Is time a concept humans created?
>>8185376
No.
no, but the way we measure time is a human concept
>>8185376
Time as you experience it, yes. Time as itself, no. If you ask if your perception of time is somewhat false, then the answer is again yes.
And by the way, every concept is human created. Things themselves, if any, are not.
>tl;dr I would like you to suggest, if possible, the best textbooks to learn Math from the very beginning. I will initially be learning alone, without teachers, so keep that in mind. In the future, however, I pretend to start taking seminal classes too.
First of all, I apologize for my bad English.
I was always terrible at Math in school. Not only I was not endowed with a natural gift for the subject, but also (and this is the most important thing, I suspect; the “natural gift” is mostly overrated, I guess) I did not had the will to make any effort to learn it. Why? Mostly because I knew that my gift was more of a verbal one, and so I was always studying by myself (even during classes) subjects like versification, figures of speech, dialogue, and other technical aspects of writing.
I was also, from an early age, interested in the visual arts, in literature, philosophy and in history. When I needed to make my homework or prepare for math tests I initially tried to work on them, but inevitably toughs like this would start creeping in my brain, whispering inside my skull “Why are you going to lose your time with an area of knowledge where you will never be able to contribute with anything? What is the use of learning these small scraps of math when you will never be one of the significant names in the history of this science? Why don’t you keep working on your new play, or why don’t you work on that children’s book you were writing last month - it will be nice to make some drawing-drafts in preparation for the illustrations that will accompany the text”. Invaded by these realizations I would put the math books aside and resume my personal literary and artistic projects. During classes I was never paying attention, but reading books that I have brought from home or drawing.
cont.
>>8185331
However I realize now that, even though I will never do anything valuable in any field of science, still I find physics, chemistry and biology extremely interesting, and I would love to develop a more profound knowledge of these areas. The problem is: without knowledge of math, I know that my study of physics will be fruitless (I will only learn the verbal part of it, the things you can find in popular-science books). With that in mind, I decided to start learning mathematics again, first by myself.
I will be honest with you guys: I am afraid even of starting to learn math. I reminds me of bad moments in my life (terrible grades, treats from my parents, low self-esteem, etc.) and it is a very evident and palpable reminder of my own limitations and incapacities. I fear, for example, that no matter how much I try, I will simply be unable to slowly evolve. I admire mathematicians greatly, and I guess that much of this admiration comes from the fact that I cannot even imagine how they do what they do. I read about Gauss or Euler and I can’t imagine how the minds of people like them work; how do they create. I can understand Beethoven, Michelangelo and Shakespeare (not saying I can do what they do, obviously, but I can see how they start, how they mature, how they slowly build their projects), but the creativity of Newton and Einstein (and above all pure mathematicians) is a blank to me.
But enough of my babblings. I would like you to suggest, if possible, the best textbooks to learn Math from the very beginning. I will initially be learning alone, without teachers, so keep that in mind. In the future, however, I pretend to start taking seminal classes too.
Basic Mathematics by Strang
Calculus by Spivak
Linear Algebra done Right by Strang
Advanced Calculus by Loomis and Sternberg
Principles of Real Analysis by Rudin
Algebra by Artin
do all the problems
there now you are ready to start your pure maths master program in a specific area of study
>>8185361
thank you very much
Could anyone explain to me why the fuck it looks like there's white dots around Jupiter?
Moons
wtf are you doing in this board if you cant indentify a fuckin moon? THE NAMES ARE EVEN WRITTEN
How to lay out a personal research schedule in mathematics?
By "personal" I mean not necessarily tied to reports to "authorities".
Do you always usually fragment the work into chunks, with dates where you want to produce what sort of result, and do you schedule literature time?
bump?
>>8185263
If you ever read any formal texts, topics always culminate in a 'master equation,' with the prior equations in the topic being inculcated into this equation. Memorize it, and be able to use it for every topic it applies to. The 'integration' half of the text will have you using these equatiins in tandem or on subjects that might surprise you in how they fit.
>>8185263
From someone who almost exclusively self-studies: don't schedule anything. Just set aside as much time as you are willing to invest each day, and start reading stuff that piques your interest. The second your interest has fled, you ought to start learning another math thing (perhaps related to the last). Keep following your sincere curiousity, and everything else will fall into place.
Also, keep a notebook to scribble down your own ideas. Anybody can do math research, and you will mature in extraordinary ways if you get in the habit of proving questions that come to mind, or at least posing conjectures. If you ever hit academia for real, you will be leaps and bounds ahead as far as comfort with doing research is concerned.
This has worked very well for me. I hope it works for you as well.
what is the evolutionary advantage of men wanting to be alone when under stress?
>>8185094
They are able to think things through without any distractions.
>>8185094
>for each universal trait of a species there exists a condition for which such a trait is selectively advantageous
this is not true anon
>>8185094
Have you ever tried to think with a nagging woman around? It's nearly impossible.
;)
The Rieman Hypothesis: Solved!
;)
next level shitpost kek
What's Gödel's incompleteness theorem? And what importance does it have?
>>8185041
Basically says for a system of axioms sufficiently powerful enough to express arithmetic there are true statements that cannot be proven in the system. It's a mathematical result on the limitation of foundational issues.
>>8185060
>there are true statements that cannot be proven in the system
should be
>there are statements in the language of that system which cannot be proven/disproven
>>8185060
Can you provide an example?
Synthetic dopamine when?
>>8184988
L-DOPA
>>8185080
this...
What would be the point?
Also, there are lots of dopamine receptor agonists.
/learn/ thread.
What is the most redpilled studying technique/resource?
Method of Loci isn't good for actually learning useful things.
Spaced repetition is decent.
What's under the rabbit hole of learning?
studying with other people and making sure that both are at same pace.
>>8184966
Study groups don't work.
Subscribe to YT channels that deal with that topic.
What do you think about the Fibonacci sequence?
>>8184933
its cool i guess
swell thread btw
fake and gay
It's a sequence of numbers
Hello!
I'm currently collecting penile measurement studies on blacks.
I'm only interested in real measurement studies, self-reported data is not reliable enough.
Tanzanian men: 11.5 cm (4,5 in)
Chrouser, K., Bazant, E., Jin, L., Kileo, B., Plotkin, M., Adamu, T., Curran, K. and Koshuma, S. (2013). Penile Measurements in Tanzanian Males: Guiding Circumcision Device Design and Supply Forecasting. The Journal of Urology, 190(2), pp.544-550.
ask your mom, she's published an extensive case series
Forgot to mention that these are median values unless stated otherwise.
Nigerian men: 13 cm (5,1 in)
Orakwe, J., Ogbuagu, B. and Ebuh, G. (2007). Can physique and gluteal size predict penile length in adult Nigerian men?. West African Journal of Medicine, 25(3).
>>8184904
>being this butt-hurt.
I have a hypothesis about jupiter's spot.
Now, as we know, jupiter's surface is covered in gaseous hydrogen; and we suspect that deeper down it will be liquid metallic hydrogen.
Is it possible that a meteor struck the atmosphere of jupiter at a steep angle - slicing through the hydrogen layer and popping out of the other flank of the planet, leaving behind a large spot that has taken millennia to refill.
Just imagine, for decades Jupiter would have had a hole running right through its side. It's a shame that we didn't have the opportunity to send a probe in there.
would make sense with the smaller spot on the right as an entry wound and the larger spot as an exit...
Probably not.
Comets constantly crash into Jupiter, and by "crash" I mean they break into literal bits due to Jupiter's force.
You are underestimating the size and power of the planet.
Wasn't it confirmed that it's a huge hurricane anyway?
That's an interesting theory. Maybe it was made by a big ass asteroid (dinosaur extinction level) going too fast to break up and hit extremely hard, and the hole left from the impact caused gas to pour in, starting a storm, and it spread from there.
Also, nice post number!
Ain't quantum mechanics just a probabilistic model of estimating things we can't actually see and this "existing in two places at once" is just a miscomprehension of said model. How wrong am I?
>>8184661
Very wrong. If it were simply a probabilistic model, experiments such as the quantum eraser experiment would yield more "intuitive" results than they do.
>>8184661
That was the original interpretation, but then things like Bell's inequality ruled out hidden variables (at least local ones).
Biggest difficulty with quantum mechanics is interpreting what the mathematical framework means in a physical sense. And that's something that's still not agreed on to this day.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics
>>8184686
>local ones
It's plausible that in the subatomic world non-locality can emerge.
Hello,
I'm planning to start university this year and I would like to get some input on picking the right course for me. Only thing I know for sure is that I'll be going into the STEM field because that's what interests me the most and I'm very good at. So far my favorite choice is Physics because I feel like it's a broad field allowing me to go a lot of different directions later on, it's very theoretical so it'll hopefully shape my thought process and problem solving skills but with some practical applications unlike studying mathematics and I'm fascinated by many of those phyiscs/astronomy related documentaries (though I realize studying Physics is very different to that, but at least I'm interested in the subject).
However, I've been backpacking for a couple years and I really enjoy that freedom of moving around the globe at my own will without any boundaries. Also, this year I have started to pick up online freelancing work as a translator (English is not my native language) and article writer which has turned out very well and I'm up to a fairly decent hourly wage by now. It's not something I want to do forever, but it has sparked that idea of learning something that would allow me that freedom of working my own choice of hours from anywhere in the world.
For that reason I'm starting to doubt Physics now, because I think it wouldn't help me an awful lot to get me a job that gives me that freedom. In fact, I'm starting to doubt whether university in general is the right choice because any serious job that requires a degree also seems to require a serious commitment. I have thought about going more into the Computer science direction, learn programming and then make my money freelancing online but Computer science seems so mainstream and not very impressive to master if you know what I mean. Anyways, enough of my rambling. What do you guys think?
>>8184584
How about you get your GEs out of the way first and figure out what you don't hate?
Since you've already got translation jobs you could just be a communications major and be multilingual for a living. I'm sure that will get you traveling whenever you want
>>8184584
Geology lets you go to cool and interesting places.
Civil Engineering can be very complementary if you focus on economic geology.
You have some control about what you're researching, pick something interesting. Go to fantastic places with that kind of interesting stuff. Curse yourself every morning as you wake up and drink a cup of shitty coffee and walk around the mountains with no cell services for a few week.It's fun.
>>8184587
Never. I don't want to do that crap my whole life. I consider all that language, humanity, arts stuff irrelevant to life's bigger questions. It's a hobby nothing more. It's not based on facts, it's nothing worth studiying.
>>8184594
Again, that's a full time job and I get told when to work and where to work.
>Field
>Do you use \mathbb? Example?
>Do you use \mathcal? Example?
>Do you use \mathfrak? Example?
>>8183898
>>Field
problem solving
>>Do you use \mathbb? Example?
\mathbb{R}, Q,C,F,N,Z, etc..
>>Do you use \mathcal? Example?
dont evne know what this does
>>Do you use \mathfrak? Example?
usually only for \mathfrak{a} (ideals)
>Computer science
>yes, \mathbb{Z} for integers
>yes, \mathcal{P} for power set
>no
>>8183898
>Field
MechE
>\mathbb
Fields like the reals [math] \mathbb{R} [/math]
>\mathcal
functionals like action [math] \mathcal{S} [/math]
>\mathfrak
Lie algebra [math] \mathfrak{g} [/math]
> \mathscr
The Lagranian if not \mathcal [math] \mathscr{L} [/math]
>\mathrm
Versor rotations [math] \mathrm{q} [/math]
> \mathbf
3-vectors in a Gallilean space [math] \mathbf{v} [/math]