Can you post loli on /trash/ that's not NSFW?

>>11564289
if u want to you can test it out the waters

It's debatable. technically you can, but if you make a thread about it like what happened with the Gwen threads then it's only a matter of time till someone posts a nsfw loli image and the whole thread gets deleted...

>>11564289
>calling children lolis when it's SFW
Yep, definitely a pedo.

It varies

>>11565725
>referring to cartoons as if they're actual real live children
Yep, definitely a wingnut.

>>11567430
>LOLI ISN'T PEDOPHILIA YOU IGNORANT BIGOT!
Yep, definitely a pedo.

>>11564289
If you get lucky. I got a Lilo ban.

Well don't you try it and find out?

>>11571251
*why

>>11567521
Sounds about right, dunno why you'd frame it in sarcastic greentext.

>>11567521
I bet you think that furry pictures are bestiality too.

>>11571402
>this retarded meme again
Idiot, if you wanted to make a valid comparison it would be drawings of animals = bestiality. Not anthro animals that are pretty much humans with fur. Retard.

>>11573061
It's an equally retarded comparison to put liking chinese cartoon lollys on par with molesting children, so ...

Pedophiles leave

File: Rage.jpg (281KB, 599x780px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 599x780px

>>11564289
DIAF YOU FILTHY FUCKING PEDOPHILE

File: 14761234-illustration-of-a-foot-standing-human-foot--Stock-Vector-foot-cartoon-leg.jpg (61KB, 1300x887px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1300x887px

>>11575567
>>11576595
B-b-but muh peds...

File: GTFO.jpg (48KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x281px

>>11576710
back to >>>/lgbt/ with the rest of the degenerates. They like filthy pedos there.

File: 2266678 - Addie_McAllister Shadman The_Emoji_Movie.jpg (408KB, 900x1154px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 900x1154px

>>11564289

If it's work safe, I don't see why not.

File: 1469338051749.jpg (2MB, 1061x1500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1061x1500px

>>11580327
what if there is like a butt outline

Apparently

File: Gomez.jpg (13KB, 185x185px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 185x185px

>>11564289 (OP)
Not untechnically you aren't not allowed, however, if not not-safe-for-work Loli isn't not posted, the thread not unlikely won't go undeleted and not aren't you might not go unbanned if the mods don't think you weren't trying for reverse of toward the opposite of to end with.