3x3 thread https://bighugelabs.com/mosaic.php rate and recc

>>80773422
I mean, it's kinda ho hum, but I can't really fault it... good taste I guess.

>>80773422
Chinatown doesn't get talked about enough on /tv/. One of my favourite films.

>>80773422
I only know 3 of them from those pics, can you name them

>>80773607
repoman
five easy pieces
one flew over the cuckoos nest
chinatown
cool hand luke
the long goodbye
inherent vice
the hunt
whiplash

File: 1490205039282.jpg (125KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1280x720px

>>80773636
Thanks

>>80773683
np

>>80773576
sgood film rick

File: mosaicfd146f42ca3b2a5e557efa155ba8b012dc33ef8e.jpg (171KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 900x900px

>>80773422
is the long goodbye the best altman film? i also really like 3 women and i havent seen mccabe

>>80775226
to be honest its the only one ive seen from him. didnt know his other films were worth checking out. never considered looking into it.

its my favorite sort of noir film, although the twist isnt that big. its a good ride tho and elliot gould is really fun to watch. he really plays the character well.

cant say im familiar with any films you have. which ones would you highly recommend? im still trying to get into foreign films and havent gone further than das boot and the stalker, and a few others

File: 3x3x.jpg (174KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 900x900px

>>80773422
2/5, didn't care for Inherent Vice at all

>>80775470
Not him but, if you are looking for your basic entry level foreign films I recommend Seven Samurai, High & Low, The 400 Blows, Seventh Seal, if you liked Stalker try Ivan's Childhood and go through Tarkovsky's filmography.

File: 3xd3.jpg (218KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 920x920px

r8 & b8

>>80775718
seven samurai is one of the others i have seen, but thank you for the rest. time to start the torrents.

>>80775697
nice spread of films, 4/5. and i didnt like it either until i started seeing some analysis' of the film. after rewatching a few times, i started to really love it. its dense and really has me thinking in a different perspective with each watch. i recommend watching at least once more

>>80775697
9/9 my dude
blade runner is so great

>>80773422
This thread is why people think /tv/ is pleb

>>80775697
mind telling me 4,5,6(wickerman?), 8 and 9? Cheers

>>80776183
expand on that

>>80776149
2/5, glad someone else loves the hunt still after a few years

>>80775984
2/3, matrix doesnt sit well with me

>>80776198
5 looks like fitzcarraldo

>>80776223
what do you want me to say? everything in this thread is entry level as fuck with some epic criterion stuff thrown in for good measure

do you guys just watch stuff that's available on netflix? it's clear from these 3 x 3's that you haven't found any facet of film you've loved that's made you go further into it. every flick you guys like is narrative with nothing unique about it.

if you actually had good taste you would have found your niche and posted a 3 x 3 of movies you truly loved. either you have shit taste and low iq OR you haven't seen enough movies

>>80773422
Is middle movie on the right from the long goodbye? Or am I thinking of the wrong Jew.

>>80776320
Or some of the most known films are also some of the best, and watching more films most likely won't lead those more niche ones to surpass the great known ones.

>>80776223
what does the 2/3 means? do you mean a 2/5 as in a 2 out of 5 i will end you reeeee if you don't like those movies than nigga walk away from the screen like nigga close your eyes

>>80776390
or the people who like them have just as entry level taste as you do and that's why they're so well known

i bet you think a movie winning an oscar makes it good too

>>80776320
saying that some of those movies has nothing unique about them and that liking a movie with a narrative is somehow bad is really going overboard

>>80776442
winning an oscar isn't a clear indicator to how popular it is. That usually follows after it wins the oscar.

>>80776320
being mad at a distribution company LOL

>>80776198
8 is Stalker

>>80776500
>chinatown
generic neo-noir film
>one flew over the cuckoos nest
kek
>the hunt
babbys first emotional foreign film
>inherent vice
babbys first PTA after just getting into movies but not wanting to watch anything of his that's 2deep because you know you wont get it (the master)
>whiplash
literally any sports film but jazz edition

can't be bothered to comment on the rest but you get the idea. entry level fuck
>>80776526
my point is your using popularity and general praise as an indicator of quality without thinking about WHO'S praise your taking into account

most people are as dumb as you, and you're a retard so of course retards will all enjoy the same movies and pretend they're the gold standard cause they can't comprehend anything else

if you want to prove me wrong then watch more films and come back to me in a year and then tell me all those films are still your favs
>>80776595
nice reddit post LOL

File: Capture6.jpg (31KB, 650x451px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 650x451px

>>80775226

It's great to see another fan of It's Such A Beautiful Day!

File: film3x3.jpg (191KB, 912x912px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 912x912px

>>80776423
What are the bottom 3?

File: BjSfiZj.png (281KB, 885x593px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 885x593px

>>80776320
>every flick you guys like is narrative with nothing unique about it
I'm going to bet that your favorite films don't have a narrative at all so you have to scramble to find anything of meaning on the screen and so you do and call it kino.

>>80776617
that's just some great criticism there explaining why those movies are bad, thanks, you should consider making a blog writing your reviews there or something i'll be the first to read it!

>>80776320
Hole up faggit, I gotta get my screencaps

>>80776640
how the fuck is zerkalo your fav tarkovsky and one of ur fav films
there is no way you understood it when all your other favs are entry level as fuck
>>80776690
nice mindless conjecture
way to miss the point entirely (that you're too low IQ for any non narrative film to resonate with you)
>>80776695
wtf I hate concise reviews now
>>80776725
ok cant wait!

>>80776617
>if you want to prove me wrong then watch more films and come back to me in a year and then tell me all those films are still your favs
This has been me for years now and my top films pretty much remain the same. That's why I made that argument. That post revealed you're not really worth taking seriously anyway since you think you can just sum up any movie whose structure is similar to a genre can just be summed up as Generic [insert genre].

>>80776749
i want to see the 3x3 of the ebin le troll xdd

>>80776617
>generic neo-noir film
>kek
>babbys first emotional foreign film
>babbys first PTA after just getting into movies but not wanting to watch anything of his that's 2deep because you know you wont get it (the master)
>literally any sports film but jazz edition

you realize this is not actual criticism nor does it encourage meaningful discussion
stop pretending you're the shit when you can't even discuss films without resorting to memes

>>80776619
i don't have it in my chart i think you meant to quote the other guy

>>80776690
>I'm going to bet that your favorite films don't have a narrative at all so you have to scramble to find anything of meaning on the screen and so you do and call it kino.
stop projecting

>>80776749
>concise reviews
those are not concise reviews and you know it, just empty shitposts

>>80776640
>What are the bottom 3?

Hour of the wolf
Rhapsody in August
West of the Tracks (Rust part 1 and 2 is best)

>>80776786
if you've spent years watching films and those are your fav films then you have NEVER watched anything avant-garde or any arthouse nor anything foreign in your entire life except jagten
>>80776791
i dont bother making these vapid things
>>80776803
all of those reviews were short and to the point for a reason, the reason being this is 4chan not l.eddit so i'm not going to post a 10 page essay on how whiplash is formulaic garbage that follows the sports film formula of talented guy meets tough coach, gets good, sacrifices everything, screws up, then redeems himself. you should also be able to see this yourself and if you cant you need to ask yourself some serious questions

every review was ACCURATE.

>>80776803
>>80776749
Post your 3x3.

>>80776889
>anything avant-garde or any arthouse nor anything foreign in your entire life except jagten
lets see that 3x3 boi

>>80776889
>>80776803
>>80776749
>>80776889
Whatever one of you guys is more kino, post your analysis of Brade Runner. I'm still making my 3x3 so stay awhile familias.

File: Top 9.jpg (217KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 900x900px

Give me recs, please

>>80776889
>i dont bother making these vapid things
but you do bother visitng those threads and shitpost on your high horse, you're hilarious. You do know /tv/ is pleb central, right? By just being here you've outed yourself as a pleb. Just accept it.

>>80776889
No one needs a 10k word response on why these films are shit, but proving your point with shitty meme structured "reviews" doesn't add to the conversation at all.

>>80776749
Are you asking how could a movie as wide open to interpretation as Zerkalo, allowing it be appreciated by viewers from all backgrounds, could possibly be understood by me?
Cuz that's a pretty narrowminded/condescending/stupid question.
It's practically his most accessible film.

File: mosaic25c8869187f07fd588d4180a8362faa2d1b8563f.jpg (227KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 900x900px

damn now these threads are getting hostile too

>>80776912
mine >>80775226

>>80776889
you moron, you realize the only film you partially talked about was whiplash? the others you just dismissed with "generic" "babbys first" and "kek"

you actually didn't criticize or point out negative aspects of the films you're shitting on

no one's asking you to write 10 page essays, just to actually point out what to you is bad about those films, you don't even need to tell the plot (which is all you talked about in the whiplash thing you just wrote, never mind the visual aspect, pacing, etc)

you also sound very low iq in general

>>80777105
>>80777023
Post thoughts on Blade Runner smart person.

>>80776969
Ki-duk Kim films

>>80773422
>ywn rip the chopin fantasie in the back of a truck in the middle of traffic

>>80777140
baby's first le cyber punk

>>80777105
Pretentious.

>>80776912
>>80776937
I just told you I don't bother making them
feel free to take that as a victory because you spending the time to put 9 below mediocre films must mean you're super smart and have better taste than me
>>80776960
>needs someone to analyse blade runner for him
wow your 3 x3 is gonna be amazing
>>80776984
damn you sound upset that i've made you feel insecure about your taste and knowledge of film
did you go around telling everyone you're a film buff and trying to get girls to give you the succ by telling them you own 4 criterion dvds
>>80777023
that's where you're wrong kiddo
i'm not trying to have a conversation
i just enjoy letting you know you have terrible taste as no one else will then enjoying the meltdown that follows when ur insecurity amps up to eleven
>>80777028
KEK
YOU DIDN'T GET ZERKALO AT ALL
THAT'S THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU'RE MEANT TO GET FROM IT
>>80777083
its weird how people who have zerkalo has their fav generally have shit taste
>>80777105
what more do you want me to say about whiplash
if you understand the formula that sports films adhere to then you know everything u just mentioned (pacing, cinematography et al) come under that formula...
also every other review summed up each of those movies perfectly.
chinatown IS a generic neo-noir film, if you know what the neo-noir archtype is then u know why chinatown is a generic neo-noir film...
im starting to think u just dont understand enough about cinema to be able to understand what I said about those films

File: 3x3.jpg (2MB, 4080x2304px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4080x2304px

>>80773422

>>80777248
just make and post your 3x3. Stop being a coward. If you cannot rank the movies in at most a top 10 format, you've got literally no fucking taste, and the reason why you are so angry is because you recognized all the faults within yourself.

Just stop posting, make a 3x3 and lets talk.

File: 3x3.jpg (184KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 920x920px

>>80773422
8/8

>>80775697
5/5

>>80775984
4/8

>>80776149
3/7

>>80776640
6/6

>>80776969
5/5

>>80777248
not even him but
>THERE IS ONLY ONE RIGHT INTERPRETATION OF A FILM
what a terrible person you are

>>80777248
I...didn't actually say what I got out of it, but that speaks volumes about your reading comprehension.
And if you really think Zerkalo has one interpretation you're beyond help, but chances are you know that and are just trying to act elitist.

>>80777140
ok
i liked blade runner, also we are different posters

its a very atmospherical film, not only from the world building but from the way the characters are presented and how the film let the visuals present themselves to the viewer

to help with this atmosphere the film also plays with rain and light, which makes for some amazing imagery throughout

decker is the protagonist yet he feels so distant from the viewer, i think the film nailed this pretty good, and its my favorite from Scott

what else my nig

>>80777140
Not him but I kind of love this video senpai
https://youtu.be/rVarn-m7o9k
enjoy

>>80777238
how?
>>80777248
>im starting to think u just dont understand enough about cinema to be able to understand what I said about those films

and i'm sure you do, mr "i dont get tarkovsky"

>>80776351
it is

>>80776415
is this the first time you posted on a 3x3 thread? x/y is x liked and y being how many youve seen

>>80776640
2/2 i cant spot the others. i know a few others look familiar tho

>>80776791
second. lets see a "true" 3x3

>>80777250
maybe like 3/5 but i get the feeling you enjoy those films for good reasons and i respect that. gotf is the only film that brings me to tears

>>80777441
>how
why do you like them?
>implying you can answer that question competently for each of those 9 films
Do you even remember them?

>>80777309
what is the bottom left? i need my jack kino

>>80777169
Fuck, someone recommended me his films a year ago and I never got around to watching his films. What should I start with?

>>80777309
>5/5
Thanks. Titles?

>>80777521
The Passenger

>>80777294
oh you want me to download my 9 fav films again then go through each one, take a screenshot, then compile it in a collage just in the hopes it will somehow make my valid points more valid?
heres what will happen
i'll do that (i wont) and you'll call me pretentious then ask me what I liked about the one recognisable non narrative film i throw in there to fuck with you (lucifier rising or some shit) then i'll write some nonsense and you'll fall for it
doesn't sound fun to me and wont stop you from being a pleb
>>80777339
>>80777315
>I didn't say what I got out of it
Because you didn't need to explicitly say anything because it's clear you're a pleb
also
>only one interpretation
there's clearly one way to interpret it and it's obvious what you're meant to get out of it due to the stream of conciousness, clips of russian history and the plot being loosely based on tarkvoskys life
if you can't put two and two together then think about how the main interpretation works with your own then form an opinion from that then you're a retard
you've just taken the film at face value then philsophised about it instead of actually reading into it
>>80777441
you don't get tarkovsky
im gonna go watch Coeur de femme then go to bed but feel free to reply so I can read all the angry replies when I wake up tomorrow and this thread has rightfully 404'd

>>80777534
Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring i think

>>80777534
The American Friend
I Don't Want to Sleep Alone
Only Lovers Left Alive
Stray Dog
La Haine
Two Lane Blacktop
The Passenger
McCabe and Mrs. Miller
A Brighter Summer Day

>>80777614
Just post it.

>>80777248
>>80777232
Geez louis, I don't need you to do anything, I just wanted to gauge your thoughts, to see how you think and hold up to the standards I set for intelligent film analysis.

>>80777370
>what else my nig
Nothing my negroe, that will do anon. I certainly appreciate the visuals, but I think that is the sole strength of Blade Runner, as it's themes are quite shallow compared to the book. Usually film deviating from source material can lead to new creativity, but that's not the case with Blade Runner. It doesn't explore the nature of empathy like the book, and the Tyrell corporation motto rings true: "more human than human", simply making the replicants, humans to sympathize with, which is nothing new in sci fi territory desu. I highly recommend the book as it's commentary is rather foretelling, and it has some interesting parallels with Christianity, Judaism and Jews as well, which I think were intentional by Philip K. Dick.

>>80777614
Just list them out then. It doesn't even need to be 9 films. If anything it'll give all us plebs a gateway to become great consumers of cinema such as yourself.

>>80777614
kys

>>80777727
ok
The Anvil Hoarder
Who Shot The Anvil
Me, My Anvil And I
Through The Anvil
Anvil
The Anvil
Don't Anvil Don't
Anvil At Dusk
The 1% Anvil

File: 40.png (168KB, 367x181px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 367x181px

>>80777715
>im gonna go to bed
>he keeps going
you have derailed the thread. good job. this board is still meme/troll shit

>>80777715
thanks for the comment anon, i must say i havent read the book, so cant really comment on what the film misses

i thought the empathy loss was actually intentional, with the kinda anonymous and distant characters, they remain mysterious and not open for us to engage with, at least thats how i felt it

also if you're talking about empathy between replicants and humans, i also think the film delivered that pretty good, because all characters felt neutral in a way, you know?

and i thought it was a very humanist film, not at all shallow, but cant comment further on its relation with the book

>>80777727
Sometimes in April
Le Mystère Koumiko
Zauber der Boheme
Ifigeneia
Winter adé
Novye pokhozhdeniya Kota v Sapogakh
Of Magic, Love and Beauty
I demoni di San Pietroburgo
Kagoya hangan

Happy now?

File: 3x3.jpg (225KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 920x920px

>>80773422
Today OP wasn't a faggot

>>80777983
7/7

>>80777946
>i hate hollywood so much!! my faves? everything by the BLACKED collection :)

>>80777983
5/6, not a big fan of the sting. but really, thanks. glad you like my picks. i like yours too

can you tell me what bottom right is?

>>80778141
rush hour before they digitally inserted chris tucker

>>80777928
I think you're confusing me with somebody dude, I'm this guy >>80776351 and >>80776608 and >>80776725 and >>80776960 and >>80777140 the guy asking about Brade Runna. I just want to talk about movies in a constructive manner.

>>80777942
>i thought the empathy loss was actually intentional, with the kinda anonymous and distant characters, they remain mysterious and not open for us to engage with

I think you misread, in the book, you don't empathize with them, as they don't empathize. In the film Scott makes it clear that they are sympathetic characters.
>and i thought it was a very humanist film

Yes, that's why it's a very shallow film compared to the book in my opinion. "Humanist" themes like that have been done very often, whereas the book explores the difference between humans and "replicants" (they are called Androids in the book, hence the title "Do Androids dream of electric sheep") The primary difference being the ability to empathize, so Scott reversed the roles in the film, making the human characters rather unsympathetic, with Deckard being a ruthless killer (the scene where he guns down that girl through the glass) and he gives the replicants much more emotion, with Rachel, and Roy (the end speech, which I admit is well done). So the film succeeds in the visual department, but thematically is little compared to the book. Which I again suggest reading highly.

File: mosaicfb98c91fa4c295776f616ac9d78c49c654f8aab8.jpg (240KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 920x920px

>>80773422

>>80778296
nice, black narcissus is a somewhat underrated film of those two

why shame though?

>>80778239
please explain the bottom right? i dont see how anyone could like this. i just want an answer

>>80778296
2/2

>>80778188
my bad, wrong reply

>>80778369
>>80778239
also explain why you like neon demon and bvs

they were trash imo

>>80778365

I was deciding between Shame or Hunger. I think I liked Shame a little bit more because of the portrayal of Brandon and his sister.

>>80775984
>orange clockwork

dropped

File: top3x3.jpg (222KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 900x900px

eyyy

>>80778605
Top middle?

>>80778460
>>>80778369 (You)
i dont tho

>>80778605
a decent spread. whats the middle?

>>80776423
middle top??

>>80778688
Super Size Me

>>80778854
Top row, middle column. The cartoon one.

>>80778296
9/9

I dig your style

>>80778688
princess mononoke

>>80778956
It's Princess Mononoke jesus christ

File: Mosaic of films.jpg (161KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 920x920px

Alright fags, I finally did it, here comes my highly anticipated 'mosaíc le 9 kinòs'. Note, this contains spoilers for Brian De Palma's "Blow Out" and you need to watch that film ASAP if you haven't already seen it. It should also be noted that these films aren't specifically my "favorite" and are just movies I highly enjoy, and find stimulating. You better rate, and don't hold back.

>>80778141
It's The Killing Fields, a movie about the Cambodian Genocide

>>80779143
I've only seen Blow Out, Drive and BvS.
So 1/3.

File: mosaicab2586b1d8f69836fcdbea367904b679ae3aebf2.jpg (177KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 920x920px

second try.

>>80779959
>blood simple
N-nice

>>80777983
great taste

>>80776640
nice taste, amadeus doesn't get mentioned a lot in these threads...
what is the film on middle right and the one in the centre with the boy in the snow?

File: 3x3.jpg (201KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 920x920px

Tried to think of stuff that I don't ever get tired of watching.

>>80780364
what's top left? Hoffa? never heard anyone talk about that film, is it good?

>>80780364
5/5, although i don't like seeing that little faggot chris kattan in there...
what's the film in the top middle and the one with the blacks?

>>80779558
Jesus fucking Christ dood. Get yourself together.

>>80780495
People seem split on it but I loved everything about it.
>>80780567
Top middle is Vanishing Point. Middle is CB4. Bottom right is Do The Right Thing.

>>80780572
W-what anon?

File: ty burrell DotD.jpg (37KB, 612x400px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 612x400px

>>80780710
What is >1/3 even supposed to mean? You liked 1 out of the 3 movies you saw? You liked 1/3 of the films posted as you've seen 3/9ths? You need to get your critic together, I said don't hold back and you gave me some minimalist shit, and beyond that, you haven't seen some great movies, and that 3x3 is pretty mainstream.

Here's the list in order of appearance from top left to bottom rights, watch these films.

>Blow Out
>Taxi Driver
>Raising Cain
>Drive
>Pain & Gain
>Blow Out again (Nancy is a qt3.14)
>Obsession
>Point Break
>Batman v Superman

Where's yours so I can shit on you.

>>80780901
The Fifth Element is great, but what's the nazi movie, and the movie with the robot in the top middle. I've seen it before, but I've forgotten where.

>>80780957
downfall and total recall

File: mosaicdcc4c41c475a6718814159fe1a068564738dcbc9.jpg (206KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 920x920px

love you all xoxo

File: blow out.jpg (831KB, 4000x1627px) Image search: [Google]

831KB, 4000x1627px

>>80780896
yeah i meant i liked 1 film out of the three i've seen, BUT, i've actually seen taxi driver as well, so 2/4 now hehe

you seem to love de palma my man, what do you like so much about his style? (i like him as well, but its funny to see what film of his do people like more) i just love his diopters desu

ill watch pain and gain soon anon

>>80776969
>Upstream Color
>Stalker
my man

>>80781288
I've never seen a De Palma film but that cinemagraph looks amazing

File: Nancy girl.jpg (155KB, 1024x614px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1024x614px

>>80781288
I don't think I've seen a Brian De Palma movie I haven't enjoyed, but I haven't seen his comedies and his anti-war movies (I heard they weren't very well). I just think he's got a very creative eye, when he wants to he can shoot some great angles to get a nice visual illusions. He also has a very sensual (and sexual) touch as well with stuff like Dressed to Kill, Body Double, or Femme Fatale. I think he's very versatile too, making some pop culture staples like The Untouchables or Scar Face, and then doing something that would otherwise be relegated to B-movie territory with some transsexual killer. He's really willing to do things outside of mainstream Hollywood. Film is a visual medium, and he maximizes it's potential.

>diopters
What does this word mean?

>>80781491
Seriously anon, he's one of my favorites, I can't laud him enough. Beautiful films, and beautiful women.

>>80781727
De Palma used a lot of split diopter camerawork, which basically focuses half the frame on the foreground and half on the background, with kind of a blurry smudgy area between them.

>>80781727
taking it from google cause it'll explain far batter than i can
"Diopters are optical elements that can be placed in front of a prime or zoom lens, offering a fast and convenient way to increase the lens' magnification. In practical terms they move both the close and far focus distance of a lens closer to the film plane; on one hand the lens can focus closer than its native close focus distance, but on the other the far focus moves from infinity to a closer value. The strength or magnification of a Diopter is expressed in the 'diopter power' number."

en example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZjvcgj3CQQ
or that owl shot in my blow out grid

ill check out body double, it looks incredible m8

File: deb shelton.jpg (352KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 1920x1080px

>>80781805
Oh yeah, like the frame with Travolta, another technique he's fond of is the split screen, which isn't seen very often. One of the things I like is that he uses the visuals as important part of the larger story, like when Antonio Banderas is taking pictures of Rebecca Romijn in Femme Fatale, it's not just an embellishment for the sake of it, and it's without pretension if that makes sense? He's not doing it as a gimmick, like say Ineretu or whatever that Mexican guy's name is.

>>80781879
>>80781805
Thanks for the explanation as well. Body Double, Blow Out, and Dressed to Kill all have a similar feel and they came out around the same time as Scar Face. If you can get into him, you'd probably really enjoy his other films as well, you can see in his earlier work, experimentation with stuff that would later be a staple, and it's nice to see how he evolved so to speak. Even if most critics aren't big fans, don't let those glib prudes get you down.

>>80781986
Your taste is great but why oh why did you include Donnie Darko on that list

File: Mosaic.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>80781986
You should organize it differently, to have better composition. Maybe so? Could I also have a list of those films?

File: 3x3 March 2017.jpg (245KB, 912x912px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 912x912px

Doing these always takes so much god damn time

And I never know whether to put "my favorite movies to watch over and over" or 'my favorite kino' because those are two very different lists. So I just tried to put a mix of both, like Blade Runner. Yeah everybody and their dog has got Blade Runner on their 3x3 but it's perfect, because it straddles the line of "fun/enjoyable" and 'kino/artistic'.

File: 3x3.jpg (195KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 900x900px

Rate me, people on these threads are the last remaining good people on /tv/

File: 3x3.jpg (177KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 900x900px

>>80773422
3/4

>>80775226
2/2

>>80775697
6/6

>>80776969
6/8

>>80782400
>>80782482
>blade runner
my niggas

>>80782400
saragossa manuscript? that's new!
what's top left?
also dont say kino thats gay

>>80782287
I watched at the perfect age and ever since then I haven't been able to shake my enjoyment of it. I've always kind of disregarded the 2deep4u time travel shit and just enjoyed it as a great coming of age tale.
>>80782348
I'll give that new layout a go. Here's the list:
Persona, Donnie Darko, Twin Peaks:Fire Walk With Me, Mulholland Drive, Memories of Murder, Lost in Translation, Under the Skin, Alien, Apocalypse Now.

>>80782482
Looks like pretty good action stuff, Blade Runner is weak, as seen here >>80778188 and >>80777715.

Personally I'm not that big on Kubrick's stuff, but I like Eyes Wide Shut.

>>80782532
>2/2
which ones anon?

>>80782571
I mean I really just judge a movie by whether or not I actually liked it, it's as simple as that. When you start breaking down every single aspect and analyzing everything the movie has to offer then you can't really enjoy it the same way, if you understand what I'm getting at here

>>80782557
Also switch Lost and Translation to the bottom left so that the line leads towards the middle. Can't really fit faces in, but that's alright. Honestly it probably doesn't matter, I might have autism, you could also do something, with 3 oranges, Alien, Apocalypse Now and Twin Peaks, contrasted with the darkes and blues of Under the Skin, Donnie Darko and Mulholland Drive.

>>80782547
>saragossa manuscript? that's new!
it's not new, it's over 50 years old

top left is The Double (2013)

>also dont say kino thats gay
where do you think you are?

>>80782667
That was actually my original layout, with each column essentially being a certain colour but it looked too set up if you know what I mean?

>>80782658
Of course, but art should be watched critically so that you're not getting shit served on a visually enjoyable platter.

>>80782760
Yeah, I was thinking, each row could have 1 orange, contrasted with the blue, type deal. It's TOO much if they are all in one row, definitely know what you mean.

>>80782592
It's Such a Beautiful Day & Merry Go Round.

What are the others?

>>80782714
>it's not new, it's over 50 years old
no dummy i don't mean it's actually a new release but something refreshing to see in these threads
>where do you think you are?
/lgbt/, /r9k/, /pol/, /b/? it could be any desu

>>80782837
I don't have It's such a beautiful day in there anon.
the clock-she spent so many nights under the suns light-safe in hell
time regained-iron rose-fruits of paradise
merry go round-faithful heart-stopped in the city

File: couch dubs man.jpg (54KB, 447x378px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 447x378px

>>80782839
>lgbt/, /r9k/, /pol/, /b/? it could be any desu

You know it nigger!

>>80782839
>no dummy i don't mean it's actually a new release but something refreshing to see in these threads
I know. I'm just fucking with you

I'll give you a break because it's hard to detect sarcasm over the world wide web
>/lgbt/, /r9k/, /pol/, /b/? it could be any desu
don't say desu, ya weeb

>>80783215
also link me to your 3x3 if you already posted, cause if you recognized saragossa i'm interested

>>80783260
>>80781147
desu desu onii chan senpai

>>80783260
>>80783215
Is there a streaming service for old kino? The only place I can find old kino is the public library, and it's always checked out.

>>80783428
Yeah I've been wondering the same thing, not even my library has anything

>>80783428
>streaming
get it with times gramp, torrents its where is at
but check out filmstruck if you're in the US

File: mosaic3d226e058ab787e5456aef6cfe33e84222ab51e8.jpg (195KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 920x920px

Not necessarily the greatest works of art or anything, just stuff I either keep rewatching over the years or have stuck with my subconscious.

>>80783487
But what if there are no torrents :(

>>80783485
Yeah, my library has some good flicks, but it's even spare, despite being in a major city.

>>80783487
Is there a reason it doesn't work in non US?

>>80783581
yeah its only for burgers as of now, same thing with hulu

>>80783614
It's about time somebody started this, surprised it took so long desu. Why doesn't it work in other countries, do you know?

>>80783703
>surprised it took so long desu.
hulu used to offer the same deal, when they were with criterion

also idk why it's not available outside the US, i also think Criterion website doesn't ship outside the states

>>80783700
8/8
have you seen more from Sokurov?

>>80783855
Pretty sure they ship, it's just expensive, I remember some Canadian or Australian complaining about it.

File: radi.jpg (229KB, 990x705px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 990x705px

I just visit these threads to see how many movies I can guess.

>>80784228
movie?

>>80783855
i tried faust but wasn't getting into it and dropped it, was hopping to try some other time

>>80784271
i specially like his pre 00s work
you'll like them more if you like dostoievski and borges

>>80775226
I think McCabe is.

>>80784242
No idea. Might be a movie, might just be a great photo.

>>80773422

What is the benefit of obscuring the title of the film? At best, you can highlight interesting images from certain films, and prevent people from voicing opinions on films they've never seen - at worst, you prevent people from exploring their tastes, introduce unnecessary confusion, encourage a glut of posts of asking/answering which film is which, and make yourself appear to be both conceited and seeking validation.

>>80784647
the best part of these threads is seeing how many movies you've seen and recognize. the ones you don't recognize you just ask.
what is your fucking issue?

>>80784762
>what is your fucking issue?

It would be more economical to include the titles, if they must be hidden, within spoiler tags included alongside the image.

File: tbh.jpg (223KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 900x900px

desu

>>80784824
>if they must be hidden, within spoiler tags included alongside the image.
no.

File: 1490079116836.jpg (137KB, 500x510px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 500x510px

>>80776749
>He thinks the Mirror is a deep, obfuscated mystery film like some Christopher Nolan film.
This is how I know you are without gnostikos.

>>80784838
finnanon <3

>>80784228
I visit these threads to lurk random film discussion but today someone threw a bucket of shit into the blender and looked at it go.

>>80784869
>no.

Well, then I revert back to my original post. Why not include the titles in spoiler tags?

>>80785074
because it defeats the purpose of using scenes to represent the movie. You would rather the movie cover itself with the title visible but there's no fun in that and making a mosaic of movie covers is stupid. No one is stopping you from making yours that way though.

File: 3x3v2.jpg (207KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 920x920px

Trying to branch out more into older/foreign films

>>80785214
Well it don't look like you are succeeding at it.

File: My picks.jpg (329KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 920x920px

>>80773422

>>80785191
>because it defeats the purpose of using scenes to represent the movie

How so? The image would be unchanged, and context would be provided if needed. Further, the title is already implied for those who are aware of the film. Refusing to include that information in the original post (yet seemingly being perfectly fine with providing that information upon request) only serves to harm the quality of the thread.

For example: outside of the context of this thread, does a title defeat the purpose of a work? Does labeling Citizen Kane, "Citizen Kane", mean that it is less than it would be otherwise? No, it is a means for assigning a definition to the work so that it made be discussed.

>>80776198
4 is all quiet on the western front

>>80785278

Hence the "trying"

>>80785458
the purpose being to see how many you recognize without looking down or reading spoilers. The ones you don't recognize evoke curiosity and you ask the title. This promotes more discussion not less.
If the titles are included there really isn't anything to talk about, I either fuck off and google it or I don't.

Also, I only speak for myself but I really don't want to write down all the titles every time I post the fucking picture. im lazy..

File: image.adapt.990.high.hiroshima_film_mon_amour_anniversary_70_0806_1.1438891244129.jpg (246KB, 990x618px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 990x618px

>>80784913
>>80784913
How is life, terra?

one flew over the cuckoos nest > the rest

File: mosaicbd47124e8395120c83d944469e905e9591d3e9e1.jpg (214KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 920x920px

They cropped my shit up

>>80773422
good taste but watch more stuff bruh

>>80775984
>>>/out/

>>80776390
Thats objectively not true in any medium, why would it be on film? And other medias arent even an industry, believing the best cinema is know because its the best in an industry its just plain stupid

>>80776690
You're fucking dumb

>>80786077
Incredibly vitalistic, going to a 35mm screening of Francisca tomorrow!

What about you? I see you've added a lot of books but I don't know if they're recent reads or just all time stuff you've read.

I see you're reading Leviathan now.

>>80785214
Dont watch anything thats not from +60 except the russians, modernism saved cinema.
Watch more foreign shit cause your taste is terrible lmao

>>80786310
What are these?

>>80783700
What are those, i think i recognize In The Mood For Love, Russian Ark, Yi Yi and Elephant.

>>80786336
It is absolutely true in film.
http://www.theyshootpictures.com/gf1000_100-1.htm
If you are gonna retort with popular films like Twilight and Marvel everything being popular in your circles, it only tells us that your social circles are shit.

>>80786342
I marked read to everything I've read over the years. I use update feed for whatever currently reading/read, but sometimes i forget to tick the box that adds it to the feed. I'm close to the end of Leviathan, a really good read. Got it for 9 euros from antiquarian bookshop.

>35mm screening of Francisca
...the '81 film?

>>80786450
TSPDT is not judging movies by how well known they are, you guys are posting Nolan in here and acting like he is Tarkovsky.

Lets be honest, half of the kids in these threads havent even watched 50% of TSPDT.

>>80786407
1. The Americans
2. The Knick
3. You're The Worst
4. True Detective
5. Better Call Saul
6. The Whispers
7. Halt & Catch Fire
8. Wayward Pines
9. Aquarius

>>80786515
>>80786515
>TSPDT is not judging movies by how well known they are
It's an aggregate list of critics top rank lists - ranking them by popularity also known as "judging films by how well they are known".

>>80786537
>TV Shows
Jesus christ thats why i didnt recognize shit
into the trash it goes

>>80786515
>you guys are posting Nolan in here and acting like he is Tarkovsky.

no one thinks Nolan is Tarkovsky. get a grip.

>>80786578
The goal was to bait you in the first place. Though you should watch The Americans, The Knick, You're the Worst.

>>80786450
TSPDT’s Top 10 Greatest Films
1. Citizen Kane (1)
2. Vertigo (2)
3. 2001: A Space Odyssey (3)
4. The Rules of the Game (5)
5. Tokyo Story (4)
6. 8½ (7)
7. The Godfather (6)
8. Sunrise (8)
9. The Searchers (10)
10. The Seven Samurai (9)

>Hitchcock
>Second best movie of all time
Ranking art is stupid but jeez putting vertigo in second is even stupid-ier

>>80786594
nah senpai ty

>>80786495
Oh I see, I always thought Hobbes' state of nature (and state of the state of that makes sense) was pretty interesting.

Yes the Oliveira film, it's been on my watchlist since forever and it just happened to be part of a retrospective in my town, pretty great coincidence!

>>80786674
*if that makes sense

File: mosaica501b42d7ad68a33fff1a3341d43bbc1088e5e67.jpg (281KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 920x920px

>>80786310
Whats middle right and left?

>>80786701
>>80786537
fuck never mind i should have read. Also unique taste.>>80786310

>>80786674
It has been a grim fucking read. Hobbes was not optimistic man in the slightest. People are wicked, natural state of things is war, complete surrendering to sovereign power..

Probably gonna re-read The Nicomachean Ethics next, at least it isn't as dark as Leviathan. Then Locke and then Marx.

>>80786831
Oh fuck, remind me how's that bottom right one called. Watched it last month and forgot

>>80775226
What's middle right?

>>80776423
Middle right?

File: purekino.jpg (193KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 900x900px

There's something about the grainy texture and color desaturation of 80's film that really makes my dick hard

>>80787038
Adrift in Tokyo