camera tier list

>>3035587
switch hasselblad and fujifilm

>>3035587
Absolutely disgusting cancer and this is coming from a Pentaxfag

>>3035588
>instax meme tier cameras
>shitty apsc "cameras"
>overpriced lenses and bodies for apsc
>made generally shit (short of a handful) film cameras (looking at you GW690iii)
>discontinuing all their film in not long
>

>>3035592
you know this list to be true

>gearfags

>>3035615
gear fagging =/= caring about what you own

>>3035587
How is Sigma not shit?
We're only talking camera bodies, right?

>>3035587
Why do you think that Pentax and Olympus deserve to be in god tier?

>>3035628
sigma did foveon and that single achievement rapes canikon and lolsony in the ass forever.

>>3035587
you forgot to include "making a camera brand ranking chart" under autism tier

File: 1487281222951.png (72KB, 283x268px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 283x268px

>contax shit tier

>>3035632
>sigma did foveon
Yeah, they just can't implement it in the right way.

File: 1481792660981.jpg (117KB, 512x384px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 512x384px

Why are sonyfags so hated here?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2014:09:17 22:10:22
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	512
Image Height	384

>>3035656
Jealousy,
80% of the people here have entry level kit cameras and couldn't afford an a6000 or better.

>>3035660
Projection, the post

>>3035660
lel'd hard.

a Canon 5DmkIV can do better than a Sony a7sII. People like sony because sony release new 'shit tech' every six month and this get this gearfags turned on

anyone shooting Sony deserve to get raped by a nigger

>>3035660
>couldn't afford an a6000 or better.
>a6000 is less than $600. That's literal chump change m8

>>3035628
>what is the dp2 merill

8/10 solid bait

>>3035698
The truth hurts doesn't it :)

>>3035587
You know, usually on lists like these. I find that the bottom one tends to be one of the best on the ranking.

>>3035719

A tear down the cheek

Olympus is the best. You'll all be sorry when they make a full frame.

>>3035587
>mfw my camera isn't even on the list

feels good man

>>3035662
>>3035669
>>3035677

Ask yourself this, if these people weren't jealous, why are they so angry?

>>3035736
>I find that the bottom one tends to be one of the best on the ranking
That's just your bias opinion, because your shit tier brand is always on bottom, kek

>>3035864
Or an objective truth.

Or are you one of these "DXO is fake news" cucks.

>>3035867
although dxo isnt fake its kind of annoying how they rate lenses on the output of the body as well.

>>3035860
if you think thats angry you probably have no social skills

>>3035749
they did desu, their film cameras anon-sama

>>3035868
Why's that annoying? That's where you're going to use them and they test for every body/lens combo.

>>3035869
You're still so heated you forgot about punctuation, count to 10, breathe slowly, try again.

>>3035867
>DXO sonycuck calls others cucks for not acknowledging "online scores" that mean nothing in the real world
im lmaoing @ ur autism m8

>>3035876
I'm not using proper punctuation and grammar because this is an online image board.
>sonyggers grasp this hard

>>3035880
>objective based testing is pointless because the real world isn't test charts

Non sequitur reasoning is the best eh.

>>3035887
Taking grammar bait.

Kek, maybe have a nice cool glass of water and ring your mom.

>>3035901
>sonycucks

>>3035587
the typical sheep. grouping cameras into tiers.

I started on a Pentax film camera
Then got Pentax DSLRs
Then switched to Olympus

So obviously the chart is exactly correct in any context

lol someone actually put in this much effort to gearfag...

we get it Sonyggers are easily triggered now fuck off

>>3036089
>fujicucks

>>3036167
i use olympus, pentax and nikon :-^)

>>3036173
That's nice sweety, call me when you grow up and use LEICA.

>>3036174
can you explain the digilux series, rebranded cameras marked up?
the new shit instant camera and instant film which are rebranded neo 90s?
the leica SL costing 8000 dollars for a dated sensor they didnt even make?
the leica tl?
the leica md?
the 22USD medium format camera that was dated when it came out?

leicas day is over, accept it

>>3036181
BTFO gg

>>3036173
Still haven't found a brand you want to stick with eh? Can I recommend Sony?

bought an olypmus today so your list is spot on. good work.

>>3035587
>Panasonic for vidya
>MF Fuji for stills

meh til I die

File: 1.jpg (501KB, 777x545px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 777x545px

>>3035588
>>3036244
Fujicucks think they are hot shit due to misleading sensationalist article.

>>3035867
DXO is to cameras what Buzzfeed is to news

>>3035587
>Canon and Nikon same tech
>Different tiers

Ayy

>>3036673

>having to buy an intervalometer

>>3036674
>using an intervalometer

>>3036734

>doing photography

>>3036734

>not using an intervalometer
>not shooting every kind of photography you can

>>3036674
>shooting timelapses
that's some babbys first tripod shit

>>3036665
Incorrect
Buzzfeed is not an objective based testing method.

>>3035880
Vignetting - means nothing in the real world
Resolution - means nothing in the real world
Chromabs - means nothing in the real world
Dynamic range - means nothing in the real world
Color depth - means nothing in the real world
Shadow recovery - means nothing in the real world
High iso performance - means nothing in the real world
Transmission - means nothing in the real world

I can go on if you want? Or would you rather that all reviews were done by opinion pieces that fit your agenda?

>>3035887
But you still didn't answer my original question?

>>3035587
Switch Sigma and Leica
Switch Kiev and Contax
Switch Panasonic and Polaroid
Switch Hasselblad and Fuji
Bump Pentax down one tier and replace it with Praktica
Separate Olympus into film and digital. Film Olympus remains in god tier, digital Olympus goes in shit tier.

Not meming

>>3035587
This list is upside down.

>>3037689
so is ur brain my nigga

add Agfa to good tier

>>3035587
Why does autism tier have an indian flag? Shouldn't that be the shit tier?

Why are people so mad they chose the wrong kit and didn't go with the Sony FE master race kit?

>>3037279
LOL at this faggot!

This is the rantings of a retard that owns a canon rebel xt and kit lens, saying to himself "good lenses don't matter! Dynamic range?! Thats for sony cucks. I personally like how noisy my images are at 400iso"

You're top 10 biggest idiots I've ever seen on this board. Right off the top, CA, DR, High Iso, and shadow recovery ONLY matter in the real world.

>>3037909
This is the source of all anti-sony butthurt. People are mad that they picked a different camera brand that hasn't done dick in nearly a decade.

To those people: It's okay! This is an anonymous board, we won't know if you changed sides. And good news, you can use your kit lens on the sony cameras, so you won't have to immediately buy lenses. Come to greener pastures

>>3037279
>your agenda
gettaloadathisguy.jpg

File: 3_contax2003_1.jpg (410KB, 1024x472px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 1024x472px

>>3035587
>kiev > contax
u wot m8

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Orio Menoni
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1024
Image Height	504
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2010:11:21 04:58:10
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	472
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3037912
>>>>>>>>>>sony kit lenses
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you can still use it
holy shit my sides

>>3037976
not him but holy fuck your reading comprehension

>>3037976
>t. nicuck
>t. Cucknon

YES! YOU CAN USE CANON AND NIKON KIT LENSES ON SONY BODIES! WOWWW!!!

>>3037976

t. Fuji user

>>3037994
try again

>>3035628
Sigma deserves to be god tier, They've done few cameras but each of them has been very, very worthwhile.

The DP1 was the very first large sensor compact. The Merrill series are completely unique and fill a niche that nothing has come near to since. The Quattros are sadly misconcieved, but they could have been great. All I want is for Sigma to release a new series that's the same size and shape as the Merrills but with all the incremental updates.

The dream would be a SD gen 3 with E mount for adaptability. One of my life goals is to use any of the contax G series lenses on a Foveon sensor.

>>3035587
Seems about right

File: 1489516073054-0699824e-e4cf-4482-bd0a-348bc88970af.jpg (1MB, 1687x1359px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1687x1359px

>>3035587

tfw i love shooting with polaroid but all of /p/ just thinks it's a meme, feels bad man

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GooglePhotoScan
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:03:14 11:27:53

>not eschewing every brand and ascending to the highest level of analog photography: mental pictures

>>3039560
you look handsome as hell my man, what's your ethnicity?

>>3039595
>>>/gd/

>>3036229
which one?

No Alpa, no Mamiya, no Contax.

OP confirmed as a pleb.