
>its some faggot in an aoba whining about scharnhorst spam
>shoot at him
>1 hit
>its a citadel
lol
>>
>>152125794
>>152125905
>Defending Raptor
We're suppose to rid these threads of his kind.
>>
File: fbLUUZZ.png (183KB, 602x720px) Image search: [Google]
fbLUUZZ.png
183KB, 602x720px
>>152126716
feel free to post your Bismarck stats :^)
>>
>>152126716
But I'm just defending myself because I'm probably going to blow all of my free XP to just rush to the Bisko too, I already have pretty much all of the other BBs in the game outside of the Mikasa and Izishitty. And the Scharnhorst because they haven't fucking released it yet
>>
File: life.png (313KB, 370x467px) Image search: [Google]
life.png
313KB, 370x467px
>>152125567
>pic
That's like the bote version of this.
>>
>>152126716
I remember your types when I was posting my Iowa victory results a day or two after the US BB release in the CBT, I also remember I just keep posting them to spite you.
>>
>>152127102
I'm not talking about people who free xp, I'm talking about getting rid of shitposters.
>>
File: 1463334194139.jpg (11KB, 500x359px) Image search: [Google]
1463334194139.jpg
11KB, 500x359px
>>152127582
>no one is shitposting
>complains about shitposting
>>
>>152120602
What show, senpai? I'm drawin' a blank.
>>
File: 1459905213451.jpg (136KB, 1920x1079px) Image search: [Google]
1459905213451.jpg
136KB, 1920x1079px
>>152127707
Schwarzemarken, highly reccomend
>>
>>152127869
On nyaa now, thanks senpai
>>
>>152127582
Back then that was declared shitposting, or blogging if you will, even though it was related game discussion. Better than say, accusing everyone of being wave or autispara, shitposting like we have now was almost nonexistent compared to what this general has become.
>>
File: 2nd game_compressed.jpg (344KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
2nd game_compressed.jpg
344KB, 2560x1440px
i like this bote
>>
>>152103657

Im up to the Konig and I have to say I like the 'lower' pen, insofar as yes it pens less, but actually JUST pens. Im finding Im getting MUCH fewer overpens with the german boats than with the US boats (like in my Monty I get about 50% over pens even against the YamCam, which I refuse to understand). You end up doing MORE damage, just fewer citadels.
>>
>Steering gets crit in Nassau
>Nothing too serious because i was slowing down behind cover
>Two enemy Nassaus whip around and I end up in a broadside with one and I cripple the shit out of him
>Keep going hard left and get between him and the second BB, not sure what type
>Secondaries blazing on all sides 80+ hits counting along with several fires caused
>Teammate sinks first Nassau
>Get behind the second one
>Full salvo of AP into his ass blows him the fuck up winning the match
Nassau fuckin' comfiest early BB
Doesn't have that far of main gun range, but you can make it work
>>
Hows the Bayern? Is it basically an ugly warspite?
>>
File: disgusted grenadier.png (45KB, 192x185px) Image search: [Google]
disgusted grenadier.png
45KB, 192x185px
>>152127941
don't breed
>>
File: qtbismarck.jpg (40KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]
qtbismarck.jpg
40KB, 480x640px
gnight wowsg, sleep tight
>>
>>152128585
Too late, nigga. Might watch it with my kids tomorrow.
>>
File: shot-16.08.18_01.58.56-0673.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.18_01.58.56-0673.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
It bothers me a little that Amagi as modeled in game would have made for an impractically wet ship. The entire forecastle is so low and flat that going at any sort of speed in anything but calm weather would have swamped her with tons and tons of water.
>>
File: shot-16.08.18_08.58.00-0335.jpg (454KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
shot-16.08.18_08.58.00-0335.jpg
454KB, 1920x1080px
The spirit of der Führer himself led my shells.
>>
File: 1459232179922.png (231KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]
1459232179922.png
231KB, 640x360px
>>152124897
>buy digital boats from Judaeo-Slavic game developers
>they funnel it up to Putin
>Putin uses it to annihilate takfiri fucking shits in Syria

Maybe we should buy more premiums.
>>
>2 Burger ports
>1 Russian port
>2 Jap ports (including 1 weeb port)
When are the Germans going to get a port? Wilhelmshaven when?
>>
>>152128978
>Wilhelmshaven
>Not Hamburg
>Not Kiel
>>
File: HMSVanguardSternView.jpg (394KB, 1920x1445px) Image search: [Google]
HMSVanguardSternView.jpg
394KB, 1920x1445px
Anybody know why the Vanguard is flying her colors from the stern while underway in this photo?
I was under the impression that the RN only flies the ensign from the stern while moored
>>
>>152128803
Thing is, WG has no idea how to design ships
All their paper designs are impractical (see Amagi) or fugly (see Izumo)
>>
>>152129068
>Hamburg
>Kiel
>not Wilhelmshaven
>>
>>152129302
>not All three
>>
File: 3rd game_compressed.jpg (262KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
3rd game_compressed.jpg
262KB, 2560x1440px
>>152128808
likewise comrade
The spirit of der Führer lives in the bridge of the Scharnhorst
>>
>>152130151
Seriously, whoever said her smaller caliber guns were shit has no idea. Her dispersion is also fairly good. She may not get the most citadel hits, but damn can she deal pen damage.
>>
>>152130260
This
I may not be able to cit a Nagato, but god damn if I can't do 10-15k damage to him every 20 seconds

And if you're shooting at a range that her dispersion is a problem, you're not playing her right
>>
File: 1444325158585.jpg (438KB, 1080x1242px) Image search: [Google]
1444325158585.jpg
438KB, 1080x1242px
>>152130420
Does the shell velocity also feel like insanely fast for you? And yeah, she's best played at and below 15km. I think her sweet-spot is at about 13ish km.

>tfw Prinz soon
>>
>>152130570
It does feel very fast and her arcs are pretty flat too.
Her armor aint bad either, I find myself bouncing 16in shells a lot more often than I thought I would
>>
>all this scharnhorst talk
>we're now the only server to not have it
christ I wish the morons that ran our fucking cluster were more jewish
I swear to god if we have to wait until next tuesday before they put this shit up then I'm just not buying the fucking thing
>>
>>152129210
>paper designs
>Amagi
Better get in your time machine and tell the Japs that their design was impractical, because the Amagi is in the game as she was designed by the IJN.
>>
>>152131116
Thats why she was converted to a CV - namely Akagi.
>>
>>152130570
>Prinz soon
Still waiting for Dunkerque
>>
>>152067953
>hood
>tier 8
you want it to get detonated by Bismarck as often as possible?
>>
Can one of you come pick up the baBBy that's shitting up the thread in /wtg/? We have enough retards of our own.
>>
Does Scharn face tier 8 or 9
>>
>>152131194
Because by the time Japan started annexing China, they had enough of a mind to grasp that a CV is more useful than a Battlescruiser.
>>
>>152129210
Aren't both historical projects?
As far as i know, the only truly paper botes are Yorck, Hindenburg, Roon and Zao
>>
>>152131194
The Amagi herself wasn't, her hull was fucked up by an earthquake so they scrapped her, but the Akagi was converted because of the Washington Naval treaty, which ruined the entire plan for the whole 8-8 navy, not because they though she was going to be a bad ship.
>>
>>152131194
She was converted because the ship that was actually meant to be converted (one of the Tosas, IIRC) was damaged by an earthquake.

And the reason why they did not finish all those ships as BBs or BCs was the Washington Treaty, not the design.

The designs for the Tosas, Amagis and Kiis were actually pretty good.
>>
File: 1471490990219.jpg (39KB, 350x471px) Image search: [Google]
1471490990219.jpg
39KB, 350x471px
>>152131335
Why don't tell Mako that yourself
>>
>>152131346
Yes, but if you play her right you can still be effective.
>>
>>152131282
>2 turrets
>4 barrels each
>All in the front

It may sound good on paper but if one of your turrets gets knocked out, you're gonna be only half a battleship.

>>152131346
Tier 8 definitely, don't know about Tier 9. But you can still fight Tirpitzes surprisingly well. NC and Amagi are mean and you should avoid trying to fight them.
>>
LOL THEY'RE SHITPOSTING ABOUT WOWSG ON THE WARTHUNDER GENERAL

TFW WTG IS MORE ALIVE FOR WOWS SHITPOSTING THAN THIS STUPID THREAD

TFW WT PLAYERS SO BUTTBLASTED ABOUT THEIR SHIT GAME THEY PLAY WOWS NOW
>>
>>152131408
Other way around, the Amagi's hull got damaged and her sister (Akagi) and one of the Tosa's (Kaga) became CVs. Can't remember what happened to the other Tosa, I think they scrapped it or used it for target practice or something.
>>
>>152132226

>>152132226

>>152132226

new
>>
>>152046131

>>152046131

>>152046131


new
>>
>>152125486
Source on pic? iqdb isn't showing anything.
>>
File: 1372316105773.jpg (139KB, 319x480px) Image search: [Google]
1372316105773.jpg
139KB, 319x480px
>>152132360
for fucks sake anon
>>
>>152132360
>Any booru
>Put in Kantai_Collection
>>
>>152131116
Well, it is true that the Amagi's B hull is a WG design while the A hull was the IJN initial specs
This includes a much more practical forecastle
>>
>>152129068
>Hamburg
never was a naval port, only the shipyards were there
>>
>>152066861
>>152066861
my secondary speced captain is ready
>>
>>152102797
i love it so far. For lols, team up with two scharnhorsts
Thread posts: 774
Thread images: 228


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.