any racists here? fuck you

>>38806470

you would be racist to if you got bullied by negroes every day at school

>>38806470
What's wrong with being racist? Is it racist to point out that black people have lower IQs? Is it racist to point out how well colonized peoples flourished under colonial rule?

Is it racist to say you have white pride?

>>38806601
it's probably racist if I say "white is right" and "niggers must hang" then right?

>>38806632
What's wrong with thinking your race is superior to another if it's true? I don't advocate killing niggers, but I advocate my right to tell them how much of a dumb niggerr they are.

>>38806470
I'm not a racist ,

I just don't like the black bastards

>>38806682
>What's wrong with thinking your race is superior to another if it's true?
As a (not practising) jew, I agree. Although whites seem to have a problem when they're the inferior.

File: 1471805641009.jpg (43KB, 510x610px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 510x610px

>>38806470
not really a race but I cant f*cking stand frogposters

Go to a school with a large black population and you'd be racist too. I don't want to kill them but I don't want to live around them or subsidize their existence either.

Africans ruined my small german town. IT IS NO LONGER SAFE FOR WOMEN TO LEAVE AT NIGHT FFS. CRIME HAS NEVER BEEN HIGHER.

Fuck niggers and fuck towelheads, I hope a plague wipes them all out.

File: 1499749214788.png (203KB, 500x795px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 500x795px

>>38806738
praise kek anon

>>38806470
Negroids and Australoids aren't people. Doesn't mean I hate them. I think they are entitled to the same rights as other mammals. Negroids, like bears in Yellowstone once were, are too dependent on human handouts and waste and have become overpopulated. For their own sake, the safety of others and ecological stability they need to be cut off and if necessary culled.

I wouldn't say I'm racist, as I regard the true modern human species (caucasoids and mongoloids) as mostly equal. I don't see non-human species as inferior to humans either.

>>38806727
If you're ok with being upfront about your "superiority", no more kvetching when people shit talk Jews and no more pretending you're White when it's convenient. Either you're a Jew or you're White pick one.

>>38806727
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms5835
>Reconstruction of recent AJ history from such segments confirms a recent bottleneck of merely 350 individuals.
>being inbred

Literally every black person i met has been nicer than a white one fuck off /pol/

>>38807009
nigger lover lul

>>38806601
its not racist to say any of those things, it is to say
>whats wrong with being racist

>>38807825
Why is that racist? A person who isn't racist can have that opinion.

File: 1499261612378.png (89KB, 553x506px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 553x506px

>>38806470
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_W1YXWnVPd0

>>38806883
Jokes on you, incest is my biggest fetish

File: 16142895_1301087046622627_4881492379834773384_n.jpg (24KB, 480x559px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x559px

>>38806601

Thanks for telling me that the white farmers in south africa had it coming.

There is litterly nothing wrong with racists, they had to die.

Also i think you hate when blacks are racist towards you, but not the other way. Because you cant put yourself in other peoples shoes.

>>38806470
You realize this is not reddit? Anyone who does not mind blacks simply have not spent enough time with them or lived in their neighborhood.

>>38808334
What does any of that have to do with what I said? What's wrong with being a racist? Explain this to me to the best of your retarded ability.

>>38808399
it's just stupid. race realism is good for modeling policy, especially immigration, but on an interpersonal level it is just much more sensible to judge people individually

>>38808459
>it's just stupid
I'll ask you again.

Can you explain to me what's wrong with racism?

>>38808471
i just did, if you read past the first sentence you would know

File: 1501690946029.jpg (739KB, 1872x1796px) Image search: [Google]

739KB, 1872x1796px

>>38808399

If you think that racist blacks who kill white farmers are justified.

I just wanted to see if your beliefs hold on water if other groups do it to whites, because you know blacks will be the majority in the century.

>>38808334
just a quick reminder that jews have lost every war they fought against the muslims

>>38806470
Racial seperatism is the only thing that makes sense, the races weren't meant to congregate as they do now, its the reason there is so much racial conflict and how invariably the less numerous race must be oppressed in mixed society.

A black nation run by blacks with no white or jewish influence and who owned the means of production would infinitely be better than our placed in current society.

>>38808513
6 day war?

>>38808500
You said "It's stupid, it's better to judge on an individual level." That's not an explanation, that's a statement not backed up by anything. The only people who say this are people who've had zero experience with people of different races from my experience.

>>38808510
>If you think that racist blacks who kill white farmers are justified
What? Watch them kill and kick out the whites and starve to death.

>because you know blacks will be the majority in the century
And what does that have to do with anything?

>>38808513

Who cares what Muslims think.

File: 1499265155050-pol.jpg (2MB, 1880x2880px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1880x2880px

Seeing as the other thread was deleted and this one wasn't, I'll post my reply here. The Hebe janitors think they're slick, but they're not.

This was a response in relation to this picture.

>This is stupid, its like saying there is a white conspiracy because most of the x industry is maintained by whites.

>Have you ever though of that

If 100% of a population is white, it would make sense if 100% of any given industry was controlled by whites. If 50% of the population was Jewish and 50% white, then it would make sense that 50% of any given industry would be controlled by whites, all things being equal. Jews make up less than 2% of the population in the US.

Given random probability, and assuming all things are equal, a Jew being part of any given company is a 1/50 chance. Two Jews being in a company is 1/2500. Three Jews being in a company is 1/125,000. As you can see, CNN, and other media institutions, being chock full of Jews is no (((coincidence))).

So, conspiracy? Not really. Nepotism? Quite obviously.

>>38808517
>nigger society
>not utterly shit

explain your reasoning

>went to a school that was 50% non-white
>got on with everyone fine
I must be the only one on the entire site

File: 88c.png (60KB, 700x566px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 700x566px

>>38808532

Im not saying what would happen. Im saying if they are justified in doing this because you stated that there is nothing wrong with racism.

You either go back on it, or you are a hypocrite.

I don't understand how you can hate blacks for being violent, but when chad brutally beats your ass or a Stacy mocks you with her clique or your parents let old white fucks rape you that's just "normies" and not proof that whites are innately assholes.

>>38808564
>Im saying if they are justified in doing this because you stated that there is nothing wrong with racism.
That quite literally makes no sense at all.

File: 1485575943522.jpg (136KB, 1220x947px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1220x947px

I can deal with most except i can't stand chinks and niggers.They ruin everything around them

>>38808532
Who would you trust more; a black guy in a suit and tie or a sketchy looking white guy in baggy sweats?

File: 1482790995635.png (465KB, 1000x1050px) Image search: [Google]

465KB, 1000x1050px

>>38808573

Please tell me what makes no sense.

You said there is nothing wrong with being racist.

Blacks are being racists and thus kill whites.

Do you agree with this?

Whats not to get?

>>38806470
Ghetto niggers are disgusting
Ghetto Spics are disgusting
Ghetto Crackers are disgusting
Everyone in the ghetto is disgusting unless they don't have the ghetto mindset.
The only people I'd say are worth talking to would be the controllers of said gangs/yakuza/triad/etc

>>38808571
Chad's behavior is only even partly acceptable because he's good looking and popular, which are get out of jail free cards in almost any society. When you have disgusting filth like Jamal shitting up your neighborhood and there's nothing being done about it, you have to wonder why.

>>38808598
A black guy in a suit, but if they were both wearing suits the white man is more likely to be more honest and less violent.

>>38808609
>if you advocate racism you advocate violence

That's what doesn't make sense.

>>38808532
>That's not an explanation, that's a statement not backed up by anything.
It's the truth though. you can propably determine wether or not you will get along with someone
just by looking at them, no matter the race. no need to shut entire groups of people off.

>The only people who say this are people who've had zero experience with people of different races from my experience.
Half my friends in high school were non white. there were never any problems

>>38808645
>A black guy in a suit
so judging on an individual level makes sense?

File: 1495399072842.png (225KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 800x800px

>>38808645

But since they are racist, they turn violent.

If you advocate its okay to be racist, then racists will turn violent.

Its inevitable.

So do you agree or not?

>>38808659
I don't think you're really understanding this entire thread is about different races, not different individuals.

You can chew gum and talk at the same time, meaning you can be a racist (hate a race) and like an individual. The good doesn't wash out the bad, nor the bad the good.

>>38808673
But we're judging on the level of race, keep up.

>>38808681
>But since they are racist, they turn violent.
They're inherently violent.

>>38806470
I'm a self hating mongrel, does that count?

>>38808614
I don't understand your logic. I'm not talking about society, I'm talking about robots as individuals. The odds of Chad beating the shit out of you and everybody laughing about it is so high it's a wonder the lot of you aren't self loathing and hate white people. Is it because you guys want to feel superior at least in ONE way? I don't get it

File: 1496628556395.png (786KB, 1000x1050px) Image search: [Google]

786KB, 1000x1050px

>>38808699

Just answer the question.

Is it justifiable for blacks to be racist towards white people?

Since you said in your own words, its okay to be racist.

>>38808699
>But we're judging on the level of race
you just admitted you'd trust a black over a white in certain situations. If you were only judging on race that wouldnt happen.
> keep up.
um, no sweetie

>>38808723
>Is it justifiable for blacks to be racist towards white people?
Not really, since white people gave them everything they've since destroyed. They have no reason to hate whites, white have every reason to hate blacks.

>Is it justifiable for blacks to be racist towards white people?
It is justifiable to be racist if the circumstance dictates, violence isn't always justifiable.

>>38808740
>you just admitted you'd trust a black over a white in certain situations

And? You said it yourself, in certain situations (i.e building a scenario where a white happens to be dressing and acting like a typical black)

Sweetie, you can be a racist and like a black person. Judging an entire race is more practical.

>>38808699
>You can chew gum and talk at the same time, meaning you can be a racist (hate a race) and like an individual. The good doesn't wash out the bad, nor the bad the good.

Thats pretty much exactly what i said in my original post. policy should take race into account, but judging individuals on their race is just petty

File: ghetto-thug.jpg (64KB, 640x512px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 640x512px

>>38808776
>but judging individuals on their race is just petty
Maybe if you're the kind of liberal fuck that believes pic related is less likely than a black businessman wearing a suit.

>>38808794
i don't believe that, and if i did that would have nothing to do with anything i posted. you can clearly tell that the negro in your pic is a fucking nigger. doesn't mean that all of them are like that though, so you can judge everyone based on your experiences with them specifically

File: 354deaa3770912621bb816da070346ab.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

>>38808775

There it is, hypocritical.

So that means your opinions are useless since you dont value word.

Also you didint do anything to humanity. So they are justified in being racist towards you except the inventors. Also when blacks chimp out, i hope you get caught and necklaced.

You have accept your views from all sides or its not a view.

Lastly good things whites are becoming extinct. You had it coming when you messed with the jews.

Hopefully you wont kill yourself i want you to suffer in this increasing brown world.

>>38808852
>i don't believe that, and if i did that would have nothing to do with anything i posted
Are blacks and white different? Why? Culture or physiology?

> you can clearly tell that the negro in your pic is a fucking nigger

And most black people are niggers like that faggot, funny how that works huh?

>doesn't mean that all of them are like that though

Most of them are, that's what I'm saying.

>>38808864
Remember when I said you're not making any sense? You're not making any sense.

>>38808864
he condemned violence, where are you getting this bullshit from?

>>38808681
Blacks are violent regardless of race. They kill more of their own kind at disproportionately high rates and also kill more whites at a disproportionately high rate in relation to population. That being said, correlation isn't causation, but the fact that blacks are disproportionately more violent is indisputable. Why these two factors correlate is a separate conversation, but data is data.

File: end it.jpg (17KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 400x400px

Is anyone here racist but they don't want to be?
I find non white people smelly and annoying but I feel bad about that

There is an Indian lady at work, she really always smells like Indian food. It really annoys me and makes me very furious.

A few weeks ago I found out where she lived and took pictures of her children then at night, glued the images of her children to her bedroom window and left curry bowls with fake blood in them and notes that said 'SMELLY INDIAN BITCH' written in turmeric powder on her doorstep etc. She hs been very tetchy at work since, I eel bad but can't help it.

>>38806601
Not only it is racist but it's also complete bullshit

>>38808887
>Are blacks and white different? Why? Culture or physiology?

yes, physiology

>Most of them are, that's what I'm saying.

no fucking shit, i'm under no illusions there. but that doesn't mean that if you were to meet a negro that seems decent, that you should judge him by his race when he is clearly different from the majority

>>38808957
What did I say that was complete bullshit? and explain to me why that's racist and what's wrong with racism.

>>38806499
you got bullied because youre a beta cuck kill yo self child

File: 79e0f76f22f429dc6a79ebbe8f3b484d.jpg (20KB, 306x306px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 306x306px

>>38808935

They can do the killing, the only people dying are poor whites and poor blacks so i dont care.

>>38808887
You are a hypocrite.

>>38808905
He said its okay for white to be racist, but not blacks meaning he is a hypocrite.

>>38808976
>no fucking shit, i'm under no illusions there. but that doesn't mean that if you were to meet a negro that seems decent, that you should judge him by his race when he is clearly different from the majority
Judge him by his race until he proves he's not like most of his race, I don't see what's so hard to grasp about that.

Works insanely well. Most white people are decent hard workers who are nice and like to chat, so I'm going to judge those qualities before I even know who they are.

>>38809010
>You are a hypocrite.
No, you're being a dishonest little weasel.

>>38808957
it's true though, black people have lower IQ on average and many african countries were better off under colonialism, specifically british colonialism.

>>38808718
Because getting picked on and bullied is vastly different from being mugged/shot/raped/stolen from. What Chad and Stacy do is shitty but less likely to be damaging, while what Tyrone and Shaquanda do is more likely to be extremely damaging. Trying to equate bullying with violent crime is false equivalence.

>>38809010
>He said its okay for white to be racist, but not blacks meaning he is a hypocrite.
And how is that hypocritical? He gave his own reasoning as to why it exactly isn't hypocritical.

I dont mind racists because it's not a meme, black people actually are dumb. If it wasn't true I would dislike them

>>38809038
We don't even have data on 10% of population.

How can you tell that it's due to genes?

>>38809038
>>38809052
>>38809071
>>38809074
>reddit spacing
>>>/r/the_donald you cucks

>>38809016
>Judge him by his race until he proves he's not like most of his race

that's basically what i said, except that i don't think you have to prejudge them on their race. if you aren't a complete autist you can get a good guess of a persons character just by looking at them.

>>38809010
Not really. Blacks tend to target upper class whites, as they usually live in the inner cities that have strict gun laws where most of the educated whites live.

>>38809076
>implying 10% of a population is not a representatvie sample

>How can you tell that it's due to genes?

IQ is around 70% heritable, it has been confirmed to be mostly genetic in twin studies.

File: 18813434_10213220873463435_8398634375832611805_n.jpg (46KB, 720x454px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 720x454px

>>38809071

Because he only believes one group of people can be racist.

If a white corporation comes along and steals land from africa they have a right to fight and kill the whites who stole from them.

But with his reasoning, they are not allow to do this since whites are "Superior"

But if blacks did this, he would be against this.

>>38809093
>except that i don't think you have to prejudge them on their race
Works most of the time. I'm not saying it's 100% accurate, as there are always outliers. But that's what a black suited up businessman is. A statistical outlier.

>if you aren't a complete autist you can get a good guess of a persons character just by looking at them
Again, most blacks look like>>38808794 so really you're right. If it speaks, dresses and acts like a nigger chances are it's a nigger.

>>38809016
>Judge him by his race until he proves he's not like most of his race

You're retarded, average mean nothing about individuals.

>>38809088
I wrote a solid paragraph, you greasy little shit. Kill yourself.

>>38809088
what is wrong with formatting posts to make them more readable? i have always done it this way, fuck off

>>38806601
Gotta pull out my Lynn book to silence all these cucks. Hahahahaha, I love scientific racism and running regressions on small population sizes like everyone else does. Hahahahahaha, raw data analysis. Nice meme, anon

>>38806470
>tfw spic
>everyone thinks you're short and brown

also:
>/pol/ always classifies hispanic as a race
I fucking HATE this meme.

>>38809114

No one cares what happens to whites but /pol/fags, they are going to be extinct.

The only whites not go to extinct are the rich and do you know why they dont care?

@38809088
>Pretending to be retarded

Not even worth a (You)

>>38809130
>Because he only believes one group of people can be racist.
No, I specifically said blacks are justified to be racist against whites.

>If a white corporation comes along and steals land from africa they have a right to fight and kill the whites who stole from them.
Name a corporation that has even stolen land from Africa. Name one.

>But with his reasoning, they are not allow to do this since whites are "Superior"
And is that hypocritical? No.

>But if blacks did this, he would be against this.
of course I would, since I've said multiple times blacks are justified to be racist against whites.

>>38809152
Average has everything to do with the group as a whole.

>>38809162
Why do blacks have lower IQs?

>>38809170
Are you the guy that spams this shit everywhere? You're mentally ill my white spic friend.

>>38809190
>I specifically said blacks aren't justified to be racist against whites.
Typo

>>38809132
i don't even really disagree with you in practice, i just think you should give everyone a chance before putting them in a category. guess the outcome of your way and my way would be the same, its just a matter of attitude and principles. treat others like you want them to treat you etc

mandatory watching:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gkpr1btb1Ak

>>38809132
Not him but do you have a brain?

Crime is going down since years

>>38809190
There is no basis for Richard Lynn's data, ie. the IQ measurement for Iran he has taken from a paper in 1959 (page 208 of the book), and that *1959* study is from a rural area of the country, not a standardised test and from pre-pubescent children.
Your knowledge is limited to the alt-right white nationalist websites you read

>>38809171
>whites are going extinct
this is retarded no matter what side of the argument uses it. just because birth rates are low now doesn't mean they always will be

>>38809052
Right. I call bull shit. There's almost always a rape/murder thread on this board's front page. You don't give a shit about crime. You all frequently mock roasties for being raped or beat by Chads, and praise school shooters just as regularly. You don't hate blacks because they're violent.

I just wish one of you would be honest. Is this anecdotal hate? Ironic hate?

>>38809190

Im not saying a corporation is currently doing this, its a thought experiment.

But it proves one thing /pol/ is hypocritical since they dont agree with both sides of the racism coin.

>>38806812
This. Everyone finds diversity just peachy until they get a taste of it themselves. Then the fags who are still rich enough to experience a filtered version of it (ie. rich diplomat kids in your college) look at normal people as if we were all inbred rednecks being racist because "muh skin color, dey took our jerbs".

In the end, I'm racist towards niggers, kikes, shitskins AND whites for their countryside retard / urbanite faggot dichotomy. Only Northern East Asians are worth something as a race.

Why are people mad toward black?

Black's crimes only affect 0.162% of white while White crime's affect 0.164% of blacks

>>38809245

I know whites are not going extinct, im using this as a argument to make /pol/fags mad.

>>38809171
You vastly underestimate the genocidal and homicidal capacity of the Europeans, especially when it comes to the organized removal. The French Revolution brought about the popularity of the guillotine, and I think it's going to start making a resurgence in the near future.

>>38809211
there's a Colombian that's even worse than me on /int/, and he's not even White. and no, I don't complain about this everywhere, only on /r9k/, unless you mean on every /r9k/ thread.

>>38809275
that just creates animosity and division, completely counterproductive. why would you purposefully attempt to polarize an already extreme group even more?

>>38809223
>i just think you should give everyone a chance before putting them in a category
Believe me, I give everybody a chance.

>>38809236
>Crime is going down since years
What does overall crime have to do with black crime?

>There is no basis for Richard Lynn's data
But it's not just Lynn's data. It's common knowledge.

https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country

>>38809248
>Im not saying a corporation is currently doing this, its a thought experiment.
And I guess this is supposed to be a reference to the whites who "stole" African land during colonization? All land is what you call "stolen."

>>38809272
>Black's crimes only affect 0.162% of white while White crime's affect 0.164% of blacks
>13% of the American population

>>38809278
so you want to start executing all non-whites? edgy.

>inb4 you can't prove genocide is wrong

>>38809278

Nothing is going to happen, you dont have power the richest, smartest, and some of the most influence people like liberals. The only place you can talk about it is in /pol/ because no one is going to tolerate this /pol/ shit.

>>38809272
Because blacks are less than a quarter of the population, crime rates should reflect that.

>>38809302

/pol/ is already indoctrinated, there is no going back unless they grow up.

>>38809315
>But it's not just Lynn's data. It's common knowledge.


It's from Lynn you fucking retard.

Nice display of high IQ.

>What does overall crime have to do with black crime?
Crime also goes does for them.

>>38809236
I'd note that the iq-research site is from Richard Lynn too, I'm just not understanding why there's no basis for his data.

Can you explain why?

File: 0886 - k55GLz8.jpg (11KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 251x242px

>mfw grew up in a black school in a poor city that's on the outskirts of a major city
>mfw didn't get bullied
>mfw i'm not racist

it's almost like you guys just grew up around assholes or something

>>38809315

Wtf are you talking about, its just a though experiment to expose the Hypocrisy,

Jeez whats with /pol/ and always trying to read the mind of others.

>>38809315
>>38809335
It's just black on black crime, why do you care?

Only 0.162% of white are affected by black on black crimes

File: download (69).jpg (5KB, 243x207px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 243x207px

>>38806470

Im Not racist but...
I do belive that every race should stay in their own ethnic land and not intermingle with other races to ensure that there is true diversity in this world, so we dont all become coffee coloued half-caste's who are stripped of culture, racial pride, patriotism and not to mention being easier to control by genuine evil racist supremists who dont care about other human lives and only care about money and power.

I also acknowledge data from various studies and statistics are concidered "racist" such as...
>the bell curve and the diffrences between race and IQ.
>the unfair proportion of jews admitted into harvard university despite them only making up such a small proportion of the population.
>the number of jews who occupy postions of power with in the mass media, financial institutions and government despite them only making up a small percntage of the population.
>How blacks are more likely to have HIV compared to any other race.
>The discrimination of afarmitive action against whites where before you had the best person for the job, now you have quotas by law demanding you must employ x amount of non whites or face discrimination lawsuits and fines.
(1)

>>38809356
You're presupposing that his data is unreliable when you're not even explaining why. Classic.

>Crime also goes does for them.
But do it can too? If you meant to say it goes down for them then would you mind explaining why 13% of the population commits just as much and sometimes even more crimes than 65%?

>>38809361
Can you read?

> ie. the IQ measurement for Iran he has taken from a paper in 1959 (page 208 of the book), and that *1959* study is from a rural area of the country, not a standardised test and from pre-pubescent children.
Your knowledge is limited to the alt-right white nationalist websites you read


Nice display of high IQ btw.

jesus christ you /pol/tards are so fucking stupid kys

>>38806470
(2)
I dont hate any one based on their skin colour
>I dont belive any race is a master race as we are all good in certain aspects, but lacking in others.
>i dont call other races derograty names or share offensive memes about them.

Yet some how I'am concidered an evil racist white supremist, for simply wanting to preserve the diversity of the worlds races for future generations.

If this was put in context in regards to the worlds animals I would be concidered a decent human being with good values for wanting to preserve the bio diversity and beauty of nature.
By ensuring that tigers from sibera dont breed with lions from africa you ensure.
>the offspring will be able to reproduce
>the offspring wont have birth defects and faulty genectic code.
>ligers in afica wont freeze to death in sibera due to having thinier coats.
>ligers in afria wont die of overheating due to thicker coats.

>>38809375
And blacks make up a lower percentage of the population compared to whites, see how that works?

>>38809397
>the IQ measurement for Iran he has taken from a paper in 1959 (page 208 of the book), and that *1959* study is from a rural area of the country
And? Why does that mean the data is wrong? You can't study for an IQ test, do you even know what an IQ test is?

Can you show me the evidence as to why his data is unreliable?

>>38809076
>not having heard of the 10% rule

File: 1494731848208.jpg (39KB, 480x516px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 480x516px

I kinda hate everyone...that acts like a nigger monkey, but I especially hate the grays. I mean that's literately a different race of humanoids all together.

>>38809397
>Your knowledge is limited to the alt-right white nationalist websites you read
When Lynn's own data suggests SE Asians are actually smarter than whites?

What?

>>38809389
>But do it can too? If you meant to say it goes down for them then would you mind explaining why 13% of the population commits just as much and sometimes even more crimes than 65%

They don't commit more crime than other groups, they commit a disproportionnate amount of crime, not the same things.

It's mostly black on black crimes.

According to the statistics of "the victim's survey" in 2014 if i'm not wrong, the best way to get the most accurate number of victims; 320,082 of white where victims of black violence while 62.593 of black where victims of white violence.

We have 38.000.000 of blacks and 197.000.000 of white in USA, now, let's try to use percentages:

62,593 (black victims) is just over 0.164% of 38,000,000 (black population)

320,082 (white victims) is just over 0.162% of 197,000,000 (white population)

So, not only, the entire black race doesn't commit crime. It's an insignificant fraction of that 13% that actually commits crime.

Also there being more white people doesn't change the percentages. Percent literally means 'per 100' and the fact of the matter is both races effect the same percentage of the other population with violence.

So whites actually commit violence towards a marginally larger percent of the black population than the opposite.

>>38809425
>> ie. the IQ measurement for Iran he has taken from a paper in 1959 (page 208 of the book), and that *1959* study is from a rural area of the country, not a standardised test and from pre-pubescent children.
>pre-pubescent children
>not standardised

Don't you see the problem here you fucking retard?

>>38809454
>They don't commit more crime than other groups, they commit a disproportionnate amount of crime, not the same things.
Tomato tomatto.

Black people commit more crimes on average, both petty and violent and you've still yet to explain why.

>>38809485
I see you're not actually providing any evidence and just falling back on one greentexted line you've posted.

>>38809425
Not him but see:

www.ronunz.org/2012/08/05/unz-on-raceiq-response-to-lynn-and-nyborg/

>>38809506
Ah yes, an article. Really BMTFO on that one.

>>38809246
I challenge you to go look at those rape threads and I think you will find that a disproportionate amount of those rape/murder cases will have been committed by brown men. /R9K/, and by extension /pol/, shit on Roasties who think it's a good idea to fuck Tyrone and Chads who act like Tyrones. They place themselves in dangerous situations and then bitch when they get burned by obviously bad partners.

Try not to get it twisted: when Chad rapes or murders a female, he's acting like he's black, not the other way around. He becomes lesser by the act alone, not greater, and the roasties who actively pursue these sort of men deserve what they get. There are many, many, many, other circumstances that vastly outnumber the instances of the above mentioned, though. I can start posting them, if you like, but I believe that you're already booty bothered.

>>38809423
you piss people off because you propose a radical change to society based on something that inconveniences few to none.
thats why people dislike you for "wanting to preserve the diversity of the worlds races for future generations"

>>38809497
See >>38809454 and read it again.

Blacks don't do shit to you, why do you care so much?

>>38808334
It was basically the world vs. Germany and it was still a struggle.

>>38809536
>Blacks don't do shit to you, why do you care so much?
They do a lot for being a small percentage of the population. How do you not understand that?

>>38809506
Nice article

>>38809523
Again, nice display of High IQ.

Lynn tried to respond to the guy who has write this article but the same guy humiliate Lynn.

>>38809562
See >>38809454

Only 0.162% of white are affect by blacks.

File: file.png (33KB, 1407x161px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1407x161px

>>38809568
Yeah man, this Ron Unz is WAY more qualified than Lynn. Let's say Lynn is wrong, you tell me the correct average IQ of a sub-saharan African?

Can you also prove to me Lynn is wrong?

>>38809595
Where is this data coming from?

>>38809595
What you're not understanding is black people are victims of BLACK crime.

>>38809633
>Yeah man, this Ron Unz is WAY more qualified than Lynn

Okay, you ddin't read the article, so read this.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100121155220.htm

>>38809663
Why do you care so much then?

>>38809633
>Where is this data coming from?
The survey of victims, the best way to get the biggest number of victims

>>38809675
I did read the article. Why is this man qualified to be saying three IQ experts and professors are wrong?

File: 2010-fbi-race-murder-stats.jpg (87KB, 840x302px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 840x302px

>>38809675
>>38809712
>>38809595
originnallyz

It really sucks sometimes, trying to be fair and open minded as a young person just starting their career when evaluating some of my coworkers. At the job I'm working I was brought in with a group of about 20, and within just a few days it was painfully obvious how much less productive the black people in our group are. They look completely unprofessional, some have dreads, covered in visible tattoos, they come in wearing tennis shoes, mismatched socks, pants with holes in the knees. They put 0 effort into appearing professional. They talk in thick urban accents, throw the n word around a lot when our supervisors aren't around. We're allowed to listen to music or what have you on our headphones at work, since its mostly technical work that doesn't involve customer service, so they blast rap so loud you can hear it through their headphones from across the office. Their typing skills are subpar, I've seen one in particular resort to doing the "chicken peck" approach and getting maybe 20 words per minute on a good day.
It just sucks because we get paid the same amount but they are obviously under qualified and under performing at what would be a simple entry level job for most anyone else. I don't hate them for being black, I hate them for being shit at what they do and getting rewarded for it.

>>38809366
Fucking this. 90% of the black people I met were very smart and kind to me. Best friend material. I just don't understand where all the autistic hate on this board comes from besides "B-BUT MUH CHARTS !!"

>>38809724
Read the sources of the articles.

Lynn usually respond to this who attack his works.

Lynn didn't respond to Witchert but responded to Ron Unz, who gave him a new answer but Lynn ignored this one because he was humiliated.

Read it:
http://www.ronunz.org/2012/08/05/unz-on-raceiq-response-to-lynn-and-nyborg

>>38809751
National Crime Victimization Survey is much more accurate than an old data.

>>38809804
>muh anecdotal data trumps your FBI statistics!

>>38809814
>National Crime Victimization Survey is much more accurate than an old data.
kek

I'll ask you again, why are 3 IQ experts wrong and an op-ed nobody is?

>read his source, they're different than Lynn's sources
>therefore Lynn's sources are wrong

>>38806873
I'm also white though, I have pale white skin, european features and hair, and my dad isn't jewish at all. I'm far more european than semitic.
I'm like white+

File: file.png (30KB, 942x253px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 942x253px

>>38809814
>National Crime Victimization Survey is much more accurate than an old data.
Is old data wrong data, yes or no?

>>38809858
>kek

https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=dcdetail&iid=245

"The Bureau of Justice Statistics' (BJS) National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) is the nation's primary source of information on criminal victimization"

>I'll ask you again, why are 3 IQ experts wrong and an op-ed nobody is?

You didn't read the article you retard

>>38809881
Wait a litlle, I'm doing some math on it.

Just to be sure, 409= 400 900?

File: NCFS-Table.jpg (64KB, 620x297px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 620x297px

>>38809454
Taking a survey is not sufficient. Bring crimr statistics from .gov orgs. More reliable and standardized. Also, protip: Mexicans aren't white.

https://www.amren.com/news/2015/07/new-doj-statistics-on-race-and-violent-crime/

>>38809932
>"The Bureau of Justice Statistics' (BJS) National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) is the nation's primary source of information on criminal victimization"

And Verizon is America's #1 cable and internet provider! What's wrong with FBI statistics? Is the FBI racist?

Explain to me why all sources in relation to crime victims, blacks make up just as many and sometimes MORE data despite being 13% of the population?

You guys never really seem to address this. I read your article, why are his sources more relevant than the sources of 3 IQ experts? What qualifications does Ron have?

>>38809332
Actually, I'm here talking about it to you right now. Funny how that works.

File: file.png (285KB, 640x831px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 640x831px

>>38809932
>BJS

Are you sure you're not reading their data wrong?

>>38809995
>Taking a survey is not sufficient. Bring crimr statistics from .gov orgs. More reliable and standardized. Also, protip: Mexicans aren't white.

My survey has more victims actually but thanks, you make my work easier.

>>38809999
>And Verizon is America's #1 cable and internet provider! What's wrong with FBI statistics? Is the FBI racist?

You're retarded, my survey has MORE VICTIMS.

>You guys never really seem to address this. I read your article, why are his sources more relevant than the sources of 3 IQ experts? What qualifications does Ron have?

Did you read the article you fucking retard?

>>38810031
The % is AMONG VICTIMS.

In the entire population, it mean barely anything toward white.

>>38806470
Fuck you too, shabbos goy

>>38810052
>You're retarded, my survey has MORE VICTIMS.
So what if it has more victims, do you know what an average is?

>In the entire population, it mean barely anything toward white.
13% of the population going by BJS and FBI data are only 3% less likely to attack white people than the other way around, and more likely to attack other black people.

Are you forgetting we're talking about 13% of the population? THIRTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN PRECEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENT.

File: 1485199895821.png (522KB, 500x737px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 500x737px

>>38809533
Yep ive acceted the fact that that such an outlook on race is vilified by normies and downright dangerous to repeat openly in public due to its unfortunate associations with pogroms and men concered more about power.
Not to mention the ghastly idea to many of deporting someone back to their ethnic country that they were not even born in.

However despite this I will die happy in the end knowing I did all i could for my convictions, to stand up for the laws of nature and the idea of a beautiful utopian world with true diversity for all my grandkids and other peoples grandkids from across the world to enjoy and live in happily free from many of the problems we face in living nightmare.

>>38810031
>>38809995
>>38810132

223.6 million white, 560600 victims, 0.25% of popualtion.

38.9 millions black, 99403 victims 0.26% of the entire population

It barely mean anything.

File: islam9.jpg (52KB, 480x413px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 480x413px

how can anyone morally defend not being a racist in 2017??

>>38810161
>White affect more negatively the black population than the reverse.

/pol/ BTFO.

>>38810188
that's not even close to true.

>>38806470
Attending public schools made me a racist. If a black kid in class wasn't fucking around, not paying attention, and refusing to do any work they were accused of "acting white" and ostracized by all the other blacks in school. Most of them didn't make it past the tenth grade before disappearing forever, presumably after getting arrested.

File: file.png (113KB, 652x314px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 652x314px

>>38810161
What do you achieve from straight up lying?

Latino here. I'm not a racist because even if the statistics show a great percentage of crime rate, I don't like to generalize and like to treat each person as an individual. I am however more cautious and paranoid after swallowing the red pill.

My main problem is, after reading thousands of anonymous threads all over 4chan and especially /pol/, is that I immediately assume every white person hates me by default and that I have to work twice as hard as a white individual to even get the common courtesy of acknowledgement from them, let alone confidence. Am I right in having this mindset or am I just too paranoid and infected by /pol/ rethoric?

>>38810209
No, he's right, see >>38810161

There being more white people doesn't change the percentages. Percent literally mean per 100.

>>38810161
>38.9 millions black, 99403 victims 0.26% of the entire population
You're forgetting another fucking zero on the end of the 99000

see>>38810222

>>38810161
You're fucking numbers are all fucking WRONG.

>>38810222
Are you retarded?

In your stats, among 4091971 white victims, 13.7% of that were victims of black.

560600 victims.

Among 955800 black victims, 10.4% of them were victims of white. 99403 victims


There is 223.6 million white and 38.9 millions blacks in USA.

223.6 million white, 560600 victims, 0.25% of white population.

38.9 millions black, 99403 victims 0.26% of the black population

>>38810260
>>38810297
I'm focusing on black on white crime and white on black crime.

File: 1501163803657.jpg (154KB, 854x758px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 854x758px

>>38806470
Got a problem nigger lover?

>>38806470
Nah, I hate everyone equally

>>38810317
>955,000 Black victims: 62% black offenders, 10% white offenders
>4,100,000 White victims: 14% black offender, 56% white offender

What about this don't you understand?

>>38810388
>What about this don't you understand?

See >>38810317

It barely mean anything at the level of population.

Also there being more white people doesn't change the percentages. Percent literally means 'per 100' and the fact of the matter is both races effect the same percentage of the other population with violence.

So whites actually commit violence towards a marginally larger percent of the black population than the opposite.

>>38806812
Too bad the first plague didnt wipe your albino asses off the face of the earth before. There are only 700 million of your people and I feel bad for rhe majority of whites who are chil
as hell and have to recieve a bad image because of racist pieces of shit such as yourself.

>>38810052
>survey
>no way to verify the information
>better than hard crime data
A larger sample size of unverifiable data is arguably just as useful as a sample size one tenth the larger one. It's interesting, but not really relevant. Self volunteered data collection has always been a crapshoot. Try again.

>>38810161
Fucking what

>>38810223
White person here.
The things I will judge you on before your race include your accent, your appearance (clothing) and your work ethic. I don't think being of one race predetermines the quality of your character, but I do think certain traits are more common among certain racial groups.

>>38810223
Don't worry, 4channers don't leave their houses. There are actually less racist people than you think, you just got misleaded by the vocal minority.

File: election-halal-cart-sized (1).jpg (158KB, 590x400px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 590x400px

>>38808935
>blacks are more violent

Yea because whites surely are the most peaceful race on the planet. Let's just forget about all the world wars, conflicts and shit that they cannot go 20-50 years without doing. And you wonder why your race is the global minority.


Sure there are some people within my race who start conflicts with eachother but they are just mini squabbles compared to yours. Whenever whites get uneasy, they cause a death toll in the millions range or shoot up schools.

>>38810517
Then see >>38810317

It have more details.

>>38810567
See >>38810317
Whites actually commit violence towards a marginally larger percent of the black population than the opposite.

File: 1501290225854.png (11KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 300x300px

>>38806470
Fuck you to nigger/spic/wh*te/turk/gook/scamglo/zipperhead/dunecoon/faggot.

>>38810425
FBI statistics literally dispel that statement, which I've already provided and you promptly ignored at "old data."

95,000 whites attacked blacks
410,000 blacks attacked whites

Simple calculations yields that 0.04% of the white population has attacked a black person, while 1.08% of the black population has attacked a white person.

Going by your precious BJS data.

>>38810638
>Going by your precious BJS data.


Are you retarded?

See >>38810317

>>38806470
Racism is just the result of pattern recognition

>>38810638
>blacks are 27 times more likely to attack a white person than a white person attacking a black person
So not only do we see this in reality, we see it in the sources that people are trying to use to prove whites commit more violent crime.

>>38810682
Are you? >>38810222
>Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics

>>38810638
Not him but victims matter more than offerder.


Because offender might not be offender but victims are victims

How come it is fine for whites to abuse and kill millions of blacks for centuries but once blacks start retaliating it is totally not ok for you guys?

>>38810713
>Because offender might not be offender but victims are victims
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha what
So in a case where an offender isn't actually an offender, that victim can still be a victim?

No victim = no offender = no crime
No offender = no victim = no crime
No crime = no victim = no offenderr

File: 1500755062921.jpg (6KB, 156x189px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 156x189px

>mfw with the steady influx of black inmigrants in my country im slowly becoming a racist

>>38810709
I'm using your data you dumbfuck.

See >>38810317

Did you read the phrase?

>both races effect the same percentage of the other population with violence.

>>38806470
I'm a race realist but people call me a racist for it.

>>38810739
Not him but how do you know the number of offender by race?

File: nixon_mao.jpg (27KB, 374x303px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 374x303px

>>38810752
>whites start flooding your country and dictating shit under your own roof

This is perfectly fine

>non-whites start entering your country and dont force you into shit

OMGGGG SOUND THE FUCKING ALLARMS

>>38810787
>I'm using your data you dumbfuck.
And my data is BJS, which anyone with simple math skills can figure out that 0.04% of the white population has attacked a black person, while 1.08% of the black population has attacked a white person.

Just give up. You're abandoning your original source claim (BJS) and are just using numbers that aren't even sourced. My data is sourced. Get absolutely fucking destroyed, worm.

>>38810823
>Not him but how do you know the number of offender by race?
Do you need everything spoonfed to you? Read the fucking thread.

>>38810752
What country?

I don't blame you. They flood in, take over, destroy everything around them. I hate seeing nice places fall so far down.

>>38810826
More like whites move in and improve everything, niggos move in and turn the neighborhood into a ghetto and rob you.

File: killian-fanart.jpg (86KB, 1200x768px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1200x768px

why do whites shoot up schools?

File: c09.jpg (33KB, 680x510px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 680x510px

>>38810866
>muh white mans burden

>>38810827
>You're abandoning your original source claim (BJS) and are just using numbers that aren't even sourced. My data is sourced. Get absolutely fucking destroyed, worm

I'm talking about the victims you dumbfuck, let's use your data.

So 0.04% of the white population affect 0.26% of the black population while 1.08% of the black population affect 0.25% of white population.

So yeah, white affect marginally more the black population.

>>38806470
Hello, /leftypol/. Have you tried shitposting on >>>/pol/?

>>38810910
I seriously can't tell if you're trolling or retarded.

>>38810909
It literally is the white mans burden to civilize the world.

Well, at least the savage parts. Asia is doing alright mostly.

>>38810927
If you think that crimes from a race affecting not even 0.5% of a population is some sort of epidemic, you need to get out of the internet for a while.

>>38810910
>So 0.04% of the white population affect 0.26% of the black population while 1.08% of the black population affect 0.25% of white population.
pssssst, 13% of the population is black and 70% of it is white...

>>38810909
You go into any gore thread on /gif/ and you watch hundreds of brown people beheading each other and tell me they don't need to be civilized.

>>38810425
your math is absolutely retarded friend-o.

560600 Black on White victimizations out of 660003 total instances of interracial crime between blacks and whites.

Therefore blacks are the aggressors 85% of the time in interracial crimes between blacks and whites.

>>38808991
>t. Negro, who is envy of white people.

File: 1500881724938.png (10KB, 645x773px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 645x773px

>>38810941
I never thought I'd see this type of retarded thinking in this day and age. Oh well.

>>38810959
There being more white people doesn't change the percentages. Percent literally means 'per 100' and the fact of the matter is both races effect the same percentage of the other population with violence.

>>38810964
See >>38810317

You need to get out of the internet for while if you think that a race affecting 0.25 of a population is some sort of epidemic.

File: Screen-Shot-2016-12-23-at-8.10.40-PM-1280x720.png (758KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

758KB, 1280x720px

>>38810910
>leftists can't into math

>>38806470
Yes. Everyone is racist to some degree, so there are lots of racists on here.

>>38810997
see >>38810317

>everyone who disagree with me is a leftist.

>>38811018
>makes up his own stats
>UR WRONG UR WONG UR WRONG IT'S A NON-ISSUE

>>38811043
See >>38809995

My calcul are from this stat.

File: 1500594846547.png (170KB, 470x445px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 470x445px

>>3881096


And tell me who caused this. I'll wait.

>>38810993
What should we do then? Let them play in the dirt and rape babies? Get real negro.

>>38811063
>>38810961
Mb maine

>>38811055
Your calculs are wrong because you can't into math.

>>38809995
>>38810161
>>38810388
>>38810638
>>38810709
already laid it out for you bud

also you say >>38810996 "There being more white people doesn't change the percentages."

and then you say >>38810052 "You're retarded, my survey has MORE VICTIMS."

You're nothing but a retard or a talented troll, because you've really done nothing but make me angry.

File: 4625.jpg (41KB, 472x472px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 472x472px

>>38811111
quints confirms

brainlet leftists btfo

>>38811075
Better than killing millions of them just for material gain, raping their bo rders and causing conflicts between tribes and leave as though you werent responsible for anything? I dunno. It is not a good idea to put your fingers in others people 's pudd ing and not expect to fuck things up.

>>38811111
I was wrong about my survey having more victims.

But it doesn't change my math, try to do the math then.

>You're nothing but a retard or a talented troll, because you've really done nothing but make me angry.

Learn the definition of "percentage".

In your own fucking data, among 4 091 971 white victims, 13.7% of that were victims of black.

560 600 victims.

Among 955 800 black victims, 10.4% of them were victims of white. 99 403 victims


There is 223.6 million white and 38.9 millions blacks in USA.

223.6 million white, 560 600 victims=0.25% of white population.

38.9 millions black, 99 403 victims=0.26% of the black population

>>38810735
Blacks sold blacks into slavery and the Jews/Arabs transported them. Berber slave trade affected millions of more blacks thsn European slave trade, and it was whites that ended up giving them freedom. It was black nations that carried on slavery much longer than the white nations, and a decent number of the black nations still had/have slavery up until the mid 20th century.

>>38810826
Railroads and electricity are nice, as it not starving due to famine because the local populace is too dumb to use fertilizer to increase crop yields or use irrigation. Rhodesia is a perfect example of what happens when whites leave a nation in the hands of blacks, as is the general state of Africa.

>>38810317
Where in the fuck are you getting 225,000,000 non-hispanic whites from and under 40,000,000 blacks? Cite your sources.

>>38806470
If you look at humans like you look at any other species it becomes undeniable that millions of years spent in different environments created subspecies.

File: 1468108485536.jpg (21KB, 412x351px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 412x351px

>>38810996
you are ignoring the fact that whites are over 5x the population of blacks to begin with. Your finding that blacks managed to attack an equal proportion of a population OVER 5X LARGER THAN THEIR OWN does not help your case. Understand?

>>38811169
>In your own fucking data, among 4 091 971 white victims, 13.7% of that were victims of black.
13.7% were OFFENDERS, not VICTIMS you cum guzzling twinkled toed bow legged flamboyant cocksucking faggot.

You're making up your own goddamn numbers and can't even understand what the information in the chart says.

Why are these threads allowed to exist on thiw board. They are pointless. Just a bunch of loser white outcasts that society doesn't give a fuck about. Fuck off and get a real hobby you losers.

>>38811169
And you're ignoring the fact that blacks make up 13% of the population and are 27 times more likely to attack a white person than a white person is to attack a black.

>>38811239
>In your stats, among 4091971 white victims, 13.7% of that were victims of black offenders.
>560600 victims.
>Among 955800 black victims, 10.4% of them were victims of white offender. 99403 victims

Where am I wrong?


Are you retarded? see >>38810222

>>38811220
Right but There being more white people doesn't change the percentages. Percent literally means 'per 100' and the fact of the matter is both races effect the same percentage of the other population with violence.

0.25% of a population isn't sort of epidemic.

>>38811172
From the census by race.

>>38811310
and you do realize that whites have been killing non whites for centuries with death told beyond the millions?

>>38811310
You should eee >>38811338

>>38811338


>>38810388
>>38810638
>Simple calculations yields that 0.04% of the white population has attacked a black person, while 1.08% of the black population has attacked a white person.

And like the other anon said, you've managed to find out that blacks attack an equal proportion of whites despite whites outnumbering them over 5 times. You seriously don't know how to read graphs and charts.

>>38811447
>And like the other anon said, you've managed to find out that blacks attack an equal proportion of whites despite whites outnumbering them over 5 times. You seriously don't know how to read graphs and charts


So 0.04% of the white population affect 0.26% of the black population while 1.08% of the black population affect 0.25% of white population.

So yeah, white affect marginally more the black population.

There being more white people doesn't matter. Percent literally means 'per 100' and the fact of the matter is both races effect the same percentage of the other population with violence

>>38808334
>Thanks for telling me that the white farmers in south africa had it coming.

The blacks in SA are acting in their own self interest. It's our fault for not helping our own people.

File: electro-shock-therapy.jpg (115KB, 534x400px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 534x400px

>>38811484
>So 0.04% of the white population affect 0.26% of the black population while 1.08% of the black population affect 0.25% of white population.
>So yeah, white affect marginally more the black population.

Gotta leave this thread before I have an aneurism.

>>38808587
>tfw Canadian and wanted to move to Vancouver

>>38811510
But i'm right.

Black on White crimes affect 0.25% of white population while White on Black crime affect 0.26% of the black population.

File: 1501693919006.jpg (198KB, 1080x754px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1080x754px

>>38806470
Nope. After getting redpilled and hanging out on /pol/, I realize now that nonwhites are based. MAGA FELLOW PEDES.

>>38811510
0.25 is a pretty small number.

It also prove that only a fraction of black attack white.

>>38811248
Get off board, normal faggot.

Here's some more fun facts. In America, blacks have committed over 560,000 acts of violence against whites during the 2012/2013 period while whites committed approximately 100,000 acts of violence against blacks. Meaning, that out of the total number of all attacks, blacks were the perpetrators of violence 85% of the time. This, despite the fact that blacks make up only 13% of the population while whites make up approximately 63% of the population in 2013. If we adjust for population percentage, this means that a population size one fifth of the largest demographic is responsible for 85% of interracial crime between the two aforementioned groups.

Really makes you think.

>>38811617
Your source?

If you talk about this one >>38810222

Then see my math >>38810317

>>38811385
>and you do realize that whites have been killing non whites for centuries with death told beyond the millions?
Whites have killed far more of their own, though.

>>38811617
see >>38811645

and see >>38811484

>>38811385
Could you provide evidence to your claim, please?

>>38811385
We should never have stopped desu.

Everyone is racist. Everyone. If you think you aren't racist you're just lying to yourself

>ctrl+f
>"retard"
>20 results

Holy shit, can you guys try to argue like adults ? you are acting like le niggers that you hate so much.

>>38806470
Fuck you, want to know why I'm racist? Because I got mugged once by a fucking nigger who stole $60 from me. All niggers need to hang.

>>38811732
Where do you think we are?

We're nothing but an amount of trash.

>>38811747
Your fault if you're a weakass.

File: Screenshot_2017-08-02-20-57-32.png (434KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

434KB, 1440x2560px

>>38811338
Census by race in 2010.

200,000,000 whites. Mexicans are not white.

>>38811542
Your "per 100" argument is not addressing the points that were brought up in this thread nor is it statistically as significant, being that blacks, despite being a smaller percentage of the population, disproportionally attack white Americans more so than whites attack blacks. You are not correcting for population size. Blacks are 1/5 the size of the white populace. Multiply the occurrences of violence by 5 and you would get an approximate number of what an equivalently sized population of blacks and whites would like.

And what happens when you adjust the population size for blacks to be the same size as whites? You get something like 2,800,000 incidents, which is fucking ridiculous.

Any other blacks/non whites lurking here? Just curious l ol. Thhis thread is hilarious

>>38811971
Hilarious to you in what way?

>>38811971
haha yeah man. This board sucks though, I found one that is way better for folks like us.
http://www.nairaland.com/

>>38811935
My mistake. Doesn't really change the percent though.

>Your "per 100" argument is not addressing the points that were brought up in this thread nor is it statistically as significant, being that blacks, despite being a smaller percentage of the population, disproportionally attack white Americans more so than whites attack blacks

And my point was that both races effect the same percentage of the other population with violence

>>38812139
If I offer you 5% of my hundred dollars for 1% of your million dollars, do you think that's a good deal? Per cent means "per 100".

File: 1496360798265.jpg (38KB, 511x511px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 511x511px

>>38812057
that ypu guys have nothing to do besides bable on about than some stupid charts and argue about trivial things. Who the hell willingly does this shit? You have to be in a shit place in life to do so. Possibly the most pointless thing you can

do. Watching grass grow would be better use of your time.

I mean, come on dude. Posting here won't change the world. It just gives birth to useless bickering between anons. Shit like this belongs in /pol/ and it's sad to see the comfiness of /r9k/ become engulfed in political bullshit.

>>38812266
If you think that a race affecting 0.25% of a population is some sort of epidemic, you need to get out of the internet for a while.

>>38812275
Excuse my grammar mistakes. Ennglish is my 3rd language.

>>38812275
>some stupid charts and argue about trivial things
That's the thing though you piece of shit, they're not stupid charts and they're not trivial things. They're real world problems.

>>38812288
You're just moving the goalposts.

fuck blumpft and fvck yt pipol

>>38812296
and what's the point of posting them? Are you trying to raise awareness or something? It doesn't work because the majority of pe ople on this board don't give a shit.

>>38812296
>They're real world problems
Why talking about it in /r9k/?

What will you achieve here?

>>38812315
>You're just moving the goalposts.

Nope, my point if that black crimes only affect a 0.25% of the white population.

>>38812288
Ebola infected a much lower proportion of west africans and was considered an epidemic.

>>38812275
my most honest /thread

>>38812380
What does it even matter? Just ignore the thread if you don't like it. That simple.

>>38812387
>Nope, my point if that black crimes only affect a 0.25% of the white population.
0.25% of 230 million people is a more than 0.25% of 38 million people, right?

File: 1501701606903.png (12KB, 742x721px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 742x721px

only white people can be victims of racism, minorities are sacred cattle.

>>38812296
>They're real world problems
Black on white homicide effect on white population is close to 0%.

30935,1 white american killed themselves and affect 0.02

>>38812451
Why do you ignore suicide?

Suicide kill more white than blacks did.

File: 2c6cfafc488ad96c43d082179b383759.jpg (65KB, 736x619px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 736x619px

We need to petition to keep threads off of /r9k/

this is >>>/pol/ get out before someone BBC posts

>>38812501
Move those goalposts over just a little bit more.

>>38812521
This thread is pointless. There was no goal post to begin with.

>>38811935
And here is a practical example of why your "blacks are affected more so than whites by violence" is tripe. First, let's correct your math.(apologies for the R*ddit spacing).

Whites are 200,000,000 in number, roughly speaking. Blacks are 39,000,000 in number, roughly speaking. These stats are based off of the 2010 census, which is closer to the 2012-2013 doj stats than the 2015 data. If 200,000,000 Americans were subject to 560,000 black incidents of violence, that means that .28% of the white population was affected.

If there were 100,000 incidents of white on black violence with 39,000,000 blacks, that means that .256% of the black population was subject to white on black crime. So, already, your crime stats about blacks being more affected than whites is fallacious on its face. Moving on to the the next topic.

If a population of 1000 people and a population of 100 people (let's say group a and group b respectively) were to live in the same city, and 5 individuals of each group were murdered by 1 individual each from the other group, how would these stats look?

Well, group a would obviously be less effected, as only .5% of the population was lost. Group b would obviously be more affected, as they lost 5% of the population. However, if we were to correct for population size, and proportionally size group a and their victims against group b abd their murders, then the group b murderer rate would look something like 50 murderers for every 1000 individuals of group b, compared to just 5 murderers for every 1000 of group a.

Do you see how this is significant?

>>38812554
Funny how you're getting more and more involved in such a pointless thread huh?

File: 1475442990413.png (573KB, 1106x1012px) Image search: [Google]

573KB, 1106x1012px

>1/4 Native American
>It definitely shows (darker skin, brown hair, brown eyes, nose, etc.)
>Every single white person that I say I'm not white to gets upset and claims that I am
>"How am I white if I'm tan even when I don't go outside for months, and then when I do I get at darker and don't burn and have brown hair and eyes?"
>Y-you grew up with white family and wear Vineyard Vines and Sperrys!
"And..?"
>You're white! Quit saying you aren't!
>mfw

>>38812521
This is why I said marginally, but thanks for correcting me.

Black crimes affect 0.28% of the white population.

White crimes affect 0.26 % of the black population.

So my point stand still, even if black marginally affect more the white population, 0.28 is still a very poor number.

Before the 2016 elections I never really gave any thought to race or political ideology but now I actually hate niggers and internet commies.

>>38812650
0.25% of 230 million people is a more than 0.25% of 38 million people, right?

>>38812622
Go drink some listerine you prairie nigger

>>38812663
Per 100 mean per 100.

Black crimes only affect 0.28% of the white population,

And in your own data, only 1% of black commit crimes toward white.

File: 1501141114634-r9k.jpg (65KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 600x600px

>>38812698
>prairie nigger
This is a good thread.

>>38812514
sure, as long as we ban all homosexual, tranny, cuckold, "fembot" and normalcancer threads first.

>>38812730
fuck off of this board normie.

>>38812730
homo boards are okay
but all of those other ones should stick to >>>/lgbt/

>>38812711
That's not how stats are disseminated. It's always per 100k of group x. We've been explaining this to you in a number of different ways and you're still not getting it.

>>38812730
>>38812764
meant threads, but a strictly LGB thread would be okay considering /lgbt/ was overrun by everything past the b, which is why homos sometimes leak into /r9k/

File: nigga.png (225KB, 579x329px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 579x329px

>>38812711
>Black crimes only affect 0.28% of the white population
624400 white people

>And in your own data, only 1% of black commit crimes toward white
380000 black people

380,000 black people affect 624,400 white people.

>>38812771
No no, I am perfecly aware of what you're doing

>BLACK WILL.END THE WHITE RACE!!!!!

Whites are very very poorly affected by black crimes, in fact, suicide, cars accident, is worst for whites.

>>38812803
>in fact, suicide, cars accident, is worst for whites.
Moving the goalposts.

>>38812794
I suggest you to read the thread again.

>>38812812
>Moving the goalposts.

Of what, my number are not wrong, I said that even if black marginally affect more the white population than the reverse, 0.28 is still a very poor number.

So yeah, be afraid of 1.44% among 98,56% of blacks

File: 1500008589216-r9k.jpg (35KB, 640x561px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 640x561px

>>38812803
Two dindus don't make a cando, anon. As you say, America has enough issues already. Better to remove problematic elements as they come along. Small problems first, as they say.

>>38812946
Then try to fight against suicide and cars accident, it's deadly more dangerous to white than blacks.

File: 1497252261782.png (148KB, 1045x776px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1045x776px

>>38812812
I hate you /pol/tard so God Damm Much!

File: maybe-adolf-was-right.jpg (66KB, 445x445px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 445x445px

>>38810174

Part of me loves these stories. The other part hates it. The collapse is coming. The west will be no different from the east if this shit keeps up. Why are libtards submitting to this? When do we say enough is enough and grow a pair?

>>38812934
>So yeah, be afraid of 1.44% among 98,56% of blacks
And be very very afraid of the 0.04% of whites who attack blacks!

#BLM

FUCK OFF CRAKA

>>38812984
I wish we could, but a lot of welfare and governmental funding due to red tape seems to be tied up to a certain overweight, uneducated, and statistically more violent series of ethnic groups.

>>38813048
>everyone who disagree with is a leftist.
>And be very very afraid of the 0.04% of whites who attack blacks!

If white must be afraid of 1.44% of blacks, so black can be afraid of 0.04% of white since they both affect each other population in marginally close amount of violence.

If 0.28% being victims is something to be afraid of for you, then blacks have the right to be afraid of 0.26% of their population being victims

>>38809826
>Because the FBI is so unbiased! That's why they introduced crack into black neighborhoods!

>>38813053
Then you will have to get rid of 40% of a population since both latinos and black cost a lot for welfare programs.

>>38813122
>If white must be afraid of 1.44% of blacks, so black can be afraid of 0.04% of white since they both affect each other population in marginally close amount of violence.
Except you and I know there is a narrative of the "poor black" and the "racist whiteys" when in fact it's a disingenuous argument, the same type of argument poorly spilling from your fingertips.

It's really not even an argument, it's a WHO CARES JUST IGNORE IT kind of argument. The non-argument.

>>38813139
>there is foul play at work but don't ask me to prove it

>>38813156
>Except you and I know there is a narrative of the "poor black" and the "racist whiteys" when in fact it's a disingenuous argument, the same type of argument poorly spilling from your fingertips.

I don't really care about BLM and shit.

I'm just saying that you overreact for something which affect very very very very poorly a population.

>It's really not even an argument, it's a WHO CARES JUST IGNORE IT kind of argument. The non-argument.

Why do you ignore suicide and cars accident then?

>>38813183
>I'm just saying that you overreact for something which affect very very very very poorly a population.
Yeah and we're just proving to you if blacks were the same percentage of whites there would be a tremendous amount more violent crime.

The DJS statistics you were raving about actually tells you that blacks are more likely to commit violent crimes, 27 times more likely. Again, despite being 13% of the population.

>Why do you ignore suicide and cars accident then?
And that's just again, moving the goalposts. It's been fun but I don't see the point in trolling this hard.

>>38813156
The government has been trying to fuck over black people for years, but all of a sudden all the racist white people just give up randomly for no reason?

>>38813220
> if blacks were the same percentage of whites there would be a tremendous amount more violent crime

If they were all hoodlums, sure. But not all black people are hoodlums. I mean people here lump African sup with African Americans all the time, but they don't realize Africans fucking HATE African Americans for the same reason white people do.

>>38813220
>Yeah and we're just proving to you if blacks were the same percentage of whites there would be a tremendous amount more violent crime.
>Let's make a prediction about something which will have of course the exact same situation.

Dumb.

>The DJS statistics you were raving about actually tells you that blacks are more likely to commit violent crimes, 27 times more likely. Again, despite being 13% of the population.

Your 27 times mean shit if you compare 560600 blacks and 99403 white.

Because 1.44% of black commit crime toward white, 0.04 of white commit crime toward white.

In any case, it only affect 0.28 of the white population.

In fact, let's use your method.

You have 7579.46 % more chance to kill yourself than getting killed by a black guy/

>>38813294
Statistics aren't actual science to begin with.


I mean apparently black on black crime is like 96%. But that'd mean every time a black person crossed paths there would be bloodshed.

>>38813328
They try to manipulate number to make it scary.

Only 1.58% of black population commit violence toward blacks.

>>38809801
That's fair anon.

File: 1500182268261-r9k.gif (443KB, 400x296px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 400x296px

>>38813141
I mean, if you insist.

>>38814609
There are more white people on welfare, good luck.

I'm in a mixed bag but a very small minority... I actually WANT to be a racist but I probably am not...
Let me clarify I don't care if you are yellow or brown or black or red or white, but I do believe some in differences between races because people adapted to different environments obviously. But who I really hate are jews.. But are jews a race? Most normies think of jews as a religion and not a race but I've heard it straight from actual jews mouths that they believe themselves a separate race from non jews and don't consider themselves white although many jews appear to be white, no wonder people call them shapeshifters

File: MedicaidAllHouseholds.jpg (98KB, 600x525px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 600x525px

>>38814674
>more whites use welfare
That's not entirely accurate.

>>38806470
1488
GAS THE KIKES RACE WAR NOW
FUCK YOU NIGGER

>>38814735
Jews are a race so yes you are a racist since you hate all of them.

Africa is going to boom in population when they kinda stabilize themselves. That's a big problem, seeing how unneducated and animalistic they're, it will bring big harm to the world and to themselves.

There's one simple solution to this problem, but it is kinda immoral: offer black people 20.000 dollars if they agree to get sterilized. We all know that the negro rarely thinks in advance, and the young rapper wannabe ones would do it FOR SURE, without thinking about the future. They would probably buy a Cadillac with golden wheels for da street cred bro

Actually, writing this, it's only immoral because I believe that most of the blacks (especially fucking africans) don't think much into the future and make bad decisions. If you believe we are all equal, than it's their full choice to get sterilized, and not immoral at all.

>>38814952
It's kind of complicated but it's not even a hate to be honest because if I see a random jew on the street I don't immediately hate them because they personally didn't do anything to me and that is not worth my aggression or attention really. But knowing that someone is a jew or suspecting (and confirming) someone's ties to jewry will make me resent them and while there are a lot of attractive jewish women I would never breed with one because they are not white by their own volition and that would literally be the easiest way to have a jewish progeny by mating with jewess you see

>>38806470
everyone is racist. Everyone is ethnocentric. This is why multiculturalism will never work.

>>38815333
>being this fatalistic
>you must be 18 years or older to post on this board

File: 1501733022046.gif (2MB, 216x150px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 216x150px

>>38806738
>censoring profanity on an anonymous image board
At least try and hide that you are a tourist, faggot.

>>38809245
and they're only low because white people aren't having kids like they used to/fucking killing themseleves before they have kids

>>but muh white genocide!

>>38813238
in their universe, that neverhappened, and if it did it was a good thing

>>38813293
>Africans fucking HATE African Americans for the same reason white people do.

uh no

Africans hate being lumped in with African Americans because of nationalism

One tends to think of themselves as Gambian, or Malian, or Liberian - not 'African'.

African-American just refers to Black Americans - not a specific country with a whole history attached

It's like if a Brit moved to texas and you told them they couldn't be british anymore because they're texans now and you have to own 902 guns concealed carried in your anus

>>38810174
>>how can anyone morally defend not being a racist in 2017??

because all of the bastards in these articles could be white and also still be describing Muslims

>>38810872
because they're afraid of having to actually compete on a level playing field

>>38815051
You just understand that there is a difference between the races. You are more like a race realist than a racist, which is better in my opinion.