fashion/other doll thread

File: Pretty-Popsicles1-371x1024.jpg (51KB, 371x1024px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 371x1024px

some new Fashionista Barbie dolls

File: TutuCool-504x1024.jpg (54KB, 504x1024px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 504x1024px

>>6010522

File: Lovely-in-Lilac2-380x1024.jpg (50KB, 380x1024px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 380x1024px

>>6010523

File: Emerald-Check1-326x1024.jpg (36KB, 326x1024px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 326x1024px

>>6010524

File: Plaid-on-Plaid1-473x1024.jpg (48KB, 473x1024px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 473x1024px

>>6010527

File: Kittie-Cutie2-383x1024.jpg (50KB, 383x1024px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 383x1024px

>>6010529

File: 1477460059614.jpg (391KB, 1460x1350px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 1460x1350px

Images from the old doll thread of the new 2016 Classic Disney princess dolls with sidekick characters.


>Ariel gets Flounder

>Jasmine get Abu (not her pet Rajah)

>Pocahontas comes with flit (not her friend Miko)

>Belle comes with Chip

>Sleeping Beauty comes with random generic squirrel

>Cinderella comes with Gus

>Rapunzel comes with Pascal

>Snow White comes with generic bluebird

>Merida comes with generic Bear cub

>Mulan comes with Mushu

>The Black frog princess comes with her prince frog

>Elsa comes with noseless Olaf

The males come with nothing and they put Cristoff in a new cheaper outfit.

File: Ken-Dolls.jpg (129KB, 769x712px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 769x712px

>>6010188
Literally not sure if bait or just trolling.

Ken has been around since the very beginning. If any character is an "accessory" it would be the ethnic variant dolls. Not giving Ken a curvy body while giving Barbie, and her friends multiple different body types would be very hypocritical, and it would also go against everything this new body image forward dolls are trying to accomplish in the flipping first place.

>>6010735
Get real anon.
Barbie is for girls.
Feminists rarely complain about delicious muscular bodies for men and don't considere them impossible ideals that are making little fat girls cry.
So thanks to hypocrisy our Ken will forever remain a ottermode pretty boy. And it's a good thing.

>>6010523
>>6010530

These two are cool. They can keep the rest.

File: malibu-barbie.jpg (604KB, 1086x768px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 1086x768px

>>6010740
>And it's a good thing.
So are you implying that it would have been better if Barbie had stayed a beautiful busty thin doll as well?

>>6010522
I love this face but the outfit Mae her look like a pregnant high schooler in one of those Well-to'do Teacher Changes Lives In An Inner City School movies

File: 1471585584805.png (672KB, 1280x1707px) Image search: [Google]

672KB, 1280x1707px

>>6010758

File: 1471586108459.jpg (208KB, 1728x1728px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1728x1728px

>>6010762

File: 1471663203646.jpg (209KB, 1024x664px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1024x664px

>>6010763

File: 1471663135510.jpg (328KB, 1024x893px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 1024x893px

>>6010764

>>6010522
>>6010524
>>6010527
>>6010529
Hate the faces. It's like they're not even trying to make them look cute. Would burn the outfits.

>>6010522
She looks like she just escaped from a hospital.

>>6010758
>>6010762
>>6010763
>>6010764
>>6010767
Weren't these posted before?

>>6011211
They get posted every. single. fucking thread. They are not even nice dolls or 'upcoming', they came out back in July. No one cares about them.

And also to that poster, at least put captions with the pictures or it serves no purpose at all.

>>6011211
Someone posts it every thread. Same with this stupid post

>>6010716

>>6011211
I wasn't the anon who posted them in the last threads. I've never even posted dolls from this line before. I posted them for the other anon who posted them in past threads out of solidarity. Last time she was posted some rude person in the thread said "Nobody cares about her. Stop posting these dolls" That comment wasn't cool especially since I find them to be very nice dolls myself. If you don't like a doll just say she looks like shit or ignore the post, and move on, but it's down right rude to ask a fan of a doll line to just flat out stop posting a certain type of doll when there are so many far uglier doll lines that get posted here on the regular.

>>6011399

Oh? So that gives you the right to spam those pics in every single general?

Go fuck yourself, cunt.

>>6011399
There's literally no point in spamming the same image in these threads over and over. none at all.

>it's down right rude to ask a fan of a doll line to just flat out stop posting a certain type of doll when there are so many far uglier doll lines that get posted here on the regular.

They're not being asked to post a certain TYPE of doll, they're being asked to stop fucking spamming the same images in every thread.

>>6011409
>in every single general?
>>6011223
>they came out back in July. No one cares about them

This is the first time I've ever posted these dolls. I believe they are a great bang for your buck. They look super realistic, they have marble eyes, and rooted eyelashes for just $15. Also who give a fuck if they came out in July. I didn't know there was a rule that said that the dolls shared in these threads had to be current or else they should be considered spam. This is a doll general thread. I can post a doll from 1992 if I feel like talking about it you little try hard troll.

>>6011422
>There's literally no point in spamming the same image in these threads over and over. none at all.

That's a lie. I've only seen that doll posted once before, and that was two threads ago. I should know because I've been book marking these doll threads since 2015.

>>6011439
Your lies make Baby Jesus cry.

>>6011399
>but it's down right rude to ask a fan of a doll line to just flat out stop posting a certain type of doll

If these dolls were popular and had new releases coming up and actually drummed up actual conversation then fine, but these same pictures get spammed in every thread, the last four at least and they never get any responses. We know they exist since they've been out for months.

Also posting them (or any other doll) with no comment as to why they are being posted is also odd to me.. what are they? are they brand new? coming out soon? on sale? on clearance? do you want to know something about them? without a comment to go with the picture then who knows what you want.

Anyone can post whatever they want but there needs to be some kind of reason or purpose behind it other than spam.

>>6011463
>Anyone can post whatever they want but there needs to be some kind of reason or purpose behind it other than spam.
You can keep calling the doll spam all you want, but it doesn't make it true. Just because you call a dog a cat doesn't make the dog a cat. The image was only posted ONCE before, and that was TWO threads ago. Just because a doll is posted twice two threads apart from from each other doesn't make it spam, and you know this unless you're a retard or live in a parallel universe. I chose to believe you're just a generic brand troll because otherwise it would just be kinda sad.

>>6011439
>That's a lie. I've only seen that doll posted once before

They've been posted multiple times.

>I wasn't the anon who posted them in the last threads. I've never even posted dolls from this line before. I posted them for the other anon who posted them in past threads out of solidarity.

>>6011520
>They've been posted multiple times.
You mean that one time the anon posted it two threads ago.

>>6011463
>these same pictures get spammed in every thread, the last four at least
> the last four at least

This was the last doll general thread.
>>5987170
>>5987170
Show me where she was posted once. Just once. I'll wait......oh that's right you can't because you're just a try hard troll who's full of lies.

>>6011526
>You mean that one time the anon posted it two threads ago.

Hon, can you not read?

>posted them in past threads out of solidarity.
>past threads
>threads

The "s" means it's multiple.

>>6011526
She's right there, might want to check again

File: 1288208464393.jpg (49KB, 423x480px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 423x480px

>>6011550
So you went to the trouble of posting an image of the doll yourself at the last min before the thread 404s >>6011535 in hopes of proving this comment >>6011526 wrong?
Well played.

>>6011559
I love you more, anon.

>>6011572
no, I didn't. Nice job ignoring my comment, though, which quotes someone admitting it's been posted multiple times

File: d35e17636a7a8798d2e1d7106792c1e6.jpg (35KB, 600x663px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x663px

>>6010522
>>6010523
>>6010524
>>6010527
>>6010529
>>6010530
What no curvy thicc doll in this new line up? I feel cheated.

>>6011598
They're all awful so it would be shitty anyway.

>>6010743
Absolutely.

I want dolls that looks good, even if I'm ugly myself.

File: 14925570_10154230368726219_4705407922249558007_n[1].jpg (48KB, 487x960px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 487x960px

Seeing pictures of this new Stacie I was wondering... Isn't really any Stacies or Skippers with both articulated arms and legs released to date?

This kind of almost make no sense.

>>6012277
Nope, none that I can think of. Even the "active" dolls.

File: 1477412759062.jpg (165KB, 1041x1500px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1041x1500px

>>6012277
She reminds me of the doll that was posted in the last thread. Kinda wanna get them both, but each one falls a little short of perfection. The one from the last thread while very cute had molded on cloths, and this new Stacie not only doesn't have full elbow articulation, but shes more than likely going to be packaged with one of her older sisters which will make what could have been a $10 purchase into a $20 to $25 purchase.

File: 11.jpg (164KB, 1397x1500px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1397x1500px

>>6012470
That's a shame. The only Stacie doll I have in my collection is image related which I found on sale at Ross. I found a Skipper with a pink strip in her hair at the Goodwill last week, but she was naked, and her articulated legs are so lose I fear they might fall off.

>>6011598
Only thing that could make that curvy lady any more glamorous would be if she was a bald woman of color with an arm tattoo.

File: Dream_Come_True.jpg (305KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 1920x1080px

Well now that Hilary lost I guess these dolls will start hitting the clearance section at most toy stores soon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Se8PVZdfPg

File: 3648EBEE00000578-3690942-image-a-40_1468529427905.jpg (236KB, 634x1255px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 634x1255px

>>6012518
Believe it or not I still bump into unsold 2012 President Barbie dolls often. I saw one this week at Walmart still shelf warming after all theses years with a big red $5 clearance sticker on her. I've seen this doll bouncing around from shelf to shelf with that big bright red clearance sticker on her for years now. About two years ago they placed an even bigger red clearance sticker on top of the old clearance sticker which now covers/hides her face marking her price down from eight dollars to five dollars.

>>6012518
>Vice Presidents have to wear glasses

it's killing me

>>6012561
Rescue her anon, she looks nice.

>>6010755
It so does.

File: t15apof01_1.png (1MB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 800x1000px

I'm not usually into Tonner but I love this "Agatha's Shopping Date" fashion.

>>6012979
Those yellow eyes creep me out

File: bruh.png (12KB, 640x198px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 640x198px

>>6012979
I knew tonner stuff was pricey but do people really pay this much money just for an OUTFIT for their doll??

File: enhanced-6304-1434644148-1.jpg (39KB, 625x489px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 625x489px

>>6012979
Just looked at other dolls in this line and they are just begging to be changed in to Daria.

>>6012561
>Stands on her own!
>(literally)

Well played, marketing team. Well played. She'd get my vote

>>6013000
No, absolutely no one buys Tonner outfits, the Tonner company runs on dreams and starlight instead of profits.

File: t15apbd01_2.jpg (118KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 800x1000px

>>6013047
so tempting

File: cafcc6b5dd36ca7e0be9db674c8807ad.jpg (16KB, 260x468px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 260x468px

>>6012561
Aww, she's like Elle Woods Barbie ten years later. What a cutie.

>>6013000
They are generally very well made and good quality. Which I know is hard to compare to fashion dolls like Barbie, but compared to other high end fashion dolls like Fashion Royalty, Sybarite, and bjds of similar size, its pretty standard.

File: shitposting.jpg (207KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1280x1024px

>>6011439
>That's a lie.
>>6011487
>>6011526
I've seen them posted at least twice before and I remember the first time I saw them was with info being posted about their names as new additions to the line. People asked questions about them but then interest fell to the wayside. Since then they've been posted again and again, to the point that someone actually had to ask why they were being posted if they had been posted before. It's the same with that stupid Disney doll post that keeps getting posted at the beginning of the thread every time. 2016 Disney dolls? It's fucking November, show me leaks of 2017 releases if you have them. The point is we know they exist. They have been posted before. Instead of being defensive, admit that they have been posted before and that you posted them without any real context.

File: 14947399_10154235796291219_3160933996198722109_n.jpg (42KB, 390x960px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 390x960px

New Fashionista Barbie, 'Denim and Dazzle'

>>6013855
10/10 post right here. Couldn't have put it better myself.

>>6014050
Thats's not actual denim though is it? Looks like cotton with a denim pattern printed on

File: 14963339_10154235796546219_6400100035246630148_n.jpg (63KB, 344x960px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 344x960px

>>6014174
Probably not real denim.

>>6014195
>Denim and Dazzle*
>*Not real denim and not much dazzle

Hilarious

File: rozenmaidenpullip.png (796KB, 792x507px) Image search: [Google]

796KB, 792x507px

Hey niggers! A few quick questions about Pullips.

-Do they have rooted hair?

-Do standard models have replaceable eyes? What size?

-What size clothes do they wear? (like pure neemo)

-Do they stand up on their own/are they more poseable than a Barbie?

-Where do the customisers usually sell their pullips? Is there a DOA equivalent for Pullips or a FB group?

Thanks guys, I love each and every one of you.

File: Star Darlings Sage.jpg (73KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 640x960px

I have wanted a Sage doll for months but I finally caved in and ordered one from Amazon. This is my first non bjd doll, super excited to own her. She's really lovely.

>>6013000
Almost everything Tonner makes ends up on clearance 50-80% off. That's why you don't see as many Mattel and Tonner dealers anymore, the direct company shops ran sales to customers at under company wholesale so often everybody gave up.

File: Lovely-in-Lilac5-367x1024.jpg (88KB, 367x1024px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 367x1024px

>>6010524
Is it just me, or does this doll look like an evil bitch? She looks like the girl who is perky when it suits her, then is a cold hard cunt to everybody else. And I bet she carries one of those Vera Bradley diaper bag looking things as a status symbol.

Do the curvy Barbies all have flat feet? Or do some have high heels?

>>6015480
Fat girls can't wear heels, the heel will snap and break their ankles.

>>6015480
Some of them have heels. I believe the brunette with sleeveless peach colored top and flower skirt had arched feet?

>>6015425
Yikes, that is one unflattering dress. She looks like curvy, not tall.

>>6014968
- No, they wear wigs.

- All models have eye chips. You can pop out the irises from the front. You can't take out the whole eye without a screwdriver and removing the entire eye mechanism.

- Barbie / Bratz clothes fit them, so 1/12th I guess.

- They are more posable than standard Barbies, but there's no way they're standing alone. They have tiny feet and massive heavy heads.

>>6015480
>>6015603
>>6015611
Just got the peach/floral brunette and daisy pinko, both have high heels.

As an aside, why are the fatty Barbies so hard to undress? And when did hair brushes stop being included in the economy Barbies?

File: bratz.jpg (95KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1500x1500px

How do you guys feel about Bratz being discontinued again ?

>>6015863
Good. I never liked how big their heads and lips were.

>>6015863
Meh, I did really like the Bratzillaz line though.

>>6014974
These dolls are really pretty in person anon and they'd look good next to any pullip.
I want them myself but desu they'd just stick out in my collection like a sore thumb and I already collect enough 'pretty and useless' things. Good buy! Her eyelids have glitter all over them and they sparkle.

>>6015863
I'm sorry they got so ugly and died. 2010-2013 had plenty of good dolls until they chintzed out and started making everything cheap, Crayola-colored, and overpriced. Then they revived, and everything was expensive and in crayon colors again.

>>6013047
>>6013086
Fuck I want a Daria doll now.

>>6015863
Sad. I really liked the new line of Bratz. If you can get past the box hair they looked pretty awesome, and their outfits, and accessories were to die for.

File: Bratz 69.jpg (143KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 900x900px

>>6015878
Theses are the ones I loved the most.

Her hat made her so cuddly soft.

File: Bratz 80.jpg (50KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 450x450px

I loved this one because her pigtails, and outfit reminded me of something Baby Spice would wear.

File: Bratz 82.jpg (49KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 450x450px

I loved this one because she reminded me of a 90s Techno music club party girl right down to her green alien back pack. .

File: Bratz 44.jpg (256KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1500x1500px

I loved these just cause their outfits looked so awesome. Plus I think the did a really good job with the male doll.

File: Bratz 46.jpg (337KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 1500x1500px

I fell in love with this one because it reminded me of my sleepovers back in the day right down to the popcorn, and blue rob. Plus she looks awesome in her second outfit. I also needed it because I have a soft spot for pigs, and I needed to have the pig she came with in my life.

File: Bratz 56.jpg (320KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 1500x1500px

It really sucks that I couldn't get this one, but once they sold the few they had they never restocked more in time for me to get her or else she would have also be in my collection.

File: Bratz 68.jpg (362KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 2000x2000px

I really liked the cute hair, and outfit this one had. I think the bunny ears were such a cute touch, but there was just no way I could or would spend $50 on it.

File: Bratz 62.jpg (42KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 450x450px

I got this one instead for only $4 when they were being clearanced out so I at least got one with the pink hair.

The clothing these dolls came with was so high quality, and soft yet the world didn't give a crap about them. It breaks my heart that they are gone again, but my wallet is very greatiful.

The first ones I got were these two. I payed $37 for them than almost died when they were being sold for like $9.99 once Toy R Us clearanced them.

File: tumblr_nyca6l0lz81s1jrywo1_500.jpg (108KB, 500x625px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 500x625px

>>6016547
Forgot picture.

File: tumblr_4Life_6l0lz81s1jrywo1_500.jpg (250KB, 907x729px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 907x729px

The only good thing that come of them being clearanced out was that I was able to get this $50 one for $13!

File: Bratz 7.jpg (39KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 500x500px

>>6016532

And yes before anyone says it I already found out that this doll was a less fancy remake of a past Bratz doll.

File: Bratz 13.jpg (157KB, 761x874px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 761x874px

>>6016524

And this one is is a less fancy remake of this old one.
I still like the new ones more though. The old ones looked way to edgy and street thugish while the new ones look softer, and much cuter.

File: Bratz 59.jpg (99KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 900x900px

I came really close to keeping this bed, but I ended up returning it.

Well, those are all the 2015 Bratz dolls I got. I saw some images of upcoming ones that never came to the US which sucks. I would have totally kept collecting these dolls for years,and years to come if the line had not been killed.

RIP Bratz

>>6014974
These are really nice, but there's just something about them that causes me to keep passing on them.

>>6012518
>I guess these dolls will start hitting the clearance section
It's already starting. I saw them in bin today marked down from $25 to $19. All I could think when I saw them was that I wished I had a camera phone so I could have taken a picture of it to post on /toy/.

>>6016501
>Crayola-colored
Do you have any examples of what you mean?

>>6015742
>And when did hair brushes stop being included in the economy Barbies

Those brushes are sorf of cute, but I'm glad they are gone. Otherweise Mattel would have got even lazier with the dolls and fashions to fit their budgets so you can have a mini molded plastic brush.
What would anyone do with those brushes anyway?

>>6015863
I understand being draw to them because they have nicely made clothes in interesting/diverse styles with nice detailing such as >>6016543 and >>6016548 .

That said, I can't care much because their clothes probably won't fit my other dolls, their proportions are horrible, and they all have this plastic surgery victim unflaterring look, so It's not like I'd actually buy any of them.

>>6016655
The clothes usually fit Monster High and Ever After High dolls pretty nicely.

File: feminist rage.jpg (131KB, 600x589px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 600x589px

>>6014643

Wasn't this posted before?
There's literally no point in spamming the same image in these threads over and over. none at all.

If this doll was popular, and actually drummed up actual conversation then fine, but this same picture gets spammed in every thread, the last two at least and it never get any responses. We know it exist.

>>6016640
>What would anyone do with those brushes anyway?
Umm, brush the doll's hair? Fix the rachet-ass dox hair without having to dig around and find a brush?

>>6013855
>stupid Disney doll post that keeps getting posted at the beginning of the thread every time. 2016 Disney dolls? It's fucking November, show me leaks of 2017 releases

>>6014173
>Couldn't have put it better

It's glaringly obvious that you have no clue about Disney store doll release schedules.
Just because they are called the "2016 dolls" doesn't mean they were released at the start or even in the middle of 2016. The 2016 dolls have only just recently started popping up in some select Disney Stores. Some Disney Stores have gotten some, but not all of them. There are still people actively hunting down these new dolls who don't wish to order over the internet. Even now in late 2016 my local store is still selling the 2015 line. This is nothing new. Disney stores have been doing this for years now. It's just how it works, and you would know that for yourself if you weren't so new.

File: Stop_Supporting_Childhood_Obesity.jpg (27KB, 368x267px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 368x267px

>>6015603
>Fat girls can't wear heels, the heel will snap and break
Truth

File: Fucked muh Nose Up.jpg (73KB, 450x407px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 450x407px

>>6014050
Mother of god, please tell me you shopped on that crooked jacked up nose onto that image as a joke. If real I have no words.

>>6017411
The fuck you talking about? The complete set have been available on Disneystore.co.uk for a hell of a long time. How can people be hunting for something that is readily available?

File: 6980856061_c2a4499ab5.jpg (153KB, 500x368px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 500x368px

>6016581
R.I.P. the only dolls with a passion for fashion.

File: 5832770857_011b352c98_b.jpg (540KB, 1024x659px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 1024x659px

Pouring out a 40oz of glitter glue in memory of what was.

>>6017670
>The complete set have been available on Disneystore.co.uk

First not everyone lives in the UK.

Second the availability of the new 2016 dolls varies from store to store in the US.

Third nice job at actually taking the time to read the post.
>>6017411
>There are still people actively hunting down these new dolls who don't wish to order over the internet.

>who don't wish to order over the internet.

The post is intended for those who are trying to find them in actual physical stores. The dolls have indeed been available for sale on both the US, and UK Disney Store websites for a while now, HOWEVER the post is not intended for those who buy things off of the internet, but for those who are still actively hunting them down in physical stores within the US.

>>6017411
>Just because they are called the "2016 dolls" doesn't mean they were released at the start or even in the middle of 2016. The 2016 dolls have only just recently started popping up in some select Disney Stores. Some Disney Stores have gotten some, but not all of them. There are still people actively hunting down these new dolls who don't wish to order over the internet. Even now in late 2016 my local store is still selling the 2015 line. This is nothing new. Disney stores have been doing this for years now. It's just how it works, and you would know that for yourself if you weren't so new.

Do you live near a ghetto? If your Disney Store doesn't have the 2016 doll line, then they are violating policies from headquarters. Some stores, usually the outlets, still sell the 2015 dolls on clearance--but they should all have the 2016 line out, since it's been out for months and months now. It is absolutely not normal for Disney Stores to not be selling the 2016 dolls this late in the game.

File: 15032668_10154235796301219_8873970614534725828_n.jpg (110KB, 811x960px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 811x960px

>>6017560
It's a shadow from the glasses.

>>6017719
>The post is intended for those who are trying to find them in the actual stores

How does a picture of the dolls simply posted over and over help anyone finding them in actual stores?

>>6017719

Not to mention, ordering from the US site is a gamble. You might get the new doll, you might get the old doll. They don't purge the old stock, they update the photos and keep shipping the old dolls until they are all gone.

>>6017725
>Do you live near a ghetto?
About an hour away from Walt Disney World itself, and no my local Disney Store is not a outlet it's a legit Disney Store.

>>6017730
Just keeping the flame alive for those who are still searching for them. A little motivational post if you will.

>>6017734
Exactly. Also if Disney can't be trusted with the quality control of pricy limited Edition dolls what can we expect from the classic playline. I for one like to look at a few while I'm in store, and I find miss painted eyes where the paint drips over to the face, or sometimes a smeared double eye effect. Some times the clothing,and accessories can be messed up or even missing.

File: Bratz 34.jpg (98KB, 476x979px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 476x979px

>>6017708
I have that Rina mint in box on my bathroom wall. Wish I would have gotten a few more from that line.

File: Bratz 33.jpg (47KB, 376x350px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 376x350px

>>6017700
>Fells bad man
The only other classic Bratz dolls I won in my collection would be this one that I got on sale right before the Mattel lawsuit take down. ...

>>6017759
>in box on my bathroom wall.
Wut??

File: Bratz 26a.jpg (362KB, 894x1599px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 894x1599px

>>6017768
and this one that I found at a movie theater in the early 2000s. She was left behind.

File: Bratz 18.jpg (50KB, 640x571px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 640x571px

>>6017771
I did manage to get the full set of #SnowKissed dolls which sold for $29.99 each for only $8.99 this summer.

File: Play House Image 384.jpg (759KB, 1299x1986px) Image search: [Google]

759KB, 1299x1986px

>>6017769
I have limited space in my house so I decorate some walls with doll boxes which have plastic hanger tabs on them. I place a small nail in the wall, and hang them up mint in box.

>>6017751
>Just keeping the flame alive for those who are still searching for them. A little motivational post if you will.

So, how does it actually help them? "Keeping the flame alive"? can these people not look at the online Disney Store to see pictures?

>>6017793
You decorate with DVDs?

File: 4U.jpg (87KB, 1280x850px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1280x850px

>>6017798
I'm sure some would say let it go, but it helps me keep the flame of hope alive in my heart, until I find them. I secretly go around the internet, and keep the spirits of hope alive in others who have reported not being able to find them as well. The post is a cheerleader, a symbol of hope. I'll keep the front porch light on for you as well if you need it, anon.

>>6017811
Better question is why is this decoration series in a bathroom?

>>6017793

>The Muppet gang is very excited to see you naked.
>Don't you hate it when you're in the shower and you suddenly feel the urge to watch "The Suite Life of Zack & Cody?" Never again in this bathroom!
>Dat moisture mold residue inside those doll boxes.
>There is a blown up pic of a RL shota placed at crotch level.
>Brushing your teeth will never be the same when you wear your Hanna Montana 3D glasses!

Yeah, you're on the fast track to crazy cat lady status.

>>6017793
It doesn't weird you out that Jeremy Sumpter is watching while you take a dump?

>>6017811
All dolls are kept on shelves or on walls. All dvd discs are neatly organized in about 13 dvd holder books. Each dvd book holds about 350 dvd discs each. I use the empty dvd boxes to decorate because I miss Blockbuster video stores. I will NEVER Netflix! I also go to the Goodwill, buy VHS tapes of movies I loved from the 80s, and 90s to decorate, but I never watch the actual VHS tapes.

>>6017838
I started putting things in the bathroom because I ran out of wall space in the rest of the house.

>>6017864
You do you, but like the other guy said -moisture can mess up toys. That's the only problem i have, messing up my fun junk aint awesome. PS i do like tha specific peter pan movie.

>>6017850
>>Dat moisture mold residue inside those doll boxes.
Cheep dolls are kept in bathroom. I also shower with ice cold water to reduce moisture. I have two doll rooms. I'm putting in more wall shelves for the 2016 wave of Heros Vs Hero dolls I got recently.

>>6017859
No, it's very comforting. I worked very hard with a knife cutting an extremely large 2003 original movie theater display of Peter Pan which was twice the size I am to bring it home, and put it on the wall.

File: Barbie-Made-to-Move-Skateboarder5-526x1024.jpg (117KB, 526x1024px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 526x1024px

>>6017759
I wish I had bought every single slim box Bratz doll from 2010 until when they switched to the Barbie style body.

File: b44c90cd39_103652060_o2[1].jpg (238KB, 600x653px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 600x653px

HAHA, this is seriously fucked up.

>>6010764
>>6010767
If these are 'so good', why no owner photos instead of just spammed stock pix?

File: 6c9875c8cb_103602362_o2[1].jpg (179KB, 576x790px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 576x790px

What is going on with Mattel?

Those big eyes are cute, but the smirks just ruin their faces.
The plastic skirts look kind of cool, but defnitely not against molded clothes.

Wishing they would do a futuristic take on the collectors dolls aswell...

File: P1080488.jpg (50KB, 512x384px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 512x384px

>>6019043
>>6019061

Fuck you, Jenny. We can out-weeb you any day.

t. Matty

>>6019061
Mattel has 3 levels of playline Barbie

Cheap* Playline, where half or more of the outfit is molded
Regular Playline, where the clothes aren't molded but there's no articulation and the clothes might be only front-printed
Nice Playline, where the clothes aren't molded, there's articulation, everything is made up and the points don't matter

*not necessarily meaning cheap price

>>6019085
On the website they call your first category "fantasy," I guess because it's usually a movie/special tie-in and they're mostly mermaids, fairies and princesses. Or magical mermaid fairy rockstar princesses.

>>6017411
>if you weren't so new
Unless there is a specific scheduled or even a surprise release (which would be a leak), then posting the same dolls that have been out for months now at the beginning of the thread is kind of pointless with the exception that >>6017719 pointed out.

>>6017793
I'm so sorry, i just can't get over the fact that you have a muppets poster hanging in your bathroom

>>6017793
You need help

>>6017793
This is the kind of thing they put on reality TV to make people feel better about their own lives. You must not have any family because they would have held an intervention already.

>>6017864
>I ran out of wall space in the rest of the house.
>I ran out of wall space in the rest of the house.
>I ran out of wall space in the rest of the house.
>I ran out of wall space in the rest of the house.

File: 14963250_1152688714818274_1663827580770653039_n.jpg (79KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 540x960px

Ignoring the odd angle, a better pic of the new Shanghai LE Snow White.

File: Beauty-Beast-07__scaled_600.jpg (316KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 600x800px

Since there's so many hardcore Disney fans on this thread, what do you guys think of the new Beauty & the Beast trailer?

>TFW the trailer shows the entire cast in their live action forms & every plot point that's almost the same as the animated version.

>>6020869
Disney can GTFO with that prom dress and skinny Gaston.

>>6020869
Eh. I'm not judging anything on trailers anymore because I've been misled and/or burned so many times.

The ball gown is SO disappointing, though, from a costume stand point. Someone posted quotes on /co/ from the director and costume designer and their explanations make no sense.

Director:

>This is a gown that the household staff has pulled together -- and there's one little magic thing that happens at the end of it. But in the spirit of Belle and Beauty and the Beast, it was all about something that felt beautiful, but comfortable. There was no question of adapting Emma Watson's body to a dress. It was the other way around. It was something that belonged to her, that was in the story made for her. Our costume designer Jacqueline Durran was very true to the period, so that slightly more ruffled look of the animated film really wasn't accurate for the period we were setting the movie in. Instead, it's a riff on that.

But it's not more accurate, or accurate at all.

Costume designer:

>>“For Emma, it was important that the dress was light and that it had a lot of movement,” Durran says. “In Emma’s reinterpretation, Belle is an active princess. She did not want a dress that was corseted or that would impede her in any way.”

But her "normal" dress has a visage of accuracy plus little twists that make her more active (walking boots instead of regular shoes, etc) so why not take a design that starts historical and make it lighter? Rather than... this.

It also means the dolls will be underwhelming, although I have a feeling that Disney Store will only release the gold gown as a $75 2-doll set with Beast, so I probably won't be getting it anyway. (Oh who am I kidding, I'll get it just like I bought that $200 live action Cinderella set so I could get the Stepsisters)

>>6020869
On one hand I like that they've just taken the cartoon and shot it scene for scene unlike Alice in Wonderland which was a complete fucking disaster but on the other hand it's kinda boring and we know exactly what's going to happen so might as well just the animated version.

>>6021015
I'm so used to the live action dolls selling like shit that I actually just wait for them to end up in Tuesday Morning, TJ Maxx, and the like at this point. At $10 a doll, I usually end up getting one for display and one for the clothes. I don't see anything different happening with these dolls.

>>6020869
I'm looking forward to seeing doll Emma Watson's lantern jaw.

>>6021270
I only buy the live action dolls I know I absolutely want for regular price--or usually 20-25% off since coupons tend to pop up within a week or two of their release--and save the rest for clearance. Of course this has backfired, since I skipped the witch of the west Oz the Great and Powerful doll and now she goes for $60-100, so fuck that.

File: 15036625_10154250849496219_2519086570430075598_n.jpg (43KB, 659x960px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 659x960px

Black version of the soccer Made to Move doll

Youtube review of the Shanghai Snow White: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-Zp5V5joz4

>>6014974
I have two of these because they were being clearanced and are so stinking cute faced. The posing though is abysmal. Their joints barely move. I've been trying to modify one but its not helping much, and because of the funky pearlescent plastic there's not much hope for rebodying.

>>6017364
Anon do you not like... have combs in your bathroom? A regular comb is way more effective than that dinky lil brush.

File: You.jpg (187KB, 655x540px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 655x540px

>>6019224
>>6019680
>>6020033
>>6020046
At this point I feel like I'm just reading generic old pasta. If I only had a dollar for every time I've read this >>6020033 tired old comment I'd have enough to build five mansions by now. If this is the best this new generation of catty trolls can do I'd hate to see what the future will bring.

I practically gift-wrapped that image for you, and that was the best you could come up with.
You don't even deserve this (You)

There will be a new Hello Kitty doll at US$50,00 and a new Warhol one at US$75,00.

But the latest Warhols and Tokidokis my expectations just can't be high...

>>6022265

>Tee hee! Look at all of this attention I'm getting from shamelessly flaunting my crippling hoarding addiction!

Just when you thought Drama Whores couldn't get any worse...

File: peterpan 86.jpg (61KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 600x800px

>>6019061
How little clothing can you give a doll before it's no longer considered a doll. At this point they are more like large articulated figures. I remember when Disney Store tried selling a line of hero figures in the boys section which included Tarzan, Aladdin, and this Pan, and Hook. They had plastic hair, and molded on clothing so they labeled them Possible action figures on their website.

File: same.jpg (768KB, 2006x1906px) Image search: [Google]

768KB, 2006x1906px

>>6020869
Emma's acting is honestly cringy. It's like watching a high school play performance. Emma seems to have the same grossed out facial expression plastered on her face throughout most of the trailer, and even in the movie stills that have been released its always the same half pissed off expression. Her one note expression is comparable to Twilight's Kristen Stewart dull jaded expression which she carried throughout most of her film. The enchanted objects have entered the uncanny valley, and they repulse me. Gaston isn't even a big guy much less as big as a barge You had one job Disney.

That said the worst offender is the CGI cartoon Beast. Disney knows that little girls from the 90s, and girls who were tweens when Twilight came out are now adult woman. Twilight was a story about a Handsome yet "monstrous" Vampire who seduces a young brunette girl. Ring any Belles yet??
In short Disney wanted to create a good looking beast that woman could be attracted to just like they were attracted to the handsome, and ripped Wolf/Vampire "monsters" in Twilight. So live action beast has no lower over bit or long fangs. Hes just a good looking brown guy with some facial hair, and demonically long horns.

File: Untitledsdfsd.jpg (612KB, 1629x1086px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 1629x1086px

>>6020949
>Disney can GTFO with that prom dress
It doesn't even have fucking gloves. It's like a Disney Store budget Belle doll from the past where they leave the gloves out to reduce cost. I fear that the upcoming live action Emma Belle dolls will look like shit while of course having a premium doll price point attached to it.

File: ggjj.jpg (496KB, 1599x821px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 1599x821px

>>6021015
>Our costume designer Jacqueline Durran was very true to the period, so that slightly more ruffled look of the animated film really wasn't accurate for the period we were setting the movie in.

So they are worried about ruffles not being accurate for that period of time yet they injected black people into the film? My fucking sides are in orbit. They just wanted to give her a non flashy dress with no corset because of Emma, and the designers feminist views. Feminism killed the dress. Think I'm over exaggerating? Emma and the creators of the film are bragging about how progressive it was to not giving Belle a corset in recent interviews.

Thank god Disney had the sense to overcompensate for the feminist fashion-forward inspired dress by using every CGI background trick in the book to bring life to the ball room scene. There's so much visual background noise in the scene that it's almost like Disney didn't want you to notice how shit the dress actually is.
>Disney's screaming at the top of their CGI lungs
>Don't look at the dress!!
>Don't look at the dress!!!
>Don't look at the dress!!!!

File: 6002040900218-4.jpg (96KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 960x540px

>>6021015
>It also means the dolls will be underwhelming,
This right here is what worries me deeply. With a dull, dead dress on the over priced live action Belle doll if Disney Store so much as slightly fails to nail Emma's face in doll form the doll will completely go to shit.

>(Oh who am I kidding, I'll get it just like I bought that $200 live action Cinderella set so I could get the Stepsisters)

I didn't give to much of a shit about the live action Cinderella film do to the girl that they got to play the part, but I'm afraid I too will fall victim to, buying an over priced box set if a Live action Beauty & the Beast set is released.

Fun Fact: Disney Store is upping the price point of their standard Deluxe box sets from $79.99 to $89.99 starting with this new Elena of Avalor Deluxe doll set.
So expect to pay way over $200 if they chose to release a Live action B&B doll set.

>>6022375
Eh, I wouldn't worry about them skimping on it since the Film Series dolls have always been well done, if you can get past the bulimic jaws.

>>6022419
What does a quote specifically about the costumer designer focusing on the costumes have to do with the overall film's historical accuracy? They didn't say "we wanted the film to be historically accurate," because it's got magic, talking teacups, inventions being invented that weren't invented yet, etc.

>injected black people in the film

Black people existed in 18th century France, dear.

Also

>literally one black actress and she's voicing a character and is not showing up in the movie itself

lel

>Emma and the creators of the film are bragging about how progressive it was to not giving Belle a corset in recent interviews.

Where? Links and quotes.

>>6022472
The live action Cinderella set was $210 with 6 dolls (2 of which were the "regular" live action dolls, the other 4 were exclusive to the set) which evened out to each doll costing the same as if you'd bought it for retail on its own, $35.

I do wonder if the Disney Store might raise the price of the live action dolls to $40 from $35, since the newest classic Moana was $19.95 instead of being regular price.

>>6022539
Could be worse. At least the anon is not an SJW landwhale.

>>6022544
When the first $16.95 Frozen dolls were released in 2013 I remember feeling that they were over priced since the classic dolls had just been raised from $12.50 to $14.95. I know long for those prices. Disney knows they have us by the balls (or pussys) and they are not letting go anytime soon. Especially since they know what people are willing to pay on ebay for their dolls. I guess you could say we did to ourselves for being willing to pay over $1000 for an LE doll that they only valued at $99.99. B&B is sure to be one hell of a pay day for them.

>>6022539
>it's got magic, talking teacups
What the fuck is that supposed to mean? Fuuu you racist bigot! I'll have you know that my great, great grandfather was a singing torch, and we are very proud of our ancestors, thank you very much.

File: 1472262852618.jpg (53KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 320x240px

>>6022608
I have an aunt who thinks she's a lighthouse. Whenever it rains she insists on climbing up on the garage roof to warn the sailors.

>>6022375

Separate question, sorry if it's been asked, but why are all Disney dolls constantly looking to the side? It really ruins them for me.

File: barbie.jpg (25KB, 318x500px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 318x500px

>>6022736
What's wrong with looking to the side?

>>6022758

It always makes me feel like they're supposed to be turning or walking in that direction.

I just don't get why it's seemingly ALL dolls. No problem with some of them being that way.

>>6022348
>Emma seems to have the same grossed out facial expression plastered on her face throughout most of the trailer

Noticed this too, she seems frightened of the beast even in parts where she's supposed to have warmed up to him

>>6022678
Though I respect that a lot
I'd be fired if that were my job
After killing Jason off and countless screaming Argonauts

File: dead lights.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

>>6022787
>>6022736

I get how painful it must be if you hate the look. You would have liked the old pre-2011 Disney Store dolls than. I think Disney changed it because when they look right at you it's kinda creepy. They just look at you with their dead little eyes, and happy smiles.

>>6022833
Tiana looks downright sinister.

File: Cinderella-on-the-royal-ball-cinderella-2015-37989672-1280-1783.jpg (417KB, 1280x1783px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 1280x1783px

>>6020949
It's unfortunate because I really loved the live action Cinderella dress and I was hoping for the same magical feeling. But it really does remind me of a prom dress, and Emma having that snooty attitude about wearing a corset sort of makes me cringe.

File: Trump Disney.jpg (278KB, 1019x829px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 1019x829px

Well now that Donald Trump is president he will be joining Disney's Hall of Presidents as a life sized Trump animatonic. Disney CEO Robert Iger told investors that the park is readying its iconic attraction—the Hall of Presidents for a new figure of the President-elect.

>"We have already prepared a bust of President-elect Trump to go into our Hall of the Presidents at Disney World.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIm8F28vpO0

The Muppets will also be staring in an all new live show called “The Muppets Present: Great Moments in American History” which is beginning this fall.

With all this new Disney presidential hype I wonder if Disney will also start selling Trump related merch after these attractions.
I would so want to see what an Limited Edition Disney Store Trump doll would look like.

>>6024141

Mickey Mouse eared MAGA hats?

>>6024150
Made in China.

>>6017759
are you the one with the muppets poster on your bathroom wall?

>>6024491
Yes

File: 289620_6e0yxsiuow9b8zp9ldtjdaxol.jpg (179KB, 640x950px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 640x950px

What are some of your favorite older Barbie lines? The "Princess of the World" series was great.

File: barbie fairy.jpg (39KB, 333x500px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 333x500px

>>6024773
Barbie Fairytopia is one of my favorites.

File: 539b00262a4aa73e346183662780bb88.jpg (63KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 640x480px

>>6024805

File: 51zFyd1BiCL.jpg (34KB, 336x500px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 336x500px

>>6024805
That song will forever be burned into my mind.

>>6024773
I absolutely agree. I still have this doll in pristine condition, which I'm kind of impressed by considering I couldn't have been any older than 9 or 10 when I got it.

File: 7588468.jpg (82KB, 640x950px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 640x950px

>>6024773
Oh man, to this day I regret not snagging Princess of Portugal.

File: Ashley-Graham-522x1024[1].jpg (60KB, 522x1024px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 522x1024px

Another co-branding marketing doll was presented to the public.

She is now "a model", comes with a very heavy make up look and wears very basic fast-fashion inspired clothes, while bringing a discriminatory message against tigh gaps according to general articles being veiculated in association with the doll presentation.

File: 80478d59fa435bc58847c7457ccee9a7.jpg (94KB, 564x837px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 564x837px

>>6024773
Women of Royalty series

File: Princess of Holland™ Barbie® Doll.jpg (87KB, 640x950px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 640x950px

>>6024773
>Mattel will never do another reasonably priced historical collector line

>>6024944

Her whole outfit is a lumpy mess. Even Robert Best's handmade OOAK clothes look terrible on the curvy body 90% of the time.

File: Rumpel6.png (454KB, 500x516px) Image search: [Google]

454KB, 500x516px

>>6024840
Largely a lot of the Disney references thrown in OUAT is due to ABC being a Disney channel, so they can get away with it. There's even a nod to Buffy the Vampire Slayer, with her weapon in Rumlpe's shop.

>Tfw there's still no Rumplestiltskin doll or figure

>>6025527
oh god, a Rumplesiltskin doll would have that weird sweaty sheen that some of the newer LE dolls had

Disney did release two OUAT dolls but only as a LE 300 D23 exclusive because, fuck the fans, I guess.

>>6025869
Wow, this thread went ot. But every time Ellen brings out a man steak, and the audience looses their shit, my cringe is launched into orbit around the moon.

I wish Ken still came in skinny nerd variety. It would make sense, because they keep dressing him like a dork.

>>6022787
I think its just a cheat. Forward facing is more likely to look either dead, wall eyed, or just plain crooked.

>>6024773
My fave from that line was Princess of Ireland. She has such a gorgeous face and the combo super-pale skin/super dark lipstick and auburn hair is pretty different compared to the usual freckled carrot top Irish dolls.

There was a related line, Dancers of the World maybe? My mom has a few and I regret not getting some myself. I know she has an Ireland one but also Germany, who has a super cute beer hall dancer outfit with ribbons and kneesocks.

File: starfiredolldcshgs.jpg (158KB, 719x960px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 719x960px

Starfire's doll is coming soon.

File: Tried to kill Whore face.jpg (336KB, 814x1067px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 814x1067px

Doll related regrets, and confession time.
I did a bad bad thing /toy/. I bought this Toy Story 3 Barbie & Ken doll pack in 2010. As some of you know Mattel released two different versions of the Ken doll that came in the pack. The image on the left shows the first head that came in the pack. A few months later after people complained that he didn't look like the Ken in the film Mattel created a new head mold, and changed it to the one shown on the right. Sadly they didn't use an 80s Barbie face mold on the Barbie that came in the pack. I hated the modern day whore face with the reduced bust size that came in this set, and I decided to do something about it. At the time Mattel was releasing a line of Retro dolls so I bought a new Retro 80s Barbie doll shown below, and swapped the bodies so that the Barbie in my pack would have a non whore face. While I like the 80s Baby doll face more I recently found out that these 2010 Toy Story Barbie and Ken packs sell for a pretty penny these days. Now I feel like I might have inadvertently devalued my mint set in my crazy attempt to make the doll set look more movie accurate.

File: oktoberfest.jpg (63KB, 414x500px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 414x500px

>>6025902
Festivals of the World, is the one you're thinking of.

>>6025985
Unless you're planning on selling the dolls, the market value doesn't really matter.

File: barbie2.jpg (231KB, 438x548px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 438x548px

>>6025985
The rerelease still doesn't even look like him.

File: 1442552958711.png (217KB, 684x433px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 684x433px

>>6025944
>print on dress front only
Only on the second wave and Mattel's already cutting corners.

>>6021975
Underrated. Oh god, dem peanut joints.

File: 24c.jpg (41KB, 625x650px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 625x650px

>>6025986
Pretty. She reminds me of this doll I got last year.

File: MoodChild.jpg (227KB, 1362x898px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1362x898px

>>6026079
Her dress is a bit on the cheap side, but what made me pull the trigger on buying her was the that her face, and hair ornament reminded me of MoodChild from The Neverending Story.

File: 40s.jpg (138KB, 640x950px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 640x950px

I really liked the Great Fashions of the 20th Century line. 40's and 60's were the best.

File: 60s.jpg (308KB, 786x550px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 786x550px

>>6026156

>>6026091
god that bitch was creepier looking than the fucking retardo dragon

>>6025944
The doll looks good .The pose for the box could be better.

File: tumblr_ogtsb12D4T1saq70co3_1280.jpg (62KB, 800x762px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 800x762px

>>6026831

File: tumblr_ogtsb12D4T1saq70co2_1280.jpg (62KB, 800x762px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 800x762px

>>6026832

File: tumblr_ogtsb12D4T1saq70co1_1280.jpg (55KB, 700x667px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 700x667px

>>6026833

>>6026831
>>6026832
>>6026833
>>6026835
this thread isn't for figures

>>6027074
I figured they were kosher since they're doll related. My bad.

>>6027210

Eh, it could be debated either way. But most anons hate the whole normie big head/little body collectible fad. Best to post these pics over at the Funko containment thread.

>>6027210
no worries! I can see why you would think they were of interest

>>6027350
Am I in 2003?

File: The NeverEnding Story 13.jpg (142KB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1920x800px

>>6026178
You shut your dirty whore mouth. She looked like an angel.

>>6027210
In all honesty I hate the whole Super hero type dolls all together. They have so much molded on clothing they might as well be figures, but than they wouldn't be able to place them in the girl section of the toy stores.

>>6027592
Ugh, the budget dolls are an absolute cancer. The regular release dolls are pretty nice, though; I'd love to see more characters, clothing options, and accessories for those.

File: dcsgdolls3.jpg (298KB, 1280x948px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1280x948px

>>6025944
The first wave.

>>6027379
What did I miss?

File: 1479535780961.jpg (2MB, 3834x1935px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3834x1935px

This is what the $80 B&B Deluxe doll box set should have looked like.

File: 1479535780961.jpg (2MB, 5404x2100px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5404x2100px

>>6027759
If Disney Store is going to ask for $80 for a Deluxe box set they should at least include more than three dolls. It shouldn't have to rely on a plush horse to help fill up 35% of the box. It's called a Deluxe doll set not a Deluxe doll, and plush toy set. Personally I would have enjoyed if they would have added Belles father instead of the horse even if the doll had a plush body.

>>6027782
The horse isn't even to scale, or well proportioned. It could literally be a random $8 plush from the dollar store.

>>6027782
The reason they added the horse is because they were already making them. They would have had to make entirely new molds to make a doll of Belle's father, and they're too cheap to do it.

Previous Deluxe Doll sets from the last few years (Frozen on, anyway) you get 1 of every doll that the Disney Store has actually made, you (sometimes) get figures, and you get a few outfits. They're not really worth it unless you planned on buying all those dolls anyway, or if you missed Gaston in the single box.

I miss when the Deluxe sets had something special--like how the Sleeping Beauty set had 3 small (bean-bag, but still) fairy dolls, plus a plastic horse; the Cinderella set had the stepsisters; the Little Mermaid set has Vanessa...

File: 7708327610_b6e8344f2a_b.jpg (670KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

670KB, 1024x1024px

speaking of the deluxe sets, damn I regret not picking up the doll+wardrobe sets they came out with in 2009, I think that was the same year (or maybe 2010) they released sets of 2-fashions + accessories for every princess. I picked up Pocahontas, Cinderella and Mulan's, but now I wish I'd grabbed one for every character.

File: Capturefgdf.jpg (302KB, 1710x902px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1710x902px

>>6027840
>>6027866
They could have at the very least improved the already exiting cheap dolls like Gaston. Back when they released the little mermaid box set they improved both King Triton and Ursula by adding more stuffing to their tails and tentacles. They corrected a few color issues, and they also improved Ursulas makeup. They even corrected Tritons drepy eyes.

File: Capturefgdf.jpg (71KB, 1117x921px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1117x921px

>>6028059
They could have added more padding to Gastons shirt or sleeves to make him look larger or maybe given us the new body, and face they created for the designer Gaston. They didn't even bother to remove that un-movie accurate beard that looks more like dirt on his chin than a beard.

File: Capturefgdf.jpg (1017KB, 2194x2790px) Image search: [Google]

1017KB, 2194x2790px

>>6028061
Fun Fact: The Beast head mold used in this set doesn't just date back to the Fairytale designer Beast head mold. The head mold actually dates back to 2008. Disney just tweaked some of the features, and gave it a new paint job when it came time to release the Fairytale Designer Belle/Beast set. There for they could have very well been able to give us a new and improved Beast/prince combo doll in this $80 deluxe box set. They could have given us a prince doll underneath the new and improved 2008 Beast head mold.

File: Capturefgdf.jpg (97KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1200x1600px

>>6028071
Instead they just gave us the same old cheap 2015/2016 Beast doll whos head is on a stick to reduce cost.

File: dfsd.jpg (77KB, 449x373px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 449x373px

>>6027866
>you get 1 of every doll that the Disney Store has actually made, you (sometimes) get figures, and you get a few outfits.
I don't know what it's called exactly, but some even include a headless mannequin thing to place the extra dresses on.

File: edb5ce4bcc5a1e94a67cd1341aaf68cd.jpg (25KB, 405x500px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 405x500px

>>6027866
>I miss when the Deluxe sets had something special--like how the Sleeping Beauty set had 3 small (bean-bag, but still) fairy dolls, plus a plastic horse
Even that wasn't all that big of a deal. The 3 bean bag fairy dolls were sold separately in their own classic doll boxes for only $10. A few mouths before the Deluxe Sleeping beauty box set came out Disney Stores clearanced the fairies, and the Maleficent dolls out so that the only way you could get them would be in the $80 deluxe set.They used this same strategy with the Ursula, Triton, Gaston, Jafar, and Genie dolls in order to get newer customers to buy $80 box sets.

File: horse.jpg (580KB, 2031x980px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 2031x980px

>>6028103
As for the horse I always thought that he was just filler to justify the $80 price point. He's still better than the plush horse they jammed into the B&B set, but he doesn't look like the horse from the film. It's like the toy company who makes these dolls for the Disney Stores had an old unused horse mold from the past laying around so they slapped some paint on it in hopes of making it look like the horse in the film, and called it a day.

Heres an image of what the horse in the Sleeping Beauty deluxe box set should have looked like.

File: 15350097123_7e04b86cd3_ozzzag.jpg (815KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

815KB, 2048x1536px

The biggest regret I have is not getting the little mermaid box set because of Vanessa. Even if she's just a repainted Ariel doll with black hair it would be cool having her.

I almost didn't get the deluxe Cinderella box set in 2012, but thankfully I did. I really thought that they would eventually release Lady Tremaine, and the step sisters separately, but they never did.

File: 21903120351_85d5704a15_o (1).png (2MB, 1308x1132px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1308x1132px

>>6027873
I don't know if this help any, but most Jcpenny stores have Mini Disney Stores inside of them which sell $30 Disney store doll packs. The dresses in those packs are not as fancy as the ones shown in your image, but they do come with three dresses, and a doll. The only down side is that while the Jcpenny dolls do use the same Disney Store face, and body molds the dolls have no wrist, or elbow articulation.

File: 18774062523_63d0ea20a1_ozgga.jpg (70KB, 711x874px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 711x874px

>>6027840
>The horse isn't even to scale, or well proportioned
Why did you have to remind me.
I repurchased the set last week because I had a 25% off coupon for $59. I had a naked Disney Store prince doll (with boots) that I found at a Goodwill so I gave him the extra beast outfit. I also had an extra naked Disney store Belle doll with her hair in a pony tail so I put her in the blue dress.

File: 7034a4ef098d0d5183ac3d37b9db51a9.jpg (204KB, 760x506px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 760x506px

>>6020869
the Saturday Night Live sketch parody dress was better... but then again I think this might actually be the Broadway costume, borrowed?

File: e89250e2a5dd0ce813cbbcabce64abb8.jpg (91KB, 736x1032px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 736x1032px

>>6028391
Sadly even Halloween dresses look better then the one Emma is wearing.

>>6027873
It kills me that I didn't pick any of those up when I had the chance. The Mulan set haunts my dreams.

so who here is picking up moana's le doll? i'm considering getting her as my present to myself this year for christmas, but i don't have any le dolls. is she worth getting?

>>6028485
Shes not very impressive, and you're not getting very much for the $127 that she will cost you after tax. If you like the character than go for it. You might wanna check out he movie before buying her tho. What if you spend the money, and end up not standing her character ?

>>6028485
> but i don't have any le dolls. is she worth getting?

Honestly, I collect LE dolls and I wouldn't get her. The doll itself is not very interesting to me since it doesn't differ radically from the regular doll. It's got some cute details--sand on her feet and water beads on the dress--but I want more bang for my buck. I'm just getting the regular doll now before they release the new version with less details in a few months.

>>6028485
She doesn't have enough of an upgrade from the $15 play doll for me to be fine with dropping that kind of dosh on her. Pass for me.

>>6012226
uggos dont get to have nice thingd

>>6029161
Anyone can have nice things if they have money. Never forget that money talks.

>>6028082
They're called dressforms.

File: dressformers.jpg (264KB, 500x700px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 500x700px

>>6031082

The Dressformers!
More than meets the eye!
The Dressformers!
Mannequins in disguise!
Dollybots wage their battle to destroy the evil forces of the Balljointicons!

Is anyone planning on going for any dolls on Black Friday or through the inevitable Black Friday holiday weekend sales?

Last year I got the Effie Trinket Barbie for $9 with free shipping because Mattel already had it on sale + their further discount. It must have been an oversight because the next day they got rid of her initial sale price and she would have been $18.

>>6027689
I think they're adding Hawkgirl, Beast Boy, and Frost as well because they updated their profile art.

>>6031082
Thanks for the info. I'll try to remember this next time.

>>6031144
>I see what you did there.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (377KB, 1021x980px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 1021x980px

>>6032076
>>6032104
These look like the current ones, but It's funny you should post this since I was wondering when the heck Hasbro was going to do a second wave of Disney Princess dolls. Their $9 budget dolls are cool, and everything, but we still haven't gotten a legit mermaid Ariel doll from them yet. Those plastic tail, and bra bath time toys don't really count in my eyes. There was that $30 royal ribbon salon one, but it was fare from impressive. Plus I wasn't about to spend $30 on a cheap Hasbro Ariel doll.

>>6031546
I wish I could, anon. Truth is that there are so many Black Friday sales I would love to take advantage of, but between LE dolls, Fairytale Designer dolls, and this months Friends & family 25% off coupon I'm totally tapped out at the moment. There's only one way I could spend more this month, and it wouldn't be pretty.

>>6032076
>>6032104
Old dolls.

All Disney dolls are 50% off at Madame Alexander for Black Friday: https://www.madamealexander.com/disney.html

but if you're planning on buying one, check ebay first in case they are cheaper there.

File: 15043869_224584944642154_5858311262617731072_n.jpg (80KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 750x750px

Mattel will start making fashion packs in 4 variations for all the body sizes

File: 1288404228120.jpg (9KB, 252x159px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 252x159px

>>6033861
>in 4 variations for all the body sizes
That's enough internet for me today.

File: 31041582715_0ac2d20aa3_o.jpg (1MB, 1749x2669px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1749x2669px

The new $35 Rey doll looks more like Rey's retarded cousin than Rey..

File: Force_Awakens_Rey-305.jpg (430KB, 1434x1434px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 1434x1434px

>>6034035
It's not that bad. Pic related

>>6034035
What are you talking about? She looks fine.

File: reys.jpg (678KB, 2287x1395px) Image search: [Google]

678KB, 2287x1395px

>>6034203
>>6034229
I know it may not be fair to compare her to the Hot toys version, but it really is day, and night. I'm not just talking about the clothing, accessories or articulation. I'm talking about the face. The $35 one just doesn't remind me of the actress in the film at all.

Plus the new $35 one has this weird thing going on with her arms. For some reason she can't place her arms straight down which makes her look off. They curve outward for some reason. Her raped arms look less like part of her outfit, and look more lick she has bulky fully arm casts on.

>>6034371
>I know it may not be fair to compare her to the Hot toys version
>$35 figure vs $200+ figure

>may not be fair to compare

Really.

>>6034203
acne

File: reys.jpg (191KB, 758x1188px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 758x1188px

>>6034371

Also for some strange reason the new Rey's three buns go up instead of down which makes her look off in profile shots.

She also has this gap under her neck when you turn her head upward which is really noticeable. Why even give her this much head movement if it's going to leave a noticeable black hole between her neck, and collarbone every time her head head is tilted upward.

>>6034203
Is that face of the 6" Black series Rey or is it the 12" plastic Hasbro doll version?

>>6034371
Wow, the $35 doll is night and day compared to the $200 doll in a line known for being ultra-realistic and details with its faces? I am so, so shocked by this turn of events. How ever will I recover from this astounding, surprising news.

File: shera_1.jpg (183KB, 600x1470px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 600x1470px

Anyone doing any Black Frida/Cyber Monday doll hunting? What sales are you looking forward to?

I'm thinking of picking up another She-Ra from mattycollector since she's on sale for $45. It would be nice to have one in box and one to play with

File: starfiredlnew.jpg (47KB, 359x960px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 359x960px

>>6025944
She is really pretty.

File: 15170761_1627644247539256_5806527161940900253_n.jpg (52KB, 471x960px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 471x960px

>>6034555

File: BlackFridayMatters.jpg (165KB, 642x628px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 642x628px

>>6034533


That She-Ra looks so nice!! I once made the mistake of paying $80 for a MOTUC She-ra figure at a comic book store. I didn't know anything about the line or what the figures really sold for.

Disney Store has had its Black Friday sales going on all week long so I took advantage of two deals today.
I got a $16.99 Christmas ornament for $8.
I also re-purchased the $50 17" spinning light up dress Belle doll that comes with a little singing Mrs. Potts for $30. I returned a few items so I only ended up paying $7 for the $50 Belle doll. I'm really happy I was able to get her at such an awesome price.

>>6034533
There's a few ebay sellers who usually slash prices on Black Friday or Black Friday weekend so I'm keeping an eye out to see if I can get something discounted. Otherwise the deals I'm looking for are figurines.

>>6034579
The Disney Store ornaments are so pretty.

>>6034380
>some strange reason
Its the scale. There's no way they'd be able to achieve that on a mass produced playline doll unless they did molded hair like the HT version. Synthetic hair is too thick and stiff at this size to lay like that.

File: princess-leia.jpg (149KB, 612x380px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 612x380px

Leak of Princess Leia from the Disney Store Leia doll (or should I say "doll" since they're marketing them as premium figures, and I can't blame them--fans are already whining on Facebook pages 'ugh these are basically dolls, why are they trying to sell us dolls? done with this line...') She will be released on November 29th.

>

File: hqdefault.jpg (36KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 480x360px

>>6034533

Hey, thanks for the heads up on She-Ra! I just ordered her off Matty's site and I can't be happier! The $70 price tag was a little pricey for me, but at $45, she's just too good to pass up. I've been lusting after this doll ever since she was announced for SDCC. She's got the most perfect doll body for a 1/6 scale female that I've ever seen.

Well, I'm done doing all my Black Friday shopping. I guess I'm going to spend Friday playing vidya and sipping hot cocoa. Sure better than beating off the hordes at Wal-Mart at 5am just to get a couple bucks off some electronic gizmo that's most likely sold out.

>>6034478

You won't. The shock will eat you up inside, and displace all other concerns. In two years time, you'll find yourself wondering how you ended up homeless on the streets of Hong Kong.

File: 1b.jpg (68KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 500x500px

Made to move Barbie poses.

File: 1c.jpg (112KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 500x667px

>>6036028

File: 1d.jpg (91KB, 364x500px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 364x500px

>>6036029

File: 1f.jpg (58KB, 500x334px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x334px

>>6036031

File: 1e.jpg (199KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1600x900px

>>6036032

File: 12467922143_81a94814c3_oec.jpg (520KB, 1516x2048px) Image search: [Google]

520KB, 1516x2048px

Made to move Barbie Disney Head Swap Edition

File: tumblr_ns01asFagP1uo9m3go1_500p.jpg (483KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 1600x1200px

>>6036047
I'm really digging the short hair they gave this Snow White. It's gives her a modren look, but it's not over the top or trashy.

File: 1480008737757.jpg (1MB, 1834x2825px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1834x2825px

If only the Belle in the new live action film looked this beautiful.

File: 18774062523_63d0ea20a1_ozwzl.jpg (530KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 1600x1200px

>>6035762
Not that anon, but congrats!
I wish I could get her as well, but I've never ordered of Matty's site, and I just don't trust it for some reason. I wish this doll could be found in stores. I agree with you on not going out today. My local Mall, and I believe Walmart stores will be opening today at 6PM instead of 12AM for Black Friday. I just don't get what type of person would skip Thanksgiving dinner to wait in line outside of a store for hours just to get $50 off some crappy ass tv.

Anyways stay safe, a warm, and enjoy that hot cocoa, anon.

>>6036050
Me too. It's really cute and still her.

File: Rey_figure-29.jpg (287KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 1600x1600px

>>6034447
12 inch version.

>>6036029
What head is this? She's cute.

I know people on here have the Animator dolls. Has anyone else done the glass eye mod on them? Or know of a good tutorial for it? All the ones I can find are bare basic and mostly for Japanese and Korean blogs so I can't quite work out some of the details. The two main things I'm wondering is headcap placement (I have seen some with wigs which means it doesn't matter where you put it, but some have the original hair still? Should I be carefully going between plugs?) and eye size. I'm estimating they'd need the same size as the similarly sized Dollmore Mokashura, right?

File: Moxie Girlz .jpg (77KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1000x1000px

Are Moxie Girlz dolls still around ? Do they still sell them ?

>>6037300
I haven't seen commercials for them in a long time so they must have stopped selling them.

>>6037300
Moxie Girlz were Bratz's replacement when Mattel banned MGA from selling Bratz. Then Bratz came back and so production of Moxie Girlz kinda slowed down. And then Bratz went on hiatus and Moxie Girlz were once again rolled out, and then Bratz came back again and Moxie Girlz were discontinued. Bratz failed and have also been discontinued. Now MGA has no fashion doll line.

File: project mc2 core dolls.jpg (110KB, 1024x549px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1024x549px

>>6038043
MGA has Project MC2 .

>>6038054
>>6037300
Here's your Moxie Girlz, they're nerds now.

>hey anon, what are your hobbies
>o-oh I jog and fish
>can't ever let people inside my room
>parents are disgusted
End me lads

new thread >>87914249

Oop I mean >>6038202