[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Canoness

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 3

File: Canoness.jpg (121KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
Canoness.jpg
121KB, 1000x1000px
Well, /tg/, what do you think?

https://www.warhammer-community.com/2016/12/06/adepta-sororitas-canoness-veridyan/
>>
>>50563711
>>50563561
>>
>>50563711
>Canoness Anonymous 12/06/16(Tue)13:47:36 No.50

Dude, I mean. It's better than I imagined. It doesn't take much to beat the rest of the range but it smokes all the other SOB mini's. If the hypothetical/rumored range is anything close to this, I'm going to throw money at it with a big grin on my face.
>>
Buying five.
Told my LGS the moment plastic sisters are out I'm getting 5 of every box, and I am going to stick to my word if the rest looks as good as this.
>>
Yes. This pleases me. I was just wondering if GW would ever put out a good exclusive model again anytime soon.
>>
>>50563711
its a very bad adaptation of the artwork, but its good that the SoB are getting SOMETHING for a change.
>>
>>50563711
love it. Im just pissed there's no way Ill ever find one
>>
File: limited canoness.png (3MB, 1562x1198px) Image search: [Google]
limited canoness.png
3MB, 1562x1198px
>>50563711
I give it a 7/10. A very decent mini all things considered.

The model is really faithful to the original art (and a bit wonky as a result IMO).
Lots of nice details everywhere without becoming overloaded.

The face and hair are meh.
The model gives me a static feeling that I hadn't with the original. After a comparison, I think it's because the 2D version is thinner and a bit more hunched forward.

I wonder how it looks from other angles, since a common issue in minis inspired by drawings is that they are made to be looked at from a single position.

Also, who the fuck paints metallic reflects on robes?
>>
File: 2016-12-06-151230_81x74_scrot.png (14KB, 81x74px) Image search: [Google]
2016-12-06-151230_81x74_scrot.png
14KB, 81x74px
Maybe I should have just gone with the Raging Heroes kickstarter.
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 3


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.