do you like my photo

>stretch mark
>arm shadow
>awkward body positioning (belly button shows it)
Needs work to do what you want it to, photoshop or a change of lighting will hide the stretch mark. If it doesn't set a high expectation its not art.

>>2812408
i would like to be a underwear model,not photographer

>>2812402
Your bra doesn't fit.

>>2812416
>>/fit/

I need an underwear model.

I need a model's underwear

>>2812402
Not a very good photo.

All it has is tits. Can't say the lighting or anything else is good.

>>2812416
Could work. But big tits are more something in demand for various kinds of sexy / nude modeling up to porn - much less for normal underwear & fashion product shots.

>>2812402
I can like the subject, meaning I like your tits and I'm assuming these are the subject
the pose (you holding your shirt with your mouth) is provocative enough too
I can't really see much of your legs and ass so I can't comment on how good you would be as an underwear model
the picture is good in that it makes you look attractive and audacious and stuff, but it's not a good picture if you look at the rest

as mentioned already, check >>>/fit/

File: 1446366191942.jpg (37KB, 471x350px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 471x350px

>that arm shadow

>>2812493
Please don't get me wrong, but.. Yum.
If we were on /b/ right now I'd definitely ask you to take off your pants so we can see those nice round and juicy cheeks.

>>2812507

This has been posted like 100 times across 4chan man

>>2812408
>not liking stretchmarks

>>2812402
Shirts need to come down about an inch and a half the show your pelvic lines.
Pull bra down a bit to have it fit with the added benefit of popping your tits up another quarter inch.

Arch your back a bit to unfuck your stomach.

>>2812450
kek

what lens did you use?

>>2813229
leica 50/2 apo

got a pic without the bra?

File: 1459726923316.jpg (181KB, 900x1400px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 900x1400px

can I get some critique?

>>2814108
Whay apreatue you use, the focus and bokeh look really nice. The colors seem real. The picture isn't that interesting or creative in my opinion. It looks like a generic shot for some social awareness campaign or something. Depending on your motives it ranges from tack on to way off the mark.

>>2814145
I like how you took the high road and didn't even mention her ass, good job.

>>2814108
Looks like a photo a creep would take.

>>2814108
How a girl so hot have such a shitty phone, is this brazil or romania or somewjere like that

>>2814108
eggy/10

oh yeah this >>2814165

File: B0117890-y720px.jpg (77KB, 480x720px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 480x720px

>>2814173
Too much behind subject. More than about 60 degress of front is usually where i start to call it 'peoples backs' unless I expect them to turn.
I'd have shot a lot closer on the obvious pocket vajazzle, and framed for a subtle featuring of her curve.
... or y'know.. just waited till she turned and tried to get her to smile back at me.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3
Camera Software	darktable 1.4
Photographer	Andrew Wade Eglington oh-hi.info
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	147 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2015:10:10 21:45:47
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	6400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	98.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	480
Image Height	720
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Distant View