Well, /tg/, what do you think?
https://www.warhammer-community.com/2016/12/06/adepta-sororitas-canoness-veridyan/
>>50563711
>Canoness Anonymous 12/06/16(Tue)13:47:36 No.50
Dude, I mean. It's better than I imagined. It doesn't take much to beat the rest of the range but it smokes all the other SOB mini's. If the hypothetical/rumored range is anything close to this, I'm going to throw money at it with a big grin on my face.
Buying five.
Told my LGS the moment plastic sisters are out I'm getting 5 of every box, and I am going to stick to my word if the rest looks as good as this.
Yes. This pleases me. I was just wondering if GW would ever put out a good exclusive model again anytime soon.
>>50563711
its a very bad adaptation of the artwork, but its good that the SoB are getting SOMETHING for a change.
>>50563711
love it. Im just pissed there's no way Ill ever find one
>>50563711
I give it a 7/10. A very decent mini all things considered.
The model is really faithful to the original art (and a bit wonky as a result IMO).
Lots of nice details everywhere without becoming overloaded.
The face and hair are meh.
The model gives me a static feeling that I hadn't with the original. After a comparison, I think it's because the 2D version is thinner and a bit more hunched forward.
I wonder how it looks from other angles, since a common issue in minis inspired by drawings is that they are made to be looked at from a single position.Also, who the fuck paints metallic reflects on robes?
Maybe I should have just gone with the Raging Heroes kickstarter.