Archived threads in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect - 2293. page

>>137186804
I hope the (((journalist))) got culturally enriched.

>>137186804
hopefully shes dead, why are you posting this?

>>137187629

You MotherFucker. Why are you hoping this?

>>137186788
>Argentina is blanco

>>137186788
police manage mentally ill people routinely

>>137186788
This is basically /pol/, jobless/friendless losers ranting about how much their race is marginalized/abused while the actual responsible/competent adults have to keep order and clean up after their shit

How do we hit them where it hurts pol?

those fucking kikes have goon too far, they're misinforming the public

File: 1502825444297.jpg (39KB, 325x476px)

39KB, 325x476px

Whatever the case may be, the Bible offers a cure for both the sick and the sinner. The cure is in God and HIS Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, so that those who believe in Christ will be healed of their infirmities and delivered from their sins.

Eugenics endorses:

a. Forced sterilizations of defective people (between 1934-1939, 350,000 defective people were sterilized).

b. Killing the hospitalized (In 1934, Adolf Hitler’s national euthanasia programme was aimed to free up 800,000 beds for war causalities).

c. Promoting abortion to kill defective children (Margaret Sanger, a proponent of eugenics and a founder of “Planned Parenthood,” is probably America’s largest cause for abortion at almost a million abortions per year).1

d. Infanticide on defective children i.e. Stephen Hawking should have been killed.

e. Killing people with diseases or other abnormal medical conditions (e.g. those who are disease prone e.g. Ludwig Van Beethoven, and the one billion obese people should be killed).

File: 1502825470609.jpg (86KB, 1280x720px)

86KB, 1280x720px

One need not be an astrophysicist to affirm the evil of killing. Similarly, any average human being can understand the similarity between forced sterilizations and rape – both violate a person’s sanctity, and hence are evil.

If this be the case, why are we discussing eugenics? Shouldn’t eugenics have been eliminated from our dictionary?

Whether we like it or not, eugenics raises its ugly hood under the guise of scientific advancement. Thus eugenicists posit cleansing of the society of its innate defects through eugenic sterilization, which is achieved by the alteration of the genetic basis of societal defects such as poverty and criminality.

Eugenics manifests in various guises. If you wonder whether forced or illegal sterilizations happen today, then prepare to be shocked. 150 female inmates were illegally sterilized in California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation between 2006-2010.2 At least 8 women died after undergoing government sponsored sterilization procedures in India, which was conducted to curtail overpopulation. These women were paid a measly $23 to have the surgery.3

File: 1502825513946.jpg (67KB, 650x403px)

67KB, 650x403px

The purpose of this short essay is to induce a Christian response to eugenics. I have offered my response to eugenics and you can formulate yours. Christians should either endorse or oppose eugenics, there is no middle ground. Having said this, eugenics has infiltrated into Christianity, for quite a few christian leaders support eugenics.

What does the Bible have to say about eugenics? In other words, would Christ have supported eugenics? No, not by any stretch of imagination.

The Bible does not warrant its believers to either kill or violate anyone’s sanctity. Historic Christianity is all about loving, healing and saving people who believe in Christ.

The Bible reveals a sovereign God who creates and determines the length of man’s life. As a sovereign creator, God alone has the power to take life off this earth. This is an entailment of God’s sovereignty.

But man is neither sovereign nor can he create life. Therefore, man, through the science of eugenics, cannot usurp God to determine who lives and who not. Nothing, not even science, provides man the authority to unjustly eliminate life.

The Bible does not discriminate people (cf. Matthew 22: 39; Galatians 3: 28), but eugenics judges and discriminates people based on their social fitness. Eugenics promotes the fit and eliminates the unfit. Life that God creates is precious in HIS sight (1 Peter 2: 4) and God is impartial (2 Chronicles 19: 7) to both the fit and the unfit.

>>138299744
Really makes you think...

>>138299744
looks accurate but they should check with snopes first

mmH

File: Captain_Picard_Chair.jpg (140KB, 343x283px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 343x283px

>>137186735
"PeePee PooPoo"
Check these digits and make it so

File: IMG_7193.jpg (35KB, 350x465px)

35KB, 350x465px

Here you go anon

File: molotov vote.jpg (254KB, 1024x689px)

254KB, 1024x689px

>>138300053
No

>>138300053
I couldn't, but I wouldn't.

current circumstances.. like what?

Not all nazis have Mustangs.

>>138299723
the most liberal country in the world, per capita.

but you all still get riled up by media companies and spin doctor think tanks to hate each other for shit that no one has any right to fucking care about.

America is in dire straights because of one thing...

americans.

Hold hands fighting or hold hands starving...your country treats you all like niggers.

>>138299723
>Preserves the union.

>>138299723
>didn't want to.

>>137186541
They're far more volatile and emotional. They lack the mental maturity of males.

>>137186541

>Someone told me that it isn't true in China.

Seems legit.

>>137186541
>isn't true in china
>country literally has a 80/20 male/female split

Feels good man!