Gearfaggotry (Gear thread)

Use the gear thread you stupid prick

>>2851645

I am using this older version of Tamron 17-50/2.8 and I like it. http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/289-tamron-af-17-50mm-f28-sp-xr-di-ii-ld-aspherical-if-canon-test-report--review
New version seems to have much worse optical quality.

>>2853813
Either Canon 15-85mm, which is a great lens, or
>Constant aperture very much preferred
Canon 16-35 f4 is/ f2.8
Sigma 18-35 f1.8

>>2853818
Over 300 replies you gimp

>>2853839
It's still bumping you spastic

>>2853839
Yeah, it's almost as if people actually reply to questions posted in the gear threads......

>>2853844
What is bump limit?

>>2853813
Assuming you're on a crop, I would recommend the Sigma 18-50mm 2.8
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-18-50mm-f-2.8-EX-DC-Lens-Review.aspx

I had one for several years. It was great!

Use the gear thread you stupid prick

>>2853865

>>2853886
Might want to look at the thread creation times you retarded /p/rick

>>2853887
The old gear thread is nearly fucking full anyway what's the problem bitch

only film, f0ck anything else. f0ck you faggets. Film king. only fuji.

>>2853882
>It was great!
>was

what happened?

>>2853813
Well I shoot 5d2, not sure if you're on ff or crop. Just bought a 17-40 and 70-200. Alongside my 40 which honestly is still gonna be the sharpest I have. But those are gonna be for versatility. I'm off on a road trip down south, which is pretty mountainous and I'm pretty sure I'll have the 17-40 on majority of the time anyway.

17-40 is good. If you're on crop it makes a decent kit lens, on ff makes a really good UWA. So consider that.