/fgt/

Post film photography youtubers

File: 9E050BCA-8243-4BC1-AFF7-D5BB2B0DEBEE.jpg (2MB, 1242x1641px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1242x1641px

Just scanned in my first roll of Velvia, will post a few. Feedback appreciated.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	216 dpi
Vertical Resolution	216 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1242
Image Height	1641

File: 99491779-8D4D-436B-86C7-6AB64F27F9B4.jpg (3MB, 1974x1242px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1974x1242px

>>3135558
Never shot positives before and damn they’re satisfying to look at.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	216 dpi
Vertical Resolution	216 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1974
Image Height	1242

File: 659B556C-61FA-40BC-9714-DBEFE4F28AD5.jpg (4MB, 2110x1242px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2110x1242px

>>3135559
Really enjoying the look of Velvia, though due to the low DR I had a few overexposed skies. Any tips on how to reduce this? UV filter?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	216 dpi
Vertical Resolution	216 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2110
Image Height	1242

File: 71C35CF8-C4BF-4B67-8CF5-994BDD5DBCC5.jpg (3MB, 2208x1234px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2208x1234px

>>3135560

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	216 dpi
Vertical Resolution	216 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2208
Image Height	1234

>>3135557
>Ben Horne (mostly 8x10 Velvia 50)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHIBbaSZcGg&t=911s

>>3135558
Love that.

I'm currently scanning my family's old negatives. How do you guys store your files? I'm currently scanning at 4800 dpi and storing them as TIFFs (about 80 Mb a pop) and then I use LR to compress them down to 40 Mb losslessly (since the Epson scanning software doesn't do ZIP compression). Probably a bit overkill given the quality of most of the shots, but my NAS have enough storage... Renting off site storage for all of it looks expensive though...

File: IMG_2340.jpg (94KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 640x480px

Hav I got the fungen?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone SE
Camera Software	10.3.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:19 12:34:53
Exposure Time	1/148 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	25
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	6.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3135566
I think that's "schneideritis"

>>3135560
>UV filter?
Really? Are you trolling me or do you not see where the over/exposed/ skies are coming from?

Think about it for a second.

>>3135560
>Any tips on how to reduce this?
Graduated ND filters.

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2050601.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xkood+graduated+filter.TRS0&_nkw=kood+graduated+filter&_sacat=0

KOOD makes filters for both Lee and Cokin holders. Decent quality for the price.

>>3135570
>>3135560
>>3135559
For scenes like this, you'd want the "soft edge" ones. For scenes with a straight horizon, you want "hard edge".

File: 1137-9348.jpg (769KB, 932x1400px) Image search: [Google]

769KB, 932x1400px

This happened.

>mfw almost had to use a ND filter to shoot 320 tri-x out there at f/45

I did 5 frames out there and there were two other guys shooting LF, saw some dude with a 500C/M and some 135 too.

>inb4 you'll never post them

September ill be in town and should be able to get them done, if not I can mail them into Flair and pick them up when I take hometime again

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON Df
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	800
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:19 12:51:07
Exposure Time	1/3200 sec
F-Number	f/13.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	320
Lens Aperture	f/13.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	24.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-19 at 18.54.00.png (4MB, 1892x1064px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1892x1064px

>>3135571
>>3135570
Cheers, I have used graduated NDs in the past but none were very good - I think I need a Cokin one but that'll add bulk. Would a UV filter do anything if it's just the kind of thing I keep on the front of my lens?

Seems to be fine on a clear day like pic related, but any light reflected through clouds looks like ass.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-19 at 18.54.46.png (3MB, 1896x940px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1896x940px

>>3135576
Last for now.

>>3135567
Can we get a second opinion from the counsel?

Quick google says schneideritis is purely cosmetic as long as it isn't extreme. With extreme cases simply reducing the overall contrast.

The thing is I purchased the exact same lens in great condition, then i found pic related a few months later in an old camera bag. So if I can, I'd like to sell one of the two if ugly one works fine and turn some of that money around

File: _DSC5073.jpg (407KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1500x1000px

>>3135558
Mein neger. I just got my first roll of slides, Provia, back from the lab. It's absolutely novel just looking at the pictures on the slide. I might just shoot slides from now on. Fuck dynamic range, I'm not shooting landscapes at high noon.

The only thing I don't like is having to spend more time in color correction, since with negatives, I can just throw them through colorperfect.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	804
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:19 10:59:30
Exposure Time	1/2 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC5050.jpg (273KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1500x1000px

>>3135583

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	804
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:19 10:59:22
Exposure Time	0.6 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC5071.jpg (252KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1500x1000px

>>3135584
Forgive my scanning setup. It's pretty potato without a macro lens. I can't find a 60/2.8D for a good price... they all go for about the same price as a 105/2.8D.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	804
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:19 10:59:26
Exposure Time	1/2 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC5091.jpg (527KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1000x1500px

>>3135586
The colors are amazing to behold on the slide. Scanned, not so much. I need more practice.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	804
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:19 10:59:35
Exposure Time	0.6 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC5096.jpg (293KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1500x1000px

>>3135588
""""""""Art""""""""". Shall I stop now?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	804
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:19 10:59:40
Exposure Time	1.3 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC5104.jpg (831KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

831KB, 1500x1000px

>>3135589
I wonder if getting the 105/2.8D or 60/2.8D is worth it over an older design like the 105/2.8 AIS or 55 AIS. I mean, at least with AF, I can use it as a portrait prime as well.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	804
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:19 10:59:45
Exposure Time	1/2 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3135583
>Fuck dynamic range, I'm not shooting landscapes at high noon.
See I shoot almost entirely while hiking, so if I wanna get good light I need to camp on the trail. I suppose having Ektar for harsh lighting and Velvia for soft is a pretty good rule.

>>3135588
>The colors are amazing to behold on the slide. Scanned, not so much.
I found this too, very satisfying to look at in strips but getting that across in scans is very difficult. Most of the work for me goes into Lightroom with only a very simple white point and USM adjustment while scanning.

File: _DSC5100.jpg (315KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 1500x1000px

>>3135590
I'll stop spamming the thread now.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	804
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:19 11:13:55
Exposure Time	0.6 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3135590
what the fuck. where is this?

File: 0013-e.jpg (118KB, 785x1024px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 785x1024px

>>3135580
so just clean the outside, take some test shots, sell it as-is? shine a flashlight through it to see how much crap is inside.

>>3135601
Malcomm Knapp Research Forest, Maple Ridge, BC.

I think.

>>3135580
Usually if it's the edges like that, it's just the glue.

>>3135576
A UV filter would only reduce haze a little bit. Nothing else.

File: Nap.jpg (838KB, 742x1000px) Image search: [Google]

838KB, 742x1000px

Not very recent but applicable

>>3135575

> No replies

Were we meant to be impressed? Maybe if you showed us the actual final image, not the 'herr derr look at me i'm using an antiquated medium!!! honestly you wouldn't understand' photo for instagram, you may get a few (You)s

File: 1.jpg (790KB, 669x1000px) Image search: [Google]

790KB, 669x1000px

posting recent snapshits from Paris, constructive criticism would be appreciated xx

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2433
Image Height	3637
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3000 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:18 20:55:41
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	669
Image Height	1000

File: 2.jpg (771KB, 1000x669px) Image search: [Google]

771KB, 1000x669px

>>3135672

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3334
Image Height	2230
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3000 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:18 20:56:57
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	669

File: 3.jpg (773KB, 669x1000px) Image search: [Google]

773KB, 669x1000px

>>3135673

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2433
Image Height	3637
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3000 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:18 20:57:45
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	669
Image Height	1000

File: 4.jpg (886KB, 669x1000px) Image search: [Google]

886KB, 669x1000px

>>3135674

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2433
Image Height	3637
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3000 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:18 20:59:15
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	669
Image Height	1000

>>3135566
>>3135580

Update: Found actual fungus, and I have it sitting in a sunny window sill at the moment. How much is a typical lens cleaning? Or should I forget about cleaning and just put it up on ebay as is for a couple bucks?

File: 5.jpg (648KB, 669x1000px) Image search: [Google]

648KB, 669x1000px

>>3135675

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2433
Image Height	3637
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3000 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:18 21:00:17
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	669
Image Height	1000

File: IMG_2346.jpg (125KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 640x480px

>>3135676
>pickler elated

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone SE
Camera Software	10.3.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	101 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:19 17:17:36
Exposure Time	1/836 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	25
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	9.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	3.5
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3135676
>How much is a typical lens cleaning?

A hundred or two from what I hear.

Depends on how bad the fungus is really. A small spot or two? Probably pretty cheap. Fungus so bad you can't look through it? Not worth it unless the lens is a couple grand.

File: 83380018.jpg (544KB, 1024x679px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 1024x679px

>>3135676
try opening it yourself, cleaning anything you can

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AWRGJx-sus

they aren't going for that much on ebay, not worth paying someone

File: 20170727-58650032.jpg (1MB, 960x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 960x1200px

Ya'll planning to shoot the eclipse?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:18 20:07:22

>>3135583
Did you pay for ColorPerfect? I can't bring myself to do it

File: 1463429314482.gif (943KB, 500x245px) Image search: [Google]

943KB, 500x245px

>>3135617

>You replied

File: _20170819_155546.jpg (607KB, 2160x1907px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 2160x1907px

>>3135557
>>3135558
>>3135559
>>3135560
These scans are proper fucked.

>>3135576
In terms of overexposed skies, graduated ND filters are a must for E6 landscapes. Formatt-Hitech resin filters are dope for the money. Properly neutral. Ill never buy another brand of grad NDs again.

>>3135588
DSLR scanning is much easier to get good slides from compared to shatbeds. That scan looks pretty good, what don't you like about it?

>>3135593
Ayyy Wreck Beach? Best place for sunsets.

TFW load up your first roll of C41 in months and the /fgt/ theme becomes E6.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	F-04G
Camera Software	Android Gallery
Equipment Make	FUJITSU
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2017:08:19 15:55:47
Image Width	2160
Image Height	1907
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	2160
Rendering	Custom
Scene Capture Type	Night Scene
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	3840
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	-3.1 EV
ISO Speed Rating	801
Exposure Time	0.1 sec

File: IMG_20160828_204607.jpg (599KB, 1536x1920px) Image search: [Google]

599KB, 1536x1920px

>>3135583
>Mein neger. I just got my first roll of slides, Provia, back from the lab. It's absolutely novel just looking at the pictures on the slide. I might just shoot slides from now on. Fuck dynamic range, I'm not shooting landscapes at high noon.
>The only thing I don't like is having to spend more time in color correction

That's exactly what I did anon.

Color correction should take no time with slides. In PS bring in one of your Provia frames thst was taken in typical daylight (not golden hour) that has things in the frame that are easy to color correct for. I find clouds and concrete easiest. Record an action of you color correcting. Take your time and get it perfected (to your eyes). Now you have an action you can use to batch edit any roll of Provia you shoot in the future.

>>3135557
Eduardopavezgoye

>>3135764
>get 6x7 camera with 220 back
>literally no 220 film on the market

maybe one of the hipster film projects will bring some back... where's ferraniaposter?

File: 17658247602_b42bf5ef74_o.jpg (1MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x1000px

>>3135772
Search and you will find, at least if you're in N. America or Japan.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6666
Image Height	6645
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2013:03:04 00:00:42
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000

>>3135557
Art of Photography, Matt Day, and Ed Pavez if you're feeling hip

>>3135593
>September ill be in town and should be able to get them done, if not I can mail them into Flair and pick them up when I take hometime again
Is this Iona Beach in Vancouver?

>>3135593
Ayy which beach is that?

>>3135764
>Ayyy Wreck Beach? Best place for sunsets.
Iona, actually. Ever watch a sunset from the end of the jetty? It's great.

>DSLR scanning is much easier to get good slides from compared to shatbeds. That scan looks pretty good, what don't you like about it?
It is. My setup uses a reversed 50mm, so sharpness is definitely not there, nor is corner performance. Those limitations aside, I've not yet found some magic combination of settings that can match the colour balance of the film properly. I mean, that's a limitation inherent of DSLR scanning of course. At least with slides, there's something to reference your colours to. Negatives would be, at best, at the mercy of colorperfect. I suppose you could get a whole pile of 6x4s printed off too and use those like you'd use slides for reference when editing.

>>3135766
>. I find clouds and concrete easiest. Record an action of you color correcting.
Theoretically, that should work. But that'd only work for other scenes in the same lighting. As soon as you see any other color temperature, you'll be messing around with curves and sliders until it looks right. Difference with negatives is that you know exactly what it has to look like... so you spend more time trying to get it right. It just comes with the medium I suppose.

The woodchips on that barge looked wacky until I figured out I had to boost orange saturation, and dump yellow saturation. The blues were easy to figure out, but the water should be more of a teal colour that I can't quite get back in post.

>>3135774
I want it, but the only option is ebay fuji 160ns, and 120 is cheaper per frame, so whatever. I've mostly given up on color anyway, paying for dev sucks.

File: IMG_20170629_223551_750.jpg (253KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1000x667px

>>3135791
Ahhh Iona, yeah that place is great for sunsets!

>I suppose you could get a whole pile of 6x4s printed off too and use those like you'd use slides for reference when editing.
But then you're at the mercy of the lab and what are probably automatic scan settings...which are no more reliable than just doing it yourself.

>Theoretically, that should work. But that'd only work for other scenes in the same lighting.
Actually, it works for any other scene. Film is balanced for daylight. If you make your action using a frame taken in typical daylight and it looks identical to the slide, you've nailed the inherent qualities of the slide. Take another slide shot at sunset, run your action, and the scan SHOULD look identical to the sunset slide. The scan has been color corrected for daylight (since the film itself is) and any casts should be true of the light present during the sunset.

That's at least been my experience DSLR scanning upwards of 100 rolls of E6 using this method.

Here's my Velvia 50 action on a daylight shot. Looks identical to the slide.

File: Velvia50_007.jpg (185KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1000x667px

>>3135791
>>3135796
Here's the same action on a sunset shot. Again, looks identical to the slide. No color correcting after the action was done to either.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

Last thread alot of people were shitting all over portra, I just got my first box of 160, did I fuck up?

>>3135800
People shit over portra because it's widely used, but that's because it's good.

Enjoy your box and take some cool pics.

>>3135796

I find a simple white balance makes my slides look fine.

>>3135796
>But then you're at the mercy of the lab and what are probably automatic scan settings
Ah, the lab (The Lab, since you're familiar with vancouver) can do real prints. I don't know if they'll do it for 6x4s or if it's all done in a minilab though.

>Film is balanced for daylight
That's what I thought, but not what I found to be completely true when editing in lightroom. Most needed a touch more magenta and yellow, but others needed blue added back in. Maybe I need to mess around with it more.

File: Portra30V08.jpg (177KB, 536x800px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 536x800px

>>3135804
>People shit over portra because it's
fucking trash.
There's no difference in the grain between 160 and 400, and not in a good way. And its colour balance is way more exposure sensitive than other films.
Not much green sensitivity, and only a tiny bit of red sensitivity.
I'd rather shoot Ultramax or Gold than either Portra.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.6
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number	1132529712
Lens Name	EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2015:09:04 11:42:55
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	536
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Partial
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Custom
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

File: 16113631202_87cedb12da_z.jpg (90KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 424x640px

>>3135791
I went to Iona a couple weeks ago for sundown but the smoke made the sky a grey brown color. Maybe i'll head out there next weekend and try again.

Haven't shot film in a couple years, here's an old one.

File: DSC_0304.jpg (428KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

428KB, 667x1000px

Hey /fgt/

Just found this old Lubitel in my parents garage, I've already cleaned it as much as I can, but the lens are still dusty. Is it worth taking to a professional?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	866
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	72 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:20 12:08:47
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/5.3
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	48.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3135916
Unless it has any sentimental value I probably wouldn't bother. For the price you'd pay for a CLA (clean lubricate adjust) you could just pick up a Yashica-Mat which has a much better lens and is generally a much better camera in pretty much every way

>>3135862
you took a shitty ass closeup of a tree, what did you expect? And the difference in grain is pretty noticeable, especially on small format

>>3135564
It blows my mind that he uses 8x10 film to take front on photos of rock walls

>>3135591
>>3135588

>tfw you unreel you slides after developing them and see all that positive goodness

File: mark-zuckerberg-nice-thank-i-cumed-pants-1-hour-ago-3564242.png (31KB, 500x300px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x300px

>>3135921

>>3135920
the amount of detail in 8x10 makes my penis the big penis

Anyone have any idea where you would get proper c41 and e6 chemicals? Rather than the rapid kits, not that there is anything wrong with them

File: scan081_1000px.jpg (235KB, 661x1000px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 661x1000px

Developed 4 rolls of film at home (3 portra 400 and a fuji superia 400). The 3 portra rolls have a yellow tint to them, did I ruin the developing or just scanned them incorrectly. The fuji superia looked alright (that was with another camera too though). Pic related from one of the portra rolls.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2017:08:19 17:25:52

>>3135926
Ask your lab where they get theirs. If you've got a good relationship with them you could ask them to order you some with their next order

>>3135928
post a negative scan (as in an uncorrected scan of the negative)

File: scan144_1000px.jpg (254KB, 669x1000px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 669x1000px

>>3135929
>post a negative scan (as in an uncorrected scan of the negative)
here is a 48bit colour, 2400dpi, just auto-exposure setting scan, didn't adjust anything else.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2017:08:20 12:12:54

File: scan145_1000px.jpg (233KB, 669x1000px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 669x1000px

>>3135930
then when i try to adjust it so i get all shadow/highlight detail like in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5EymnBexVQ I get a yellow tint

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2017:08:20 12:14:46

>>3135930
nah I mean post like just a straight scan of the negative, so it'll still be inverted and have the orange mask etc

>>3135932
can I do that straight from the flatbed scanner or do i need to take a photo of it?

>>3135933
there will be an option to scan to raw or scan to dng depending on what software you're using

my thought process is that the automatic colour correct is fucking up. but portra does tend to go like that under bad lighting

File: Untitled-72.png (2MB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 650x650px

agfa precisa 200 & minolta hi matic 7s ii

File: scan146_1000px.jpg (120KB, 656x1000px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 656x1000px

>>3135934
well, I didn't find that option but here is a scan as a colour positive rather than negative.

>>3135937
alright gimme a couple minutes

>>3135918
Thanks, asked my parents about it and turns out they didn't even know they had one it so it's probably belonged to the last renter.

File: asas.jpg (564KB, 624x982px) Image search: [Google]

564KB, 624x982px

>>3135937
>>3135939
yeah your colour correction software sucks ass

this was literally 30 seconds in photoshop. could have done more but I'm procrastinating uni work

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	656
Image Height	1000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:20 21:43:05
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	624
Image Height	982

>>3135942
Yeah that looks much more like how it did when I took the photo. Thanks

File: scan155_1000px.jpg (207KB, 657x1000px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 657x1000px

>>3135942
>>3135944
Here is another attempt, using the auto exposure setting and then adjusting made it far too yellow. Might have to rescan the last 100 pictures now.

>>3135921

>that feel when you open the envelope labeled "Fuji Professional" to see your positives in transparent sleeves.

Pretty much nutted myself first time I saw.

It worth getting them mounted on slides?

>>3135954
if you're gonna project them, sure. if you're not, there's no point

>>3135956

Projecting woulf be nice, but I dpn't have a projector nor have any interest in purchasing one.

So having slide mounted vs. strips doesnt matter the slightest when scanning?

>>3135959
probably better in strips because they'll be flatter in the film holder. but yeah doesn't matter at all for scanning

Has anyone used a 35mm to 120 adapters to shoot 35mm film in a Holga? Would that help with the shitty vignetting?

>>3135962
you're trying to polish a turd here pal. the lens is made of plastic, you're never going to get anything that could be described as 'sharp' out of it

>>3135557
Azriel Knight, David Hancock, Old Cameras

>>3135963
Did I ever say I wanted a sharp image? I was asking if the vignetting isn't as noticeable since the negative is smaller than 120.

>>3135968
I mean, yeah? That's how it works? The vignetting will be less since the negative is smaller. 35mm is ~4.1x smaller in surface area than 6x6 (3600mm sq vs 864mm sq).

Enjoy your shitty camera

>>3135970
>He thinks photography is about having the best gear
ThanK YoU I will enjoy the hell out of it

File: IMG_20170820_151107.jpg (2MB, 2554x3745px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2554x3745px

I'm currently documenting the decay of a city and few villages destroyed by a earthquake almost a year ago.
It's kinda a dangerous job, police patrols the red zones and some buildings could collapse while I'm passing there. In few weeks I'll post the results here.

>>3135985
sounds neat, have fun/don't die

>>3135987
I survived the first shock, I'll manage to not die like a fool. Thanks

>>3135985
Can't wait to see these make a new thread to post em so that all of /p/ will see

>>3135972
what?
he didn't say that at all. if it's a shitty camera it's a shitty camera. it might fill the purpose of taking pictures but it's still shit otherwise

>>3135985
Where is this, is it the Accumoli earthquake?

>>3136005
Yes, I was in a small village in the Accumoli municipality during the earthquake, currently I'm in Amatrice, the Municipality that had the highest number of victims and probably collapsed villages.

>>3135985
kino incoming.

>>3136011
cheers man I wish you heaps of luck there! can't wait for the pics!

>>3136018
Thanks for your support man, the project is still in progress, I guess I'll have to expose at least other 5-6 rolls, then I'll process them and start to share something here.

>>3135985
I wanna go to places like this and photograph them but I don't have any money and wouldn't know what to do with them after anyway

Do you just post them somewhere and hope they get noticed or do you try and send them to associated press

>>3136043
Well, generally you have to be so lucky/unlucky to have your roots in such places.

I don't want to earn a penny from that work, otherwise it would be like exploiting a dead body. Some pictures will be posted around the internet, some maybe included in a e-book that I'll sell to raise some funds to restore something that has been ruined and risks to be forgotten by the government. I don't even know how many people would buy that and at what price.

>>3135772
Velvia 100 in 220 is still being made.

>>3136120

source right fucking now I thought all 220 film had been discontinued

>kills off Neopan 1600 135 and a slew of other films
>still producing 220 anything

wtf mate

>>3136138
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-FujiFilm-Velvia-100-ISO-220-Film-For-Medium-Format-Camera-from-Japan-0817-/253099371595?hash=item3aede5ec4b:g:ueQAAOSw0hlZE--c

>expires may 2019

File: s-l1600 (1).jpg (225KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1200x1600px

Seems like a pretty good deal.
>17 rolls of 220 Portra 800
>expired, but cold stored

http://www.ebay.com/itm/kodak-portra-800-220-Expired-Film-Lot/332333261827?_trkparms=aid%3D222007%26algo%3DSIM.MBE%26ao%3D2%26asc%3D45560%26meid%3D96a501680e474d76aaf5f9739fd955ea%26pid%3D100005%26rk%3D4%26rkt%3D6%26sd%3D182669426978&_trksid=p2047675.c100005.m1851

Can i shoot at night with 200 ISO film`?

>>3136272
sure, if you use a tripod, flash, or long shutter speeds

>>3136273
Approximately how long of a shutter speed should I use?

>>3136274
mate how am I supposed to know, I'm not a light meter. no possible way I could tell you what settings to use without actually being there with you, holding your dick while you take a piss

Take a meter reading and it'll tell ya. Probably in the region of 1/2 to over 30 seconds depending just how dark it is. You're gonna need flash if you wanna shoot handheld

>>3136275
Cool, getting a light meter app then and hoping for the best. Thanks.

>>3136276
Don't forget about reciprocity failure. Above around 2 seconds your exposure will be exponentially longer than metered. I think there are some apps that have exposure correction data for different films.

>>3135575

oh fuck i was sheaded there this upcomming weekend?

What ND do you reccoemnd? Do i need a dust housing?

Have someone done anything at night with 800 iso film?
Post pics

File: IMG_0008-2.jpg (902KB, 4496x6800px) Image search: [Google]

902KB, 4496x6800px

Pic unrelated but cc appreciated.

Was just wondering if anyone currently had and rollei infrared 400 laying around?
On the inside of the box it should have a development time for ilfotec DDX.
I can't find the processing time anywhere online.
Can anyone help me out?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 5600F
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:21 20:29:21
Color Space Information	sRGB
White Balance	Auto

File: img1 (5).jpg (835KB, 3889x5875px) Image search: [Google]

835KB, 3889x5875px

>>3136407
I took some photos in an abandoned council chambers at 1600 but that was with a flash?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 5600F
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:01 22:44:06
Color Space Information	sRGB
White Balance	Auto

File: IMG_0008-3.jpg (439KB, 661x1000px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 661x1000px

>>3136408
>>3136410
forgot to resize sorry

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 5600F
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:21 20:37:50
Color Space Information	sRGB
White Balance	Auto

File: velvia-qmf.jpg (2MB, 1016x1500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1016x1500px

>>3136408
Queen Mary Falls right?

I was down there just recently, great spot for photos

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: IMG_0010-2.jpg (505KB, 1000x721px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 1000x721px

>>3136412
Yeah dude, lovely spot. That's an awesome shot btw.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 5600F
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:21 20:45:34
Color Space Information	sRGB
White Balance	Auto

>>3136407

I got some stuff with Natura 1600 but no 800. I did just pick up a roll of Venus 800, will try to shoot it next.

>>3135557
www.youtube.com/channel/UCZpSVIFxNV_p62fkuucmtnA

Not really a photography channel but they have a couple of decent film videos.

File: untitled.jpg (1MB, 1108x1441px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1108x1441px

>Epson V750 in charge of scanning slides
It''s so hazy/foggy. B&W and C-41 is just fine.

Velvia 100F

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	300 dpcm

Recommended macro lens for film "scanning"? I think the FD > EOS adapter is fucking things up. I am getting a glare in the center of the photos. The lens is also kinda loose. I can move it and when I do that, the glare gets worse or better. meh.

So I just discovered a P900 can take macro as close as pressing up on the front element. So, given a diffusing lightbox, dad with a P900, and a lack of fucks to give for scanning film with a super zoom on a bridge camera sensor, it's an easy way to scan film.

>>3135575
why the fuck are you shooting high speed film in daylight

Are you retarded?

File: 20170821_204419.jpg (355KB, 628x806px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 628x806px

Ive bought a Minolta x300 today. First ever camera, I have no idea of what I'm doing. Film came out with a brighter strip on top and bottom. Shot on Ilford HP 5 Plus 400. Ive used Ilfosol 3 Developer, 1+9 dillution at 24 degrees for 5:30. 3 rinses with 22 degrees water. 4 minutes in Ilford Rapid Fixer, 1+4 dillution at 24 degrees. Why the bright edges?

>>3136693
You didn't fix for long enough, by the look of it.
Respool the film, fix again.
Also, 5:30 is a very short dev time for an active developer.
Switch to 20 degrees.
Also, I'm sorry you got memed into a Menelta.
I really don't know how this keeps happening to your dumb american fucks.

>>3136587
Your adapter is pure trash, and it's leaking light.
I would do two things to fix this, assuming you don't want to just order another one from a different seller and hope it works better.
Also I'm assuming you just bought a plain metal mount adapter, and not one of those coathanger abortions with a lens in it to allow infinity focus and fuck your shit up with CA and field curvature. You don't need infinity focus to scan film.
You need to shim your mount to get rid of the slop.
Use a thin, tough plastic if you have some available, like that black gardenbed stuff, or paper if you can't find anything like that.
After that, tape over your mount with opaque tape once it's on the camera.
Obviously this shit is a pain in the ass, but I'm assuming you shoot film now, and the digi will just be for scanning.

File: 51600013.jpg (470KB, 1024x1545px) Image search: [Google]

470KB, 1024x1545px

Just trying a new lab.

Is this shit? (Pic related, 35mm Ektar 100)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:16 20:16:56
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	1545

>>3136773
Lab scans are always shit, anon.

>>3136775
Okie, but what specifically is shit about it? The last lab I used I was disappointed with, but after failing to get good enough scans on my own/lacking patience I tried a new one and I liked the results. What specifically is wrong with it?

>>3136768
why does minolta get so much hate?

File: F1Superia28.jpg (264KB, 534x800px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 534x800px

>>3136777
Soft as shit mane.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	534
Image Height	800

>>3136786
This. Those noritsu scanners are there to sucker you for money, not provide quality scans. Their tonal range is shit, and they're soft as fuck. And don't fool yourself thinking the operator is going to fuck with curves or levels for you.

At least the colors and highlights in the photo aren't btfo. The clouds retain decent detail. The bushes are soft mushy messes though.

>>3136782
Unreliable, ugly, lenses are nothing special, cloth shutters long after they became deprecated, dead mount. Practically ANY other jap SLR is a better choice.

File: 16A_0020-7.jpg (561KB, 2000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 2000x3000px

1/4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Windows)
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:12 16:59:47
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 11A_0025-2.jpg (546KB, 2000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 2000x3000px

>>3136794
2/4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Windows)
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:12 16:59:45
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: _35_0003-24.jpg (358KB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 3000x2000px

>>3136796
3/4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Windows)
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:12 16:59:54
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: _37_0001-26.jpg (381KB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 3000x2000px

>>3136797
4/4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Windows)
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:12 16:59:54
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3136782
Autism, as per usual.

>>3136782

One Anon is really butthurt about them for some reason.

I don't mind though. Being less popular means more cheap lenses for me.

>>3136408
I herd Rollei IR400 is the literal same stock as Retro 400s, Superpan 200, and Maco AQS. Furthermore, JCH StreetPan looks and feels exactly like the other three (which I have samples of).

So you could try one of those, with the MDC recipes for IR exposures (ISO 6 or 12 w/ a 750nm, generally).

>>3136799
>>3136805
Oh. I was thinking that it had to with something like that.

>watch nhk
>back in the day people toss the film canisters in the forest
>mountain guides glad camera became digital
film btfo

>>3136773
>>3136775
>>3136777
>>3136786
>>3136788
So... moral of the story is always get prints and find a way to scan them yourself?

>>3136835
>get prints
why

>>3135557
Negative Feedback

File: BinnaburraEOSITN00019.jpg (908KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

908KB, 1500x1000px

>>3136834
>degenerate assholes who litter in natural parks have always been the same type of scum
>implying the rise in popularity of bottled water since the death of film hasn't completely offset the litter saved from tiny film canisters being discarded when you need to change a roll
>implying anybody who changes a roll in the nature doesn't just put the finished roll in the next one's canister, to protect it from impact or moisture
Yeah, uh, film btfo guys...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:19 13:55:33
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-8.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3136834

>fucking gaijin tourists ruining japan even back in the film days

>>3136770
Or should I get a Epson V550 for 130 euros? I am kinda done with "building" a set up now. It has been months. Getting a piece of glass. Another milky one. Getting a lens. Now I have to build something but I don't have the motivation anymore.

File: _20170822_171627.jpg (186KB, 999x562px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 999x562px

Look what came in the mail /p/

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:08:22 17:16:27
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

I just bought a 50mm Zeiss Planar for my M4 for $470 dollars, did I do good /p/?

Whats the superior SLR mount for manually focusing

Canon FD, Nikon F, Minolta MD, Pentax-k or M42?

noob here. i have a mju ii and would like to know whats a good bw and colour film to shoot at night. I'm usually walking around the neighbourhood where there are only streetlights and the flash is spoilt. thanks

>>3136921
Whichever has the best focusing screen and brightest viewfinder.

>>3136934
just use the flash and any film

>>3136936
the flash is not working.

>>3136921
The one you have with you

>>3136934
Not much choice in color.
There's superia, portra, and cinestill tungsten in 800.
And Superia in 1600.

If streetlights are yellow and you want normal colours you might wanna try the cinestill.

B&W just go with a 400 like tri-x or fp4 and push if self devving.

>>3136934

Natura 1600.

And get your flash fixed.

>>3136946
Do you think these might work for concert photography as well?

>>3136873
Well the V550 is gone. I still can get a Canoscan 9950f (accepts 120) and a Minolta Dimage Dual Scan III (35mm only and seems like it has pretty good scans).

>>3136951
>>3136873


The v550 has questionable quality for 35mm negatives anyway.

Best bet would be the Plustek 8200ai. Probably your best shot outsude of professional equipment.

A DSLR scanning rig comes pretty close to the 8200 in quality too, but is a pain in yhe ass to get set up properly.

>>3136952
You can make a large leap by using anti-Newton glass instead of the flimsy plastic negative carriers.

>>3136921
M42 is the patrician’s choice

>>3136967
You know "patrician" means the opposite of "brokeass slavshit" right?

>>3136956

The newest top level epson is supposed to have anti-newton carriers actually.

>>3136951
I'd suggest the 9950f, but mainly because I'm interested in the scanner myself and would like someone to check it out before committing. 30 frames of 135 at a pop seems like something I could very much use.

>>3136921
>>3136935
Olympus OM

>>3136983
Still thinking about it. The Minolta is a dedicated scanner and is probably a bit better with 35mm. But the 120 makes the Canoscan a better choice. Meh.

Minolta = €45
Canoscan = €115

Helppp

File: IMG_2118.jpg (130KB, 750x850px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 750x850px

I am not selling anything on Facebook Marketplace ever again

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	750
Image Height	850

>>3136975
I have the V550, it's just a year old so I don't think I'm buying a new one any time soon. Loose ANG is a bit of a hassle but the results warrant it. Shame I have to retroactively rescan everything I have because I did a lot of it without ANG. Ddo you have any experience with wet mounting by the way?

>>3137048
Could you post a full res pic?

>>3137045
Horrible lol

>>3137036

There is also a Dimage Dual Scan IV.

>>3137045
The power of brand names

>>3136970
>based Zeiss and Takumar glass
>slavshit

>>3137048
What’s your software setup/workflow for the V550? Just got one and I’m fairly happy with the results but thinking I could do more.

Anyone here have photos the developed themselves?

>>3137036
If I can influence your decision a little, my CanoScan 9000f mk2 makes very nice 120 scans -- as long as the negatives are within reasonable levels of hi-fi, the scanner is far from the weakest link in the process. If you're shooting a 'blad or something else significantly more modern than Kievs and Bronicas, a better 120 scanner may be indicated. And that 115€ for a scanner that retails for 400 is a great price.

Shit, I'd get both if these were available to me. Paid like 230€ for my existing flatbed...

File: film.jpg (193KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1440x1080px

>>3135772
I have some.

File: IMG-20170822-WA0007.jpg (948KB, 3877x2592px) Image search: [Google]

948KB, 3877x2592px

r8 my first RA4 darkroom print /p/eople

I can now understand why people prefer labs for colour. Open trays of chemicals and not knocking them over in pitch black darkness is a challenge to say the least. As is counting seconds in your head accurately

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	ONEPLUS A5000
Equipment Make	OnePlus
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3877
Image Height	2592
Image Created	2017:08:22 21:27:43
White Balance	Auto
Flash	Flash
Focal Length	4.10 mm
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
ISO Speed Rating	1600
F-Number	f/1.7

>>3137111
You should try DSLR scanning

this might be a stupid question:

why the fuck does my local camera shop charge extra for push processing ($1 per stop in either direction)?
Is there an actual reason are is it just some bullshit scam?

I'm thinking of just removing the labels and lying to them saying the film is a different speed than what it really is so I don't have to pay extra

>>3137145
IIUC there's like nanolabs and such that you can use to process single sheets at once, in daylight once the sheet has been inserted. That being said, the colours didn't turn out well on that one, or the picture was without them to begin with.

>>3137154
They likely do it in a separate job, or have to configure the minilab a little different for each time. They also get less film to be processed that way, so there's an extra charge. Be glad they do this at all.

>>3137154
No scam at all, when you ask to your lab to push or pull a roll they'll have to develop it alone, so more time for less film.
Labs with a lot of work generally develop 5 or more rolls of the same type together to save time and chemicals.

>>3137160
>>3137161
maybe I'm stupid but I'm still not quite understanding how there is a difference between
>developing 200 speed roll of film
>developing 100 speed roll of film pushed 1 stop

>>3137164
Box speed C-41 development is identical between films regardless of ISO. It's only push, or pull, development that changes anything about it. For B&W, everything's already custom, but special development can still be charged a tiny extra for.

Up here it's double the cost for the first roll, subsequent ones for normal price in the same batch.

>>3135937
Stop using auto color software and learn how to use curve masks.

>>3137160
Well it is a stone statue against a stone background, so there isn't that much colour. Other than that, there is a very slight yellow cast but overall I'm not disappointed at this first try. I don't really have the space for a nanolab and I prefer larger prints anyways, so I'll try to improve my current, tray development situation

>>3136921
Nikon, so the only other lenses that focus the same way are Bronicas, and you'll fuck up using anything else :DDDD.

Although in a twist of fate, Fuji's aperture rings go in the same direction as Nikon.

>>3137148
Memer no memeing

File: 30VHP533.jpg (152KB, 1192x800px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1192x800px

>>3137045
The real question is why are you trying to sell one of the finest 35mm cams in existence for the cost of a bottle of scotch?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1192
Image Height	800

>>3137222
A VSCO pack costs $59.
Maybe he has a $9 giftcard or something.

>>3137222
Well how much will you pay for it anon? I am selling all of my 35mm shit so I can have a little rangefinder for travel photography. Currently I have a Mamiya C330 as my major work force.

>>3137246
Do you shoot professionally? Do you shoot film for something you're paid for?