content drought edition
resources
>pastebin.com/Cb3X4ZKW (embed)
Core rules
>https://www.games-workshop.com/en-US/Warhammer-Age-of-Sigmar-Rules
Skirmish
>https://mega.nz/#!jMQxCa6C!9TQ324QTcZ7nDJbv2Q7uQ9xg442K-UA-dtK2wTLxFPw
General Handbook
>https://mega.nz/#!nMpnGQBS!Ew5rz8JMzKi5e7_mtN9nibMGY3UWO5jwOl8DIf9UZ1I
Army builder
>https://www.warhammer-community.com/warscroll-builder/
Custom Warscroll Designer
>http://runebrush.pa-sy.com/warscroll/
New info:
GHB2 announced, 20 factions getting allegiance abilities
New rumour engine shows more Stormcast
Old Thread: >>54085700
>>54133247
>content drought edition
That's every edition.
>>54133344
Ded gaem.
Seriously though, fuck AoS.
>>54133247
What the fuck wrong with dragon's face?
Also, did they use laser-printer to make this wings?
>>54133344
Man, don't I know it. We've had shit all since Skirmish, which was minor, or the Kharadrons, which feel like they were half a year ago...
Anyone else here think that we'll soon(TM) will see the release of a new GUO model?
>>54133247
You could at least ctrl+f "aosg" before making a thread, you know?
>>54133088
>>54133820
>You could at least ctrl+f
My apologies. I swear that I did ctrl+f: sigmar and no return so I whipped up a new one. Really doesn't matter what one people use. Migrate or don't makes no difference to me.
>>54133788
>release of a new GUO model?
they really should have just released rules to use this as a GUO. obviously a lot of work went into this model and making another behemoth for Nurgle would be cool but I don't know if I see it happening any time soon.
>>54134027
forgot the pic
>>54133581
So popular people can barely generate discussion about it on one of the internet's hottest and fastest growing websites. Fuck's sake.
>>54134171
> one of the internet's hottest and fastest growing websites
If you mean 4chan then remember that for most people it's still a "le scary place with children pornography" site
>seriously guys Arkanaut Company is really awesome!
t.GW
https://www.warhammer-community.com/2017/07/02/kharadron-overlords-tactical-spotlight-part-2gw-homepage-post-2/
>>54134233
>that for most people it's still a "le scary place with children pornography" site
Definitely not for geeks anjd nerds
>>54134376
>we know you hated those naked dwarves, plz buy these ones we put them in power armour!!1
t.GW
>>54133247
This head is TOO fammiliar
>>54134037
That or one of the Maggoths, yeah.
Really, one big monster of Nurgle is as good as another. Kind of the idea behind demons, innit?
>>54134723
Power armour my ass, those are basically dwarfified diving suits.
>>54134958
>those are basically dwarfified diving suits.
Nope it's literally power armor
>>54134989
>75% fabric
>Power armour
What?
>>54135146
>75% fabric
What?
>>54134027
Granted, as a person who heavily favours conversion-work I really have nothing to complain about seeing as we have loads of minis to make a GUO from allready. It's just that seeing that art work makes me greedy.
>>54133247
>>54133581
>>54133691
>>54134171
Welcome to what 40k went thru when AoS launched. You have at least 4 more months of the same.
http://whfb.lexicanum.com/wiki/Template:Mortal_Realms_Deities
Are there any deities missing from this list?
>>54135187
Because >>54135146 is probably talking about the Arkanaut Companies like >>54134376 which ARE mostly fabric.
I love the Kharadrons but even I can agree that Brokk and his flying top hat are kinda dumb.
>>54135632
/40kg/ went through a dozen generals every day even during the AoS push.
>>54134723
They were sold out for almost a month at my local stores, I'd say they got that right.
>>54135146
>>75% fabric
Are Wanderers any good?
>>54136626
>Legacy army
>good
>>54136316
It doesnt help that there are two AoS threads right now.