Would you have sex with a transgender person?

>>35185661

no. I'm a gaybot and having a partner with a vagina is a deal breaker.

File: 1484162489330.jpg (97KB, 623x829px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 623x829px

No.

Neo-vaginas:
>Look unnatural
>No natural lubrication
>Only 3 inches deep
>Fill with smegma that needs to be douched out
>Need electrolysis to stop ballsack hair from growing inside them

File: 14183875_736078926530005_7604271895427582817_n.jpg (61KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 540x960px

Straightbots:

If you had to have sex with either a Pussyguy or a Dickgirl on pain of death, which would you pick?

>>35185721
what if they got phalloplasty

No. I like feminine females, not feminine males.

File: geebill4.jpg (53KB, 441x457px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 441x457px

>>35185880

A fake weiner? I don't think so. They look........strange

>>35185661
trans man yeah because I'm a faggot, trans woman no, they're too fucking feminine for me

I would gladly fuck a tomboy dyke that thinks she's a guy, as long as she doesn't have a flesh dildo replacing her vagina.

I'm a male to female transsexual and I would have sex with another MtF or a FtM, as long as they did not have any kind of bottom surgery.

File: 1477289904901.jpg (1MB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1600px

>>35185661
Fucking gross ass faggots
My dick is fine.
Anyone who cuts it off to slapjob it into a jokehole is mentally ill.
Im just as much a woman with than without.
Without you're a monster.

>>35186042

So much mayonnaise on the bottom bun......

>>35185743
These are the result of older techniques. Newer techniques produce lubrication and are self-cleaning. They're also 6-7+ inches deep depending on technique and material available. And AFAIK they now look almost entirely like natal vaginas; only gynecologists are able to tell otherwise.

trans here

i would only fuck another trans, no questions

would fuck a trap
this weird menwithvagina shit however? nah

>>35186066
yep that's just the way I like it

File: 1336890229634.jpg (205KB, 767x940px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 767x940px

>>35185661
oh god that's disgusting holy shit

>>35185661
I would have sex with a trans girl as long as they didn't have SRS. Neo-vaginas are horrific and it's not worth it with current technology.

>>35186167

I'm not the guy you replied to but I still don't believe you at all.

Show just one credible source and I might reconsider.

File: 1392734258257.jpg (29KB, 400x549px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 400x549px

>>35186226
lol fag.

Traps are only put upon this earth by our lord to provide straight men with proper porn.

With a dick, definitely not, I find cocks pretty unappealing and would rather only have my own set of balls and cock.

Post-op I don't know, it will depend of the person and circumstances but I'm ptetty sure to refuse if I get the information that my partner is actually a dude. But then again, if the tranny is passable and cute and doesn't disclose that information can you really say no?

https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/styles/story_medium/public/thumbnails/image/2017/02/26/15/mack-beggs.jpg no I wouldn't

Do surgically made vaginas cum like that or is that webm just a weird something happening (and if so, wtf is it) I'm genuinely curious I have no clue what I'm looking at.
In regards to the OP's question I would not have sex with a guy with a vag. A 100% passable girl with a dick I'd let fuck me in a second.

No. I'd only sleep with someone I love, and I could never love someone so deluded to the concept of gender.

She's doing steroids and other treatments to become male, girls don't think that's fair, fucked up situation. Opponent forfeited state championship to her

>>35186565
They can. Some neovaginas can get pretty wet, via the cowper's gland (basically the equivalent of what makes biofemales wet) which is kept in since removing it is pointless and invasive. It's not always as active though, it's kind of a crapshoot

>>35186565
also
>I'd let fuck me
Couldn't you just do anal with you doing the fucking? Most transgirls would probably prefer that

>>35186042
>>35186066
Too much meat too. It's so bad for you.

>>35185661
At this point after being exposed to traps here since 2009 i would fuck a non passable man even if they were under 30 with a shaved ass and wouldnt say shit about it ever.
Havent fucked a girl since july.. Really thinking about trying boipucci lately.. Just dont know where to get it.

>>35186963
Pre-op MtF have too much meat too :( It's so bad for them.

File: 1282291713431.jpg (49KB, 910x685px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 910x685px

>>35187086
Holy fuck half a year without any sex?!?!?! Loser LMFAOOOOOOO

>>35187105
Not if their meat is feminine.

>transgender
>person
Oh, OP.

absolutely not
we can barely fix receding hairlines. no fucking way I'm going anywhere near a neo-vag

>>35187124
I know.. At least im in good company here.

>>35187183
Just have good genetics cunt.

>>35186565
i think that's a dude, who was born a chick

Only if pre-op.

Traps like to jab at your sexuality when you prefer preop, I don't think they understand that no sane man would want to go near a fake vagina.

Personally extreme body modification is a turnoff even if its just ass and tits on a real girl.

>>35185814
The painful death.

>>35187244
no that was semen that came out of his vagina

File: 1483636954763.jpg (33KB, 604x453px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 604x453px

>>35187302
what were you trying to type here? lol

>>35185661
no id rather die.
I would rather have my penis cut down the shaft into 8 strips so it looked like an extruded asterisk than fuck a tranny.

>>35187356
it's some kind of bot(?) that's been spamming this thread with tl;drs

>>35187381
lmfao what are you gay or something?

>>35185661
>person
Nope

>>35186270
>ignores intersex people
The occasional defect doesn't mean anything.

>>35187723

A good troll is art but this copy-paste troll tries too hard.

D-

>>35186916
Okay thanks for the info, anon
>>35186960
I am a female so that wouldn't work unless strap ons were involved. Which is fine too.

Can't call yourself a robot if you wouldn't fuck a transgender person

>>35185814
Dickgirl obviously

File: tranny couple.jpg (495KB, 708x912px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 708x912px

>>35185661

ask your target audience >>>/lgbt/

>>35185661
no
>>35185814
preferably neither, depends on the options presented to me

for what its worth i would prefer pre-op to post. The idea of fucking an open would is way more disgusting than a dickgirl.

>>35185661
No.

By the way, friends, did you know that there are trans who object to the use of the words transman/transwoman? It's true. They prefer trans man/trans woman, because much in the same way "fat man" means "a man who is fat", "trans man" means "a man who is trans", whereas "transman" makes it sound like something other than man. If they're not mentally ill, they're certainly pedantic.

>>35188868
>ywn fuck Michelle's fat ass

>>35185661
What the fuck?

Is that a biological female that filled her/his cunt with semen, or is that a biological male who had lazy srs?