/film/

I have a problem with Olympus mju ii:
All sensors are working, all the lights, too, but when I insert the film, the error appears. What could be the problem?

>>2936694
Fuck you my house gets hot af during the day I throw all film in da fridge

File: 16647353764_ffd5d60b36_b.jpg (229KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 800x533px

>>2936712
Do you mean it tries winding for awhile, stops, and then flashes E on the screen? Is this your first time using the camera or have you loaded film into it before no problem? Make sure it catches into the film advance prior to shutting the door.

What film is it? I dunno if it can do non-FF coded film in case that's what you're using.

File: 18017100331_77c2a9046f_b.jpg (286KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1000x1000px

>>2936766
Ugh, autocorrect. Meant non DX coded film...

My Minolta x700, quite regularly, refuses to turn on when I flip the switch. I have to have it on for about 6-7minutes before the LEDs start working, almost like it needs time to warm up. Any ideas?

>>2936766
If be honest, I don't know. Some guy selling it for $8 and I dont know buy it or not. Now I ask him about all stuff

how do you calculate dilution? like 1+1 or 1+4? Are there any app to do this? Im so bad at math.

>>2936832
Don't pursue photography. There might be numbers involved.

>like 1+1

Not everyone had/enjoyed chemistry at school and it's simple to explain but with the examples you gave you are either trolling or a hopeless case.

>>2936832

1+1 = 1 part undiluted developer(or whatever you are mixing) and 1 part water

so say you need 500ml to cover your roll of film in your tank, (should say how much ml you need for the tank), then you do 500ml / 2 and get 250ml undiluted developer and 250ml water.

with 1+4 it works the same, so if you need 500ml divide that by 5 parts (1+4) and you get 100ml, so 100ml developer and 400ml water.

most of the time it should say on the bottle how to prepare it.

File: foto.jpg (392KB, 671x1000px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 671x1000px

r8

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture NX-D 1.4.2 W
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	120 dpi
Vertical Resolution	120 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:30 16:37:42
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	671
Image Height	1000

>>2936771
Change the batteries

>>2936852
not gr8

European film shooters, where do you usually buy or order your films from? I'm assuming most of you are buying in bulk? I know Amazon.co.uk has a pretty big selection but are there some other good options?

>>2936862

Ebay from the seller filmfestival.

>>2936862
I know macodirect
But never used it before

>>2936868
I'm australian and I buy film from macodirect, because even after currency conversion and 60 euros of shipping it's still the cheapest for bulk orders.

>>2936852
sick

>>2936872
Europe is really lucky
When irl I can buy one film for 3 euro in random store
In my country the same film about 5 euro

>>2936889
M8, in Australia a roll of HP5 is $18 if you buy it loose from a non-specialist store. Seriously a fucking joke.
People in backwards countries like Europe where film infrastructure still exists have no idea how lucky they are.

>>2936897
Yea, in my city in Russian, I can buy only colorplus for $5,50 and fujifilm 200 for the same price and it only in special store

>>2936897
Damn...3 packs of 35mm hp5 are $18 in Vancouver.

File: provia-c41.jpg (450KB, 1000x985px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 1000x985px

Going through my old photos.

These are Provia 400 cross processed in C41. Shot with Yashica-Mat 124g. Scanned with some shitty flatbed 10 years ago.

File: provia-c41-2.jpg (491KB, 1000x991px) Image search: [Google]

491KB, 1000x991px

>>2936928

File: provia-c41-3.jpg (664KB, 1000x956px) Image search: [Google]

664KB, 1000x956px

>>2936930

File: provia-c41-4.jpg (648KB, 1000x994px) Image search: [Google]

648KB, 1000x994px

>>2936931

File: provia-c41-5.jpg (447KB, 1000x999px) Image search: [Google]

447KB, 1000x999px

>>2936933

Does anyone here have experience with carrying and 8x10 Monorail for fieldwork? Is it a hassle to assemble and disassemble? They're way cheaper than an 8x10 field. I saw a Cambo 8x10 go for $250 dollars....

File: Contrast Forest.jpg (936KB, 1192x1791px) Image search: [Google]

936KB, 1192x1791px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Officejet 4500 G510n-z
Camera Software	Apple Image Capture
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1192
Image Height	1791

File: received_741940765946480.jpg (131KB, 1920x1275px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1920x1275px

>>2936694
First roll devloped.

Russian scale focusing plastic cheap piece of crap Camera.

Had a hard time getting the rewind to work so I opened it under two duvets with the lights off.

Is it a light leak in the camera ? Or do you guys think it's from the opening ?

Apart from that I was quite surprised at how sharp some of the pictures came out.

It was kodax iso 200 pharmacy crap.

Local shops sells 2 rolls of it with 35 exposures for €2.50.

>>2936942
""""""""Sharp""""""""

>>2936942
looks like light leak from the camera not shutting all the way.

>>2936943
stop being silly, i was asking more about the light leak with that example

>>2936944
yeah looking at it the film sprockets are about on the same line as where the crack between the body and back plate is.

>>2936947
My advice would be to tape over all the seals next time you load film into it.

>>2936935
i love this picture very cute dude !

is it your kid ?

>>2936931
nice man

>>2936949
i was thinking that.

the camera was 2 quid though didnt expect a lot.

>tfw you load 100 speed film after using 400 for a while
>tfw you wonder why you're barely pulling 1/30 at f1.8 in marginal light until you remember

So do I have to worry about Nikon matrix meter (10 segment luminance only) getting my Provia BTFO? What about Velvia?

And what the fuck do I even do with 36 frames of 135 Velvia?

>>2936928

picture is cozy as fuck. what camera is this.

>>2937016

Can you read?

>>2936942

dude that photo is perfect. red, green, its like poetry.

>>2937017

nope.

>>2936767
fuck is that ireland dude ?

dcu or something no ?

I just bought a pentax me and 50mm f1. 7 for 30 euros.
I just wanted the lens.

>>2936941
This would probably be a beautiful photo with a decent scan.
Sorry for your loss.

>>2937031
>>2937028
>>2937019
>>2937017
>>2937016
>>2937010
What a time to be alive.
The instant messaging generation really doesn't have any mental filter in place at all for the words it shits into the internet.

>>2937119
i think your retared.

>>2937031
thats the only lens i use. its amazing. fully open it still blows me away at how sharp it can be sometimes. no vinetting,

only mild corner softness fully open, gone past 2.8 its gone.

what camera you using it for ?

you in ireland by any chance i saw one going for that on deals and was almost tempted to buy another so i dont have to change lens for my film camera.

>>2936694
what you people think of the fed 4 ?

i just got it shot a roll, fucked up the rewinding process, you have to turn the release collar i just found out.

cant wait to see how the pictures came out. fixed the lightmeter and the focusing arm.

it feels amazing and pretty enjoyable to use at the very least.

File: 6389345367_eb4c572342.jpg (87KB, 500x377px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 500x377px

>>2937202
forgot the pic

>>2937116
the print i have is beautiful, but i guess i need to change around a few settings for scanning to my computer.... Also, it was 400 asa film, so the grain is less than desirable.

>>2937028
Nah, Vancouver.

>>2936862
Fotoimpex usually is pretty good, I've wanted to go with maco but their selection never really wows me at the time.
>>2936897
Hi former colony. Hope you're enjoying some sweet discrimination passed down from daddy with prices of film. Unless you're abo, in which case Australia belongs to the british.

>>2936942
Looks like a leak on the back, the pressure plate should hold it in place. If the top parts are out of focus too then it could be that. Kind of hard to tell with an Irish scan though.
>>2937010
>usually shoot in average conditions
>hate loading ISO 100 for casual shooting because of this
If you can spot meter, I would use that or learn where the meter usually covers. Chances are you'll be fine unless it's a very contrasty scene though. My xpan meter can usually guess it about right 9 times out of 10.

>>2937119
>>2937190
Hilarious, it's a real shame I can't watch both of you flop around on your bellies on a pavement on a Saturday morning trying to prove that you can both perform "the worm". I guess I'll just have to settle for these quality posts instead.

>thats the only lens i use. its amazing. fully open it still blows me away at how sharp it can be sometimes. no vinetting,
>only mild corner softness fully open, gone past 2.8 its gone.
That's generally how lenses work m80, you stop em down a little and they're usually at their sharpest.

just asked a german seller about a camera he had on ebay (in english of course). he answered in german.

are all germans this autistic?

File: 297[1].jpg (47KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 800x450px

>>2937119
Thanks for the useful input

File: Memphis 80.jpg (224KB, 1200x888px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 1200x888px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	1200
Image Height	888

File: Memphis 81.jpg (176KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 800x1200px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	800
Image Height	1200

>>2937337
The walgreens logo is rather garish

File: 1472834962981.jpg (3MB, 3089x2048px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3089x2048px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:26 23:20:55
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2937337
I get the feeling that the tram cables weren't intentionally lined up the way they were but I like it.
What I don't like is the nasty sign and the lights leaking in from above and the left. A short hop could have solved that.

Got a Bessa R2 as a gift for myself for getting a new job. Now I just need a 35mm lens for it, probs the CV 35mm f2.5 II. Holy crap the finder is awesome after shooting only point & shoots for months.

I need to pick up glue of some sort from a craft store, the rubber is coming off a bit.

>>2937356
It won't be looking back on that photo in 20+ years. Then it will be nostalgic to a bunch of hipsters shooting with original mirrorless cameras.

What's better to scan film? 45mm (90mm eqv) 2.8 macro lens or a Canon scanner?

>>2937564
>hipsters shooting original mirror less

Lol

I doubt they would though because digshital always becomes outdated every year when a new digshital camera comes out, compared to film cameras where a camera from 1950 gets better results than a digital camera from 2016

I want to start learning to shoot film. I already have a Fujfilm X-T10 and Canon 550D

Is the Canon A1 a good starting point? I'm checking eBay and wondering what's a good price for a body and lens?

>>2937306
jesus dude i was saying the guy had a nice lens and it performed well and you got butt hurt for.... what reason ?

still not sure what your angry about post quailty. if anything your post quality is worse just giving out about nothing in particular

>>2937604

nigger, there are already cucks who shoot shoot D100's for that CCD look, since they prefer it to CMOS.

there is no doubt that people will be super nostalgic for that quaint CMOS look that we love so much today but will look laughably outdated in two decades.

>>2937332
yes

I got myself an Olympus XA3 and flash and I'm wondering how using the flash with 1600 film would work. The flash is pretty basic and it has a 100, 400 and FULL setting.

Am I just going to end up with under exposed photos?

Shooting Lucky SHD100 in the foggy mountains today. Hoping for some cool effects due to the missing anti-halation layer.

File: IMG_20161001_193422.jpg (354KB, 480x1004px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 480x1004px

Got these for $4, almost done with a roll in the Minolta. Also doing a roll in a Nikon FM, first time using a non-disposable film camera.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Photo Editor(dev.macgyver)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016:10:01 19:33:40
Image Width	480
Image Height	1004

>>2937819
Also using Fuji CA135 cause it was cheap. Are those $30 canisters actually a good replacement for a darkroom? Around here it's like $5 to get a single roll developed.

>>2937749
Use it in manual and expose according to the guide number. I've used the A11 on my XA like that when shooting 800 speed film or when I want to use a different aperture.

The XA flash is something I feel Maitani dropped the ball with. It ruins the ergonomics and looks ugly.

File: img.jpg (424KB, 1545x1024px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 1545x1024px

>>2936694

Fuji Superia 200

On this particular roll, I may have had like, two or three shots I was actually happy with.

File: img.jpg (349KB, 1545x1024px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 1545x1024px

>>2937895

File: img.jpg (283KB, 1545x1024px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 1545x1024px

>>2937896

I was kind of hoping there'd be beautiful girls at this little car show, but nope. Just old people and their souped-up old muscle cars. :/

>>2937337

oh shit another Memphian! That's not far from the Blue Plate Cafe, right?

>>2937332
Kek, I do this all the time and I'm not even German

>>2937901
Not a Memphian ha. These are actually my buddies shots. He was down there for a convention. He shot like 5 rolls and I have the living room film lab, so I uploaded a couple shots. I'd love to visit though!

>>2937915

come in May, there's a shitload of music, barbecue, and alcohol. the rest of the year is pretty much...meh.

>>2937458
OOOOOOOOOHHHHHH!

>>2937821
pls respond

>>2937926
no

>>2937919
What's wrong?

Alright so I got a few rolls of Hungarian 35mm forte film (50 ISO), expired in 1992 that I shot with an auto exposure compact film. My question is: How do I develop this? I can't find any info on the times or anything online so I'm just gonna aim for Ilford 50 as a measurement. However, since the film expired almost 25 years ago, I am thinking that I will need longer developer times, is that correct?

File: R1-00944-0015.jpg (850KB, 671x1000px) Image search: [Google]

850KB, 671x1000px

>>2937895
Love this

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:02 13:15:48
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: R1-00947-0017.jpg (642KB, 671x1000px) Image search: [Google]

642KB, 671x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:02 13:18:06
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: R1-00947-0016.jpg (597KB, 671x1000px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 671x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:02 13:18:44
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: R1-00943-0017.jpg (630KB, 1000x671px) Image search: [Google]

630KB, 1000x671px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:02 13:19:52
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: R1-00973-0016.jpg (549KB, 1000x671px) Image search: [Google]

549KB, 1000x671px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:02 13:20:11
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2937939
too late. you already did.

>>2936771
Try cleaning the metal contacts in the battery bay. Give them a good scrub with a Q-tip or something.
If it's something more advanced than that you're probably better off buying a new X700.
Lovely camera, by the way. Light and handy and with all the control you need. Loved shooting mine with the 45/2 pancake.

>>2937625

yes it is. wouldnt pay more than $60 off ebay.

>>2937830
XA3 is fully auto unfortunately. I'm just going to have to test and see.

Hey guys I wanted to ask, what transition is at 2:25- 2:29 of this video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gcpys_iX0Qs

Please critic my video. Thank you :) --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw747xIoy4U

>>2937749
Under exposed? They would be 2 stops overexposed with 1600 film right?

Opinions on the Kiev 60? Got to try one when I was shooting the shit with a guy about MF gear and I mentioned I'm GASsing for a Pentacks 6x7. He brought out a Kiev 60 with an eye level WF and said that he had had the Pentax but it was a boring camera, and this Kiev with Zeiss Jenas had served him a lot better. It felt pretty good in the hand so now I'm curious.

>>2938060
Yeah rule of thumb is it looses about half its iso sensitivity after a couple of years.

Unless it was refrigerated it might be a goner and the Hungarians were a soviet bloc country In the 80's so I say the film is about the same quality as Soviet film. Witch wasn't great

Sorry I don't know too much about your problem be worth a shot anyway

>>2938162

finder is bright. more prone to failure than other cameras (the slavic factor)

>>2938141
You messed up with film and video threads.

>>2938162
Kievs are the Trabant of medium format. That's to say: you'd best learn to repair them yourself, which is nontrivial to say the least. Things like brass gears becoming stripped and needing replacement.

Also, Kievs smell. Like a lot. And there's light leaks out the arse, which is par for the course for any old MF camera, but still super aggravating.

If at all possible, go for a Bronica S series with the steel gears. Those will both last, and likely be in a working order when you lay your mitts on 'em.

I'm hopefully going to shoot some paid portraits soon with my rz67. What price would be a good jumping off point? I'm thinking of $10 for a print and $5 for a scan. Is there any poses I should look into for people wearing full suits of plate armor?

>>2938230
I hope you're planning on using a polarizer.

>>2938230
>$10 for a print and $5 for a scan

what the fuck. film portraits should be more expensive than rabal tier portraits. and rabal ones are way expensive than what you plan to charge.

give context.

File: shroomfern.png (3MB, 1545x1024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1545x1024px

>>2938313

File: lodgerainier.png (3MB, 1545x1024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1545x1024px

>>2938314

File: boat.png (1MB, 1545x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1545x1024px

>>2938316

File: sushichef.png (1MB, 1545x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1545x1024px

>>2938317

File: IMG_2675.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

What did you guys do today

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 6
Camera Software	10.0.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:02 14:07:01
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	0.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2938201
That doesn't sound too bad actually. I already have experience with FSU cameras so I know they can be temperamental, and that quality varies by how much vodka had been consumed when the camera was made.

A Bronica SQA would be cool but knowing how I shoot it'd probably be collecting dust in a month.

>>2938320
wanted to develop some B&W film but I had a massive hangover

>>2938320
Better than that sorry mess

>>2938320

gearfagged on ebay.

>>2938086
>>2938087
>>2938090
>>2938091
>>2938092

Cozy

>>2938149
I dont know how the camera takes into account the power of the flash. If im using the flash set to 400 but the meter set at 1600 im not sure how that would affect the exposure.

I suppose i'd have to know whether the flash setting overrides the meter. Probably not, and again i think its going to be a case of trial and error.

>>2937898
and pedophiles

>>2938320
masturbated to my ex and ate deep fried frog legs. I'm now browsing craigslist for clowns.

File: IMG_20161002_142943.jpg (2MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1536px

>>2938320
Leeches, lots of leeches. 4 broke the skin, buy I probably pulled 30-40 off me in total. Never seen shit like that before...

Shot that roll of Lucky SHD100 on the Stylus tho. Moody and foggy Japanese forests on bw should look neato.

>>2938506
Also, help with figuring out dev times for Lucky SHD100 and Tri-X in Fuji Microfine? Cant find dev times anywhere. Is this possible to look up dev times for a more common developer thats chemically similar to Microfine and make a decent guesstimation about ratios and dev times?

>>2938506
>Lucky SHD100

is that a good film? comparable to what? worse or better than foma or shanghai?

>>2938321
I've also got plenty of experience with FSU gear, but nothing, _nothing_ could prepare me for the SMELL. It's like they made the glue that holds the leatherette in place out of cabbage, and so every Kiev owner is now haunted by ghosts of pureed cabbage concentrate of the nineteen-seventies.

Consider that this is gear that you put your face up to, to use the waist-level finder, for proper focusing. The smell will linger up your nose for days after you've put the camera away. It's not moth balls, it's not grease, it's not oil, it's something infinitely more sinister.

Don't say I didn't warn you.

>>2938525
I dunno, this will be my first roll. I'm not expecting much.

>>2936939
dont do it. i tried it and it was totally miserable, a huge pain in the ass to move around. Shell out the extra cash for a field camera.

>>2936939
Do it.

There's only one way to get /fit/ anon.

File: img334.jpg (337KB, 840x1000px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 840x1000px

Wew lad, HP5 lives up to the hype I think.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7150
Image Height	8941
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:02 22:25:20
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	840
Image Height	1000

>>2938023
I just liked it.

>>2938162

Kievs are really unreliable cameras. Enjoy your lightleaks.

>>2938703

Nice. What developer did you use? I wanted to try Rodinal 1 + 100 stand development because I'm a faggot hipster and love making things hard on myself.

I have like three rolls of the stuff but the local labs don't develop black and white film.

>>2938760
Xtol 1+1 all day, every day. It will make any film look great honestly, besides maybe the 3200 stock films.

File: img336.jpg (314KB, 840x1000px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 840x1000px

>>2938766
And here's one more from that roll.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7150
Image Height	8941
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:02 22:37:32
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	840
Image Height	1000

>>2936852
u posted this a while ago in b&w you fuckin fag

>>2938805
BW one was digital though.

>>2938533
iktf
My Zenit smells like an old person crawled inside and shat the bed.

>>2938533
>>2938820
smells nice and damp, just how I like my soviet cameras.

File: happy fake.jpg (26KB, 215x365px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 215x365px

Need halp, my staple lab is going to discontinue E-6 and I want to expend my stockpile before that happens. I'm going to head out for some golden hour goodness this week, what I have is Velvia and Provia 16 years past the expiration date. Stored in room temperature at a photo studio. I have no experience in expired slide film, how should I go about it? Overexpose by several stops like with negatives or just roll with the box speed and pray to the frog god?

>>2938923
I'd be wary of overexposing by more than a stop, since slide film doesn't have the same highlight latitude as negative film. Best to try a test roll first

>>2938923

ive shot provia from 2001 and it was tip fucking top, they take age well. shoot it at box speed.

>>2938991
>>2938993
Thanks. I just shot the first one with one step overexposure, I'll do the next at box speed for comparison.

>>2939007
>one step overexposure

too much. develop for asa 200-150 then.

I've learned a lot by reading and chatting in /fgt/ so thank you guys and gals.

In case anyone owns/has owned half-frame film cameras, which do you think would be a versatile and affordable choice as a side-carry? What film do you usually shoot through them?

>inb4 state your budget faggot
Up to ~70 eurobucks

File: 000040.jpg (222KB, 1000x640px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1000x640px

>>2939017
Also recent photo

File: raw0002.jpg (177KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1000x667px

Ektar

>>2939017
You can check out and ask in half frame camera thread instead >>2930634

File: img344.jpg (245KB, 733x1000px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 733x1000px

Dumping a bunch of 35mm shit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4175
Image Height	6656
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	4800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	4800 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:02 23:52:17
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	733
Image Height	1000

File: img350.jpg (230KB, 717x1000px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 717x1000px

>>2939090

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4240
Image Height	6559
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	4800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	4800 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:03 00:09:22
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	717
Image Height	1000

File: img381.jpg (475KB, 867x1200px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 867x1200px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2337
Image Height	3504
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:03 01:16:08
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	867
Image Height	1200

File: img361.jpg (207KB, 1000x733px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1000x733px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6854
Image Height	4549
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	4800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	4800 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:03 00:20:33
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	733

File: img372.jpg (265KB, 733x1000px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 733x1000px

>>2939095

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2242
Image Height	3455
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:03 00:49:56
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	733
Image Height	1000

File: img345.jpg (316KB, 1000x650px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1000x650px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6671
Image Height	4175
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	4800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	4800 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:02 23:45:26
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	650

File: img366.jpg (244KB, 1000x650px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1000x650px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3295
Image Height	2080
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:03 00:52:57
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	650

File: img355.jpg (199KB, 1000x650px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1000x650px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6384
Image Height	4239
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	4800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	4800 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:03 00:03:45
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	650

File: img377.jpg (339KB, 1000x733px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 1000x733px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3376
Image Height	2103
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:03 01:09:02
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	733

File: img391.jpg (299KB, 1000x733px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 1000x733px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3280
Image Height	2096
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:03 01:57:23
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	733

File: img364.jpg (288KB, 700x1000px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 700x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3328
Image Height	2080
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:03 00:57:35
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	700
Image Height	1000

File: img393.jpg (337KB, 1000x710px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 1000x710px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2080
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:03 01:59:28
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	710

>>2939108

create a whole new thread for such an amount of garbage snapshits next time. you are not new here, you know better than that.

File: 2.jpg (351KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 800x533px

Posting some from Warsaw

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2013:01:22 12:22:44

File: 3.jpg (274KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 800x533px

>>2939128

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2013:01:19 17:20:03

File: 4.jpg (325KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 800x533px

>>2939129

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2013:01:19 17:27:20

File: 5.jpg (274KB, 800x500px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 800x500px

>>2939130
All are Tri-x 400.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2013:01:19 17:38:35

File: Film7945_04.jpg (1MB, 1000x985px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x985px

Some recent snaps from Nice an Vienna (will make a dedicated Nice thread once I have all my pictures from there together)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: Film7944_09.jpg (1MB, 1000x985px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x985px

>>2939141

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: Film7945_01.jpg (738KB, 1000x985px) Image search: [Google]

738KB, 1000x985px

>>2939142

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: Film7944_04.jpg (805KB, 1000x985px) Image search: [Google]

805KB, 1000x985px

>>2939145

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: aynjl.jpg (428KB, 878x1200px) Image search: [Google]

428KB, 878x1200px

>>2939134
>>2939129
You went to Warsaw and all you took photos of were billboards ?

File: Film7945_05.jpg (792KB, 1000x985px) Image search: [Google]

792KB, 1000x985px

>>2939146

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: 6.jpg (355KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 800x533px

>>2939147
Of course not. But I mostly shot digital. I'll see if I can find some more film shots.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2013:01:19 17:34:15

File: 7.jpg (366KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 800x533px

>>2939151

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2013:01:19 17:35:37

File: 8.jpg (379KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 800x533px

>>2939165

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2013:01:19 17:36:09

>>2939103
>dat nonagonal aperture
35/1.4 AI-s?

>>2937821
Assuming you mean a patterson tank? You still need to load the film on the reel in total darkness. Whether you get that from sealing off a room or buying a changing bag is your guess. If you bought all the equipment and chemicals new, that would be ~80$, not to mention getting a scanning solution together if you don't already have one. You can weigh the cost.

File: Screenshot_20161003-140956-01.jpg (286KB, 678x800px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 678x800px

Bought my first medium format tlr in pic related. What's some good 120 film to start off on?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016:10:03 14:10:15
Image Width	678
Image Height	800

>>2939267

H P 5
P
5

>>2939317
That's the first thought I had in mind lol any others worth shooting?

>>2939368
Kodachrome - you can sometimes find rolls for sale on eBay, and nothing beats those colours.

>>2939368
For me, I always use HP5 pushed up to 1600 in low light or stick with tripod and FP4/PanF for medium format.

I either go really slow or fast and not in between, but when I have used HP5@400 I always got good results.

File: 17922084876_c1c8139162_b.jpg (183KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 800x800px

>>2939267
For slow bw, Acros is the best imo.

For color negative give Ektar, Portra, and 400H a try.

For slide try Provia 100F.

For fun go on eBay and buy a lot of random film. Lots of great films out there that are no longer produced but fantastic to shoot (e100vs, Portra VC, Portra NC, neopan 400, Astia 100F, etc.)

File: BassinOlympiqueDock1small.jpg (903KB, 1000x823px) Image search: [Google]

903KB, 1000x823px

Just took this. Tried my hand at the Zone system. Boy did I fuck that up. Whatever I chose as Zone 0 was wayyyy too dark.

File: yoube.jpg (457KB, 1000x823px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 1000x823px

>>2939427
I'm not sure what you are talking about. I see no lack of shadow detail anywhere in this photo

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>2939373
I thought kodachrome couldn't be developed anymore?
>>2939412
I definitely want to try porta 160. I love the 35mm portra so I'm looking forward to 120. I might give provia 100f a shot too. I'm shooting my first roll of provia right now in 35mm to see how I like it.

File: DSC_0049.jpg (249KB, 1000x793px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1000x793px

Heres a "scan" I took earlier. Not really an actual scan I just took a picture of it on my desk so I could upload here. Critique please.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3100
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.18
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:03 17:33:58
Exposure Time	1/13 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	793
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2939498
The pic is decent. It needs more contrast
>>2939470
Kodachrome can only be devved in b&w solution now. Not recommend

>>2939452
I think he doesn't have any idea what he's doing.

File: RITA.jpg (434KB, 900x1157px) Image search: [Google]

434KB, 900x1157px

>>2939017
>which do you think would be a versatile and affordable choice as a side-carry?

the canon ee17. has Tv and full manual. 1.7 lens. godly. worth every shekel.

dont bother with the cheaper demis they have selenium meters most probably dilapidated and even dead at this point, and no full manual.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	GT-X770
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	28702
Image Height	3287
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:07:12 21:29:56
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	900
Image Height	1157

>>2938766
>>2938767

Hmm. Damn, I dunno, you've got me rethinking how I want to do it now. Those are some damn fine results.

>>2939555
This is true. I don't, really. I've never tried the zone system before this, and if you're talking about the scanning, post-processing is something I don't even know the basics of. I'd like to learn.

>>2939745
You need to learn basic post processing as scanned black and white negs are always lifeless as the scanner software tries to not clip any blacks or whites. You need to sort the contrast out after

>>2939745
What are you metering with?

6x4.5 camera recommendations
so far the best I can find is a Fuji GA645

>>2939073
Thank you, I did check it out and I think most of my questions have been answered

>>2939628
Sounds like an excellent choice but I am not sure it'd be easy to find one in good condition in Europe. I will look for one though now, it looks sexy af plus that lens. I do know about the selenium meters that's why I wanted to hear opinions on which would be the best choice or choices.

Thank you for the info!

>>2939802
Oh! I'm assuming that's something I can do in GIMP. What tool do I use? Do I just play with Levels/Contrast?

>>2939809
Sekonic 778.

File: robot-iia-film-camera-w-40mm-f1-9-lens-415-04fc55866a0d9b60ea11d16534ba95b9 (1).jpg (56KB, 500x332px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x332px

OMG IDS HABBEDING.

just won me this puppy off ebay auction. the mythical Robot iia w/40 1.9 Schneider-Kreuznach Xenon.

im happy as fuck.

>>2939874
>not sure it'd be easy to find one in good condition in Europe

got a perfectly fine one from an uk seller. as i said, lurk fucking more. good luck.

>>2940132
robot's are rare af also dat lens
how much did you pay?

>>2940163

100 euro shekels. if we use the lens in a full frame camera itd be like a 35 f/2? rare as fuck for such an ancient lens. fell in love with the oof rendering, smooth as silk, not unlike the xenars found in rolleis.

>>2940163
samefag

>robot's are rare af
in the same way that Toyota Camry from 1998 are, sure

File: looool.jpg (317KB, 607x601px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 607x601px

>>2940178

lmfaoooo the camera is months away to even arriving into this country, and its already making fags go this jelly. sweet.

pic related, its u.

>>2940191
>lmfaoooo the camera is months away to even arriving into this country
lmfaoooo ecks deeeeee it is so rarerrrrerereeee

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Robot-IIa-w-Schneider-37-5mm-f-3-5-Radionar-Half-Frame-Spring-Motor-Camera-Nice-/331983808381?hash=item4d4bc6e77d:g:u2EAAOSwLpdW9vLu
http://www.ebay.com/itm/ROBOT-IIa-VERY-RARE-German-24x24-mm-camera-Schneider-Xenar-2-8-37-5-WORKS-GOOD-/272399984517?hash=item3f6c4de785:g:T7QAAOSwmfhX6T6i
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Robot-IIa-26484-1-/281889259147?hash=item41a1e8be8b:g:5AMAAOSwCQNWdGxs

What third world country do you live in that it takes months for one of these to ship to you? Do you even still have stores that sell film in Rododijijirwandiopia?

>>2940177
No, it would be a 40/1.9, you fucking moron.
Square format in a miniature camera is pretty based though.
>>2940200
They're rare outside all slavic countries m8. I've only ever seen one, and that was in a shop in Japan. Sorry for your degenerate birthplace tho, I hope easy access to communist meme cameras soothes the burn for you.

>>2938317

That ridge looks imposing as fuck.

File: img023.jpg (595KB, 1000x668px) Image search: [Google]

595KB, 1000x668px

dumping a few HP5 snapshits

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	94 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	94 dpcm
Image Created	2016:09:30 23:53:23

File: img015.jpg (1MB, 653x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 653x1000px

not developing my own yet :(

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	94 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	94 dpcm
Image Created	2016:09:30 23:45:19

File: img025.jpg (439KB, 674x1000px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 674x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	94 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	94 dpcm
Image Created	2016:09:30 23:53:42

File: img020.jpg (622KB, 1000x656px) Image search: [Google]

622KB, 1000x656px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	94 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	94 dpcm
Image Created	2016:10:01 00:08:40

File: TIRE4.jpg (898KB, 1000x800px) Image search: [Google]

898KB, 1000x800px

>>2936694
Dead Horse Bay, NYC

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	200 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:04 22:29:55
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	800

File: JACKET24.jpg (408KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 800x1000px

>>2940377
Vietnam Souvenir Jacket.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	200 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:04 22:33:08
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	800
Image Height	1000

>>2939146
Nice colors in the water

File: Diacord 30.jpg (598KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 1200x1200px

Another square.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	1200
Image Height	1200

There's someone selling a Canon AF35M in my area for 20$, i'm tempted alot to buy it. Would it be a good deal and a nice camera to shoot with film?

Here's the link http://www.kijiji.ca/v-appareil-photo-camera/ville-de-montreal/camera-35-mm-canon/1177846669?enableSearchNavigationFlag=true

Where do you guys cop your film online? eBay? I want to shoot a roll of Portra but I can't get Kodak locally.

File: 17162956804_e277aec774_b.jpg (58KB, 700x460px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 700x460px

>>2940593
Buying single rolls is really not that financially great once you factor in shipping and potential savings from buying pro-packs. In addition to ebay, some good sites that sell fresh film include:
Bhphotovideo.com
Freestylephoto.biz
Ultrafineonline.com
Amazon.com

>>2940132
I have one of these at home, from my grandfather. It's really dusty and non-functional, I think. Is it worth selling as a paperweight?

I just got lomo lc-a for free. I tried to open back cover, but it was stuck. Anyhow to open it properly without breaking it?

>>2940139
Will do, thank you

Remember the thread about Acros 100 being discontinued in 35mm format? I went to my usual shop today to buy some film and they told me they are out of stock of Acros 100. Some online shops still have it - for literally twice the usual price.
Is this the end? ;_;

>>2940664
Tfw I got 20+ 120 rolls of acrid off a dude last year.

File: IMG_20161005_174227.jpg (3MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3120x4160px

Hey guys, just found this little dude in a charity shop going for £20. This is my first film camera and was wondering if there is anything I should do before I go out and take some snaps. The only thing I can see wrong with it is a slight crack in the top of the flash housing.

>>2940678
i wouldnt of bothered to get it anon

its baerly worth 20 quid.

plastic af slr from the early 2000's i bet.

clean the mirror with a mircofibre cloth and compressed air if you have it.

apart from that i bet it would work grand.

>>2940669
120 and sheet film seems to be still available everywhere, although the question is how much longer they're gonna keep it that way if it really turns out that they have stopped the production of 135.

>>2940679
Thanks for the quick reply, yeah the mirror looks spotless from what I can tell but I'll double check it. Yeah but as a student I got too much money laying about, currently saving for a dslr, thought I would try film in the meantime.

File: IMG_20161005_174303.jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

>>2940678
Just got some fresh batteries, but the stores around here are out of 35mm film so gonna hopefully grab some at uni tomorrow. Just gotta get used to these buttons and whatever the hell they are doing. Anyone got a crib sheet or maybe an instruction manual for this camera? Also as it is an A mount lens are there any other interesting lenses to put on this?

>>2940366
what lens has yuck pentagonal bokeh

>>2940833
Most Hasselblad lenses, for one.

>>2940786
Here's the instructions for the first roll:
Open rear door, drop in roll of film, stretch film leader to red dot, close door, turn power on, press "P" button, aim, compose, and press shutter button. Get roll developed. If the roll comes out ok, download the manual to learn about other advanced/manual controls.

The lower end maxxum bodies didn't stand the test of time very well if stored poorly. If you like the Maxxum cameras, save up for a Maxxum/Dynax 7. It is godly.

And yes, Maxxums take a-mount lenses. All a-mount lenses will fit, but only the screw drive lenses will be able to focus. The exception being the Maxxum 5, 7, and some 9's, can drive the newer style lenses.

>>2940664
Probably not. Sometimes stocks run low in areas. You'll notice the price of Portra/Tri-X rises steeply in Europe sometimes only for the price to fall back down to normal after a couple of months when stocks have been replenished.

File: IMG_20161005_174416.jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

>>2940848
Seemingly the camera is always on whilst the batteries are in. After opening and closing the door it auto reels the film, which makes sense as the only time you'd open it up would be to change film.

Thank you for the information about the lenses. I was afraid I wouldn't be able to use the autofocus on any other lenses but the one it came with, which I am fine with as I plan on doing portraits and the sort and get down with manual controls.

>>2940836
what?
thats fucked, only lens ive seen with 5 blades is a shitty vivitar tier chink 28mm lens

>>2940865
Most earlier canon EF glass too, I think. I like the 50/1.8, 24/2.8, 28/2.8, 35/2. Often the choice will hinge on how much mechanical effort the engineers want to devote to stopping down the lense, more than anything else.

File: IMG_0011.jpg (2MB, 1596x1129px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1596x1129px

first film ever. also, shitty photographer with no experience. meh.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 8800F
Camera Software	MP Navigator EX 1.0
Photographer	Picasa
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Created	2015:09:22 17:28:33
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1596
Image Height	1140
White Balance	Auto
Unique Image ID	005c493bf546e3f85f6a6b341e65e60f