Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
Peer-To-Peer Political System 2017-06-09 03:21:41 Post No. 8966136
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Peer-To-Peer Political System 2017-06-09 03:21:41 Post No. 8966136
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: ethereum.png (2KB, 300x168px) Image search:
[Google]
2KB, 300x168px
I live in the United States and I want to start a grassroots campaign to institute radical democracy using the Ethereum network, or some other blockchain system. How can we do this 4chan?
>>
>>8966147
Can you explain to me what is wrong with a blockchain based voting system so I may have a better opinion on the matter?
>>
>>8966161
>Russians hack the last election
>let's use a system designed by a Russian to vote now!
>>
>>8966163
>guilt by association
Top kekeronis please post IQ
>>
>>8966161
>expecting low IQ rural retards to figure out how a blockchain works to be able to vote
I don't know how badly you don't want rednecks to vote but I guess if you only wanted ultra high IQ city folk to vote this might work
>>
>>8966179
>y you don't want rednecks to vote but I guess if you only wanted u
I was thinking to simplify the message and to try and target religious communities to help spread this goal. Just focusing on things like being able to vote from your phone, or it's our god given right to have a direct voice in our system or something.
>>
File: 1496260595423-v.jpg (25KB, 460x276px) Image search:
[Google]
25KB, 460x276px
>>8966147
>cryptocurrencies are a meme
For a /sci/ visitor that statement was really dumb. I've made more money off imaginary coins in 2 months than I have with "real value" stocks in 5 years, and I hold a damn degree in commerce.
Just answer OPs question without being a fag for once.
>>
Some potential problems I see:
>People might vote more than once
>Voting won't be anonymous
>People might be pressured into voting in a specific way
>51% attacks can be executed by state-level actors
>99% of voters have no idea how any of this works, so it would be hard to legitimise/make people trust the voting system
>Might be difficult to actually verify the election results
>>
>>8966136
Trying to use technology to surpass politics is inherently political.
The bad kind of politics, even : no representation, no administration, no orders. Your idea sounds good on paper and in fiction, but the theory (as in political theory) behind it is severely lacking.
Come back when you've written a readable, coherent and convincing manifesto or some other paper.
To me, technology can't replace and will never replace policy.
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3