Why do people lately believe that mods stage public bans?

>>1567344, >>1567575, >>>/v/389848671, >>>/v/389848747, >>>/v/389848813, >>>/v/389848935, >>>/v/389849019

File: 1502274026890.gif (2MB, 460x259px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 460x259px

Why do newfags lately believe that mods don't pull pranks?

Someone wants to create a fuss, feed in seeds of doubt without any facts to back it up. Makes it easier to push the notion that reports don't do anything and make it easier for third parties who want to push some activist agenda to get away with it.

Essentially a certain group wants to damage a tool the mods use to seem like they're on top of things and in control.

Acting cynical all the time makes you hot shit.

>>1567585
Because even worse threads will stay up until bump limit, like massive threads that are 75% shitposting of a series. The threads/posts that get publicly banned look like textbook examples of what should be banned, not too obvious, but just crappy and apparent enough to the majority to serve as a good example of what to not post.

>>1567585