Girls Who Code

>>9160775
Everything is purely for money.

What's the problem with GWC? I volunteer as a teacher with my local library's club and they seem pretty swell.

girls like to socialize
i don't see what's weird or strange about organizations popping up to accommodate unmet needs

I dont like such things, but the difference between how many women could be great at coding and how many are realy doing it is too big imo. Not everything has to be 50/50 but I am okay with changing the odds temporarily.

File: Margaret_Hamilton.jpg (61KB, 566x719px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 566x719px

They see me codin', they hatin'
Auditin' and tryna catch me codin' dirty
Tryna catch me codin' dirty

>>9160873
Why do /sci/ women always have flat tits and asses? Is there some law in the universe that prevents sexy women from getting into science? Seriouslly, all science girls are fucking disgusting. I wouldn't even shit on some of them fearing that my shit would get dirty from touching them.

I'm not some crazy feminist or anything, but I do believe it's harder for girls to enter into this environment considering how it's viewd as something for loners and "weirdos". Yea, I fucking hate that people are so superficial that preferring to be alone while doing some activities or being into tech and shit instantly outcasts you, but that's just social shit. Women are much more likely to suffer under social pressure and generally can't have a "who gives a fuck" attitude. So I understand that it's a step towards bringing women who aren't uber autist goblins into the field. However, it seems that in these communities do far worse than any typical open community, but I think that's because a lot of girls do enter to prove something instead of genuine curiosity. I meab, you see it in the code how they want to put their own "signature" which just makes it messier and shit. The problem is that these cunta overshadow women with real interest because they are usually more loud. Shit this reads as some lose thought, but I kind off know it from experience. I suppose the best thing to do id to teach women to don't give a shita about the amount of things they give a shit.

>>9160884
God made ugly people so things could get done, you stupid cunt.

>>9160895
>cunt
Please no sexism in this thread

>>9160899
Cunt is misogynistic, not sexist.

>>9160884
>Is there some law in the universe that prevents sexy women from getting into science?
uhm, ja? Male sexual attraction will make sure these women will NEVER ever dive into a career of painstaking work, sweat and disappointment when spreading their legs can literally give them a free ticket to anything their hearts desire

>>9160902
Why?

>>9160903
Are you saying that some women willingly become sex objects? Please get the fuck back to >>>/r9k/ you disgusting virgin. Women are not here for your pleasure or entertainment. We are human beings too, you sexist bastard.

>>9160906
why would it be sexist? it doesn't say anything about women relative to men, it's just a term of disparagement

>>9160907
>Are you saying that some women willingly become sex objects?
do you know how to read? he/she said male sexual attraction turns them into sex objects, not the will of the women themselves

>>9160775
Because women generally need more help than men in "coding".
these coding workshops are 60% writing helloworld and "help how do i use eclipse" and 40% eating food and talking trash.

they can also be very passively agressive when they think they're right and you're just a silly man, mansplaining why it isn't working.

>>9160907
I would call you a larper, but this place is such a reddit/tumbler fest that I wouldn't be surprised some cunt will come here to complain.
>>9160873
Thia cringe beibg my primary source.

>>9160912
>he/she
Heh, with that sexist comment we all know what HE is.

>male sexual attraction turns them into sex objects, not the will of the women themselves

The idea that men influence and dictate women's life is part of PATRIARCHY. Women are not slaves of men. Women are smart enough to avoid sexist men, so claiming that some women are "shaped" by men is sexist. There is a board for your kind. It is called >>>/r9k/

>>9160899
>>9160907
>le pretending to be an sjw on 4chan meme

>>9160910
No I mean why do care about arbitrary and meaningless denominations?

>>9160919
>No I mean why do care about arbitrary and meaningless denominations?
what are you talking about?

>>9160917
How do you know xir isn't a sjw pretending to a /pol/tard pretending to be a sjw. Note that he is being obnoxious in the way a /pol/tard larper would be obnoxious to try to sway your opinion against SJWs, but in a way that makes the larping obnoxious in itself, so he may be mocking sjw larpers because he is a sjw.

File: 18lpnam3i8ik3jpg.jpg (38KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 800x450px

>>9160907
it happens automatically through reinforcement learning during adolescence.

We do what we're good at. If you get male attention all the time and all the guys are extremely "nice" to you for no particular reason, of fucking COURSE you're gonna use that to your advantage.

it's not even women's fault, it's just that humans always want to be as lazy as they can possibly be. Being a scientist is fucking hard work, being a reasonably good looking slut is not, in fact it's extremely easy and will get you through life much smoother than any amount of "hard and honest work".

have some anecdotal evidence: here's the CEO of playmagnus interviewing magnus carlsen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aEhXqgPEAs
please note that Magnus Carlsen is the absolute best chess player currently alive, while that blonde slut besides him has a BA in tourism or some toilet-paper "degree".

Yet she earns very good money, much more than 99% of chess players earn. Do you hear me talking? Is any of this getting through to you?

>>9160916
>look how good at larping i am
>aren't i funny
also speaking of redirecting people.
/g/ sounds like an appropriate place for this. This isn't science or mathematics.

>>9160923
>We do what we're good at.
And women are good at being sex objects? No thank you. Please go away.

>, being a reasonably good looking slut
Take your slut shaming and virgin rage back to >>>/r9k/

>>9160928
>And women are good at being sex objects?
since when are women bad at being sex objects? it's given them an easy ride in life throughout the entirety of human history

>>9160930
Yeah yeah nice virgin rage there buddy. Are you done?

>>9160932
>Yeah yeah nice virgin rage there buddy. Are you done?
what do you mean?

>>9160933
That it is clear that all this hate you have for women stems from the fact that no woman wants to sleep with you.

>>9160934
>That it is clear that all this hate you have for women stems from the fact that no woman wants to sleep with you.
what hate?

>>9160935
>what hate?
>Says women are sex objects
>Slut shames women for expressing their sexuality

>>9160940
>>Says women are sex objects
>>Slut shames women for expressing their sexuality
in which post?

>>9160943
All of them.

>>9160945
>All of them.
like?

File: giphy (7).gif (1MB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 540x540px

WHAT HAVE I DONE. THIS IS NOT THE DISCUSSION I INTENDED TO ILLICIT

>>9160940
>>9160934
>>9160932
>>9160928
90% of porn is targeted at hetero men
99% of all prostitutes (m & f) are targeted at men

men are just way more horny, which means women have something men want, which means they have an advantage in that area.

this has nothing to do with "hate" or "shaming", it's a simple fact of life

>>9160775
>Surely everyone knows its purely for money right
SJW types can't code because they are against the concept of logic. Therefore they need to take the money by playing the political correctness card. This is the point of such organizations

>>9160943
Not that guy but pointing out the fact that women, especially the hot ones,have historically been treated as sex objects and received preferential treatment on that basis is not muh soggy knee

>>9160907
>Are you saying that some women willingly become sex objects?

what do you think chicks who get into porn are doing?

Why isn't there a "Boys who code" program?

Boys aren't exactly encouraged to code either they're encouraged to play football. Boys who show interest in stem are ostracized. The idea that boys are "culturally encouraged" to take an interest in stem is bullshit.

>>9160970
it's all against their will!! they are being exploited by evil rapist-men!!

that reminds me of the story of the (female) school teacher at some christian school. the school board found out she did porn and said "pls stop with the porn or we'll have to can ya" and of course the teacher did what any reasonable female would do --- she quit her teaching job and did more porn.

when you're homeless and need money for drugs:
* men go to prison for gang violence and selling drugs
* women just prostitute themselves

which one's better? well let's see: men dont really have the option of prostituting themselves (jigolos earn way less than whores), while women totally have the option of selling drugs.

yet for some reason women choose to spread their legs to bring home the bacon. Only god knows why

>>9160940
What is the difference between being a sex object and expressing their sexuality?

File: ada.png (144KB, 217x302px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 217x302px

>>9160884
i bet ada was thicc

>>9161041
When a woman is presumed to be a sex object that implies that man is somehow influencing how she expresses her sexuality. But in reality it is a woman's choice how she expresses it.

>>9161041
the difference between you being a faggot but just doing faggotlike things

>>9161054
No, that is just how dresses were back then.

>>9161064
i know that. if i thought her dress was her body, i would have said "ada was thicc". i think she was thicc under the dress as well

>>9161069
We have to be scientific. We don't have the exact data on Ada's body but we can do some statistical analysis. How many thick women are in science today? Roughly 0. Therefore it is fair to conclude that Ada wasn't thick either.

>>9161073
she has an attractive face and in my experience, women with attractive faces tend to have better figures

File: koding with karlie kloss.png (1MB, 1357x1281px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1357x1281px

>nobody posted it yet

>>9161076
Not even that attractive. Her face is weird. I mean, maybe you like it but given that I don't like it is clear that she doesn't have general attractiveness. She probably just fulfills some fetishes of yours.

>>9160775
Some group women take money corps or state because muh feminism and use voluntaries to get work done, women just use feminist to get money.

In boot camp money,just feminist found one way get money.

>>9160907
>human beings too

It's been proven time and time again that girls tend to be inferior in hard sciences

>>9160932
>name calling
The absolute lowest form of debate.
Go back to Tumblr and bitch with the other harpies. You aren't worthy to debate.

>>9161699
So they are not human?

>>9161054

she make my dicc diamond tho

>>9161699
Decode feminist

>human beings too
Code word begins base on projection women believe no "real men" aren't human.

>Sex object
Way to avoid hot women gets more power on media as standard beauty and get successful men easy.

>Women are not here for your pleasure or entertainment

Projection women feel entitlement to men labor,status and resources.

>>9160922
How do I know you're not a /pol/tard pretending to be reasonable pretending to be a SJW pretending to be reasonable

>>9160884
My ex biology and genetics prof. is pretty attractive and she's got a PhD in microbiology

How come you never see stuff like #GirlsWhoDoUnderwaterWelding or #GirlsWhoDoOilDrilling? Females are even more underrepresented in those fields.

File: randy.jpg (161KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1920x1080px

>>9160884
>Is there some law in the universe that prevents sexy women from getting into science?
we have plenty of cute girls (male)

>>9160823
because they teach janitorial skills, not cs

>>9160932
The projection is insane. You're making this too easy.

>>9160891
This. The same thing with video games historically. The common belief "cs is for losers, nerds, or computer addicts" is retarded. I don't consider myself even close to a feminist but shunning organizations like this soley for encouraging girls to get interested in cs or computers is just dumb. They aren't trying to push males out.

>>9161889
I thought that was a chick

>>9162117
>I thought that was a chick
It is

>>9160951
>start a thread that mentions gender or race in any way
>expect it not to devolve into /pol/ vs tumblr
lel

>>9160928
>And women are good at being sex objects? No thank you.
I don't see how this could possibly be disputed.

>>9160928
triggered!

>>9160907
>are you saying some women willingly become sex objects?
Yeah

>>9160934
>>9160932
why is it so easy to spot rostie posties?

oh, it's because they always equate value to sexual status. the only value of a woman is in her sexual status

File: SkadMC14lXc.jpg (16KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x360px

>>9161889
>hue hue hue men are better at being women than women

their voices are fucked and can never do this:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kna6PHUNLL0

>>9160932
>>9160934
>>9160940
What if I agree with all these statements and I'm gay. Does that still make me a /r9k/ virgin rage poster?