Image limits are for plebs edition
Previous Thread:>>149303805
A thread for all vehicle simulation games: racing sims, flight sims, train sims, submarine sims, tank sims, anything else sims which do not have enough traffic to sustain their own independent generals.
>Extra attention grabbing search terms for example welcome sims
/fsg/ /dcsg/ /fsxg/ /bmsg/ /shg/ /rofg/ /etsg/ /il2g/ /lfsg/ /tsg/
>/simg/ TeamSpeak:
ts.artificialanimation.com:7997
>Experimental website
http://nogf.moe/simg/
>/fsg/ Steam Group:
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/flightsimgeneral
>BMS download links
http://pastebin.com/2CDSgvZq
>Planefag pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/Zb0U61in
>Boat- and subfag pastebin
http://pastebin.com/JqTQWFFE
>Repository of various aviation related material:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B3EQDvufMNdeTUh4SE9WV0txa0E&usp=drive_web
>OP pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/yXeNzrpg
>Example of welcome sims
Falcon BMS, DCS World, Rise of Flight, IL-2, Combat Helo, Microsoft Flight Simulator, X-Plane, Euro truck sim, Assetto Corsa, rFactor 2, Live for Speed, SAM Simulator, Steel Beasts Pro, Steel Armor: Blaze of War, Enemy Engaged: Comanche vs Hokum, Silent Hunter, Train Simulator, Farming Simulator 201X
>Example of non-welcome games:
Ac* C*mbat, W*r Th*nder, W*rld of _____
>you will never fly this
>>149646719
Warthunder isn't that bad if you have a toaster desu. It also looks nice
>>149646928
feels bad man
>already this ded
>>149647872
its always a little dead around this time.
>>149646971
It's nonexistent if you're wanting to play sim though
>>149649283
Ground forces sim battle is actually really fun
too bad they never fucking run it anymore
So been out of the loop for a while. Whats in the pipeline for DCS, currently?
As far as I know
>Announced
F-15C AFM/ASM
Mirage F.1
>In Development
F-14
F/A-18C
AV-8B
AT-27
What am I missing? What am I wrong on?
>>149649520
F-15 already has AFM
There's a Mirage III in development, VEAO has the P-40 in the works, AJS-37 by leatherneck at some point
>>149649520
They're add MLP/FIM variants also in a couple years
>>149649402
They do its like a preselection of tanks and aircraft. I wish they would bring the old sim back though I did not get to play that way much because I did not have a joystick
>>149649891
I know, but they only run it like once a week don't they?
>>149650009
No it is all the time the lineup just changes from time to time
Main things holding back the DCS experience:
Shitty explosion effects - this is either slacking or bad taste
Shitty gun/bomb/rocket release sounds and shitty cockpit noise sounds - this is caused by amateur sound engineers thinking what the microphone records = what the human ear hears. Only way to get close to authentic sounds is to sculpt the sound subjectively i.e. add a bunch of bass to simulate the warthog cannon vibrating below your ass
>>149650614
The shitty sounds are easily fixed with soundmods- most of diveplanes stuff is good, and the genuine huey sounds mod is ABAP
>>149650909
idk why they would do high quality flight models and artwork on the planes then fuck up the sound so badly
do they just not hire actual sound designers?
>>149650995
Probably not. They very consistently fuck up sound.
The face of a man who knows EXACTLY how many G's he's about to pull.
>>149651329
>/hgg/
>>149651485
5 MiG-21 vs 2 F-5 given they are 20nm away from each other.
>>149649520
A-6 Intruder, A-7 Corsair, TU-22M, subs/ships/vehicles with controllable/clickable interiors
>>149651690
>subs/ships/vehicles with controllable/clickable interiors
wait fucking what
>>149651642
21s win that easily, the F-5 is very good one on one but in a furball the MiG will win until the aim-9p is fixed.
>>149654347
Wonder why people don't put the c&f pods on their 21s
>>149654347
Also at that range the 21s can use their radar guided missiles
>>149654754
The R3R is probably one of the MiGs least threatening weapons from the F-5s point of view. The all the Tiger has to do is break when he gets a launch warning, R3R can't turn for shit.
>>149655078
True. Well MIGs were meant to intercept bombers and the likes
>Tfw if we do simg 2v2s Id feel like I'm too shit
>tfw who I want to wingman with won't want to wingman with me
>>149656069
>play
>git gudder
>don't play
>don't git gudder
I believe in you, anon
>>149656069
I'll play with you and we can be shit together
Maybe we'll get a wooden spoon prize
Simg 2v2 3rd gen + trainers tournament when?
Why don't we do some how-to-not-be-shit dogfight trainan sometime before a tournament thing?
>>149650614
BoS has nice sound fx
>>149659493
BoS is really pretty and has fantastic damage models too
>>149660397
Because the devs give a damn about polish, when they don't you get shit like dcs.
>>149660397
>>149659493
Because the devs give a shit about polish.
>>149661597
>>149661693
>ywn have DCS fidelity planes with systems and FMs that work, BoS tier damage models, sounds and pretty explosions, BMS tier dynamic campaign and an F-4 module
>>149662073
Never ever
Modern flight sim developed by western team when?
>>149659164
+1 for this
Comfy mi-8 blueflag SAM drop ops
What have you done for REDFOR today, simg?
>>149660397
Yes. It was shit at first but now it's worth it. They're adding DX11 soon too. Goes on sale 50 percent fairly often
>>149664976
2
>>149665293
This is one of the few games I would probably have fun doing "taxi" stuff in, at least multiplayer. Since you're actually making a difference in the larger battle
Anyone up to flying Blueflag ops?
>>149665840
Does the server still crash every other hour?
>>149665905
No idea.I crashed just after dropping the SAM at >>149665293 however that was only on my end
>>149665950
what if everytime your game crashed you had a powerful orgasm
>>149666001
I'd have ruined my trousers several times over just trying to join a server.
also I would like to have some let's get not shit at air combat ops
>>149666001
I would fly Hawk a lot more often
Will they ever add a full on immersive Korean war mode? Imagine the huge ass battles with all the tank rushes and infantry. That would be awesome to strafe from the air in multiplayer
Anyone have good nvidia control settings for DCS 2.0?
If anyone wants to practice their 3rd gen dogfightan skills come in ts & I'll fly with ya.
>>149667724I would but I'm away from home for a couple of days so no ops for me :^(
So whatever happened to that new TS?
>>149668909
kek, greg btfo is what happened
F-5 gunsight anon from last thread here - sorry, fell asleep
>>149644165
>>149644513
>>149645326
If I'm understanding this correctly, what you're supposed to do is aim the pipper yourself so that in the time it takes for your shells to hit the target after being fired, the target would've flown to the position your pipper is currently pointed at when you originally fired them.
Honestly it just seems like an overly complicated explaination of Kentucky windage but I may be missing something.
Is it true that the mig21 radar is broken right now?
>>149670454
Mig-21 radar is always broken
>>149670514
Is it more broken than it usually is right now?
>>149670614
I think so, i couldn't find targets that were straight ahead of me
>>149669680
>Honestly it just seems like an overly complicated explaination of Kentucky windage but I may be missing something.
yup
If you want a radar assisted solution in the F-5 atm;
>turn the gunsight to A/A2
>press the radar acquisition button
>this puts the radar in a type of boresight mode
>fly behind a bandit at close range, puting him in the centre of the sight glass
>the symbology should change and the pipper float around
>a dash at the 1 o clock position on the pipper means you're in range
>a dot at the 12 o clock position means you're too close, break off
>if he's flying roughly constant speed and constant G then this will give a good guns solution
>>149670614
Depends on who you ask, we weren't sure last night,
>>149670746
If you were going against F-5s, then maybe it was because those are tiny, if compared to say, a bomber or a meatier fighter aircraft (F-15s and whatnot)
I didn't have much trouble acquiring a B-52 at 30km or so distance whilst being vectored by AI GCI.
>>149670937
Pretty much this.
Not sure if just due to it's WIP nature and the size but I rarely see F5s on the MIGs radar.
>still now bms ops
Fuck you dcs shitters who just want to play with their babby fc3 shit planes.
You are what is killing this general.
>>149673373
>FBW, modern point 'n' click shit
no thanks, DCS is the only one with full fidelity 3rd gen planes. The best gen.
>>149673373
Only person who knew how to host BMS ops was BMShost, and he's away
If you want BMS ops, host them yourself, I'm fairly confident that quite a lot of people will partake in them.
wszyscy Polacy powinni być zagazowani
I had no idea it would be so easy to off an F-117, the AI didn't even try to maneuver even after I saw him and sidled up behind him
What speed should I be at in a Mig21 if I want to maximize my turning rate?
>>149674993
Did you manage to pick it on radar?
>>149673982
I can host BMS ops.
Seriously
I can teach anyone here how to host bms ops.
>>149676493
Its best turning speed
>>149676975
It's mostly an issue of upload bandwidth
BMS has a ridiculous need for speed, otherwise I'd set up a permanent server
t. computer scientist
>tfw all simg wants to do rn is pvp eachother in Migs and F-5s
>I just want to do some comfy ass 2nd and 3rd gen ops against a shit ton of AI and stuff and just work together
Feels bad.
>>149678618
This is the round table, dead men's words have no meaning here
>>149679281
t. Raptor
>>149651690
>A-7 Corsair
FUCKING YES
Is multiplayer still fun with just an Su-25t?
>>149681381Maybe
>>149678618
t. shit ass pilot who gets btfo'd every time and would rather gang up on retarded AI.
I think almost all ops should have playable enemy aircraft.
Missions feel so much more real when there are human pilots on the other side.
Only BMS has good enough AI
>behind F5
>he doesn't know I'm there
>super sneaky, don't have any missiles
>suddenly 9 second freeze
>I'm dead
fuck this game
>>149682817
>retarded AI.
Enemy dogfight AI is okay, certainly a threat. Even the famous MiG-21bis ace Tony 'Mach-1 meme-gun' Kito is easier to beat than an Excellent MiG-21 AI in an F-5.
>>149666001
>>149666001
>>149666001
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnwqJmOL6I8
>>149683695
now someone post THIS video on reddit
>>149683868
We already did.
They weren't too fond of it.
>>149684156
kek
Attention all planefags
Me and another planefag are going to fly choppers in Blueflag to drop some more SAMs around and whatnot to support the redfor effort like in >>149664976 and >>149665293
If you feel like flying some minor DCS blue flag ops, be on the TS in about 40 mins (18:00 UTC) or so, maybe a bit more. GCI and CAS could go a long way.
I have 2 extreme 3D Pros now
What doo
>>149684483
Oh yeah forgot to mention
We'll be using simpleradio once we start operating.
>>149684504
Fly two MiGs at once for maximum slav
THANK YOU ARTEM MIKOYAN
>>149685614
What a MiG 29 and SU 27 at the same time?
>>149686882
Two MiG 21s
Ops when?
>>149686948
Kill f5s twice as fast
>>149687158
Gib max_client_sub perms on TS and I will stroke your pearly bottom with the blades of my KA50
>>149687406What
QUICK BLUEFLAG OPS STARTING NOW GET IN TS
>play on signature check server
>can't spot planes because ED's retarded """model enlargement""" only works properly for 1080p
>play on non-signaturecheck server
>people are obviously using leavu and other cheats
fugg
>>149667042
Everything on max that cant be app controlled hbao shit off
>>149681381
>shitty a2a
>shitty a2g
>only useful for sead memes
what do you think
>>149691075
>shitty a2g
>shitty a2a
Wew lad git gud
>>149691075
not so bad a2g
Can't get my god damned joystick set up to not bounce. If it wasn't so finicky I would have hit him rather than literally circling around his profile like I was throwing knives at a carnival
>>149693210
My main problem is I can't get the yaw (twist axis) to slowly turn as I move it. No matter what I settings I do it seems to bounce large gaps, even if I turn sensitivity down. I've made it work well enough in other flight sims
>>149691075
>grach
>shitty air-to-ground
Wow, you're retarded. Nice. So what, it doesn't have mavericks. You don't need them because you're not a casual andit has missiles that basically do the same shit, just with shorter range
>>149683075
The AI in DCS are really inconsistent.
On anything but expert I feel like they're useless, but set them on Expert and suddenly their planes' performance no longer matters and they have eyes in the back of their heads. Fuckers start shooting flares basically any time you get close, as well, and always when you're on their six, so you're usually gonna waste a missile or two because fuck you.
>>149693210
Set a deadzone and literary
Just paid for some MFGs. As I understand it, I'll be getting the new graphite ones. I'll finally be able to get rid of my knackered saiteks and get stuck into the gazelle.
>>149695205
I paid for kisses and I did not receive any. Don't make me file for a refund
>inb4 we get removed by a single F-15
>oh that won't happen raptor
>>149695764
File a police report about a sexual deviant on the prowl
>>149695764
Why are you flying so high when enemy fighters were nearby? Are you people complete morons?
>>149696774
I FOLLOW ORDERS OF BEE EMM PEE DVA
>>149697794
I order you to take out Khorne, Lord of Skulls
>>149698313
UNDERSTOOD TOVARISH GOD EMPEROR
>>149698602
thx
I want to play a flight sim right now but can't when I'm this tired because it takes so god damn long to get into the action in most sims
>>149698814
>200x200
Got some spooky music for you fellows to listen to while you fly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTRXOnbuJVM
>chase F-15 for a few minutes
>no GCI
>follow him through a turn
>realize I'm literally fucking over sochi airfield
fug
>be over sochi
>get shot in the face
DCS missiles are pure quality.
>>149703027
F-15 so your complaint dosent mean anything.
Yep pure quality netcode where jets change their course in less than 1 second and quality missiles that go dupe without flares deployed or anything.
>>149703027
>AIM-7E.webm
>>149703893
B-B-BUT only Russian missile are shit..
>>149703027
You do realize you must keep the target IN the circle,right? At all times. Not just sometimes.
>>149704453
Not with 120s you don't. And even if it was a 7, he did anyway. It's the dot relative to the circle that represents the gimbal range of the radar.
>>149704453
>You do realize you must keep the target IN the circle,right? At all times. Not just sometimes.
errr, no
You keep the steer-dot in the circle. All you have to do is keep him locked, not directly on your nose.
>>149704031
Sometimes they do incredible hits but that time it was a bad round.
>>149704453
Nigga you dumb, this shit isn't Ace Combat.
Can we do Helo ops or at least an op with Ka-50s in it sometime soon? I need to practice
>>149705328
>Dat burn time
AiM-7M is gods missiles desu.
I don't even fuck with AiM 9 anymore.
>>149705253
>You keep the steer-dot in the circle
You don't even need to do that with an AIM-7
You just need to have him within the angle of the antenna, cant remember what the degree is but you this thing called cranking where u turn 50 degrees from the target both ways and pull in the throttle, so your missile goes far but you dont
>>149707093
Steer dot is only important for when you launch. After that is irrelevant for any middle the F-15 uses.
>>149707421
Missile*
>>149705253
>You keep the steer-dot in the circle
You don't even have to do that, just keep him locked. The steering dot is simply to guide you to the best pitch and heading to get the best loft and lead for a kill on the locked target. Simply put, if you can keep the dot in the circle as the missile comes off the rail you'll have the best range and probability of a kill assuming the target doesn't try to evade.
>slavboos meme about how easy the F-15 is and how Blueflag plebs don't even know how to use SARH
>The resident retards in the thread don't even know how to use it
Toppest of keks
Slavboos are fucking idiots.
>>149707953
t. Ralfi
>>149708281
t.harmless
>>149705935
>flying gods helicopter without me.
No. Not allowed.
Last time flying on blue flag I flew all the way from Krasnodar to Maykop an inch off the ground at 300km/h.
Multiple mirages and F-15s over flew me on the way. Finally got to a town just out side Maykop.
Chopper Dave was already there so I was in prime position to remove everything on the field.
Just as I pop up server lags, and I come back to an upside chopper on fire.
Never been so salt in my life.
>>149707589
>if you can keep the dot in the circle as the missile comes off the rail
*in the centre of the circle*
My bad.
>>149708401
Should have flown the gazelle.
You would have been 80x more capable.
>>149708401
CHOPPER OPS
WHEN?
>>149651690
>A-6 Intruder
>all-weather dedicated strike aircraft
>early 60's quirky but extremely ahead-of-their-time avionics
>working multicrew, WSO to banter with all the way to the target
>SEAD in a non-slavshit non-prototype
Can't fucking wait
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvyBrX1eK4I
For keeping a target locked in the F-15 after you fire an AIM-7, you need to keep it within +/- 70 degrees horizontal and +/- 35 degrees vertical
e.g. a 140deg horizontal and 70deg vertical cone in the front hemisphere
>>149710010
Started watching clip then stopped because is this the climax? Want to watch the movie probably today now, haha, don't want to much spoiling.
>>149710189
to clarify, it wont make it any more accurate to keep the target centered once you fire, you just need to keep the plane angled within that cone so the missile doesn't go blind
when you watch some people in youtube vids use the AIM-7 they use it in close like an AIM-9 because they just center it and go full afterburner - the way they used it in desert storm was to fire it at full afterburner then pull the throttles in and snake left and right and up and down within the 140deg horizontal/70degree cone to get maximum seperation
>>149710487
he turns into the green golbin and his copilot has to suck poison out of his anus to save his life when Spiderman fucks his mom
>>149710959
>Never was once told how to fire SARH the autistic way
>This is how I use SARH
Born in the F-15
Molded by it
I am gods plane reincarnated.
>CMANO has a new DLC called "You Brexit, You Fixit"
the memes is reals
Not sure if this is the best place to ask but are there any good battalion- or higher-level ground combat sim games that will satisfy my autism? Turn-based or RT, whatever.
>>149711894
Flashpoint campaigns? CMANO?
Can someone who watched the MOOSE Dynamic Missions video explain to me what it is/how it works.
I'm away from home and have no computer.
>>149712134
does CMANO do ground stuff?
>>149711894
Mius Front is hands down one of the best upper level sims around right now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vj1bjTnxpwk
Any good 'space dogfight' novels written with an attention to realism, if that makes sense?
A realistic sci-fi 'aviation' fighter-squadron series, I guess would be the summary.
To be honest I loved the X-Wing Rogue Squadron series growing up; something like that but perhaps written by a veteran fighter pilot.
Would the Hawk and L-39 be any trouble if you threw them into matches with the MiG-21 and F-5?
>>149712458
Much lower T/W, no radar or RWR, but it's obviously not as bad as putting them against 4th gen aircraft.
>>149712559
Do you think your favorite flavor of icecream can stack up against 4th gen fighters though?
>>149712559
The Hawk can actually get up to a decent speed and carries a very similar load out to the F-5, It just has no ranging radar, afterburner or RWR. And one 30mm instead of 2x20mm
>>149713194
I could easily ground a Typhoon if I pop down to Coningsby and just throw a cone of chocolate chip mint into an intake while the engine is running
That gunpod, brutal.
>>149711894
Get Falcon BMS and just frag packages and command ground units in the dynamic campaigns lol
>>149708639
GODS PLANE pic 4 u
>>149713635
>>149713659
ADENs are fucking amazing. It's just a DEFA with a higher fire rate
>>149713659
Malaysian pilots are complete shit though.
>>149712458
>>149712559
Yeah, basically having all-aspect heaters in a WVR fight is enough by itself to create trouble. This is actually where all the autism about F-5Es being 4th gen slayers comes from
Basically in an exercise in the 70s or 80s, they gave F-5 aggressors all-aspect AIM-9s and restricted the F-15s and whatever to making visual ID before they could shoot. The F-5s traded with the F-15s at something like a 2 or 3 to 1 ratio despite being shittier in almost every respect. Anyway the lesson was that it actually was more cost effective to lose two or three or four 2 million dollar planes to shoot down a thirty million dollar plane than the other way around and this eventually led to the lightweight fighter competition and the F-16A, which eventually mission-crept back into an expensive multirole superfighter
>>149714687
I want this stealth/bvr meme to die, we should take what our air forces had in the 60s and modernise it so we have super dank gunfighters again
>>149686192
In DCS if you go into F4 view and then reposition the camera to face forward on the nose and get the speed up to 500 knots/military power in a fighter, then set the time acceleration to x30 that's the exact speed of an ICBM
I'm practicing flying at low level like this its like flight of the navigator
>>149717146
lol are you bored anon?
>>149714428
Find me another high res pic of a Hawk with missiles and a gunpod then Bill.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OsbRfyprZo
with the time acceleration if you go at the top speed of a scud (4500 knots) its quite easy to control. the top secret SR-72's alleged top speed (2900 knots) is a piece of piss you can go under bridges
So the F-5's AA2 mode computes lead but only with a manual lock, and AA1 works in dogfight mode and is supposed to compute lead, but doesn't?
I am Aaron Sorkin of the West Wing. AMA.
>>149723043
kill yourself?
>>149723043
fug off randy bobandy
>>149723492
Hi, let's keep this about Overwatch please. Thank you.
I'm really liking the F-5. Hopefully they fix the dogshit missiles though
>>149724014
>not targeting the one in cutting through the grass
>>149722803
A/A2 is working as intended as far afaik. A/A1 works as posted in
>>149669680
As far as I can tell it doesn't give lead, at least in the traditional sense of setting up the pipper to be placed on top of the target.
>MiGs appear from the nowhere
>>149728913
keep it together cougar
>the face of a man watching ekran
>>149730269
>WATCH
>EKRAN
Brave /simg/ F-5 pilots fly hundreds of miles with three bags, hugging mountain valleys and finally dashing across an open plain at treetop level just to deliver two snake-eyes each onto a train covered in AAA.
tfw https://youtu.be/2WBG2rJZGW8?t=206
>>149725694
So there's no way to get lead computing from dogfight mode?
>>149734231
Not in DG afaik, no. You can still lock people up by using bore in conjuction with A/A2 though.
https://a.uguu.se/zgoooREAx0DZ_F5-ETopGunMusicTheme.7z
JSGME compatible mod to turn the F5 menu music into this song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OSMqSPmfVA
>>149734636
All this does is remind me that the Tomcat still isn't out yet.
>>149734636
Is it not the full version?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCTJmXrgsFg
>>149734889
I had the guitar version before but I found it too energetic for the menu theme.
>>149734687
>>149734636
>not saving it for the actual tomcat
>>149734159
Makes me think of the old "drag my dick through a mile of broken glass" pasta
>>149734385
According to the weapons delivery manual the sight is supposed to compute lead in both modes. It just says the "nontracking solution" /kentucky windage should be used when unable to track a maneuvering target.
>>149735168
>>149654754
The AIM-9P5 actually outranges the R-3R by a short margin. It's effectively a shitty version of the Amraam, so NATO plane still gets the BVR advantage.
>>149736220
>kentucky windage
Kek'd
How is the performance of the F5 compared to the Mig21? My computer is shit, so the best optimized modules are the ones they get my bux.
>>149737060
I think you misunderstand please explain how a IR missile will beat a SAR missile in BVR. Even if it fired at its max range all the MiG wound need to do is probably turn 45°-50° to defeat it. The MiG-21still has the edge in BVR.
>>149737894
Mig 21 pros:
>Three times as many missiles
>Some missiles are possibly more effective than they should be, but others are trash so idk
>IFF interrogator
>Gotta go fast
Mig 21 cons:
>RWR is trash
>gunsight is trash
>radar is trash and also broken
>low velocity guns that jam
>can't turn, will auger in trying to match F-5 down low
F-5 pros:
>easiest plane to fly and fight in DCS
>real RWR
>radar can look down
>awesome guns
>intuitive cockpit layout
>very maneuverable and exceptional roll rate
F5 cons:
>missiles are complete dogshit and you only get two
>radar is broken
>gunsight is broken
>engines are unresponsive and underpowered
>bleeds energy like a motherfucker
>>149739025
>>149737060
The aim 9 would also not be able track the 21 from that range, and basically you're stupid.
>>149739174
That's some great comparison, but really I was just asking about how it runs as a computer model. I'm aware of the differences as fighter craft.
>>149739725
>>149739174
He is stupid and can't explain himself properly but what he is trying to say is
Which one will I have better fps on my toaster pc
>>149739725
>>149740081
either way save the 50$ and put it towards a new computer
>>149741138
Just waiting to secure that job offer. Probably the first thing I'm going to do with the signing bonus.
>>149741237
What do you have currently PC wise
>>149741390
R9 280x, Phenom II X4 965
>>149741676
Yeah get an i5
DCS eats cpu cycles like crazy and nvidia just doesn't have the single core performance
I went from 15 fps to 100+ just by upgrading to a skylake
>>149741676
Get a r9 380 for ~$150 USD and a x4 860k for ~$80 USD
>>149741972
err I'm retarded meant amd not nvidia
DCS actually works better with nvidia cards too btw
>>149742105
Is it gimpworks?
>it aint me start playing
https://youtu.be/Hq8yAhjEK0I
>>149742371
>5 MiG 15
>1 MiG 21 as AWACS
>???
>Profit
>>149742371
I down voted this but I liked it
>>149743743
rude
Why do Russian general purpose bombs still look like they're from WWII?
>>149744630
If it ant' broke don't fix it
>>149743875
Give me something and I will upvote it
>>149744630
You can't be blamed when it 'misses' and hits a hospital then.
>>149745017
But American bombs are the ones that hit hospitals
>>149745685
americanpropaganda.png
>>149745685
But the difference is that the american hospital hit isn't a miss.
>>149748820
Well, yeah, but that's like saying that an AIM-9 that decides to fuck off into the dirt has been successful because it managed to hit something.
gimmie some aesthetic webms bois
>>149749564
so shamed he didn't even eject
Are there any worthy additions to the F-5/Mig-21 gen 3 lovefest on the way? Will the Mirage III be a good fit?
>>149749950
very honorable
You people need to learn how to make good WebMs from the /wsg/ anime threads
>>149751425
?
The webms are fine
>>149751675
At least use the 4MiB size limit and make them longer or higher rez
>>149751916
>>149752058
Looking back at the file sizes I see the size limit is 3MiB
Take this
>>149752404
At about 30 seconds webms they get really shitty and start to get fuzzy. High resolution webms only work with short videos because like I mentioned before long webms get really fuzzy and high resolution only makes that worse.
>>149752873
But why 3MiBs every were else FETs 4 and up
>>149753169
Hiroshima Nagasaki
>>149753323
Nip moot changed it?
Are planes boys or girls?
I'm in love.
>>149754372
>caring
The F-5 has two holes, so I assume it's a girl.
>>149712242
>CMANO & ground stuff
Rudimentarily. It's basically there to have targets for air/naval strikes. Would not recommend solely for ground combat. Otherwise it's god tier.
>>149712134
Flashpoint Campaigns is gud.
CMANO is for watery and plen stuff.
>>149711894
>good battalion- or higher-level ground combat sim games
There's Combat Mission of course, it usually operates in lower levels (few companies n stuff), but IIRC there ARE scenarios for battalion sized battles. Please investigate. Be warned though, that micromanagement _IS_ real and it's worsely optimized (and has a worse business modell) than DCS. (and looks shitty) There are individual games for Normandy/Italy/'44 Eastern Front/Ardennes for WW2 setting and has a modern game (set in 2018?, I dunno -- but no tom clany bullshit) for a hypotethical war between US (+Ukraine) and Russia.ignore Shock Force and Afghanistan, those are trash
They have demos for each game, which all have enought content to judge if you're into that style of game. Otherwise you can't torrent them, except for an ancient version of the Normandy game which is like the vanilla version with no updates.
some unpaid shilling
http://www.battlefront.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=335&Itemid=579
The ULTIMATE GOD-LEVEL hex-wargame autism is Gary Grisby's War in the East and War in the West.
>>149712272
Graviteam games are pretty and fun, but you're basically suggesting troops what to do. It's a different kind of game compared to Combat Misison.
>>149742371
just now realized i rendered the video to 30 fps, fugg
>>149754594
>CMANO is for watery and plen stuff.
>tfw it doesnt cover the WW2
Also, do we have any Mius front buyfag here? Can anyone upload the game with the lastest update?
>>149754372
they're girls so it's only natural to love them like god intended
>>149754680
>>149742371
60 fps version up
https://youtu.be/uq9A66vcFM0
DONT DIE
Any news on the Steel Beasts update?
>10
Britbong gazelles got a contract extension so they're staying in service til at least 2025
>No napalm bombs for the F-5
>>149762231
Reading about the performance issues they're having with 4.0 doesn't fill me with confidence.
Then again, I'm unlikely to spend £150 on a simulator no matter how much I like the subject matter
>>149762231
>>149767494
I've just looked at some of the demo videos for 4.0 and it looks like absolute garbage.
The geometry isn't anything special, the particle effects are something I'd expect from a game 5-6 years ago. The textures are all low-res.
If this wasn't the only hardcore tank sim I suspect they wouldn't be in business long
>>149750249
Mirage III will probably be the worst of the bunch, Mirage F1 is a bit more fitting. The Sea Harrier FRS1 would fit well, as would the Dagger or an early Kfir.
>>149768868
I'd fly the shit out of a Sea Harrier
>>149757578
That's a nice video you got there senpai
would be a shame if anything were to happen to it
How the fuck do I spot targets on a 4k display
I can't used the visibility mod because it breaks the signature check, but the default model enlargement doesn't work / doesn't do shit on 4k
>>149770207
I guess you just have to squint really hard
>>149770207
>he fell for the 4k meme
>>149755797
>it doesnt cover the WW2
>implying
When the server resets in blueflag do the SAMs and player placed EWRs reset aswell?
Don't mind me, just working on the F-16 we don't have in DCS
>>149774084
Bit claustrophobic m8s
>>149774291
Negative, it's comfy in here.
Anyone know when I'll be finished and we can fly this beast in DCS?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVdakpMPYe4
>>149774939
Cancelled due to FOD.
Why not just fly BMS?
>>149775264
I don't have space on my SSD to install both :'-(
>10
>9
>8
Post stealth
Ops when?
>>149781781
Stealth is a meme
cute
>>149782226
>not pictured: flight of Raptors firing AMRAAMS from 20 miles behind
>>149783154
*teleports behind you*
nuthin personnel kid
t. F-22xRaptor
>There are shitters right now asking for features on the F-5 such as more missiles and A2A refuelling probes
>>149783595
Wouldn't mind mavericks atleast desu
>>149783424
*AMRAAMs you into a million pieces*
Heh
>>149784123
I'll accept that because the E-3 could carry and use them. But it never had a refuelling probe or extra missiles
>>149785435
F-5E weapon wishlist:
>127mm Zunis
>Napalm
>AGM-65B
>CRV7 rockets
more skins bls BST
>>149785435
Not all E-3's could use the mavs, however. The variant we have in DCS is the E-3 with the AN/APQ-159 radar. Only the E-3's with the -159-1 radars could actually employ mavericks. Nothing is stopping BST from switching it to a 159-1 besides missing documentation.
>>149785435
>But it never had a refuelling probe or extra missiles
They were optional extras for the customer, just like the RWR.
I wouldn't mind if all three of those options were tickboxes in the mission editor desu.
>>149787078
We need the skin on this last f-5.
It's pure sex.
>>149787616
But we have the us f5 not some banana sambo version of which only two can fly
>>149787974
>Implying they have fuel to even fly that one F-5
>Implying those dumb banana niggers didn't just crash two A-4 into each other
Brazil not even once.
It'd be nice to have mavs and a refueling probe. It'd also be nice to have the optional ILS so I'd have a fast jet to practice instrument landings in
>>149789435
You like cool things?
Dcs didn't sound like the right game for you.
Try bms.
This nigga always makes me laugh
Question:
If I want to be a pilot, what kind of education do you pursue?
I know for the military its not really important, but I don't know how it works in the civilian world.
Is it just any aviation related degree? Is there a specific one? Do you even need it at all to be hired.
>>149793173
For most major commercial airlines all you need is a college degree.
>>149792912
In one way he right. People there know what they're doing in terms of air combat.
The issue is people on that server are the complete opposite of humble. Waving your dick around because your good at airquake is obnoxious. Playing there will help you "git gud" as they say.
>>149793821
>not waving your dick after dunking someone
>>149793821
Keep in mind this is the same guy who got into arguments with people because he's the biggest F-15Babby there fucking is. He is the biggest dick waver out there.
>I play exclusively on 104th
Is there any way to discard someone's opinion faster?
>>149793956
That's a little different.
Constantly reminding people about how skilled you are like your the only one blessed on this planet to have enough mental will power to smash a button so you can fire off missiles.
>>149793446
And 1500 hours.
I don't understand how the fuck it's possible to reach that many hours.
>>149793964
Yak-140, right?
>>149794289
There's a reason why muh skill is a common talking point. Most 104th fags are insecure over the fact that they fly a plane which is almost borderline arcade despite things like a flight model. This goes for diehard Su-27 fags as well. They come up with some sort of mental gymnastic meme talking point that lets them feel better about flying such easy to learn and use aircraft.
>>149794950
I like em ans ill keep flyin them and theres nothing you can do about it.
>>149794950
"It's about the realistic tactics!!"
t. sweeper
I only fly FC3 because some of my favorite aircraft of all time are there.
MiG-29, Su-27, Su-25.
>there will never be a full fidelity MiG-29 module to fight against the up coming full fidelity F-18, F-14, Harriet, etc.
Give me one good reason to continue living.
Blackbird SR-71 fucking when
>>149795571
Just play COD black ops
>>149795816
i don't care about that
in DCS when?
>>149795562
Most Russian planes lovers are really not like what I mentioned at all. I have met a few that were F-15 teir delusional though. Roofies on the 104th is a prime example of that.
>>149796051
Literally never ever
>>149795562
Hang on for a couple years and we'll have straight of Hormuz full-fidelity carrier ops with F-18s and F-14Ds, supported by Emirati and Qatari Mirage 2000s, battling Iranian F-14As, Mig-21s (pretend they're J-7s), Mirage F.1s and F-5s for control of the persian gulf while A-7s and AV-8Bs fly strike missions
Wew
Ded general
>>149800986
>Inb4 harmless starts calling for the end of /simg/ again and starts shilling his discord because he got made fun of too much
>>149796608
Still could use a MiG-29
Otherwise, Hormuz should be the map, nevada is like trainers:the map while hormuz will be like our F/A18 white whale holy grail
>reminder that the F-5 flight yesterday got removed
What kind of cool planes do you think we'll see in development once Trump kills NATO and all of Europe needs to start defending itself?
> try MiG-21 campaign
> fumbling around in the dark looking for enemy fighters AWACS called out
> find one, lock, move in for R-3R launch
> get removed by S-300
I thought they fixed the RWR behavior?
>>149801317
Good bait dude. I shilled discord one time and it was in the TS during the whole Greg thing.
Besides craigs pepe pictures keep me alive.
>>149809231
>>149807001
The spammraam drone would meme on soviets
>>149809874
Soviets meme'd themselves.
>>149811537
but muh soviet super plens!
>>149812398
>America has super planes
>Cough* gods plane
>Still won the cold war
Kek
>>149787974
>But we have the us f5
No, we have an -3 standard F-5E, which is not a US exclusive aircraft. In fact for a long time US aggressor F-5Es didn't have an RWR at all.
why so ded today
>>149816225
here have a webm of Ivan dying
>>149816853
holy shit what a shitter
>>149816853
>Furry
>Dead
I am happy
>>149819765
IVAN IS A FURRY????????
>>149816853
>>149820816
Babby cliffs 3 planes are the only ones that one can fly in a fursuit
>>149820816
No he just has autism
>>149817174
>>149819765
>>149820816
>>149821049
>>149821357
Here have another
>>149822017
wew im even more happy
>>149816853
>>149819765
>>149820816
>>149821049
>>149821357
>>149821974
Yes... It begins again.
>>149770131
Hi cephei
>>149822017
[diet Dr. Pepper intensifies]
Hey I'm pretty new to DCS but I want to start flying with you guys.
I've been flying on the 104th for about a month now so I've gotten pretty good at dog fights.
Do you guys ever do F-15 ops?
My favorite DCS youtuber is Ralfi dude and he has some awesome videos.
>>149824514
>>149824514
Become one with the true god plane
Is anyone here super good with manual bombing?
Is the trick just being able to hit the alt/speed/angle etc numbers? How do you deal with wind?
>>149824871
FU C K I N G
>B E A U T I F U L
>>149824765
I've been lurking the thread long enough to know F-15 is GODS plane while Russian stuff is shit.
Not sure why you would fly anything but a fighter that is 104-0.
>moving to a new state for school
>won't be back to get my computer until next month
>getting laser eye surgery almost immediately afterward
Kill me now, all I want to do is fly the F-5 I preordered
>>149794950
Even if all the current FC3 planes were BMS/DCS level, I really don't think that would change their attitudes.
I dont think it stems from flying simplified planes at all, and instead that's just you projecting your annoyance at getting killed by literal children who have nothing better to do than play DCS all day.
Some people are just really shitty, and that's all there is to it. The idea of being good at something close enough to super cool fighter pilots just inflates that kind of persons ego even more and makes them insufferable douchebags.
Even if the only AMRAAM platform was a DCS F-18 and the rest of the Russian planes were FC3, that would only make them think they're more hot shit because they would be shitposting the same as you with how only babbys fly simplified jets and they're not good enough for a man's plane like a DCS Hornet.
>>149825073
See
>>149794950
>want a warthog
>don't want to clean t and regrease it every year
is there a flightstick like the warthog, except not shit?
Vietnam ops WHEN
>>149825496
CH sticks maybe?
>>149825396
fak i meant >>149825646
for
>>149825496
>>149825238
I can't wait to fight F-18s in my MiG29, but I already know every kill will be responded with "lol nice babby plane can't handle full fidelity scrub xdd"
A couple days ago on the 104th I said I loved the MiG29 and some dude responded with "yeah good plane for noobs" and I checked his plane and it was an Su27 (he later tk'd a teammate and disconnected immediately)
If F-15 get mad at the Fulcrum for being a noob plane (even though theirs can do the exact same thing as the MiG in terms of G's, acceleration, etc.) I can only imagine how they will sperg when they are in Hornets.
Also just that statement from the Flanker pilot, as if you're supposed to move on to "harder" planes for the sole purpose of doing well on the 104th, instead of flying things you like.
Shows the mind of the average DCS player, and it's sad.
>>149826547
But the MiG-29 is shit.
>>149825238
>I dont think it stems from flying simplified planes at all, and instead that's just you projecting your annoyance at getting killed by literal children who have nothing better to do than play DCS all day.
Nope, I'm a huge 104th shitter who tells it like it is, I know the 104th community quite well. I got so good at blowing 104th fags out I stopped playing DCS for about a year until I started playing with people on /wgg/ before /simg/ was born.
>>149826772
t.F15
>>149826772
I like it.
In fact, it's PFM is the one thing I'm looking forward to more than anything else in DCS.
>>149825073
You should leave. We don't take kindly to your kind here.
>>149827004
I still think that point applies to all the people here who blame F-15 shitters for being shitters because their plane is FC3 and not because the people behind the plane are just genuine ego driven E-Sports people.
Again, it could be a DCS Hornet and you would have exactly the same attitude, ego, and elitism. If anything, it would be even worse.
>>149824871
G R E EN L E A D E R
I'm umm'ing and aaa'ing over buying the Corris Railway DLC for Train Simulator 2016 but funds are a little tight at the moment and it is £9.99.
Now, I live in Wales, surrounded by defunct mining railways and pit yards, Corris isn't far away from here. So there's a large amount of local interest in the route for me, the gravity trucks bundled with also interest me.
I've had just over 600 hours playtime on TS2016 so far and I really want this DLC but I want someone to tell me if it's good or not first, anyone here got Corris?
I primarily play scenarios involving yardwork and shunting assignments so I'm concerned that most of the scenarios for the corris route are going to be stopping runs, for obvious reason.
That little narrow gauge 0-4-0ST looks cute as hell too.
>>149827713
Woah dude relax you wouldn't want to snap your wings off.
>>149829557
Never happens to me
I was able to cobra and kill a 15with guns one time. The rest I got shot down or crashed into the enemy
>>149827859
If we had a mirage with MICA missiles, I bet it would be considered skilI-less
Not him but I think BVR is not fun. What is the point of buying fc3 when you stay 20nm away and hardly ever see the enemy.
>DCS will always have a tiny playerbase
>>149832783
we stay STRONG
POST YOUR DANK /SIMG/ WEBMS
>>149832783
Just make the pilots zombies and call it DZS
>>149831028
I think its like choosing a sniper rifle in FPS games. Master systems to defeat others that may not even see you
>>149807076
S-300s actually don't give any launch warning. The radar guides missiles without changing modes from search and track.
How am I supposed to find the area ground targets are? I'm on 104th phoenix server and the map has no units at all.
>>149825073
I'm gonna go try to splash F-15s with F-5s now.
What the fuck the ju87 is more complicated to fly than the 190/109. Have to mess with manual prop and manual everything otherwise it literally doesn't fly. I just want my 3.7cm
>>149839961
Just set pp to 95% rads to 30%-40% and set everything else to reasonable values
>>149838359
Okay so I'm going to each waypoint and there's nothing there.
>>149838359
step one:kill yourself
>>149840542
Go fuck yourself first
Has anyone else been unable to fire the right side Magic in the Mirage this patch? The left one comes off the rail just fine but the right doesn't work and I have no idea why. Happening to my friend too.
>>149840798
It's bugged my amigo
gotta wait till next update
>>149841397
I figured, just wanted to confirm
>>149846113
that op was aesthetic as fuck
>>149840542
Why do teenage faggots have to post, go listen to nu-metal
>>149849556
>tfw i actually like nu-metal
Blens?
>>149830651
Mirage is already skill less it has magic missile deflection systems a bugged damage model and a flight model thats mostly guess work
>>149853932
Same as the MiG-29 then.
>>149827004
Fuck off craig unless that kd is in a not f15 it doesnt count
>>149854096
Mig has an excuse mirage has dcs infront of its name. And its flight model is still more accurate than the mirages
I'm glad that DCS can appeal to more than one group of people but I hate Airquake with a passion
t. mig21 pilot
>>149854405
airquake a shit
ops a best
>>149854378
Mirage has an excuse of being in beta state while the MiG is out for years.
Checkmate you filthy migger.
BlueLag KA-50 ops when?
We need full Korean assets/maps already. Makes for bigger/more conventional battles than Vietnam generally.
>>149855359
I wonder why the Korean war is so overlooked in media and vidya.
>>149855551
Checkem
>>149855359
Would be awesome. Ironically the most difficult part is that there's so many different aircraft from that era due to how fast development was progressing.
>>149855551
Me too
>>149855672
Fug
>>149846113
>>149847189
>Had a normal non-pvp F-5 MiG-21 bullshit op finally
>I missed it
:'(
what the fuck are these
>>149855859
C-119, literally called the Flying Boxcar.
>have dank ideas for cool different ops
>can barely place a place at an airfield in the mission editor
blyat.
Is the mission editor hard to learn? How fast would it take to learn how to make complex missions with triggers and shit.
I know literally nothing apart from learning how to throw a plane in to test certain liveries.
God dam slavs
Q: You know how ED keeps releasing final revisions of aircraft versions that often are dated after their heydays - how hard would it be to say, downgrade the mig-21bis to a vietnam era variant?
Would they have to start from scratch?
>>149856098
>Is the mission editor hard to learn
Not really, it's pretty intuitive.
>How fast would it take to learn how to make complex missions with triggers and shit
Depends on what exactly are you calling complex. It's pretty boring work and takes awhile to build shit
>I know literally nothing apart from learning how to throw a plane in to test certain liveries
Feel free to ask around /simg/. As far as I'm aware, 4 people make most the ops we fly: Ivan, Pie, Custard and Tyrannik. One of them is bound to answer to steam adds or just questions in the thread.
>>149856293
The vietnam era mig-21 is basically a completely different plane from the Mig-21bis so yeah probably
>>149856293
Not necessarily, if the layout of the cockpits is still similar and there aren't significant changes in the external appearance. The re-modeled section(s) of the model will need to be unwrapped & textured from scratch and tested. In the case of the Mig-21, the final -bis version is very different in both appearance and capability from the types in use during Vietnam, so in that case it might be quicker to start fresh rather than convert.
>>149856539
>mig food
>>149856801
Seems accurate.Miggers only eat shit
>>149856906
>mig food
>I
>g
>
>f
>o
>o
>d
>>149856801
>one of the most advanced and maneuverable jet fighters in the world
>gets shot down by an early Korean-era propeller ground-attack plane flown by a furry tripfag and a BR with a 180 ping
https://theaviationist.com/2015/01/14/the-most-unusual-mig-killer-the-skyraider-air-to-air-victories-on-north-vietnamese-mig-17s/
>>149857139
Hardly
>>149857116
Retard pilot. The aircraft is only as good as the pilot
>>149856801
http://vnafmamn.com/Skyraider_vs_MIG17.html
>>149857332
See
>>149857256
If the Slavs were flying it would be a different story
>>149856747
>>149856653
So would they just not make more than 1 variant for cost reasons? I'm thinking that a requirement for era-appropriate variants wouldn't fit their business model.
>>149857116
Wasn't this a lucky head-on pass shot
Can someone explain what the best way to figure out efficient fuel usage?
e.g. in the mig-21, is it best to put the engine RPM at 90% and climb at +7 degrees to 36000ft?
Do I keep the mach meter at 0.7, rather than watching the airspeed, for fuel efficiency? really wish there was a guide
>>149858981
it's literally in the manual, just read it
>>149859291
alright cool, 95% rpm climb and 600kph IAS for range, 400kph for loiter speed
The IAS says 600kph - but mach says 0.9
Does this mean I'm travelling at 600 knots but the air is so thin at 32000 ft that it registers on the pitot as 600kph? Does the machmeter get a better idea of how fast you're really going?
>>149829338
Sorry trainbro, this doesn't seem to be the current area of expertise for people in the thread.
We really do need to look at finding knowledgeable people who play more than just flight sims for the thread
What's the point in having 1 2000lb bomb instead of 4x500lb bombs? DCS makes it seem pointless to use the heavy ones as a ripple of smaller ones are more likely to get a direct hit.
Is there some unmodeled factor like shrapnel/blast that benefits using a heavy hitter?
>>149861909
Not sure about DCS but I've read that the larger the bomb, the more chance of the energy being directed straight up from the site of the blast compared to smaller ordnance.
I suppose the benefits of a larger bomb are for cracking larger nuts, so to speak. Bunkers, tanks, hardened structures etc.
>>149855551
No red-dot sights innit.
Do I build a sim-pit, or do I invest my money in a gtx 1070 + some VR headset?
Anybody have the rift? are you capable of combat without labels, using only the model enlargement?
>>149864506
I would never build a simpit unless it was completely modular. Wouldn't want to built a simpit around one aircraft, then get bored and start to favor another aircraft.
There was recently an A-10C pilot on leddit who was asked how the DCS version compares to real life. He said 6/10 with trackir and a thrustmaster stick, 9/10 with the Oculus CV1 - the last 1/10 probably blackouts and grunting
>>149864806
Oh yeah, the "simpit" wouldn't be modelled after a specific aircraft, it'd just be a generic multirolepit I can bind shit to
>>149864806
>A-10C pilot on leddit
A: The HMCS can display whatever is on your right MFCD in a quarter of the monocle or you can "paste" it somewhere in the cockpit so when you look in the spot you put it the video is there. For example, you could put the TGP screen pasted straight up and every time you're bored lean back and look at it. Just an extra feature.
dayum, I want that
>>149860307
In general, your airspeed as visible on your instruments will be "indicated" airspeed. This is already adjusted for altitude and the thickness of air just by the nature of how an airspeed indicator works.
If the manual says fly at 600, them fly at an indicated 600. At higher altitudes that will translate to a higher true air speed, but what's important is what speed the airplane thinks it's flying at, because that's generally how it'll act.
>>149865882
So if it says 700kph IAS, but mach 1.0 - my ground speed is really mach 1.0?
>>149866160
mach is the ratio of your speed to the speed of sound (which changes with air density)
If you're not moving (relative to the ground) in a strong storm your mach would be zero (you're not moving at all), but your IAS would still display a number because the air around you is moving
I think
>>149866160
>>149866390
Also RTFM, the Mig21 has a groundspeed indicator
It's the thin needle on the mach indicator
I never understood how mach number work. is it your airspeed in relation to speed of sound or your true speed?
>>149867258
Mach
noun
the ratio of the speed of a body to the speed of sound in the surrounding medium.
>>149867258
This is kind of interesting too
https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/mach.html
>>149867258
All Mach means is speed in relation to the speed of sound. That's literally it. The only special thing to know is that the speed of sound gets a little bit lower at high altitudes.
>>149867604
>>149867440
so its almost as easy to reach mach one at sea level as 10 000 ft?
>>149867945
I suppose that's subjective. There's a not a big difference in speed between those two altitudes but it depends on if your aircraft is just capable of reaching that speed or if it can smash it.
Have a table http://www.fighter-planes.com/jetmach1.htm
>>149868308
thanks senpai, here have a putin
I've been thinking about some of the recent blueflag ops we've had, the failed rotorcraft one in fact.
Wouldn't it be interesting to have some sort of standard /simg/ flight group organization? I kind of enjoyed how the two different chopper flights organized and whatnot even thought they got removed.
>>149869403
Depends how far you wanted to take it. I wouldn't sign up for mandatory training, getting shouted at for not using brevity, rank assignation fuckery but organising flights of mutually supporting aircraft is cool
>>149856293
If the MiG-21 F-13 is the F-18A, the MiG-21bis is the Super Hornet. The similarities end at the general configuration.
>>149869697
I was thinking something like the following. Definitely non-mandatory and to be used only if people want to autism up in the organization when we're operating. It could and should be discussed and written up somewhere, probably in the planefag pastebin
Stuff like a standard CAP, CAS and Chopper flight composition, say:
>CAP flight has 2 air to air aircraft
>CAS flight has 2 air to ground aircraft
>Chopper flight has 2 choppers in whatever role
With that we could have a standard Air mission package composition, say:
>Ground strike flight has 1 CAP flight as escort and 1 CAS flight as the strike element
>Fighter Sweep flight has 2 or more CAP flights
>Escorted Chopper flight has 1 CAP flight flying TARCAP, 1 CAS Chopper flight and 1 Transport chopper flight
That kind of stuff. Once again it wouldn't be mandatory but it's a good excuse to make some more serious training ops every once in awhile.Yes I'm technically suggesting to make/дa бoйз/ 2.0 Turbo non conscription system edition
>>149772612
>1946-2020
Elaborate. Havent seen anything related to the WW2
>>149870772
For WW2 it has a lot of ships and covers most of the pacific war planes
>>149825646
I have an ancient X-52 (Like pre-madcatz) and it absolutely has a 2-stage trigger. Did they seriously take that out?
>>149870375
I think if we've got the numbers at any given time then it's a good idea. Largely depends on what people feel like flying.
I'm sure we could come to a compromise if somebody really didn't want to, for example, fly CAP or whatever
>>149871175
No, that's just a really old version of that image with mistakes. Why people keep posting it I have no idea desu, there's a much better new version.
>>149871186
Could be better for organization, yes.
Just an idea though.
>>149871041
>covers most of the pacific war planes
The time has come and so have I. I'd love to have the European theater but that's good enough. Will check it later.
>>149870772
It has all the important stuff from ww2, they're even working on throwing in more IJN units. If you want some shits and giggles, look up "Niitaka yama Nobore" on the Steam Workshop; It's a scenario based off the movie "The Final Countdown".
>>149871487
I'd be down for some tryhard faggotry
>>149829338
Train sim bro I'd you come back I have a few questions because I'm curious about the game now that I live near rail.
In train sim you drive the train. Do they have fully 3d cockpits that are clickable or is it something like you just look at the instruments and press keyboard commands?
Are there peripherals for train swimming or do you just use a keyboard for everything? My super limited understanding of modern trains is that it's just a few levers so I wonder if people just use joysticks, build their own things, or just use the keyboard.
When you actually play the game, are you following schedules and delivering passengers with money and ratings or is it just a sandbox where you do whatever you want and "make your own fun" as they say?
>>149874719
Not trainsim-anon but I do have the game. I'll try to answer your questions
>Do they have fully 3d cockpits that are clickable or is it something like you just look at the instruments and press keyboard commands?
The cabs are 3D and mostly-clickable(haven't dirven all of the engines). You can use the keyboard too, if you like.
>Are there peripherals for train swimming or do you just use a keyboard for everything?
Apparently there are, although the main controls are just throttle, reverser, brake.
http://raildriver.com/products/raildriver.php
>When you actually play the game, are you following schedules and delivering passengers with money and ratings
There's no money involved but you do get points for things like timely adherence to the schedule, smooth driving, obeying posted speed limits etc. There's passenger routes, freight routes, and 'yard-work', where you shunt carriages around to make up trains. Bit like a puzzle game
>>149874719
It really depends on the train you're driving and the group which modelled it.
All trains have the basic functions modelled in the cab, the reverser, throttle, any available brakes, engine start. Good models will have as many other features accurately replicated as they can, such as instrumentation lights, radio, intercom, demister, gritter, heaters, wipers, headlights, various protection systems etc etc
As stated there is the well known raildriver controller, there even exist companies that will modify your existing raildriver for other features. There aren't many competitors though and the vast majority of trainsim users just stick to the keyboard, especially as the raildriver unit itself is now getting quite old and lacks certain functionality in newer games and operating systems.
With regards to scenarios there are all sorts of things you can do, here are some examples;
>Stopping passenger runs
This involves moving from one destination to another, stopping at each station for the passengers, while also sticking to a timelimit and within speed/comfort levels
>Express passenger runs
Very similar but with less stops and generally a far stricter time limit
>Freight runs
This could be as simple as transporting some cars loaded with cattle from one station to another or it could involve manually loading a whole train of coal cars, transporting them to a power station and dumping them one at a time. Time limits still exist because you're on the national tracks and must fit between the passenger trains
>Yardwork
Assembling and disassembling pre-existing trains, shunting carriages around, rescuing failed locomotives, clearing track of debris. I particularly like these scenarios as my favourite locomotive is the BR Class 08, a beautiful British diesel shunter specifically designed for this work and found in basically all freight yards across the UK from 53 until modernisation essentially obsoleted them. Some still work but most are on heritage rail.
>>149876346
With regards to locomotives you can drive anything you wish with any consist you desire, on any route so long as the gauge is compatible. I love how easy it is to make your own scenarios or pick some up from steam workshop.
Personally I find driving electric locomotives a terrible bore, they essentially drive themselves and are all shaped like large suppositories.
The diesel and steam locomotives however are all dripping with character, there's nothing like building up a full head of steam in a 4-6-2 class 7, managing the fire mass, various steam valves and having to strongly take the lay of the track into account. That's driving a train for you.
In an electric locomotive you switch it on, set reverser, release brakes, apply throttle. Hooray.
Diesel engines are interesting in that, despite being only slightly more involving than electrically driven locomotives you are constantly fighting it, a diesel doesn't behave like an electric, you have to show a diesel who is boss, there's nothing like the sound of starting up a cold 37 growler.
Look at this clagg.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njnN_-vE3k8
>>149876891
Have some more great class 37 claggers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcKzpKeMkVo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXkPXOpeyX4
Fucking beautiful mates, brings a tear to my eye.
So, is there space in here for us trainsims?
>>149874719
>>149875172
>>149876346
>>149876891
>>149877189
>>149877189
>So, is there space in here for us trainsims?
It's right there in the OP anon.
Feel free to trainpost as much as you'd like. Even if there's no replies, the bumps and content are appreciated
SAUNA?
>>149711894
Command Ops 2 is the best, second to none
>>149750249
The F-104G.
Aesthetics incarnate.
Important Cold War machine too.
>>149880331*thud*
>>149880331
A DCS F-104 is one of my dream modules. It's a beautiful plane that looks like the atomic future of the 50s that we never got.
>>149875172
>>149876346
>>149876891
Thanks a bunch for the info anon(s), that's exactly what I was looking for. If I wanted to get into Train Sim what's the recommended entry point/modules or whatever it's called in the Train Sim world?
Is there base content that comes with the game, and if there is, is it any good?
Actually, now that I think about this, but is there more than one game that people call Train Sim or is there just one game (that gets put out yearly?) that has a monopoly on the whole genre?
>>149880991
What was it's landing speed in km/h?
Attention all planefags
Me and another planefag are going to be doing some blueflag chopper ops today at 19:00 UTC (About 3 and a half hours from now)
Any and all help is appreciated. Currently we're a two-ship Mi-8 flight who's going to try and drop a few SAMs and MANPADS near mineralye vodye or somewhere in the way near the FARP. Of course, in case we get more people we'll see the feasability of doing some other mission aswell.
If anyone is interested in this, a CAP escort flight and a Chopper CAS escort might be good so we don't get removed again like >>149695764 last time. Strategy and start time for this op will be discussed in TS.Also we might use the Simpleradio mod because it's cool however if we get more than a couple of people we'll just use the TS as usual
>>149880991
>F-104
I'd rather have the English Electric Lightning
>>149882553
>English Electric Lightning
>engines on top of each other rather than side by side
>external fuel tanks on top of the wings
I'll never understand Britbong tastes.
>>149882942
Its all about being the fastest washing machine in history
>>149882942
>>149881669
175 knots with flaps in ideal conditions and about 220-240 knots without flaps.
Comes out to 325kph for flaps, about 400kph without.
>>149884126
Also the brakes really suck, and you need to be slower than 150 knots for the drag chute to work.
>>149880991
There's a bunch of train simulators but the big popular ones are Train Simulator 2016 on Steam (This started out many years ago under EA as a different company, was sold a couple times, had major overhauls and eventually became the Train Simulator <year> series) which is popular, a good all-round sim with a huge amount of community support, which is important in the sim world as i'm sure you know.
Microsoft Train Simulator is still a big thing, despite being ancient, but i'd advise against it due to its age.
Trainz is available too but is slightly less serious and has less support but is the cheaper option as far as i'm aware.
The baseline Train Simulator 2016 currently comes with..actually, i'm not entirely sure what the basic package includes anymore, i've been with this simulator since 2006/7 when it was called Kuju Rail Simulator and as such have utterly lost track of what is standard and what i've added over the years, I should probably sort that out.
I'll go looking and find out exactly what is included in the basic package on steam then get back to you.
>>149884547
Ok so the standard latest edition of Train Simulator 2016 only comes with three routes built-in but they do offer a broad view of locations and rolling stock:
"Riviera Line in the 50s" a british route, from Exeter to Kingswear, set in the 50s obviously at the end of the steam era, includes several period steam locomotives.
"Sherman Hill" a modern US route, features the classic american long distance haulage diesels like the SD40-2s.
"West Rhine Railway" a german route from Cologne to Koblenz, features the modern electrical locomotives used on the routes, which fulfil a mixture of freight, passenger and shunting work.
Those are the three routes included, each has multiple scenarios bundled and plenty of locomotives and rolling stock, however, right from the start you can begin adding content from the steam workshop, so you're not going to run out of scenarios any time soon.
I'd say in that content alone you've got a couple hundred hours easy if you were into it.
>>149885323
>>149884547
Awesome, thanks again for the detailed insight anon. I'm out of the country for a while, so I can't do anything at the moment, but you've given me a lot to think about and a great primer on what to look for and research.
>>149857256
>>149857530
>every time a slav plane gets blown out slavboo fangirls come up with excuses on why it got btfo
Priceless.
What's the name of that multiplayer Early Access shooter that was about weapon handling and operation?
>>149885323
A lot of the Steam reviews complain about crashes - have you had problems with this?
>>149885914
Squad?
>>149885595
Slavtears are the best
>>149885914
Are you talking about the one that used the scroll wheel to simulate trigger pull, and had scope focusing and stuff like that?
If so I don't remember the name off the top of my head but it's still on my computer and I can check when I get off work.
>>149885914
Receiver
>>149887130
On train simulator 2016? No, I haven't.
There are people suffering from crashes though, I see that in the reviews and on the forums but i'm afraid I don't know much of the technical side of it all and can't say.
My computer isn't particularly powerful, a Phenom II X6 1055t (My nephew informs me that this is "Old as fuck") and a 750ti graphics card ("same") and I don't see any crashes, performance isn't the best but it's stable.
Did I do something wrong here? Trains is hard
External link for sound
https://my.mixtape.moe/pkjvzf.webm
>>149889469
Off da railz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rulElJITIVY
>>149889729
I'm more of a forklift guy myself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhNFrPtbKGc
>simulating something that is literally on rails
lol dude
>>149882257
Post again when you're forming up please
>>149891331
>BMS will never have the aircraft selection of DCS
>BMS will never figure out how to make custom huds and systems
https://youtu.be/H_zm97P1jSI
It hurts.
>>149891973
>>149892714
Maybe the simulation gods will one day bless us with the source code
>>149894439
>16 May 2025: BMS devs finally crack the source code, and begin work on accurate systems for the MiG-29, F-18, A-10, Mirage, and Harriet
>17 May 2025: Eagle Dynamics acquires BMS and all assets and developers. All download links for BMS are removed. Devs never heard from again. Families unsure of location of their loved ones.
>23 May 2025: ED announced F-16C as their next module.
>12 December 2034:MiG-21 radar finally fixed
>9 February 2047:MiG29 PFM released
>1 April 2063:MiG25 Foxbat module announced
>>149895258
>2 April 2063
>Previous announcement was april fools
>>149895448
xaxaxaxa
Does anyone happen to know the corner velocity of the F-5?
>>149897129
>>149898169
WHAT THE FUCK AM I READING
>>149898169
>>149897129
atm you can exceed the structural limit so the corner-speed will be a hit higher than there, however BST have said they're working on the effects of over-G on the aircraft's systems so I guess that'll change.
>>149898416
Idot
0-4-0-ST Invincible.
>>149856906
Is that a toilet?
>>149891331
>>149882257
GET IN TS
OPS ABOUT TO START ASSEMBLING
>>149899490
Yes
>>149899516
unban me
>>149900042
You will be soon in all seriousness from what I've heard.
>>149900042
#GREGDIDNOTHINGWRONG
#ADMINABUSE
>>149898169
I'll be honest I don't completely understand how to read the chart - is it around 0. 6 Mach where the medium shaded peak is?
How do you tell a targets altitude with the F-5's radar?
>>149856539
Thanks anon I'll get some help. Then /simg/ can play some amateur opsIf I git gud expect korea/vietnam ops
>>149856539
Ivan has made like 1 ops and it was complete trash.
Stimpak also want included in that list.
>>149857690
I think it would be cool but think about it
>Takes time to make old variant MiG-21 instead of Viggen and F-14
>It's a version far less capable so it would only be used for certain ops
>They would have to remodel a lot of the cockpit and external model
>It probably flies differently as well
It just wouldn't make sense for them to put time in it unless their modelers had nothing to do.
>>149898169
Okay so at 5,000ft with wingtip missiles loaded and a total weight of 14,150lbs:
365 Knots Indicated is the speed at which you have your greatest instantaneous turn rate, 20 degrees per second. Corresponding to a turn radius of just under 2000ft.
I've coloured in the labels and the lines they're labeling, understand now?
>>149864506
Okay so coming from someone with a CV1
You WILL be put at a disadvantage no matter what keep that in mind.
It will be harder to spot targets reguardless
If you don't have large model enlargement on you will have trouble seeing things.
However on the flip side of that coin if you are doing PvE instead of PVP you'll still be able to compete
Merging with a 15 in oculus is by far the most intense thing I've ever done in DCS.
Getting a 1080+CV1 would be cheaper than a simpit anyway and in terms of immersion it's 9/10. The only reason it's not 10/10 is you still have to use the mouse to click stuff but I assume when the touch comes out DCS might implement it. Also if you had a realistic joystick mounting solution I.E between your legs unlike me, it would be that much more immersive
tl;dr: It's the most immersive you can get in DCS at the cost of gimping yourself because it becomes much harder to see targets. I'd have it over a simpit.
>>149901405Who gives a shit
>>149901035
God's work, son.
>>149900262
p good
>>149902682
t. Ivan
>>149903102Not really
PREMIUM B25
ONLY 25000 GOLEDEN EAGLES
>>149902682
Thanks anon, I love our ops don't get me wrong but we need some hot old plane ops.
>>149901454
Alright, yes, thanks
>>149903698
If you need help just post it in the steam group somewhere.
Hoggit wiki is also pretty good for mission making resources. Expecially if you don't understand exactly what a trigger or a unit action does so I'd suggest giving that a read at some point.
>>149882257
OPS
WHEN
>>149904190
Got cancelled due to not enough people showing up and teams being absurdly stacked
>>149904469
Don't host during neet primetime then you chucklefuck.
>>149904469
>>149904469
we literally just need like 5 people, there's gotta be that many in TS right now
>>149905396
>>149904959
With that logic
OPS POSTPONED TO 22:00 UTC AKA 2 HOURS FROM NOW
>>149905996
>>149905396
Is it lame ass pvp ops again?
>>149906110
No.
Either one of the 3:
1- Blueflag chopper + Escort coop ops
2- CAS with CA + BARCAP ops
3- Operation we get removed by F-14s again
Depends on the amount of people we get in the TS.
>>149906110
t.Shitter
>>149906396
Alright I'm down, can someone make a steam announcement when it's habbening?
>>149906569
Sure give me a second.
>>149906110
Your the reason why we can't have fun pvp ops. Banana man and people like yourself take your deaths personally. It's fucking sad and pathetic.
>>149907907
>not acting super smug when you kill Tony and enjoying his silence on TS
>>149908049
what is there to be smug about?
the f-5 is currently OP as fuck since the migs R3Rs are broken.
>>149908372
>being this salty
show me where the F-5 gunned you
>>149908372
>the F-5 is currently OP because the R-3R is broken
Wow normally I'm getting called a delusional slavaboo
>>149908660
>>149908804
how am i supposed to kill the f5s when my bvr missile don't work?
>seeing people want the F-104 in this thread
>The F-104 is the biggest fucking meme
In early models the engine had a sort of heat sensor to adjust engine blades.
It was found out that when the plane was sitting in the sun before takeoff the drastic change of temperature would cause F-104s to suffer engine failure on takeoff.
The F-104 had a downward facing ejection seat which made it impossible for the pilots to bail.
BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE
They 'fixed' this issue
The new engines would loose thrust when the nozzle was opened and the afterburner would burn out
The new ejection seats would require a 140 mph minimum speed.
RIP pilot
THERE'S MORE
F-104s often had asymmetric flap deployment which often caused them to flip upon touchdown
They also had a system to automatically 'fix' the AoA when it was about to stall.
This sometimes caused the F-104 to go into an unrecoverable flat spin.
Losses do to accidents:
German Air Force: 30% of their F-104s
(Germany gave it the nickname 'Witwenmacher' The Widowmaker)
Canada lost 46% of their F-104s
The Class A mishap rate (write off) of the F-104 in USAF service was 26.7 accidents per 100,000 flight hours as of June 1977,(30.63 through the end of 2007)
Holy shit this plane
>>149909057
>R-3R
>BVR missile
lmao
Also you fucking git gud you moron, you have a superior engine and still have IR missiles
>>149909237
>ir missiles
the r60s are dogshit and you know it
>>149907907
I literally don't even whine about getting killed in PvP, I honestly don't give a shit, I've just been ignoring the PvP ops.
>>149909191
Fuck the F-104 off and give us the Lightning
>>149909191
How would it NOT be fun to fly a plane that's constantly falling apart? It'd be like an even more extreme MiG-21.
>>149909376
Use the R-13M1
Alternatively stop whining because the MiG 21 can shit all over an F-5
>>149908372
> R-3Rs are broken
Not unless something huge changed in the last week
> F-5 OP as fuck
Did you forget the part where its two missiles are absolute dogshit right now and have the same flare confusion rate as the F-86's GAR-8s?
Also, you still have R-13M1s you moron. Are you that fucking awful at dogfighting that you HAVE to kill things before the merge?
>>149909559
>mig
>good
>r-13 rear aspect lol
>r60 lolno
>r3r fucking broken
also lets not forget that you stall if you try to turn after mig
>>149909751
you're actually baiting me
>>149909057
>being so shit you have to rely on R-3Rs to get kills in the MiG-21
you know it has R-13M1s, R-60Ms, and fucking guns right?
>>149902651
Thanks anon
I actually own the DK2 - are you able to read the HUD in the A10C (such as altitude) without having to lean in?
Can you read flare and chaff counters on the F15C?
I don't understand why devs make trainers
It would probably be just as easy and unclassified to make some of these sexy 2nd gen jets that people would actually enjoy.
>>149910072
I don't fly either of those planes but I can read everything on Russian huds and I can read most stuff unless it's crazy small. If you want I could take a screenshot and highlight exactly what I can and can't read
>>149910095
Yeah, trainers are boring. What are we supposed to do, roleplay as some second world country military?
>>149908049
Yea its hilarious. He wont shutup when hes doing good, but when he gets blown out he stomps off and throw a shit fit and then proceeds to be as silent as a church mouse.
>>149910282
thanks m8, you don't have to do that much for me
Are you able to read your bearing on the course indicator in your russian planes? I have trouble reading that even on my monitor without glasses
Why is it so hard for ED to balance planes, the F-5 is so good there is literally no point in flying the MiG ever
>>149910797
Oh not you again, fuck off
Hey guys will they fix the overpowered F-5???
>>149911016
Found the F-5 pilot
>>149910797
>WAAAAA WHY WONT ED SAVE ME FROM GETTING BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
Seriously just learn your aircraft strengths and weaknesses, along with you enemy's strengths and weaknesses and adapt. Crying for balance because you aren't very good is pathetic. You're literally the same as ralfidood crying on the ED forums for the F-4 to be removed from BF because you got blown out.
>>149910797
>>149911151
t. tony
how fucking upset are you kid?
>>149911310
f. frank
how do you like them apples
>>149911310
Anime and furfags need to leave this general.
>>149911551
get rid of ivan then
You are aware that this entire website is dedicated towards anime, yes?
This /general/ is a /general/ for people who like anime and simulation games
>>149911856
>who like anime
wat
I like occasional anime but that is a completely irrelevant topic for the /vg/ sections, unless the game has anime in it.
>>149912041
4chan is for people who enjoy anime. That's the target audience. /g/ allows anime fans to talk about technology, /v/ allows fans of anime to talk about video games
do you see a pattern?
You normies are worse than muslims. You invade this website even though nobody wants you here, then you cry and bitch and moan until you change the board culture to your normie muslim needs
>people complaining about PvP ops
>complaining about PvP ops when there is finally a good, full fidelity match up between east and west
>there is finally no reason to be shitters and fly against DCS's abysmal AI ever again.
Are y'all fucking kidding me?
We should be doing the best ops in /simg/ history now that we have enough people and planes.
Instead a few butt hurt BRs and furries got BTFO'd one time and now they are so butt devestated they never want play against each other ever again.
Fucking sad 2 b h.
>>149912279
That would make sense if anime didn't have 5 boards dedicated to it.
But it does.
So keep it there?
>>149910771
I got into the Mig-29 just to test what I could read and couldn't
So everything on the HUD I can read completley fine
The compass I can read from the basic position without looking in alright but if I lean in just a bit I can read it really clearly. I can make out pretty much all of the gauges as well
>>149912279
>
4chan is a simple image-based bulletin board where anyone can post comments and share images. There are boards dedicated to a variety of topics, from Japanese animation and culture to videogames, music, and photography. Users do not need to register an account before participating in the community. Feel free to click on a board below that interests you and jump right in!
Even their own description says a variety of topics, not a variety of anime-related topics
>>149912334
>people complaining about PvP ops
Yeah, like 1 or 2 autists.
Stop getting butthurt over a minority complaining about x kind of ops. If they don't want to participate then who gives a fuck.
Before saying people never want to play PvP ops again consider actually hosting PvP ops again at some point to see who shows up.
>>149912525
Woah that's way better than the DK2 then, HUD is just barely readable, compass can't be read even when leaning in
thanks
have a random pic from my meme folder
>>149912334
>people are incapable of recognizing when someone outflies them or are salty about it
sad tbqh
>>149902651
>you still have to use the mouse to click stuff
Didn't they add an option that centers your cursor on the screen in VR?
So you can look at a switch, then map a hotas-button to leftclick
>>149911669
>>149911856
ANIME NEEDS TO GO
>>149913457
>not liking cute anime pilots
>>149900808
Multiply the range by the cosine of your radar scan angle above or below the horizon and subtract from your own altitude
>>149913543
I loved anime, 8 years ago. Most of it doesn't keep my interest anymore. Depends on your age I guess
>>149913841
ANIME CONFIRMED FOR KIDDIE SHIT
>>149913952
dont be so tsundere anon
>>149913150
Yeah they did, I mean I could see how some people would like it, but seems like it would be a pain for them hard to reach places.
>>149914075
well that's military peeps fault for not putting all the buttons in one spot
>R-3R
>broken
Your shitty 60s slav missiles and radar were never intended to be used against tiny ass maneuvering fighters
Use an R-60 or something
>>149880331
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5cEpoHLFOk
>>149914680
I'll maneuver into your ass with my tiny fighter... wait
>>149913802
100 ft per degree per NM works well for angles <10 degrees.
>>149912936
To me, getting killed by AI is way, way worse than a player.
AI is stupid, and it cheats. Pops flares the instant an IR missile is launched, has perfect 360 degree vision through everything etc.
Players think different and fly like a person. Getting killed by a player doesn't upset me because I know I genuinely got either sneaked up on, or just out flown.
>>149913543
Take this
>>149915681
>Pops flares the instant an IR missile is launched, has perfect 360 degree vision through everything etc.
Neither of these are true btw.
>>149915837
right back at ya
>>149916146
Are we even playing the same game?
>>149916306
Thanks
Has anyone made an anime cell shaded filter for DCS?
>>149916308
Do you even make missions and test this shit out? The AI can't see through everything, certainly not their own plane. It's actually quite annoying how blind they are in certain circumstances.
As for flares, they pop then at a very slow rate when you get on their tail. The rate does not increase substantially when you fire, if anything they need to pop a more realistic amount when you launch. You'll never see them dump flares like a player, we really need an AI mod for that shit.
Do you even have experience with getting the AI to do what you want in missions or are you just parroting memes? There are serious issues with the AI, but BFM and the issues you list aren't really big ones.
OPS GET IN TS
GET IN TS OPS
>>149916768
Are you telling me it's possible to sneak up behind a fighter from behind and below and shoot and ET without them knowing?
Also I've seen the flare meme many times.
The point is AI will never ever compare to fighting real players.
>>149917438
>The point is AI will never ever compare to fighting real players.
Yeah sure.
>Are you telling me it's possible to sneak up behind a fighter from behind and below and shoot and ET without them knowing?
I guess, when the fight starts they won't lose you though. But the AI certainly aren't all seeing, AI aircraft without look down radars can't see much below them for instance.
>haha i will just keep posting amine xD
>that will show them how mature i am
Ban underage anime autists when?
>>149916768
(Not that anon)
Something I remembered from before, and just tested to confirm:
AI don't really obey radar restrictions, as in if you're below a MiG you'll still get tracked by its radar. I don't think it's a big deal but that's a legit example of AI "cheating".
>>149918158
ahh shit well maybe I'm wrong, I swear I testing this with an F-4 and he didn't see me.inb4 just more lazy LN coding
>>149917709
Didn't see your post before I sent mine but
>>149918158
I started an AI MiG-21 at 2000m with me a couple km away head on at 500m, and I got RWR indication.
>>149917709
Game AI is pretty much universally terrible because it's so difficult to code, and expensive
>>149918638
Exactly, so in my opinion we should have way more opportunities to fly both sides in our ops.
Even if it's like 2 people flying MiG-29s or something. Blue now has something to worry about.
Ground AI does it's job since its not nearly as complex.
>>149918371
>I got RWR indication.
This doesn't mean he can see you.
>>149918638
>>149918371
>>149918158
Just tested this with an AI F-4. 8nm off his nose, 6000ft below & flew right under him.
Tried it again with a MiG-21, he saw me.
Quality coding LN.
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffuck animeposters
gib
>>149919330
Thought of those after I remembered flying under the radar working in Guardians of the Caucasus. I stand corrected, and GG Leatherneck.
>>149920663
> those little AGM-65s everywhere
Nice touch
>>149920663
uhhmm WHEN?! BST PLEASE?
>>149920663
That doesn't look like an AN/APQ-159 display
>>149921643
It's an AN/APQ-159-1
In radar mode it functions identically to the 159, it just has a secondary AGM-65 display mode.
prove that you sexually identify as slav
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4kQG_BvhYw
>>149921816
>english subtitles
you've failed already
>>149923224
It's broken english
that's slav as fuck
Who's cock do I gotta suck to get a Draken or Viggen?
>>149925275
Leatherneck's
>>149925275
3rd gen is truly best gen
>>149894439
They have the source code. Its how all these Falcon mods have been made. The issue is that it was written with only on plane in mind and was never designed to be modular or support multiple planes.
>>149909463
This is a large part of the appeal of a DCS F-104 to me.
help, I need my safe space
How will the Viggen compare to the F-5 and Mig-21?
It's a 3rd gen strike-focused multirole with a 4th gen avionics upgrade, right?
>>149885914
>>149887191
No.
>>149887335
Maybe.
>>149887358
No.
>>149929662
>4th gen avionics upgrade, right?
That's being very generous. It's a 3rd gen strike attacker that received a mid life upgrade to allow it to carry more modern weapons like the AIM-9L, BK90 & Rb 15.
The cockpit & air-frame of the ASJ 37 are identical to the un-upgraded AJ 37. So you could accurately simulate a 70s Viggen by just restricting the weapons available.
>>149929873
The scroll wheel one was called "D.U.S.T." and their website is www.terapoly.com
>>149930478
Oh ok I thought it got a glass cockpit at some point
Does the AJS have any BVR capability? I'm assuming it's inferior to either the F-5 or Mig in a dogfight
>>149931203
No, only Ikea Sidewinders. LNS is considering a FC3 level AJ that would be extremely similar, but could fire radar missiles, but that's all. It's not confirmed. Theyre just considering it.
>>149774084
this might be my fetish
>>149931203
JA 37D got the glass cockpit and AIM-120s.
AJS 37 is the attacker variant, so no BVR missiles. It has a radar with both A2G & A2A modes. However the A2A mode is very rudimentary, more or less pointing the ground radar at the sky. It can pick up air contacts and provide ranging information but no IFF or anything like that. A2A armament is 30mm gunpods, AIM-4, AIM-9B, AIM-9P & AIM-9L, though it ever actually carried the AIM-4 IRL.
Air to ground is the usual rockets and bombs, it can also mount mavericks, anti ship missiles & stand-off INS guided cluster bombs.
However at the end of the day it's a jet from the early 70s, so expect *very* janky systems. In the pic on the left the tube to the right of the HUD (yes it has a real HUD) is the AGM-65 sight and the RWR is the 6 little lights around the central radar scope.
>>149931897
Does the HUD do CCIP or CCRP
>>149932468
I don't know enough to say, I would guess some form of automated aiming (even if it's not *true* CCIP or CCRP like the Su-25A) but you'll have to ask the viggen nerds on the LN forums.
>>149930732
Yes that is it thank you.
But they are going to pivot into a survival game.
RIP interesting concept.
You know, we really need the Mig-17, 19 and 23
Would anyone be interested in using my visual mod? I replaces all missiles with turd logs
>>149755797
Bumping this request since the lastest available update is from April.
>>149932725
God damn Swedes and their triangle anime jets
>>149936216
The Viggen is fugly
It looks like a wing commander spaceship
>>149937731
you misspelled glorious
For anyone that was interested in the whole F-5 DG (dogfight guns) mode confusion as to whether or not it's supposed to lead, the in game tutorial supports the idea that the pipper does NOT in fact lead so that you place it on the target, and you instead have to lead the target yourself.
From what the tutorial text says it seems like the gunsight only accounts for the effect of gravity on the trajectory of the shells, and compensates for that in conjunction with range so that you only need to lead in the vector the target is traveling.
>>149938062
F-5 is sexiest jet every designed, especially two-seat versions, it's slim and gracefully curvy like a beautiful woman
Viggen is brutal and masculine, with bumps, lumps, terrible lines and a really weird silhouette due to the canards. It's so ugly it's almost endearing. It's like the Willem Dafoe of airplanes
>>149939069
>canards
They are just another set of wings, as they are stationary.
They were added to give it a shorter take off run.
It was also able to be refuled/armed in 10 min by a team of 5 conscripts and a single technician, and would operate from hidden bunkers with just a few hundred meters of straight road as runways.
Instead of the american "a rifle in every bush", the swedes were trying to have something like a squadron in every forest.
>mfw when taxiing to the runway is harder than taking off and landing in IL-2 BoS
reminder for never ever
>>149946243
y u do dis
>>149942167
I dont know how people did that in real life. You can't see shit.
>>149947589
Stick your head out the window or have someone sit on your wing and guide you
>>149947589
They either taxied in zig-zags or had a wing-walker direct them or had someone sit/stand on the wing and direct them.
pronin module when
What's the point of running a persistent pvp server when all the players are on the same side
any good space sim out there other than Orbiter?
>>149952779
I dont know if this is what you want but a friend told me the flightgear shuttle is good
>>149954259
flightgear is a meme.
>>149954519
Lol wut
How
>>149768868
>Mirage III
>Worst
ill cut you for hurting my french wife
>>149941546
Da they of wantings f18
>>149926667
If they had it they would be able to create new instruments instead of lel f26 hud on everything
>>149909191
Alright, but to be fair, it was an interceptor and the Germans were using it for fucking CAS.
Not saying you're wrong about how shit it was, but I mean the Germans really piled it on with the retardation. Don't know if the Canadians did the same thing.
>>149959984
From what I have read it was OK at CAS when it wasn't killing its pilots
>>149960830
So never?
>>149960971
>. Twenty-one strike and AAA-suppression sorties were flown against targets in NVN, but the great majority of the 476th's ground attack sorties were in-country CAS missions flown while under the control of airborne FACs. From these CAS missions, the F-104s quickly gained a reputation for accuracy with their cannon and bombs, and were specifically requested by FACs on numerous occasions because of their fast reaction time
I want members to leave
>lurking hoggit because fuck why not
>pic related
jesus fucking christ are we at the level of autism where we make fucking webcomics about flight simulators now?
>>149909191
Oh fuck off, you hater.
The F-104 is gud. The true opponent of the MiG-21, not the Northrop Mig-28 Memer II.
>>149962972
No, but Reddit is.
>>149963136
F-105 when?
>>149963790
Would give an arm and a leg for a Thud.+vietnam map & rolling thunder dynamic campaignearly vietnam, best vietnam
unban me
>>149962972
>dat cringey af "comic"
DCS players everyone.
>>149964049
simulators require an exceptionally rare and intense form of autism
>>149962972
>>149963790
>>149964049
>>149964124
It's funny because the F-15 is fast and the L-39 is slow!
>>149964124
I don't even get it, were they going for the tim buckley style of webcomic where there's no joke and it's not actually funny, just awkward?
>>149900529
i dont know how to read it either but the corner speed is around 400knots
>>149964671
if someone could make a loss edit out of one of those I would be genuinely impressed desu
REMOVE KEBAB
>>149959435
Again, that depends completely on how it was written and getting access to source code isn't a magic "I can do anything" button. Could you in theoty re-write significant swaths of foundational and core code of the game to support multiple sets of avionics? Yes, however that's neither easy nor practical depending on how it was written, and Falcon was never written with multiple flyable planes in mind.
And yes it is true. BMS is based off leaked source code of Falcon 4.0. You can even look at the source code for older Falcon mods online if you want, just search Falcon 4.0 source code.
>>149965092
30 seconds in MS paint
>ED releases more trainers and shitty 3rd gen aircraft that are all the same
>Retards line up to buy them
Of course we will never get another sim or better planes or a dynamic campaign or working missiles. Why would ED waste time and money on that when they can just keep releasing low quality shit that you retards keep buying for some reason.
>>149967568
>ED
>3rd gen aircraft
this is bait
>>149909414
This guy knows the score
F5 fills the american light multi role interceptor niche already, starfighter would be like a VEAO hawk after the L39
>>149793964
thicc
>>149968221
>F-5
>interceptor
>an interceptor with those anemic engines
>>149970519
Lockheed shills please go, the Luftwaffe didn't want your shit plane til you paid them off and I'm guessing the case was the same with the USAF.
Give us the Lightning because if we're getting a 3rd gen interceptor of the era don't half arse it.
>>149972140
Western interceptor sorry. I'm not entirely sure how the jet generations are classified
DCS: Cold war tactical nuclear bomber when?
>>149972720
Reinstall your attitude
Nuclear bombs are bad and you should feel bad
**bursts into tears**
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
>>149972224
Generation classification is usually about some meme or other
like 4th gen is about pesa memes and lifting bodies
>>149967568
There are no third gen aircraft but suggest a plane you actually want den
>NATOboos defending their objectively shit plane with nothing but "muh aesthetics" as an argument
Where have I heard this before?
>>149972720
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tz3ECzpu6CQ
>FC3 babbies would cancel this
>>149974772
My dad used to be on 12 and 208. Wasn't in the RAF when this was made though.
However, he was around when they went to Red Flag and annoyed all the Americans byflying too low
>>149972140
English Electric Lightning
>godawful missiles -- only 2 could be carried and are going to miss 99% of the time
>most variants had the cannons deleted
>shorter range than a prostatitis patient with urinary tract infection
Sorry guise, the only gud plen the britons did after ww2 was the Buccaneer.
The English Electric Lightning is trash and should remain in the dustbin of history and on VEAO's development roadmap.
>>149972720
>>149974772
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ltpi28rgSUTHICC
There's hope, guise.
>inb4 ED have them cancel the bucc, after the development team refuse a horrible turbocapitalist exploiting """agreement"""
>>149977204
Will they actually bring it up to DCS standard or will it be a bit crap because its free? The cockpit looks blocky af
>>149974637
Its disturbing how many of the events of the F35 are matching the lawndart.
Of course, "bribes" have been replaced with "effective lobbying"
What new era/aircraft type/role combo do you lads want in DCS?
>Play as Agent Orange crop sprayer
>Get a civilian death and injury count AAR
>Maybe get a COD hitmarker sound for every 1000 deaths
>>149979509
WHATEVER ROLE/GEN THE F14 IS
https://twitter.com/joinsquad/status/759024267690283008
>>149982863
Yo those effects look gorgeous.
Worth getting into?
>>149982863
Project Reality/DCS merge WHEN
>>149974637
I dont know why this is so hard for you to understand, but I want an F-104 BECAUSE of its wacko history and crazy flight profile. It's a plane with a lot of character and "quirks," to put it lightly. It would be a very fun plane to learn and fly for similar reasons to why the MiG-21 is so interesting and fun.
>>149986156
>plane is shit
>"it's quirky!"
>"I like it because it's shit!"
And they call slavboos delutional.
Seeing a lot of Jet fighter sims.
Any of you play ww2 flight sims like IL-2 or War Thunder Simulation mode?
>>149986451
>DCSfags are autistic retards
Color me surprised
>>149986982
>Any of you play ww2 flight sims like IL-2
Yeah we have quite a few people play IL2 Clod & BoS, they don't tend to get posted about too much but they're both pretty great.
>>149987358
How active is the Teamspeak?
Kinda new to flight sims but looking for some friends to help me out
>>149987785
>How active is the Teamspeak?
On evenings, very. Daytime it has a few euros.
>>149987876
>le superior and active americans
Fuck off you tub of lard. Euros are the only ones getting shit done.
>>149987785
Hope you like furries because there is a lot of them on teamspeak.
>>149983631
no it plays like budget arma and the devs are just as slow and retarded
>slavaboos
>>149987785
A few people hang around there. Some euros, some brits, some muhricans, brs occasionally.
When ops are happening, it tends to get more active, as expected.
>>149988183
This is true. However they're contained in their own rooms most of the time.
>>149987019
What do you play anon. I'd like to know your superiour sims with much better communities.
If you say BMS, well then I'm one step ahead of you there.
>>149987970
Woah, someone just got triggered!
>get shit done
Literally what did he mean by this lmfao
>MiG-21 pvp ops ambush video is done
>>149983631
Yes, it's still very much in early access content-wise but the gameplay is top notch.
>>149976892
>He doesn't want Mach 2 meme gun
>He wants a plane that was more effective at killing the German air force than the VVS was in WWII
>hurr durr we should get this plane not this plane
You guys do realize inside of five years, every single commonly used fighter, attack aircraft and bomber will be released? There aren't that many you know...
>>149996521
>inside of five years
>implying even the f-18 will be out by then
2.0 with Caucasus!!!
http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2858835&postcount=15
>>150000309
wait no, wtf does synchronized with 1.5 mean then? they've added the F-5E to nevada and a bunch of stuff
>>149996521
>in five years
>every commonly used combat aircraft
>released
>in DCS
A hearty kek, my naive friendo.
>>150000515
They've brought a lot of fixes to 1.5, so now those fixes are built for 2.0 as well. So, 2.0 and 1.5 have the same fixes (and bugs) right now.
>>150000515
Means they've brought all the bugfixes previously applied to 1.5.4 to 2.0.3.
Caucasus with the new engine and merged with nevada is expected to be out on 2.5
We ops tonight?
Will 2.5 have new explosion effects? I'm fairly sure the current explosions are from the 90s
Just got my first jet in shit thunder bois
>>150001435
Nobody is sure of what 2.5 will include other than a better caucasus map texture. Even the terrain geometry might not change, depends on how lazy ED is.
>>150001967
No, they've specifically said the map will be enlarged. However, the resolution of the terrain may not be changed, so pointy mountains, etc
>>150001435
God I hope so. I want some legit flaming fireball effects. Like the ones you see in every recording of modern air to air kills.
That and firey explosions in the ground, like in all the Vietnam videos.
Pathetic that BMS manages to look better.
r8 my new sweaters aesthetics
>>150001910
nobody cares
tfw wanna fly red but both my favorite aircraft mirage and F5 are in blue only reeee
>>150003003
I care
DCS is a lonely sandbox without clans and I don't want to join a clan because I'm autistic and will just get bullied if im forced to actually get to know people
I wish there was something like PR where they force pubbies to play together
>>150004179
Just join our TS and shit.
People meme and spurg on us all the time but coming from experience, we are the most fun and surprisingly least autistic group to play with. There's so much bullshit in other groups not to mention they tend to be full of 40+ somethings who yell at you for taxiing too fast.
>>150004425
Lies Lies Lies
The TS is full of underage memekids and fucking degenerate furfags
DO NOT JOIN
>>150004486
t. Greg
>>150004425
I hate TS, there's always some loud person memeing and I can't even ask a serious question without them saying because you touch yourself at night or something
PR was 8 man squads, too small for showing off - its a nice system for squadplay where you can just be a robot and only talk about the game if you want to
>>150004486
the latter part we can always change together, friend
>>150004486
Everyone is over the age of 19 and we all work or are going to school.
The furry thing is unfortunately true.
We also actually help people out with learning planes unlike most groups which just shout read the manual if you ask anything.
>>150006576
I feel like people just hate the furries for the fact that furries are easy to hate. Like, they are literally not that bad.
On TS *most* of them keep their degeneracy to themselves.
>>150006576
I don't see why everyone complains about Greg being a furry. It's irrelevant. I haven't heard him mention it once except maybe in response to someone else saying something about it.
If you don't like Greg as a person sure, whatever, but I don't understand the furry circle jerk at all.
why are you furries
did you just watch so much porn you went insane or what
>>150006873
One word.
Breezy.
Also when is Greg being let back in the furry faggot said he would unban him in three day three days ago?
>>150007440
What?
Ops when?
>>150007834
What kind of ops do you want
Can't you see the TS shitters are too busy namedropping and complaining about the furry boogeyman in the thread to have ops?
>>150006873
No.
They're people who want to become animals/want to fuck them. They should be made fun of accordingly.
>>150004773
If you are in ts ask grump (shamless self namefagging) for slav shit and editor or dumb ed shit ill help you out when im back from thursday onward.
dont ask about the mig21s though.
Also ts isnt bad there are some memesters and getting a serious qiestion in can be annoying but you can post stuff in chat if and use anothe channel
>>150009274
Kill urelf gypsy.
>>150009274
>ask grump
>the nigga that don't know shit about anything
Lol.
>>150008560
just fuck my shit up senpai
>watch one of ralfi's F5 videos
>says he's padlocked on a traget
wait a minute
does the padlock feature still work if you use trackIR?
holy shit
>>150010629Do you like AIM-54s?
>>150010815
i dont even know what padlock is
how do you use it?
>>150011143
Look at aircraft / ground object
press padlock button
your view / camera is now locked on said target making it impossible to lose
>>150010815
Yes. Tbh thats pretty pleb though it basically make it impossible to lose a target visually .
I use it to film quite often for my shitty videos.
I don't see any other reason why you would use it if you have track ir though. It's meant for people to use who don't have track ir.
>>150011247
Is this some abstraction to make it as easy as real life spotting or is it just for ppl without trackir
>>150011448
I'm playan on a 4k monitor where model enlargement doesn't work
I'm definitely gonna use that shit, aircraft become invisible once they're more than 300 meters out
Speaking of monitors I just upgraded my PC and I'm looking to get a new monitor. DCS is the only graphics-intensive game I play. What's a good setup? I've heard going over 1080p only kills your framerate and breaks model enlargement
>>150011507
It's for people who don't have track ir.
It's a pretty old thing that they used back in the day before face tracking.
>>150011143
>>150011507
The webm in the OP was made by me.
I used padlock from the ground to get that effect.
Make a new thread you faggots.
I'm at work and cant do it or I would.