Well? Also please support your reasoning.

>>387255917
Depends on the enemy you retard

>>387255917
Blue sword.
I like the color blue

>>387255976
This. Minmaxing is for scrubs. Always use whatever gear looks the best.

>>387255976
this. Only autists care for numbers chads care for aesthetics

File: tumblr_inline_mlhbyj65Qx1qz4rgp.png (95KB, 480x280px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 480x280px

10% 4 hits per second.

>>387256126
you should reverse the chads and autist part

Depends on how much damage each one does in a single hit.

blue

single high % > many lower %s

>>387255917
Given that the red sword only has a ~34.3% chance of hitting at least once in a second, I'd go with blue if they both do the same amount of damage.

>>387255976
I'm picking red, fight me bro let's have a epic multicolor duel red v red and blue v blue fights suck

>>387255917
Red one. I prefer big hits to smaller ones. It's why every game I can I play with Great Swords

Top I like bigger slow weapons with higher damage caps

File: 1478420040121.gif (1002KB, 493x304px) Image search: [Google]

1002KB, 493x304px

>>387256456
IT BEGINS

>this thread again
>300 replies of people arguing about their made up scenarios using these weapons

>>387255917
dual wield

File: 1489356811793.jpg (342KB, 800x720px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 800x720px

>1 attack / second
>30% chance of hitting / attack
>Matches the rest of your outfit

>>387255917
red has a 34.39% chance of getting a hit per second
blue is better numbers-wise

Missing one big slow attack is way shittier than missing several smaller quick attacks, so red I guess.

>>387256827
if this is multiplayer, i DEFINITELY take the right one
aside from being better, it has humiliation value and will trigger nerds who hate exclusive dlc

>>387255917
Top sword for top lads

File: the expert.png (142KB, 308x330px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 308x330px

Blue has a better chance to kill something right away if it dies in a single hit.

Red is more likely to not hit at all for several seconds at a time.

Blue strictly better for trash mobs. Red considered for boss battles and damage sponges.

>>387256827
triple wield

>>387256705
This
Blue is objectively better

Blue sword for that slow/heavy ambush damage son. Barman shanker all day baby.

>>387255917

Neither, find a sword with a decent hit chance. At least 70%.

>>387256705
It shows that /v/ has a sub-highschool understanding of math that it took this long for a post to show up explaining how the two swords do not have equal dps. This is 8th grade stuff right here. In the good communities this type of math is even taught pre-highschool.

>>387256705
>>387256931
these

why do you play video games just to read numbers and do math?

>>387257204
You answered your own question

File: hit rate.jpg (78KB, 3201x61px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 3201x61px

Depends on how much damage each one does per hit as well as how long it takes to kill whatever you are hitting. For short fights blue is the preferable one, for long fights red will overtake blue in how many hits it makes.

>>387255917
>>>/b/

>>387256673
Seriously these threads always devolve into *teleports behind u* shit.

>>387257534
dont reply to my posts ever again

>>387255917
I push OP down the well he's asking about.

>>387255917
Depends entirely on the enemy.

When you can survive for a long time and turn the fight into a war of attrition, go for Blue.

If that isn't possible and you really need to kill something fast, take Red.

This is literally the definition of low risk vs high risk choice.

>>387258460
triple wield

>>387256931
>>387257051
>both swords are OHK
Red has first move advantage in this case.

>>387255917
Neither
Those chances are so low I'm never gonna hit anything anyways
Give me a weapon with 1 Damage/ Second with 100% accuracy so I don't get screwed over by bad luck

>>387256827
>year of our lord 2017
>not wanting to beat your enemies to death with your cock sword.

Power to the players, bitches.

>>387258846
I want to fuck that sword

Red will build your weapon proficiency 4 times as fast.

>>387259116
It will break 4 times as fast though.

>>387259203
Name a single game where weapon durability actually mattered, ever.

>>387255917
>0.4/1=0.4
>0.1/=0.025
i think the choice is literally oblivious

>>387255917
both calculated on 10 sec
blue sword can swing 10 times, 4 of them are gonna hit
red sword can swing 40 times, 4 of them are gonna hit
for me, they're the same weapon, can't really choose

>>387259338
Dark Cloud

File: hagh.png (26KB, 1152x648px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 1152x648px

choose wisely

>>387255917
Blue misses 60% of the time per second = 0.6
Red misses (0.9^4)% of the time per second = 0.6561

Blue misses less often and is thus the better choice.

>>387259818
Enjoy getting poked during wind-up.

>>387259903
>not making your build damage reduction

>>387255917
This is entirely dependent on if the percentages stack with attacks. Because if they don't, the red sword fucking sucks. Like it is unbelievably shit.

>>387259818

Sword of Fags will clash hilariously with my Cape of the Ebin Raider

File: o55htvdI6U1sbm5keo1.png (362KB, 540x518px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 540x518px

>>387259903
>implying you'll keep up with my minmax build

>>387259818
>same effective range
>one makes you way more noticeable
I’ll take the fag

>>387259896
>>387260129
>>387259402
huh

>>387259449