> the artist puts anal piercings and uncut dicks in his art
#56895236
>>5314179
>uncut
>bad
(((OP)))
complaining about uncut dicks is like complaining about nude humans
oh, wait
But even though it's completely normal to be offended by uncensored/ uneffected human bodies that doesn't mean it makes sense
>>5349028
>wanting mutilated cocks instead of intact ones
>wanting porn where the guy feels less pleasure
>>5355880
cut dicks are objectively gross
Now dog-dick... that's where it's at!
>>5355880
>It makes no sense to complain about people not liking uncut dicks
As little sense as it does to complain about uncut dicks, instead of just not liking them.
>>5355880
>> if someone doesn't like something I like, they're faggots!
that's not what he was saying at all, he was saying that if someone doesn't like something he likes then they're a member of a jewish secret society trying to control his thoughts
>>5356186
agree
Let's take a look at the scientific approach to this situation. We have the following possibilities:
> OP is uncut, and therefore has to complain about not being represented in art
> OP is cut, and therefore has to complain about too much of his own kind in art
Looks like OP is a faggot no matter what because he has to come to /trash/ to complain about his uncontrollable preference in penis flaps.
>>5357601
No, he turns up his nose towards uncut cocks, so he dislikes them (not likes them).
>>5357601
Now I'm just expressing my distaste towards shadman
>>5356360
/pol/
>>5349028
>uncut
>bad
Hello, amerifat
>>5371066
>>5349028
How is that a bad thing? Piercings are hot af.
>>5371066
Maybe not american. Muslims and jews cut theirs too.