Anarcho-Monarchist General

>>132437193
that's ourflag? never knew light blue was for royalty

also, how do you get distributism without government coercion?

File: 1479630216954.jpg (2MB, 1000x1613px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1000x1613px

If hierarchy is best why are you against the enforcement of hierarchy, which is a necessary essence of it?

>>132438559
This. There is no such thing as anarcho monarchy.

Just monarchy

You mean the "our figurehead is a joke to get other nations to recognise our state" system? Only a very disrespected or very libertarian monarch could lead an anarcho-monarchist state, otherwise they'd simply use their power.

>>132438275
>never knew light blue was for royalty
I don't believe it is. I believe that was purple, but it seems that purple is taken by "Anarcho-Feminism" or something.

Also to the OP, what the hell is up with attaching Anarcho- to a bunch of things lately? There doesn't seem to be consistency.

Anarcho-Capitalism is Anarchy + an economic system, and Anarcho-Monarchy is Anarchy + a political governing system.

How do all these "Anarcho-'s" fit together consistently?

>>132439635
>>132438700
>>132438559
>>132438661

>purple is taken by "Anarcho-Feminism"
disgusting
>>132439635
anarcho-monarchism would be something like if Japan abolished parliament but didn't give the emperor more power or something, methinks

he'd be the emperor of the japanese (the nation), so no government needed

just performing symbolic and spiritual functions and representing his people abroad (we need this in the current world order)

and the royal house could be a private service too, paid for by the emperor's businesses and working for the japanese that wanted it voluntarily

the king o lietchenstein has some sketches on how a scheme like this might work, since he's kind of ancap too

his book (the state in the third millenium by hans adams II) explains this well

the distributism part tho, I don't see how that fits

>>132441243
Yes, the Japanese emperor was at one stage a anarcho-monarchist, exactly the disrespected (unless it was about art) monarch, but all the previous government services were replaced in ways more similar to anarcho-capitalism.

>>132441495
the daimyos were physical removers?

>>132441644
gg m80

>>132441755
Not ideologically, but they basically hired their security with commodities and cash. It was more like the emperor saying fuck the country, let me sit home and do art, which meant everything stopped until it was replaced with something else.

Japan was definitely a functional anarchical society at one stage though, it wrecked havoc on the poor but if the only way to survive is to be a really, really clever merchant then you could imagine who would survive till today amongst the Japanese.

This is so fucking dumb

>let's just have a king just b'cuz lol XD
>but wait! Let's not give him ANY power

Retards like this are entry-level into politics

File: 1498142574128.png (133KB, 1000x1000px)

133KB, 1000x1000px

>>132437193
Eh, better than democracy, so to say

>>132437193
>anarcho monarchist
So... fuedalist?
Really what's the difference

>>132443012
that the king doesn't own lords which own knights which own serfs, it's not hard

>>132437193
How about stop getting your political positions from dead gay Brits who wrote about elves and dragons?

>>132442637
this

>>132437193
An-archy
>against hierarchy

Mon-archy
>One leader at top of hierarchy

are you fucking retarded

Maybe we should just turn this thread into a "Monarchism" thread, and leave the "Anarcho-" out of it.

Nothing wrong with Monarchy.

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-07-05 06:37:30 Post No.132446398
[Report]

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-07-05 06:37:30 Post No.132446398 [Report]

This thread was moved to >>>/bant/1308341