Anarcho-Monarchist General

>>1308341
that's ourflag? never knew light blue was for royalty

also, how do you get distributism without government coercion?

File: 1479630216954.jpg (2MB, 1000x1613px)

2MB, 1000x1613px

If hierarchy is best why are you against the enforcement of hierarchy, which is a necessary essence of it?

>>1308343
This. There is no such thing as anarcho monarchy.

Just monarchy

You mean the "our figurehead is a joke to get other nations to recognise our state" system? Only a very disrespected or very libertarian monarch could lead an anarcho-monarchist state, otherwise they'd simply use their power.

>>1308342
>never knew light blue was for royalty
I don't believe it is. I believe that was purple, but it seems that purple is taken by "Anarcho-Feminism" or something.

Also to the OP, what the hell is up with attaching Anarcho- to a bunch of things lately? There doesn't seem to be consistency.

Anarcho-Capitalism is Anarchy + an economic system, and Anarcho-Monarchy is Anarchy + a political governing system.

How do all these "Anarcho-'s" fit together consistently?

>>1308346
>>1308345
>>1308343
>>1308344

>purple is taken by "Anarcho-Feminism"
disgusting
>>1308346
anarcho-monarchism would be something like if Japan abolished parliament but didn't give the emperor more power or something, methinks

he'd be the emperor of the japanese (the nation), so no government needed

just performing symbolic and spiritual functions and representing his people abroad (we need this in the current world order)

and the royal house could be a private service too, paid for by the emperor's businesses and working for the japanese that wanted it voluntarily

the king o lietchenstein has some sketches on how a scheme like this might work, since he's kind of ancap too

his book (the state in the third millenium by hans adams II) explains this well

the distributism part tho, I don't see how that fits

>>1308347
Yes, the Japanese emperor was at one stage a anarcho-monarchist, exactly the disrespected (unless it was about art) monarch, but all the previous government services were replaced in ways more similar to anarcho-capitalism.

>>1308348
the daimyos were physical removers?

>>1308349
gg m80

>>1308350
Not ideologically, but they basically hired their security with commodities and cash. It was more like the emperor saying fuck the country, let me sit home and do art, which meant everything stopped until it was replaced with something else.

Japan was definitely a functional anarchical society at one stage though, it wrecked havoc on the poor but if the only way to survive is to be a really, really clever merchant then you could imagine who would survive till today amongst the Japanese.

This is so fucking dumb

>let's just have a king just b'cuz lol XD
>but wait! Let's not give him ANY power

Retards like this are entry-level into politics

File: 1498142574128.png (133KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1000x1000px

>>1308341
Eh, better than democracy, so to say

>>1308341
>anarcho monarchist
So... fuedalist?
Really what's the difference

>>1308355
that the king doesn't own lords which own knights which own serfs, it's not hard

>>1308341
How about stop getting your political positions from dead gay Brits who wrote about elves and dragons?

>>1308353
this

>>1308341
An-archy
>against hierarchy

Mon-archy
>One leader at top of hierarchy

are you fucking retarded

Maybe we should just turn this thread into a "Monarchism" thread, and leave the "Anarcho-" out of it.

Nothing wrong with Monarchy.

Fucking gaaaay.

This thread was 100% entirely /pol/.

Why did the fucking kikes move a political discussion into /bant/ What the fuck?

>>1308341
>literally a pure political thread
>gets loved here
>while trapgeneral stays on pol
Mods are actively working towards making pol shitty.

This thread is now a fuck the mods thread!

this thread wwas 100% pol and a serious discussion

whoever moved it needs to go khs

>>1308375
>>1308383

this, wtf?

>>1308352
no wonder they're such merchants
>>1308357
tolkien was fucking based, kys

File: thread_is_bakas.jpg (159KB, 429x600px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 429x600px

>>1308341
Welcome to /bant/, baka.

Anarcho-Monarchism may be the ideal political system, but it is entirely impossible to uphold long term. The entire idea requires the monarch's power to be limited by another entity. This entity cannot be the people, as that would be no different than democracy. This means that the monarch must be kept in line by either economic, or military elites. In either case, as soon as a majority of the elites need the monarch to do things that he cannot legally do, they will either look the other way when he does them, change the rules, or get rid of him. In this case, it's not much different than democracy, really.

The system of government a nation has matters very little. Only the character of those with power matters. If those with power have good character, most problems will sort themselves out. If they have bad character, the country will be a fiasco. Same goes with economic systems, as they're just a different way of distributing power.

The best political system cannot be one where tons of power is put into few hands, as it becomes tyrannical, nor is it one where power is in too many hands, because power is fluid and nobody will be strong enough to take on someone making a sudden power grab.

>planning a monarchy-republic type micronation
>lost in thought this whole year
>see this thread
Hi I'm future king how r u doing anons dond be a gommie :::---DD

>>1309982
The monarchy must only be a pro vider giving people what they want and letting individual cities have the right to seccede.

Hans Adams explains it very well in his book

edgy teen thread

>>1308374
because anarchy + any form of control is contradictory is fucking stupid and makes no sense. you're worse than the kekistan niggers.

>>1310322
>control
Not mentioned anywhere and extremely subjective

The stupid cunts believe they can force shit like feminism or socialism or communism or syndicalism on others and this isn't "control" because everyone is supposed to just smile and accept it

Only forms of anarchism that make sense are anarcho-capitalism and anarcho-monarchy (and learn2differentiate nation and state)

>>1310356
you cant have a group that anarchist but organized. its a coin that doesnt land flat. what is the end game? city states everywhere? or maybe ethno-states?

Who /enlightened absolutism/ here?